I'm having a play with mina-core-2.0.0-M1-20071221.061156-110
I'm using slf4j-simple-1.4.3.
If I add a LoggingFilter using addLast to the filter chain (as the first
such addLast call), then the logging filter will use its
EXCEPTION_CAUGHT if I have a socket client that connects, does not send
anything, and then disconnects.
The trace looks like:
Listening on port 2960
10836 [NioProcessor-1] WARN org.apache.mina.filter.logging.LoggingFilter
- [/127.0.0.1:4036] EXCEPTION:
java.io.IOException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the
remote host
at sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(Unknown Source)
at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(Unknown Source)
(and so on)
Two things:
1) I'd like to receive this in the exceptionCaught method of my
IoHandlerAdapter - and if I don't push the logger into the filter chain
then its what happens.
2) It doesn't seem to be thrown for clients that connect, write a
message (which I handle with a specialised codec) and then quites.
I'd like to have the filter so I can turn on logging for the session and
message events, but setting the log level to NONE for EXCEPTION_CAUGHT
doesn't pass it on - it seems to consume it silently.
Is there any way I can achieve what I want? Ideally I'd like my
exceptionCaught handler to be called first and to be able to filter the
exception at that level, so that only exceptions I don't discard will be
reported by the filter.
A further issue is that if I 'pass on' to super.exceptionCaught then I
get 'please implement myclass.exceptionCaught() for proper handling'
and in the case of a client dumping the connection untidily without
writing the exception repeats - nothing closes the session and the
process spams its log.
Is the difference of behaviour between the cases of a client that does
write and one that doesn't indicative of a bug?
James
