[VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
Hi guys, we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that magically the release gets out of the box. My opinion is that the current trunk may not be perfect, but unless we release it, it will be difficult to know what's wrong about it. We also can release a 2.0.1 if needed. I mean, perfection is a goal, not a requirement... Also my perception is that everyone is waiting for 2.0 to be out before starting to work on 3.0. I think it's time. So : [] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 [] +/-0 No opinion [] -1 No, we are not ready yet. Thanks ! -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
+1 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on > windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now > wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that > magically the release gets out of the box. > > My opinion is that the current trunk may not be perfect, but unless we > release it, it will be difficult to know what's wrong about it. We also can > release a 2.0.1 if needed. I mean, perfection is a goal, not a > requirement... > > Also my perception is that everyone is waiting for 2.0 to be out before > starting to work on 3.0. I think it's time. > > So : > > [] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 > [] +/-0 No opinion > [] -1 No, we are not ready yet. > > Thanks ! > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.nextury.com > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > [X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as well :-) /niklas
Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
+1 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny >wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on > > windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now > > wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that > > magically the release gets out of the box. > > > > My opinion is that the current trunk may not be perfect, but unless we > > release it, it will be difficult to know what's wrong about it. We also > can > > release a 2.0.1 if needed. I mean, perfection is a goal, not a > > requirement... > > > > Also my perception is that everyone is waiting for 2.0 to be out before > > starting to work on 3.0. I think it's time. > > > > So : > > > > [] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 > > [] +/-0 No opinion > > [] -1 No, we are not ready yet. > > > > Thanks ! > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.nextury.com > > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
Le Mon, 31 May 2010 09:18:24 +0200, Niklas Gustavsson a écrit : > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: > > [X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 > > Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as > well :-) > > /niklas +1, as soon the tests are stables :) I won't be much available for helping. -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
+1 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on > windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now > wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that > magically the release gets out of the box. > > My opinion is that the current trunk may not be perfect, but unless we > release it, it will be difficult to know what's wrong about it. We also can > release a 2.0.1 if needed. I mean, perfection is a goal, not a > requirement... > > Also my perception is that everyone is waiting for 2.0 to be out before > starting to work on 3.0. I think it's time. > > So : > > [] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 > [] +/-0 No opinion > [] -1 No, we are not ready yet. > > Thanks ! > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.nextury.com > > > -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
+1 Jeff On May 31, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on >> windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now >> wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that >> magically the release gets out of the box. >> >> My opinion is that the current trunk may not be perfect, but unless we >> release it, it will be difficult to know what's wrong about it. We also can >> release a 2.0.1 if needed. I mean, perfection is a goal, not a >> requirement... >> >> Also my perception is that everyone is waiting for 2.0 to be out before >> starting to work on 3.0. I think it's time. >> >> So : >> >> [] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 >> [] +/-0 No opinion >> [] -1 No, we are not ready yet. >> >> Thanks ! >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Cordialement, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.nextury.com >> >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com
Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?
+1 Regards, Alan On May 31, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Hi guys, we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that magically the release gets out of the box. My opinion is that the current trunk may not be perfect, but unless we release it, it will be difficult to know what's wrong about it. We also can release a 2.0.1 if needed. I mean, perfection is a goal, not a requirement... Also my perception is that everyone is waiting for 2.0 to be out before starting to work on 3.0. I think it's time. So : [] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 [] +/-0 No opinion [] -1 No, we are not ready yet. Thanks ! -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
