[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-790) 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex C. updated DIRMINA-790: Attachment: vcs-diff2592916253391973179.patch Proposal on how the session config has correct values after opening the socket/channel > 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue > -- > > Key: DIRMINA-790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790 > Project: MINA > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-RC1 > Environment: WinXP SP3 with disabled Firewall + Virusscanner, Win7 > 64bit with disabled Virusscanner and Firewall, Win7 32bit with absolutely no > virusscanner and with disabled firewall, all Systems with 32bit JRE6U20 > Ubuntu Linux 64bit mit JRE6U20 64bit >Reporter: Alex C. >Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.0.2 > > Attachments: MINASocketTransfer.zip, vcs-diff2592916253391973179.patch > > > Hi there, > I've written a kind of RMI replacement uses MINA for network communication > layer that is also able to transfer files very fast (without reflection and > complex serialisation stuff). One of my customers faced a performance problem > as soon as the receiving application part is running in Win7. > I tried to create an reproducer: > First I wrote a small test application using Java IO that simply transfers > 1.000.000 bytes of random data from a client to a server. That's very fast. > It doesn't matter if I try on localhost, or from WinXP->Win7 oder > Win7->WinXP. Even Linux->Win7 is fast. > Then I wrote the same kind of application with mina. No additional codec, > nothing complex. I just transfer 100 IoBuffers with 10.000 bytes each from A > to B. > If I run the application on WinXP via localhost, it's very fast. <1sec > runtime. > If I run client and server in Win7, it's f*cking slow. Takes >1min to > complete. > Please find attached the test application. > Just extract and run: > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Client Hostname of Server> > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Server > The lib folder contains 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. To switch from the one to the > other version, simple "move" the tailing "_" to exclude the specified lib > from classpath. > Java-Source files are included in the MINASocketTransfer.jar ... > I tested it with 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. It's reproducible with both versions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-790) 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-790: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.1) 2.0.2 > 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue > -- > > Key: DIRMINA-790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790 > Project: MINA > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-RC1 > Environment: WinXP SP3 with disabled Firewall + Virusscanner, Win7 > 64bit with disabled Virusscanner and Firewall, Win7 32bit with absolutely no > virusscanner and with disabled firewall, all Systems with 32bit JRE6U20 > Ubuntu Linux 64bit mit JRE6U20 64bit >Reporter: Alex C. >Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.0.2 > > Attachments: MINASocketTransfer.zip > > > Hi there, > I've written a kind of RMI replacement uses MINA for network communication > layer that is also able to transfer files very fast (without reflection and > complex serialisation stuff). One of my customers faced a performance problem > as soon as the receiving application part is running in Win7. > I tried to create an reproducer: > First I wrote a small test application using Java IO that simply transfers > 1.000.000 bytes of random data from a client to a server. That's very fast. > It doesn't matter if I try on localhost, or from WinXP->Win7 oder > Win7->WinXP. Even Linux->Win7 is fast. > Then I wrote the same kind of application with mina. No additional codec, > nothing complex. I just transfer 100 IoBuffers with 10.000 bytes each from A > to B. > If I run the application on WinXP via localhost, it's very fast. <1sec > runtime. > If I run client and server in Win7, it's f*cking slow. Takes >1min to > complete. > Please find attached the test application. > Just extract and run: > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Client Hostname of Server> > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Server > The lib folder contains 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. To switch from the one to the > other version, simple "move" the tailing "_" to exclude the specified lib > from classpath. > Java-Source files are included in the MINASocketTransfer.jar ... > I tested it with 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. It's reproducible with both versions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-790) 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-790: -- Fix Version/s: 2.0.1 (was: 2.0.0-RC1) > 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue > -- > > Key: DIRMINA-790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790 > Project: MINA > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-RC1 > Environment: WinXP SP3 with disabled Firewall + Virusscanner, Win7 > 64bit with disabled Virusscanner and Firewall, Win7 32bit with absolutely no > virusscanner and with disabled firewall, all Systems with 32bit JRE6U20 > Ubuntu Linux 64bit mit JRE6U20 64bit >Reporter: Alex C. >Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.0.1 > > Attachments: MINASocketTransfer.zip > > > Hi there, > I've written a kind of RMI replacement uses MINA for network communication > layer that is also able to transfer files very fast (without reflection and > complex serialisation stuff). One of my customers faced a performance problem > as soon as the receiving application part is running in Win7. > I tried to create an reproducer: > First I wrote a small test application using Java IO that simply transfers > 1.000.000 bytes of random data from a client to a server. That's very fast. > It doesn't matter if I try on localhost, or from WinXP->Win7 oder > Win7->WinXP. Even Linux->Win7 is fast. > Then I wrote the same kind of application with mina. No additional codec, > nothing complex. I just transfer 100 IoBuffers with 10.000 bytes each from A > to B. > If I run the application on WinXP via localhost, it's very fast. <1sec > runtime. > If I run client and server in Win7, it's f*cking slow. Takes >1min to > complete. > Please find attached the test application. > Just extract and run: > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Client Hostname of Server> > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Server > The lib folder contains 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. To switch from the one to the > other version, simple "move" the tailing "_" to exclude the specified lib > from classpath. > Java-Source files are included in the MINASocketTransfer.jar ... > I tested it with 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. It's reproducible with both versions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-790) 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-790: -- Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-RC1 Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-M6) Agreed : no reason to set the default value to 1024. Will rfix that as soon as I have a working computer. > 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue > -- > > Key: DIRMINA-790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790 > Project: MINA > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-RC1 > Environment: WinXP SP3 with disabled Firewall + Virusscanner, Win7 > 64bit with disabled Virusscanner and Firewall, Win7 32bit with absolutely no > virusscanner and with disabled firewall, all Systems with 32bit JRE6U20 > Ubuntu Linux 64bit mit JRE6U20 64bit >Reporter: Alex C. >Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.0.0-RC1 > > Attachments: MINASocketTransfer.zip > > > Hi there, > I've written a kind of RMI replacement uses MINA for network communication > layer that is also able to transfer files very fast (without reflection and > complex serialisation stuff). One of my customers faced a performance problem > as soon as the receiving application part is running in Win7. > I tried to create an reproducer: > First I wrote a small test application using Java IO that simply transfers > 1.000.000 bytes of random data from a client to a server. That's very fast. > It doesn't matter if I try on localhost, or from WinXP->Win7 oder > Win7->WinXP. Even Linux->Win7 is fast. > Then I wrote the same kind of application with mina. No additional codec, > nothing complex. I just transfer 100 IoBuffers with 10.000 bytes each from A > to B. > If I run the application on WinXP via localhost, it's very fast. <1sec > runtime. > If I run client and server in Win7, it's f*cking slow. Takes >1min to > complete. > Please find attached the test application. > Just extract and run: > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Client Hostname of Server> > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Server > The lib folder contains 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. To switch from the one to the > other version, simple "move" the tailing "_" to exclude the specified lib > from classpath. > Java-Source files are included in the MINASocketTransfer.jar ... > I tested it with 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. It's reproducible with both versions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-790) 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex C. updated DIRMINA-790: Attachment: MINASocketTransfer.zip The testapplication as mentioned in the description > 2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue > -- > > Key: DIRMINA-790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790 > Project: MINA > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M6, 2.0.0-RC1 > Environment: WinXP SP3 with disabled Firewall + Virusscanner, Win7 > 64bit with disabled Virusscanner and Firewall, Win7 32bit with absolutely no > virusscanner and with disabled firewall, all Systems with 32bit JRE6U20 > Ubuntu Linux 64bit mit JRE6U20 64bit >Reporter: Alex C. >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: MINASocketTransfer.zip > > > Hi there, > I've written a kind of RMI replacement uses MINA for network communication > layer that is also able to transfer files very fast (without reflection and > complex serialisation stuff). One of my customers faced a performance problem > as soon as the receiving application part is running in Win7. > I tried to create an reproducer: > First I wrote a small test application using Java IO that simply transfers > 1.000.000 bytes of random data from a client to a server. That's very fast. > It doesn't matter if I try on localhost, or from WinXP->Win7 oder > Win7->WinXP. Even Linux->Win7 is fast. > Then I wrote the same kind of application with mina. No additional codec, > nothing complex. I just transfer 100 IoBuffers with 10.000 bytes each from A > to B. > If I run the application on WinXP via localhost, it's very fast. <1sec > runtime. > If I run client and server in Win7, it's f*cking slow. Takes >1min to > complete. > Please find attached the test application. > Just extract and run: > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Client Hostname of Server> > java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Server > The lib folder contains 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. To switch from the one to the > other version, simple "move" the tailing "_" to exclude the specified lib > from classpath. > Java-Source files are included in the MINASocketTransfer.jar ... > I tested it with 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. It's reproducible with both versions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
