Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@archean.fr wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. Sorry ! didn't get much :-( Can we list down what all we need to do like cleanup and other stuff, so that its easy. One thing I can think off is moving out the 1.0 documentation to achieve. Sorry for the dumb question :-) Julien Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org a écrit : May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Thoughts? Jeff On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. So lets do that ;-) Jeff Julien Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org a écrit : May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Thoughts? Jeff On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/ filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, Jeff Genender jgenen...@savoirtech.com a écrit : On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. So lets do that ;-) Jeff I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website (removing all the old 1.X references). Julien Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org a écrit : May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Thoughts? Jeff On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/ filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, Jeff Genender jgenen...@savoirtech.com a écrit : On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. So lets do that ;-) Jeff I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website (removing all the old 1.X references). Here is the new mina 2 site : http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11.10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now.
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Emmanuel Lcharny wrote: Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, Jeff Genender jgenen...@savoirtech.com a écrit : On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. So lets do that ;-) Jeff I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website (removing all the old 1.X references). Here is the new mina 2 site : http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11.10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now. fussy point: should the copyright include 2010? Regards, Alan
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Alan D. Cabrera a écrit : fussy point: should the copyright include 2010? Changed. It will be 2010 now. Regards, Alan
Re : Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
deep purple one is very cool :) Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- - Message d'origine De : Emmanuel Lcharny elecha...@gmail.com À : dev@mina.apache.org Envoyé le : Lun 25 Janvier 2010, 18 h 27 min 14 s Objet : Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ? Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, Jeff Genender jgenen...@savoirtech.com a écrit : On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. So lets do that ;-) Jeff I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website (removing all the old 1.X references). Here is the new mina 2 site : http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11..10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now.
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11.10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now. Its looks cool... Now its time for the content.. :-) -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Le Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:04:28 +0530, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com a écrit : http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11.10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now. Its looks cool... Now its time for the content.. :-) IMO the purple is perfect with the dark colors of the logo For the content we need to remove all the 1.X references and I would like to provide much more visibility to sub-projects (a bit like on directory.apache.org). Julien -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Julien Vermillard a écrit : For the content we need to remove all the 1.X references and I would like to provide much more visibility to sub-projects (a bit like on directory.apache.org). We should also keep some pointer to 1.0 somewhere. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Thoughts? Jeff On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/ filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Jeff Genender a écrit : May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Hmm, ok, I think it's a decent choice at this point. Let's get a 2.0.0 oiy, see what happens in the wide, and get ready to quickly fix the code if necessarY. I like the idea. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org wrote: May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. +1, go for it! /niklas
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Makes sense to me. Let loose the Kraken! Regards, Alan On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: +1, time for 2.0 ! Bye, Norman 2010/1/22 Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org wrote: May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. +1, go for it! /niklas
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org wrote: May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. +1 I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Thoughts? Jeff On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc documentation for org/apache/mina/filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. JIRA looks a lot lot better. Thanks to Emm :-) we have 7 issue that are unscheduled B DIRMINA-737 StateMachine deadlock on StateContext synchronization B DIRMINA-683 APR transport on FreeBSD throwing Exceptions B DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs F DIRMINA-705 Transport for unix local sockets based on APR B DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista I DIRMINA-758 APR code needs unit tests B DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed Lets park them somewhere and remove unscheduled issues. Regarding DIRMINA 593 - I thought there was an app attached with this or some other JIRA which used ReqRes filter. I am having a hard time finding it out. Anyone has a clue, about that attachment? Got it. The example was with DIRMINA 92. Will look into and try to work the details out. thanks ashish
