Re: [vote] separate issues@ list
+1 Brett Porter wrote: per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED] list? [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett
Re: [vote] separate issues@ list
+1 -Deng Brett Porter wrote: per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED] list? [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett
Re: [vote] separate issues@ list
+1 Was wondering what this was about, as I have a .procmailrc filter already to do this for me. Sure. formalize it! - Joakim Brett Porter wrote: per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED] list? [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett
Re: [vote] separate issues@ list
+1 On Dec 5, 2007 1:57 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > list? > > [ ] +1 > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 > > Cheers, > Brett >
Re: [vote] separate issues@ list
+1 -- Olivier 2007/12/5, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > list? > > [ ] +1 > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 > > Cheers, > Brett >
[vote] separate issues@ list
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED] list? [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett
[vote] separate issues@ list
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED] list? [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett