Re: Best stable version?

2007-04-12 Thread Sean LeBlanc
On 04-12 12:04, Trustin Lee wrote:
 Hello Sean,
 
 On 4/12/07, Sean LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I'm using Java 1.5 so I compiled 1.1 using mvn install after doing a
 
 svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/branches/1.1/ mina-1.1
 
 I'm trying to write a bit of client code and I'm running into some odd
 behavior (separate question in another thread), so I'm wondering if I 
 should
 use the pre-compiled version.
 
 The current code in branches/1.1 will be released as 1.1.0.  It's
 quite stable because many people here are using it now to take full
 advantage of Java 5 language features.
 
 Please let us know what 'odd behavior' you experienced, just in case it's a 
 bug.

The odd behavior is described in another thread which I titled lifecycle
question. It would seem that this is actually expected behavior, so
nevermind. :)

And thanks for the good work.

-- 
Sean LeBlanc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
http://sean-leblanc.blogspot.com/
Both models are identical in performance, functional operation, and interface 
circuit details. The two models, however, are not compatible on the same 
communications line connection. 
-Bell System Technical Reference 


Re: Best stable version?

2007-04-11 Thread Trustin Lee

Hello Sean,

On 4/12/07, Sean LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

I'm using Java 1.5 so I compiled 1.1 using mvn install after doing a

svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/branches/1.1/ mina-1.1

I'm trying to write a bit of client code and I'm running into some odd
behavior (separate question in another thread), so I'm wondering if I should
use the pre-compiled version.


The current code in branches/1.1 will be released as 1.1.0.  It's
quite stable because many people here are using it now to take full
advantage of Java 5 language features.

Please let us know what 'odd behavior' you experienced, just in case it's a bug.

Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6