RE: JBoss plugin - new modifications
-Original Message- From: James CE Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 02:51 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: JBoss plugin - new modifications [snip] Perhaps there should be a maven.jboss.version property and a j:if tag would check that in order to invoke the right JMX thing. I seem to recall that the url was something different before we upgraded to 3.0.x... j:if test=${maven.jboss.version == '3.0.x'} the stuff we have now... /j:if j:if test=${maven.jboss.version == '3.2.x'} whatever is appropriate for 3.2.x... /j:if Sure. I have now introduced this property but I still don't have the patch for JMX stuff with 3.2.x. Anyone? Thanks -Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JBoss plugin - new modifications
BTW: Are you going to make jboss plugin compatible with jboss 3.2x series? What is not compatible? I seem to remember I have used it with JBoss 3.2.1. maven.jboss.jmx.url.deploy=http://${maven.jboss.hostname}:${maven.jboss. po rt }/jmx- console/HtmlAdaptor?action=invokeOpname=jboss.system:service%3DMainDe ployermethodIndex=19arg0= maven.jboss.jmx.url.undeploy=http://${maven.jboss.hostname}:${maven.jbos s. po rt}/jmx- console/HtmlAdaptor?action=invokeOpname=jboss.system:service%3DMain DeployermethodIndex=2arg0= Perhaps there should be a maven.jboss.version property and a j:if tag would check that in order to invoke the right JMX thing. I seem to recall that the url was something different before we upgraded to 3.0.x... j:if test=${maven.jboss.version == '3.0.x'} the stuff we have now... /j:if j:if test=${maven.jboss.version == '3.2.x'} whatever is appropriate for 3.2.x... /j:if ok, I haven't used those JMX deployments yet. The rest works with JBoss 3.2.x (the static deployment part). Would you have a patch for the JMX stuff :-) ? Thanks -Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JBoss plugin - new modifications
-Original Message- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 6:33 PM To: 'Maven Developers List' Subject: JBoss plugin - new modifications Hi, I don't like the way the jboss plugin works. ATM, it assumes the EAR and the jboss packaging is done in the same project. I think they are 2 separate activities that should be done in 2 separate projects. Why? Because packaging something in JBoss can mean packaging several modules: An EAR module, an EJB-JAR one, a WAR one, etc. and this won't work in a single project. Proposal: * Add a jboss.bundle property for dependencies. Example: dependencies dependency groupIdeverest/groupId artifactIdregistration/artifactId version1.0-SNAPSHOT/version typeear/type properties jboss.bundletrue/jboss.bundle /properties /dependency /dependencies * Keep only a jboss:package goal (remove the jboss:package-ear, etc) as they are no longer needed. The modules to package are now listed in the dependencies list If no one has any objection, I'll implement this in the coming 1-2 days. Thanks -Vincent Question: In this project for jboss all dependecies will be bundled, right? Why to mark them in special way? BTW: Are you going to make jboss plugin compatible with jboss 3.2x series? Michal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]