Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
Looks like there's no objection. It would be nice Julien and Niklas could move it to the trunk soon. Cheers, Trustin On 10/13/07, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, I'm playing a little with MINA SM (State Machine) from Niklas sandbox it's a very nice SM implementation and quite useful for server/protocol implementation. I think it's time to move it in trunk as a new module. WDYT ? +1 -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, I'm playing a little with MINA SM (State Machine) from Niklas sandbox it's a very nice SM implementation and quite useful for server/protocol implementation. I think it's time to move it in trunk as a new module. WDYT ? Julien +1, I'm glad you like it! /Niklas
Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
I'll take care of this this week. What should we call the module? Is sm ok? /Niklas Trustin Lee wrote: Looks like there's no objection. It would be nice Julien and Niklas could move it to the trunk soon. Cheers, Trustin On 10/13/07, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, I'm playing a little with MINA SM (State Machine) from Niklas sandbox it's a very nice SM implementation and quite useful for server/protocol implementation. I think it's time to move it in trunk as a new module. WDYT ? +1
Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
On 10/15/07, Niklas Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll take care of this this week. What should we call the module? Is sm ok? or statemachine...? because it sounds to short. :D It's up to you though. People will give you feed back. BTW here's the JIRA issue for you. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-457 Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
I also prefer statemachine over sm Maarten On 10/15/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/15/07, Niklas Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll take care of this this week. What should we call the module? Is sm ok? or statemachine...? because it sounds to short. :D It's up to you though. People will give you feed back. BTW here's the JIRA issue for you. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-457 Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
Ok, statemachine will be perfect! Maarten Bosteels wrote: I also prefer statemachine over sm Maarten On 10/15/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/15/07, Niklas Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll take care of this this week. What should we call the module? Is sm ok? or statemachine...? because it sounds to short. :D It's up to you though. People will give you feed back. BTW here's the JIRA issue for you. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-457 Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, I'm playing a little with MINA SM (State Machine) from Niklas sandbox it's a very nice SM implementation and quite useful for server/protocol implementation. I think it's time to move it in trunk as a new module. WDYT ? +1
Move MINA SM to Trunk
Hi, I'm playing a little with MINA SM (State Machine) from Niklas sandbox it's a very nice SM implementation and quite useful for server/protocol implementation. I think it's time to move it in trunk as a new module. WDYT ? Julien
Re: Move MINA SM to Trunk
On 10/12/07, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm playing a little with MINA SM (State Machine) from Niklas sandbox it's a very nice SM implementation and quite useful for server/protocol implementation. I think it's time to move it in trunk as a new module. WDYT ? +1 Cheers, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
