Re : Re : new benchmark results for mina1/mina2/grizzly/netty
@ashish he already did like said in a previous mail but it didn't change much as well @bluedavy i'd like to know what are exactly the parameters used to start the client and the server ? (timeout , concurrents, byte size etc ...) also plz note that this link is broken : http://bluedavy.com/projects/nfs-rpc/benchmark-1.xslx Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- - Mail original - De : Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com À : dev@mina.apache.org; Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr Cc : Envoyé le : Jeudi 22 Septembre 2011 15h24 Objet : Re: Re : new benchmark results for mina1/mina2/grizzly/netty On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr wrote: First you could try enabling some socket options (like on the others frameworks) to the mina2 test : server side add these before bind : ((NioSocketAcceptor) acceptor).setReuseAddress(true); ((NioSocketAcceptor) acceptor).getSessionConfig().setTcpNoDelay(true); client side add after the setTcpnodelay line : ioConnector.getSessionConfig().setReuseAddress(true); what are the new figures with these settings ? Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- @Edouard - updated the benchmark code with your suggestions. Did marginally increased TPS on my laptop :( @bluedavy - can you rerun the test again. thanks ashish
Re: Re : Re : new benchmark results for mina1/mina2/grizzly/netty
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr wrote: @ashish he already did like said in a previous mail but it didn't change much as well oops i missed that... i tried adding Executor filter as well, but it made my results worse :( @bluedavy i'd like to know what are exactly the parameters used to start the client and the server ? (timeout , concurrents, byte size etc ...) also plz note that this link is broken : http://bluedavy.com/projects/nfs-rpc/benchmark-1.xslx Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- - Mail original - De : Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com À : dev@mina.apache.org; Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr Cc : Envoyé le : Jeudi 22 Septembre 2011 15h24 Objet : Re: Re : new benchmark results for mina1/mina2/grizzly/netty On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr wrote: First you could try enabling some socket options (like on the others frameworks) to the mina2 test : server side add these before bind : ((NioSocketAcceptor) acceptor).setReuseAddress(true); ((NioSocketAcceptor) acceptor).getSessionConfig().setTcpNoDelay(true); client side add after the setTcpnodelay line : ioConnector.getSessionConfig().setReuseAddress(true); what are the new figures with these settings ? Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- @Edouard - updated the benchmark code with your suggestions. Did marginally increased TPS on my laptop :( @bluedavy - can you rerun the test again. thanks ashish -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: Re : Re : new benchmark results for mina1/mina2/grizzly/netty
maybe the website have some problem...I attached the benchmark file... client start args: [serverIP] [serverPort] 100 500 3 100 120 1 server start args: [listenPort] 300 100 2011/9/22 Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr: @ashish he already did like said in a previous mail but it didn't change much as well @bluedavy i'd like to know what are exactly the parameters used to start the client and the server ? (timeout , concurrents, byte size etc ...) also plz note that this link is broken : http://bluedavy.com/projects/nfs-rpc/benchmark-1.xslx Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- - Mail original - De : Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com À : dev@mina.apache.org; Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr Cc : Envoyé le : Jeudi 22 Septembre 2011 15h24 Objet : Re: Re : new benchmark results for mina1/mina2/grizzly/netty On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr wrote: First you could try enabling some socket options (like on the others frameworks) to the mina2 test : server side add these before bind : ((NioSocketAcceptor) acceptor).setReuseAddress(true); ((NioSocketAcceptor) acceptor).getSessionConfig().setTcpNoDelay(true); client side add after the setTcpnodelay line : ioConnector.getSessionConfig().setReuseAddress(true); what are the new figures with these settings ? Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- @Edouard - updated the benchmark code with your suggestions. Did marginally increased TPS on my laptop :( @bluedavy - can you rerun the test again. thanks ashish -- = | BlueDavy | | http://www.bluedavy.com | = benchmark-1.xlsx Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
