Re: release-plugin enhancement

2006-05-10 Thread Brett Porter

+1, for the next version.

On the second one, I suggest allowing a choice of "use for all" and "use 
for all that had the same original version" in addition to the current 
"user for this one only".


- Brett

Brian E. Fox wrote:

All,
I'd like to add the ability to specify the release version, next
development iteration and tag base as parameters to the release plugin
so that no interactivity is needed. 
 
1st any objections?
 
2nd: For multimodule builds, release prompts for the versions for each

module. Is this really needed? It seems like if someone is releasing a
multimodule build as a single unit, shouldn't all the modules share the
version number?
 
 If no, then I propose 1 of 2 solutions: if the version IS the same as

the parent to begin with, then don't bother prompting. AND/OR if
multiple modules are detected, prompt if we can use the same number.
 
I don't mind doing the work here, just wondering what everyone else

thinks.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: release-plugin enhancement

2006-05-10 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ok, that might cover the first part. I still think the second part could
be improved to make the interactive mojos easier to use. 

-Original Message-
From: dan tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:24 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: release-plugin enhancement

There is a JIRA to create release:release mojo to do just that to
support full release automation


On 5/10/06, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All,
> I'd like to add the ability to specify the release version, next 
> development iteration and tag base as parameters to the release plugin

> so that no interactivity is needed.
>
> 1st any objections?
>
> 2nd: For multimodule builds, release prompts for the versions for each

> module. Is this really needed? It seems like if someone is releasing a

> multimodule build as a single unit, shouldn't all the modules share 
> the version number?
>
> If no, then I propose 1 of 2 solutions: if the version IS the same as 
> the parent to begin with, then don't bother prompting. AND/OR if 
> multiple modules are detected, prompt if we can use the same number.
>
> I don't mind doing the work here, just wondering what everyone else 
> thinks.
>
>



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: release-plugin enhancement

2006-05-10 Thread dan tran

There is a JIRA to create release:release mojo to do just that to support
full release automation


On 5/10/06, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


All,
I'd like to add the ability to specify the release version, next
development iteration and tag base as parameters to the release plugin
so that no interactivity is needed.

1st any objections?

2nd: For multimodule builds, release prompts for the versions for each
module. Is this really needed? It seems like if someone is releasing a
multimodule build as a single unit, shouldn't all the modules share the
version number?

If no, then I propose 1 of 2 solutions: if the version IS the same as
the parent to begin with, then don't bother prompting. AND/OR if
multiple modules are detected, prompt if we can use the same number.

I don't mind doing the work here, just wondering what everyone else
thinks.




release-plugin enhancement

2006-05-10 Thread Brian E. Fox
All,
I'd like to add the ability to specify the release version, next
development iteration and tag base as parameters to the release plugin
so that no interactivity is needed. 
 
1st any objections?
 
2nd: For multimodule builds, release prompts for the versions for each
module. Is this really needed? It seems like if someone is releasing a
multimodule build as a single unit, shouldn't all the modules share the
version number?
 
 If no, then I propose 1 of 2 solutions: if the version IS the same as
the parent to begin with, then don't bother prompting. AND/OR if
multiple modules are detected, prompt if we can use the same number.
 
I don't mind doing the work here, just wondering what everyone else
thinks.