Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Julien Vermillard a écrit : For the content we need to remove all the 1.X references and I would like to provide much more visibility to sub-projects (a bit like on directory.apache.org). We should also keep some pointer to 1.0 somewhere. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Le Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:04:28 +0530, Ashish a écrit : > > http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ > > > > If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can > > ook at it using a proxy : > > 140.211.11.10:80 > > > > There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. > > > > If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's > > band !) header, I have a dark grey one. > > > > Just let me now. > > Its looks cool... Now its time for the content.. :-) > IMO the purple is perfect with the dark colors of the logo For the content we need to remove all the 1.X references and I would like to provide much more visibility to sub-projects (a bit like on directory.apache.org). Julien -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
> http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ > > If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at > it using a proxy : > 140.211.11.10:80 > > There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. > > If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) > header, I have a dark grey one. > > Just let me now. Its looks cool... Now its time for the content.. :-) -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re : Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
deep purple one is very cool :) Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- - Message d'origine De : Emmanuel Lcharny À : dev@mina.apache.org Envoyé le : Lun 25 Janvier 2010, 18 h 27 min 14 s Objet : Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ? Julien Vermillard a écrit : > Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, > Jeff Genender a écrit : > > >> On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all >>> the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. >>> it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an >>> updated/cleaned website. >>> >>> >> So lets do that ;-) >> >> Jeff >> >> > > I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website > (removing all the old 1.X references). > Here is the new mina 2 site : http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11..10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now.
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Alan D. Cabrera a écrit : fussy point: should the copyright include 2010? Changed. It will be 2010 now. Regards, Alan
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Emmanuel Lcharny wrote: Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, Jeff Genender a écrit : On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. So lets do that ;-) Jeff I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website (removing all the old 1.X references). Here is the new mina 2 site : http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11.10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now. fussy point: should the copyright include 2010? Regards, Alan
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, Jeff Genender a écrit : On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. So lets do that ;-) Jeff I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website (removing all the old 1.X references). Here is the new mina 2 site : http://mina.apache.org/mina2/ If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at it using a proxy : 140.211.11.10:80 There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS. If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !) header, I have a dark grey one. Just let me now.
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700, Jeff Genender a écrit : > > On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: > > > Hi, > > IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all > > the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. > > it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an > > updated/cleaned website. > > > > So lets do that ;-) > > Jeff > I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website (removing all the old 1.X references). > > > > Julien > > > > Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, > > Jeff Genender a écrit : > > > >> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone > >> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we > >> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 > >> release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets > >> get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. > >> > >> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast > >> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Jeff > >> > >> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> > >>> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : > >>> > >>> DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a > >>> WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs > >>> DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in > >>> Windows Vista > >>> DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all > >>> sessions closed > >>> > >>> I think we should at least check the first one before launching > >>> a vote... > >>> > >>> > >>> Julien Vermillard a écrit : > Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, > Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > > > > Hi guys, > > > > the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues > > so far : > > > > > > Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the > > TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig > > Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the > > ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block > > until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] > > Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc & documentation for > > org/apache/mina/ filter/reqres > > Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x > > and 2.x > > Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery > > attempts : Improve documentation > > > > With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my > > opinion is that we are ready for a release. > > > > Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA > > version and launch a vote ? > > > > > > +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues > > > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Regards, > >>> Cordialement, > >>> Emmanuel Lécharny > >>> www.nextury.com > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Julien Vermillard > > > > Archean Technologies > > http://www.archean.fr > -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: > Hi, > IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the > PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. > it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an > updated/cleaned website. > So lets do that ;-) Jeff > Julien > > Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, > Jeff Genender a écrit : > >> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone >> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we >> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release >> because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a >> real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. >> >> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast >> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Jeff >> >> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >>> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : >>> >>> DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a >>> WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs >>> DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in >>> Windows Vista >>> DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all >>> sessions closed >>> >>> I think we should at least check the first one before launching a >>> vote... >>> >>> >>> Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > Hi guys, > > the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so > far : > > > Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the > TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig > Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the > ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block > until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] > Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/ > filter/reqres > Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x > and 2.x > Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery > attempts : Improve documentation > > With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my > opinion is that we are ready for a release. > > Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA > version and launch a vote ? > > +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Cordialement, >>> Emmanuel Lécharny >>> www.nextury.com >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Julien Vermillard > > Archean Technologies > http://www.archean.fr
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote: > Hi, > IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the > PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. > it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an > updated/cleaned website. Sorry ! didn't get much :-( Can we list down what all we need to do like cleanup and other stuff, so that its easy. One thing I can think off is moving out the 1.0 documentation to achieve. Sorry for the dumb question :-) > Julien > > Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, > Jeff Genender a écrit : > >> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone >> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we >> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release >> because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a >> real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. >> >> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast >> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Jeff >> >> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >> > Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : >> > >> > DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a >> > WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs >> > DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in >> > Windows Vista >> > DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all >> > sessions closed >> > >> > I think we should at least check the first one before launching a >> > vote... >> > >> > >> > Julien Vermillard a écrit : >> >> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, >> >> Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : >> >>
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website. Julien Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, Jeff Genender a écrit : > May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone > on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we > can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release > because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a > real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. > > I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast > it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. > > Thoughts? > > Jeff > > On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > > Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : > > > > DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a > > WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs > > DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in > > Windows Vista > > DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all > > sessions closed > > > > I think we should at least check the first one before launching a > > vote... > > > > > > Julien Vermillard a écrit : > >> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, > >> Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > >> > >> > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so > >>> far : > >>> > >>> > >>> Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the > >>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig > >>> Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the > >>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block > >>> until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] > >>> Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/ > >>> filter/reqres > >>> Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x > >>> and 2.x > >>> Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery > >>> attempts : Improve documentation > >>> > >>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my > >>> opinion is that we are ready for a release. > >>> > >>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA > >>> version and launch a vote ? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.nextury.com > > > > > -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Ashish wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : >> >> >> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass >> value set to his DatagramSessionConfig >> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter >> [was :Writing more than one message will block until the >> MessageReceived as been fully proceced] >> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for >> org/apache/mina/filter/reqres >> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x >> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve >> documentation >> >> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that >> we are ready for a release. > > JIRA looks a lot lot better. Thanks to Emm :-) > > we have 7 issue that are unscheduled > > B DIRMINA-737 StateMachine deadlock on StateContext synchronization > B DIRMINA-683 APR transport on FreeBSD throwing Exceptions > B DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter > can lead to hangs > F DIRMINA-705 Transport for unix local sockets based on APR > B DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows > Vista > I DIRMINA-758 APR code needs unit tests > B DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions > closed > > Lets park them somewhere and remove unscheduled issues. > > Regarding DIRMINA 593 - I thought there was an app attached with this > or some other JIRA which used ReqRes filter. > I am having a hard time finding it out. Anyone has a clue, about that > attachment? Got it. The example was with DIRMINA 92. Will look into and try to work the details out. thanks ashish
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : > > > Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass > value set to his DatagramSessionConfig > Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter > [was :Writing more than one message will block until the > MessageReceived as been fully proceced] > Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for > org/apache/mina/filter/reqres > Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x > Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve > documentation > > With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that > we are ready for a release. JIRA looks a lot lot better. Thanks to Emm :-) we have 7 issue that are unscheduled B DIRMINA-737 StateMachine deadlock on StateContext synchronization B DIRMINA-683 APR transport on FreeBSD throwing Exceptions B DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs F DIRMINA-705 Transport for unix local sockets based on APR B DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista I DIRMINA-758 APR code needs unit tests B DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed Lets park them somewhere and remove unscheduled issues. Regarding DIRMINA 593 - I thought there was an app attached with this or some other JIRA which used ReqRes filter. I am having a hard time finding it out. Anyone has a clue, about that attachment? thanks ashish
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long > time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, > etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have > negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on > bug fixes. +1 > I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to > TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. > > Thoughts? > > Jeff > > On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : >> >> DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can >> lead to hangs >> DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista >> DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions >> closed >> >> I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... >> >> >> Julien Vermillard a écrit : >>> >>> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, >>> Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : >>> >>> Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? >>> >>> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Cordialement, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.nextury.com >> >> > > -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Makes sense to me. Let loose the Kraken! Regards, Alan On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: +1, time for 2.0 ! Bye, Norman 2010/1/22 Niklas Gustavsson : On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. +1, go for it! /niklas
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
+1, time for 2.0 ! Bye, Norman 2010/1/22 Niklas Gustavsson : > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: >> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long >> time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. > > +1, go for it! > > /niklas >
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long > time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. +1, go for it! /niklas
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Jeff Genender a écrit : May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Hmm, ok, I think it's a decent choice at this point. Let's get a 2.0.0 oiy, see what happens in the wide, and get ready to quickly fix the code if necessarY. I like the idea. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. Thoughts? Jeff On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/ filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : DIRMINA-738Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs DIRMINA-379setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista DIRMINA-724getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote... Julien Vermillard a écrit : Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : Hi guys, the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far : Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/filter/reqres Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve documentation With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that we are ready for a release. Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version and launch a vote ? +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > Hi guys, > > the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so > far : > > > Bug DIRMINA-539NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the > TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig > Impr DIRMINA-682We need a better documentation for the > ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until > the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] > Impr DIRMINA-593Javadoc & documentation for > org/apache/mina/filter/reqres > Task DIRMINA-477Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x > Task DIRMINA-708Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : > Improve documentation > > With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion > is that we are ready for a release. > > Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA > version and launch a vote ? > +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
