[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-1170) Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in dual branches?

2023-04-17 Thread Radar wen (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17713341#comment-17713341
 ] 

Radar wen commented on DIRMINA-1170:


Thank you for your reply.

> Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in dual branches?
> -
>
> Key: DIRMINA-1170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1170
> Project: MINA
>  Issue Type: Wish
>Reporter: Radar wen
>Priority: Major
>
> Excuse me, I would like to ask whether Apache MINA 2.1 and 2.2 will be 
> dual-branch evolution in the future?
> In other words, if the 2.1 version has vulnerabilities in the future, will 
> the 2.1.x version be released to fix the vulnerabilities? Or just release 
> 2.2.x to fix the vulnerabilities?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-1170) Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in dual branches?

2023-04-17 Thread Jonathan Valliere (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17713339#comment-17713339
 ] 

Jonathan Valliere commented on DIRMINA-1170:


Yes, we maintain at least two branches as LTS. However new features will
likely only be added to the newest branch.




> Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in dual branches?
> -
>
> Key: DIRMINA-1170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1170
> Project: MINA
>  Issue Type: Wish
>Reporter: Radar wen
>Priority: Major
>
> Excuse me, I would like to ask whether Apache MINA 2.1 and 2.2 will be 
> dual-branch evolution in the future?
> In other words, if the 2.1 version has vulnerabilities in the future, will 
> the 2.1.x version be released to fix the vulnerabilities? Or just release 
> 2.2.x to fix the vulnerabilities?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



Re: [jira] [Created] (DIRMINA-1170) Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in dual branches?

2023-04-17 Thread Jonathan Valliere
Yes, we maintain at least two branches as LTS. However new features will
likely only be added to the newest branch.

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:36 PM Radar wen (Jira)  wrote:

> Radar wen created DIRMINA-1170:
> --
>
>  Summary: Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in
> dual branches?
>  Key: DIRMINA-1170
>  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1170
>  Project: MINA
>   Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Radar wen
>
>
> Excuse me, I would like to ask whether Apache MINA 2.1 and 2.2 will be
> dual-branch evolution in the future?
> In other words, if the 2.1 version has vulnerabilities in the future, will
> the 2.1.x version be released to fix the vulnerabilities? Or just release
> 2.2.x to fix the vulnerabilities?
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> (v8.20.10#820010)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>
>


[jira] [Created] (DIRMINA-1170) Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in dual branches?

2023-04-17 Thread Radar wen (Jira)
Radar wen created DIRMINA-1170:
--

 Summary: Will Apache MINA 2.1 and Apache MINA 2.2 evolve in dual 
branches?
 Key: DIRMINA-1170
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1170
 Project: MINA
  Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Radar wen


Excuse me, I would like to ask whether Apache MINA 2.1 and 2.2 will be 
dual-branch evolution in the future?
In other words, if the 2.1 version has vulnerabilities in the future, will the 
2.1.x version be released to fix the vulnerabilities? Or just release 2.2.x to 
fix the vulnerabilities?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-1322) How to identify received LSTAT command is part of PUT command at Server

2023-04-17 Thread Thomas Wolf (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17713257#comment-17713257
 ] 

Thomas Wolf commented on SSHD-1322:
---

I don't think you can.

The LSTAT comes from OpenSSH querying [whether  is a 
directory|https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/ac383f3a5/sftp.c#L747].

> How to identify  received LSTAT command is part of PUT command at Server
> 
>
> Key: SSHD-1322
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1322
> Project: MINA SSHD
>  Issue Type: Question
>Reporter: Sreedhar J
>Priority: Major
>
> From SFTP client,  when I execute   PUT  ,
> SFTP Server  recieves   first  LS command  SSH_FXP_LSTAT  followed by  PUT 
> commands ( SSH_FXP_OPEN,  SSH_FXP_WRITE ).
> where as  if we issue  PUT < local file>,   Server would get the commands as 
> SSH_FXP_OPEN, SSH_FXP_WRITE
> *So, my question is,at Server  level  LSTAT command was invoked as part 
> of  embeeded PUT command  vs normal LSTAT command from sftp client.*



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[GitHub] [mina-sshd] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #361: Bump spring-core from 5.3.26 to 5.3.27

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/361

   Bumps [spring-core](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework) 
from 5.3.26 to 5.3.27.
   
   Release notes
   Sourced from https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/releases;>spring-core's
 releases.
   
   v5.3.27
   :star: New Features
   
   Limit string concatenation in SpEL expressions https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30331;>#30331
   Limit SpEL expression length https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30329;>#30329
   Disable variable assignment in SimpleEvaluationContext https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30327;>#30327
   Introduce StringUtils.truncate() https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30291;>#30291
   Introduce ObjectUtils.nullSafeConciseToString() https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30287;>#30287
   Make HttpComponentsHeadersAdapter#getFirst nullable https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30269;>#30269
   
   :lady_beetle: Bug Fixes
   
   Fix regression  in ReactorServerHttpRequest related to IPV6 Zone id with 
% https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30314;>#30314
   SSE breaks with indenting serializer in WebMvc.fn https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30302;>#30302
   Increase max regex length in SpEL expressions https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30298;>#30298
   NullPointerException on timeout in HttpComponentsClientHttpConnector 
when using Apache HttpComponents https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30246;>#30246
   Wrong MockRestRequestMatchers.header() method in spring-test being 
invoked (JDK issue?) https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30235;>#30235
   TypeNotPresentException: org/springframework/cglib/proxy/NoOp not 
present on Java 17 https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30228;>#30228
   Refine generic type management in 
AbstractMessageWriterResultHandler https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30215;>#30215
   MvcUriComponentsBuilder.fromMethodCall breaks for controller with 
CharSequence return type https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30212;>#30212
   Handle all exceptions for stored proc output param retrieval in 
SharedEntityManagerCreator https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30164;>#30164
   
   :notebook_with_decorative_cover: Documentation
   
   Fix @PathVariable reference documentation code snippets https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30258;>#30258
   Fix example in Javadoc for @EnableWebSocket https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30187;>#30187
   Fix anchor in link to Web on Reactive Stack chapter https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30163;>#30163
   
   :hammer: Dependency Upgrades
   
   Upgrade to Reactor 2020.0.31 https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30315;>#30315
   
   
   
   
   Commits
   
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/08bc1a050ec87cdaad6b05170c27e34d3f90cafa;>08bc1a0
 Release v5.3.27
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/6bfb94a563800313745ddc2c8eca0de6e17f2cb5;>6bfb94a
 Disable variable assignment in SimpleEvaluationContext
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/ebc82654282bda547fbc20a9749ab1bda886a46f;>ebc8265
 Limit SpEL expression length
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/86457464d767284a7c588292a39d6accf1f65bfe;>8645746
 Limit string concatenation in SpEL expressions
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/be129dc17160c82da9e56b88321da13199cda2af;>be129dc
 Change max regex length in SpEL expressions to 1000
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/8bb1b3eb443ec8c0e497cc1bf4f232d61097adaa;>8bb1b3e
 Upgrade to Netty 4.1.91 and Checkstyle 10.9.3
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/6abd822e77722e6c92853f9abd470fb36e68a1e7;>6abd822
 Upgrade to Reactor 2020.0.31
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/1c43a4c7ab46e7e5ac871b0fb1c04830c6299bc4;>1c43a4c
 Fix regression in ReactorServerHttpRequest
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/423f2215c2c542426afa6682b8240e668bb133ed;>423f221
 Remove flaky assertion to fix build on JDK 17
   https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/0bad69d5fbab74cd1afded96fbf5ed287ece7f18;>0bad69d
 Fix SSE with indenting serializer in WebMvc.fn
   Additional commits viewable in https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/compare/v5.3.26...v5.3.27;>compare
 view
   
   
   
   
   
   

[GitHub] [mina-asyncweb] dependabot[bot] closed pull request #9: Bump spring-core from 2.0.8 to 5.2.23.RELEASE

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


dependabot[bot] closed pull request #9: Bump spring-core from 2.0.8 to 
5.2.23.RELEASE
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-asyncweb/pull/9


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[GitHub] [mina-asyncweb] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #9: Bump spring-core from 2.0.8 to 5.2.23.RELEASE

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


dependabot[bot] commented on PR #9:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-asyncweb/pull/9#issuecomment-1511795623

   Superseded by #10.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[GitHub] [mina-asyncweb] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #10: Bump spring-core from 2.0.8 to 5.2.24.RELEASE

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #10:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-asyncweb/pull/10

   Bumps [spring-core](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework) 
from 2.0.8 to 5.2.24.RELEASE.
   
   Release notes
   Sourced from https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/releases;>spring-core's
 releases.
   
   v5.2.24.RELEASE
   :star: New Features
   
   Limit string concatenation in SpEL expressions https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30332;>#30332
   Limit SpEL expression length https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30330;>#30330
   Disable variable assignment in SimpleEvaluationContext https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30328;>#30328
   
   5.2.23.RELEASE
   :star: New Features
   
   Improve diagnostics in SpEL for matches operator https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30150;>#30150
   Improve diagnostics in SpEL for repeated text https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30149;>#30149
   Increase scope of regex pattern cache for the SpEL matches 
operator https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30148;>#30148
   
   v5.2.22.RELEASE
   :star: New Features
   
   Refine CachedIntrospectionResults property introspection https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28446;>#28446
   
   :lady_beetle: Bug Fixes
   
   Ignore invalid STOMP frame https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28444;>#28444
   
   v5.2.21.RELEASE
   :star: New Features
   
   Remove DNS lookups during websocket connection initiation https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28281;>#28281
   
   :lady_beetle: Bug Fixes
   
   Improve documentation and matching algorithm in data binders https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28334;>#28334
   CodeGenerationException thrown when using AnnotationMBeanExporter on JDK 
17 https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28279;>#28279
   ResponseEntity objects are accumulated in ConcurrentReferenceHashMap https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28273;>#28273
   NotWritablePropertyException when attempting to declaratively configure 
ClassLoader properties https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28272;>#28272
   
   v5.2.20.RELEASE
   :star: New Features
   
   Restrict access to property paths on Class references https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28262;>#28262
   Improve diagnostics in SpEL for large array creation https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28257;>#28257
   
   v5.2.19.RELEASE
   :star: New Features
   
   Declare serialVersionUID on DefaultAopProxyFactory https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27785;>#27785
   Use ByteArrayDecoder in DefaultClientResponse::createException https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27667;>#27667
   
   :lady_beetle: Bug Fixes
   
   ProxyFactoryBean getObject called before setInterceptorNames, silently 
creating an invalid proxy [SPR-7582] https://redirect.github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27817;>#27817
   
   
   
   ... (truncated)
   
   
   Commits
   
   See full diff in https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commits/v5.2.24.RELEASE;>compare
 view
   
   
   
   
   
   [![Dependabot compatibility 
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=org.springframework:spring-core=maven=2.0.8=5.2.24.RELEASE)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
   
   Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't 
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting 
`@dependabot rebase`.
   
   [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
   [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
   
   ---
   
   
   Dependabot commands and options
   
   
   You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
   - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
   - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that 
have been made to it
   - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
   - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI 
passes on it
   - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and 
block automerging
   - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
   - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. 
You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
   - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop 
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR 
or upgrade to it 

[jira] [Created] (SSHD-1322) How to identify received LSTAT command is part of PUT command at Server

2023-04-17 Thread Sreedhar J (Jira)
Sreedhar J created SSHD-1322:


 Summary: How to identify  received LSTAT command is part of PUT 
command at Server
 Key: SSHD-1322
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1322
 Project: MINA SSHD
  Issue Type: Question
Reporter: Sreedhar J


>From SFTP client,  when I execute   PUT  ,
>SFTP Server  recieves   first  LS command  SSH_FXP_LSTAT  followed by  PUT 
>commands ( SSH_FXP_OPEN,  SSH_FXP_WRITE ).

where as  if we issue  PUT < local file>,   Server would get the commands as 
SSH_FXP_OPEN, SSH_FXP_WRITE

*So, my question is,at Server  level  LSTAT command was invoked as part of  
embeeded PUT command  vs normal LSTAT command from sftp client.*



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[GitHub] [mina-ftpserver] elecharny commented on issue #25: Apache FTPServer adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.1

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


elecharny commented on issue #25:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-ftpserver/issues/25#issuecomment-1511055722

   Hi,
   that is certainly something to be done...
   
   If you want to give it a try...


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[GitHub] [mina-sshd] 07070529 opened a new issue, #360: Apache Mina SSHD adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.x

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


07070529 opened a new issue, #360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/360

   ### Description
   
   Hi, I see that Apache MINA 2.2.x rewrites the SSL/TLS layer to address some 
flaws that were hard to fix in 2.1.x.
   Apache Mina SSHD depends on Apache MINA, but the latest released version of 
Apache Mina SSHD (2.9.2) depends on Apache MINA 2.0.23.
   So, I'd like to ask if there are plans to release a new version of Apache 
Mina SSHD to adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.x.
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42636191/232445217-3149cd18-e079-4675-b455-6eed4b1e81c0.png)
   
   
   ### Motivation
   
   The motivation I raise this issue is that we are using Apache MINA and 
Apache Mina SSHD together.
   Currently, we are using Apache Mina SSHD version 2.9.2, and we want to use 
the more secure Apache MINA version 2.2.1. However, Apache MINA 2.2 and 2.1 
have incompatible changes 
(https://mina.apache.org/mina-project/2.2-vs-2.1.html) .
   Using Apache Mina SSHD 2.9.2 and Apache MINA 2.2.1 together has 
compatibility issues.
   Therefore, we wanted to know if there are plans to release a new version of 
Apache Mina SSHD to adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.x?
   
   ### Alternatives considered
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[GitHub] [mina-ftpserver] 07070529 commented on issue #25: Apache FTPServer adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.1

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


07070529 commented on issue #25:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-ftpserver/issues/25#issuecomment-1511003707

   The motivation I raise this issue is that we are using Apache MINA and 
Apache FTP Server together. 
   Currently, we are using Apache FTP Server version 1.1.3, and we want to use 
the more secure Apache MINA version 2.2.1. However, Apache MINA 2.2 and 2.1 
have incompatible changes 
(https://mina.apache.org/mina-project/2.2-vs-2.1.html) . 
   Using Apache FTPServer 1.1.3 with Apache MINA 2.2.1 has compatibility issues.
   Therefore, we wanted to know if there are plans to release a new version of 
Apache FTPServer to adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.x?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org



[GitHub] [mina-ftpserver] 07070529 opened a new issue, #25: Apache FTPServer adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.1

2023-04-17 Thread via GitHub


07070529 opened a new issue, #25:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-ftpserver/issues/25

   Hi, I see that Apache MINA 2.2.x rewrites the SSL/TLS layer to address some 
flaws that were hard to fix in 2.1.x.
   Apache FTPServer depends on Apache MINA, but the latest released version of 
Apache FTPServer (1.2.0) still depends on Apache MINA 2.1.6.
   So, I'd like to ask if there are plans to release a new version of Apache 
FTPServer to adapt to Apache MINA 2.2.x.
   
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42636191/232437534-a7b04520-b0f1-4084-82df-d933926891aa.png)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org