Re: Reg: Change the buffer size
Umm, it resizes itself, 1024 is just the initial size. Thomas On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 7:49 PM Gokkulasudan Rathnakumar < gokkulasudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > Is there a way to change the buffer size in SftpSubsystem under apache sshd > 2.1.0? > > Note: I see it as *protected final Buffer buffer = new > ByteArrayBuffer(1024);* > > Thanks & regards, > Gokkulasudan Rathnakumar. >
Vysper
Hello everyone, I've been looking at Vysper for a few days, and wanted to check out the sources from SVN. After looking at the web site, it appears to be pointing at a non-existent SVN repository. What's up? -- -- Thomas
Re: Vysper
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Ashish wrote: > We shall fix it up. Meanwhile here is the URL > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/vysper/ > > thanks > ashish Awesome, thanks. :-D Now to get my netbeans environment all set up. -- -- Thomas
State of Vysper, Documentation
Well, after looking thru the Vysper code for the past few days, and now ferreting thru it in NetBeans, I have a few questions. Is there any design documentation for developers, beyond what's present in the javadocs? Over all, the only issue I really see is the complexity of figuring out how to do something useful with the server. Using it as an embedded server doesn't help much when it's difficult to figure out how to add functionality. I've been able to figure out how to do something, but I'm also *VERY* familiar with XMPP. It's funny how much, but how little, has changed in the last 12 years. :-D etherx.jabber.org brings back memories. lol. -- -- Thomas
Re: State of Vysper, Documentation
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > I agree. Unfortunately, there is not much documentation. > But we have this list, so, if you already know what you want to do, we > might be able to point you in the right direction. Well, I'm having a heck of a time figuring out the flow of how rosters are handled. I was hoping to implement a shared roster mechanism, but the implementation makes rosters.. Confusing.. Additionally, I was trying to trace back exactly how the socket ends up parsing XML. :-D There's some hidden magic somewhere that I'm not seeing the connection to. I've made it as far as StreamStartHandler. :-D > >> I've been able to figure out how to do something, but I'm also >> *VERY* familiar with XMPP. It's funny how much, but how little, has >> changed in the last 12 years. :-D etherx.jabber.org brings back >> memories. lol. > > :-) Yes, XMPP is an excellent mature protocol. Yup. It helps we brought etherx and the jabber daemon together back in '99. :-D -- -- Thomas
Re: State of Vysper, Documentation
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Thomas Charron wrote: > Additionally, I was trying to trace back exactly how the socket ends > up parsing XML. :-D There's some hidden magic somewhere that I'm not > seeing the connection to. I've made it as far as StreamStartHandler. > :-D Ok, now I feel dumb. :-D Nevermind. -- -- Thomas
Re: [SSHD] SFTP does not support v3
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Andreas Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > The current SFTP implementation in SSHD does not support v3 (Section > 7) of the standard which the widely used JSch client currently only > support. The issue is in section 9.3 of the v6 standard: > bool end-of-file [optional]" > > The last byte end-of-file corrupts the datastream when used with the > JSch client and since it's optional I would like to disable/remove it > from the SSHD code to support more clients. What do you think? Curiouse, if the client doesn't support it, why, exactly, is it a bug in the server when the specification clearly shows it as being optional, (aka, the servers choice)? -- -- Thomas
