Re: [MENTORS] Minified javascript license

2017-04-05 Thread Ryan Merriman
Very helpful, thanks Taylor.

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> Sorry to reply from a phone...
>
> If this is code generated from Metron, just add the header to the
> minified  code. If it came from an external source, the L & E files should
> be updated appropriately.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Apr 5, 2017, at 10:25 PM, James Sirota  wrote:
> >
> > Wanted to bump this up to the top.  Did we ever get a resolution on this?
> >
> > 05.04.2017, 05:51, "Ryan Merriman" :
> >> Mentors,
> >>
> >> We package javascript code in a tar.gz archive for one of our modules.
> >> Before it is added to the archive it is compiled down from Typescript,
> then
> >> minified. Would that code still be considered source at that point and
> >> still require a license header?
> >>
> >> I found this section on the Apache website that seems relevant (
> >> https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#is-a-short-
> form-of-the-source-header-available)
> >> because it mentions minified javascript as an example. But I'm not clear
> >> on what exactly must be done to the minified javascript file. How and
> >> where should the shorter form be applied? If it should be applied as a
> >> comment then why not just apply the normal header?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for any help or advice you can give me. I am not able
> to
> >> find a clear example or explanation and want to make sure this gets done
> >> correctly.
> >>
> >> Ryan Merriman
> >
> > ---
> > Thank you,
> >
> > James Sirota
> > PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating)
> > jsirota AT apache DOT org
>


Re: [MENTORS] Minified javascript license

2017-04-05 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Sorry to reply from a phone...

If this is code generated from Metron, just add the header to the minified  
code. If it came from an external source, the L & E files should be updated 
appropriately. 

-Taylor

> On Apr 5, 2017, at 10:25 PM, James Sirota  wrote:
> 
> Wanted to bump this up to the top.  Did we ever get a resolution on this?
> 
> 05.04.2017, 05:51, "Ryan Merriman" :
>> Mentors,
>> 
>> We package javascript code in a tar.gz archive for one of our modules.
>> Before it is added to the archive it is compiled down from Typescript, then
>> minified. Would that code still be considered source at that point and
>> still require a license header?
>> 
>> I found this section on the Apache website that seems relevant (
>> https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#is-a-short-form-of-the-source-header-available)
>> because it mentions minified javascript as an example. But I'm not clear
>> on what exactly must be done to the minified javascript file. How and
>> where should the shorter form be applied? If it should be applied as a
>> comment then why not just apply the normal header?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for any help or advice you can give me. I am not able to
>> find a clear example or explanation and want to make sure this gets done
>> correctly.
>> 
>> Ryan Merriman
> 
> --- 
> Thank you,
> 
> James Sirota
> PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating)
> jsirota AT apache DOT org


Re: [MENTORS] Minified javascript license

2017-04-05 Thread James Sirota
Wanted to bump this up to the top.  Did we ever get a resolution on this?

05.04.2017, 05:51, "Ryan Merriman" :
> Mentors,
>
> We package javascript code in a tar.gz archive for one of our modules.
> Before it is added to the archive it is compiled down from Typescript, then
> minified. Would that code still be considered source at that point and
> still require a license header?
>
> I found this section on the Apache website that seems relevant (
> https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#is-a-short-form-of-the-source-header-available)
> because it mentions minified javascript as an example. But I'm not clear
> on what exactly must be done to the minified javascript file. How and
> where should the shorter form be applied? If it should be applied as a
> comment then why not just apply the normal header?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help or advice you can give me. I am not able to
> find a clear example or explanation and want to make sure this gets done
> correctly.
>
> Ryan Merriman

--- 
Thank you,

James Sirota
PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating)
jsirota AT apache DOT org


[MENTORS] Minified javascript license

2017-04-05 Thread Ryan Merriman
Mentors,

We package javascript code in a tar.gz archive for one of our modules.
Before it is added to the archive it is compiled down from Typescript, then
minified.  Would that code still be considered source at that point and
still require a license header?

I found this section on the Apache website that seems relevant (
https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#is-a-short-form-of-the-source-header-available)
because it mentions minified javascript as an example.  But I'm not clear
on what exactly must be done to the minified javascript file.  How and
where should the shorter form be applied?  If it should be applied as a
comment then why not just apply the normal header?

Thanks in advance for any help or advice you can give me.  I am not able to
find a clear example or explanation and want to make sure this gets done
correctly.

Ryan Merriman