Re: [VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP
+1. Nice work, everyone! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Gangumalla, Uma wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Uma > > On 9/7/17, 3:00 PM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" wrote: > > >Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP for > >Mnemonic. > > > >This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at least > >three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast. > > > >[ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process > >[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object > >[ ] -1 Do not proceed yet becauseŠ > >
Re: June Report Draft
Thanks for the updates, Gary & Yanping. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Yanping Wang wrote: > Thanks Patrick, James, Gary, > > The revised report below, if it looks ok, I will post it tomorrow before > deadline. > > Thanks > yanping > > = > > Mnemonic > > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place > structured data processing and computing. > > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03. > On 05/24/2016, we released our first official build: > Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating/ > > This information belongs in the "How has the project developed since the last report?" section. You could optionally incorporate that you're incubating and from what date in your introductory sentence above. > > Various metrics for May are as follows: (5/3-5/31/2016) > +--+ > | Metric | counts | > +--+ > | Non Merge Commits | 23 | > | Contributors | 3 | > | Jira New Issues| 18 | > | Resolved Issues| 18 | > | Pull Requests merged | 0 | > | Pull Requests proposed | 0 | > ++ > > Same as above - this information belongs in the "How has the project developed since the last report?" section > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Apache releases: Community voted and released Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating > Change to "Perform Apache releases". This section is meant to be forward looking, so I wouldn't include info on things that already happened. 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions, > 3. Develop new features: We are working in Native computing layer design. > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware > of? > > There are no issues requiring board attention at this time > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > Yanping and Gary presented Mnemonic project at ApacheCon Big Data > Conference. Yanping presented at In-Memory Computing Summit. Both talks > were well received. Several developers approached us to ask additional > details on how Mnemonic worked for Spark. They are interested to see if we > are able to successfully integrate Mnemonic into other projects. > While we are focusing on develop new features, we will try to contact other > projects' communities to explore integration opportunities. As the official > release is done this month, for the next 3 months we expect integration > activities will be increased. > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > We have been focusing the first Apache release over the past weeks. > We also explored ideas on design native computing layer which will further > enhance durable Java object model on large non-volatile memory. > If you've done your first release, say that first here. It's a huge milestone for an incubator! > > Date of last release: > 05/24/2016, we released our first official build: Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating/ This is confusing. Did you do a release or are you voting on an RC? If still voting, change this to "No releases yet, but we're voting on an RC now" Otherwise say " 2016-05-26 Released Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating"
Re: June Report Draft
Content looks good - you're doing a great job so far. Couple of minor nits: - For date of last release, this is your first release, right? That's a big deal, so I'd call that out. - For your metrics section, for TLP, the board typically is interested in relative growth compared to the last three months rather than absolute numbers. For example, the Reporter tool collects dev subscribers and number up/down in last 3 months, JIRAs created vs closed/resolved in last 3 months. Same for committer/PMC growth (which isn't expected yet). Perhaps you could track new contributors if that's easy/feasible. - For the "Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware of?" question, I'd give the stock answer of "There are no issues requiring board attention at this time". Your answer is the same, but using the stock answer makes it easier to ignore/skip. Thanks, James On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Yanping Wang wrote: > Hi, All > > Notice the deadline for June report is June 1st. > I have the following draft, please let me know if you have any additions. > > == > > Mnemonic > > > > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place > structured data processing and computing. > > > > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03. > > > > Various metrics for May are as follows: (5/3-5/30/2016) > > > > ++ > > | Metric | counts | > > ++ > > | Non Merge Commits | 20 | > > | Contributors| 3| > > | Jira New Issues | 17 | > > | Resolved Issues| 17 | > > | Pull Requests merged | 0 | > > | Pull Requests proposed | 0 | > > ++ > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > 1. Apache releases: Community voted and released > Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] > > 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions, > > 3. Develop new features: We are working in Native computing layer design. > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > aware of? > > > > Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time. > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > Yanping and Gary presented Mnemonic project at ApacheCon Big Data > Conference. Yanping presented at In-Memory Computing Summit. Both talks > were well received. Several developers approached us to ask additional > details on how Mnemonic worked for Spark. They are interested to see if we > are able to successfully integrate Mnemonic into other projects. > > > > We think while we are focusing on develop new features, we will also try to > contact other projects' communities to explore integration opportunities. > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > We have been focusing the first Apache release over the past weeks. > We also are exploring ideas on design native computing layer which will > further enhance durable Java object model on large non-volatile memory. > > > > > > Date of last release: 05/24/2016? > > > > released Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] > > > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > > > No election, the project is still in early stage of developing. >
Re: May report draft
Looks good. I signed off on the wiki here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2016 On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Looks good, +1 > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Wang, Yanping > wrote: > > > Hi, All > > > > I have following report for May 4th deadline. > > Please let me know if we have anything else to report. Or remove anything > > from following: > > > > = > > > > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place > > structured > > data processing and computing. > > > > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03. > > Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24 > > > > Various metrics for April are as follows: > > > > ++ > > | Metric | counts | > > ++ > > | Non Merge Commits| 16 | > > | Contributors | 4 | > > | Jira New Issues | 20 | > > | Resolved Issues | 24 | > > | Pull Requests merged | 6 | > > | Pull Requests proposed | 7 | > > ++ > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release > > 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions, > > adding new contributors > >a. Mnemonic website is up: > > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/ > >b. Mnemonic cwiki is up: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/Apache+Mnemonic+Home > > 3. Develop new features: We are working in Native computing layer > design. > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > aware of? > > > > Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time. > > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > We completed setting up infrastructure. Both project website and cwiki > are > > up running. We are working on adding contents and documentation to the > > sites so new contributors and community members can get better view of > what > > this project is and how to get involved. > > We realized, unlike other application level projects, library (or API) > > projects traditionally had less contributors until certain amount of > > adopters successfully integrated those libraries. We plan to help some > > integrations, such as HBase, Arrow, etc. after our first official code > > release. > > We submitted 2 proposals for Strata Hadoop World NYC. > > We will present Mnemonic project in upcoming ApacheCon Big Data > conference > > on 5/11. > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > We are designing the native computing infrastructure, built native > > computing interface code. > > In preparing first official release: > >1. Defined coding guidelines for the project. Reformatted > > all code based on defined coding style. > >2. Added the checkstyle to automate the checking process. > >3. Formalized the names of annotations, classes and > methods. > >4. Removed the dependency of property > mnemonic.core.version. > >5. Added a new profile for artifacts releasing and > signing. > >6. Added release plugin and configuration for releasing. > > > > > > Date of last release: > > > > No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release > > > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > > > No election, since the project is just starting. > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > >- Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
Re: Release Manager
+1 for Gary. On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Wang, Yanping wrote: > I agree. > +1 for Gary as release manager for version 1.0.0. > > Thanks, > Yanping > > -Original Message- > From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.ganguma...@intel.com ] > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 4:38 PM > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release Manager > > IMO, Gary should be right person for the release manager at this stage > (Assuming Gary would be ok with this). I think later(after 2/3 releases) > some one can pick up either me or any others if needed. > Mainly considering his strong hold on the component and dependancies. I > will provide my support to him on release activities. I hope others would > also provide their support anyway. > > Thanks for suggesting Yanping. > > +1 for Gary as release manager for version 1.0.0. > > Regards, > Uma > > On 4/28/16, 3:16 PM, "Wang, Yanping" > wrote: > > >Hi, Gary > > > >If we consider this is a major decision, give more time. > > > >By the way, I suggest either Uma or Gary to take this role. > > > >Thanks, > >Yanping > > > >From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org ] > >Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:50 PM > >To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org > >Subject: Re: Release Manager > > > >Please nominate till 10:31 today so we can proceed following works, > >thanks. > >On 4/28/2016 11:03 AM, Gary wrote: > >Hi dev, > > > > We are undertaking the works for preparing the first release so we need > >to have a release manager to manage release processes and provide the KEY > >for users to verify our released artifacts. regarding the KEY, that is > > > > "The KEYS file is a plain text file containing the public key > >signatures of the release managers (and optionally other committers) for > >the project" (http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basic-facts) > > > >Thanks. > >+Gary > > > > > >
Re: FW: Report Sign off
Ok - I signed off now too. Thanks! James On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I also checked and unfortunately I failed to subscribe to the podling > mailing lists. That oversight has been fixed. My apologies. > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > >> A bunch of us have now managed to sign off. >> >> As for me, my apologies, I knew we had until COB today to sign off so was >> "optimizing my time" i.e. procrastinating. Will be better next time. >> >> Good progress >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Wang, Yanping >> wrote: >> >>> I think we all missed John's email, until he became curious :-) >>> >>> It's ok, I am not worried, we still have 6 hours and 17 minutes until >>> the end of the day. >>> Wait a minute, does the deadline use Pacific time or Eastern time? >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 9:18 AM >>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Report Sign off >>> >>> Dear Mnemonic Podling, >>> >>> Your report for the month looks great. However, it doesn't have mentor >>> sign off. Are there any mentors available to sign off on your report? >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016 >>> >>> [ ](mnemonic) Patrick Hunt [ ](mnemonic) Andrew Purtell [ >>> ](mnemonic) James Taylor [ ](mnemonic) Henry Saputra >>> >>> >>> John >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >>- Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > >- Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
Re: Mnemonic JIRA is now live
Excellent - thanks, Patrick. I added a link to JIRA on the status page, updated the dates on some completed items, and fixed a few formatting issues: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html Also, there may be an opportunity for a GSoC internship for Mnemonic+Phoenix on a this self contained Phoenix issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2405. Comments on the JIRA are welcome. Thanks, James On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > The jira is now active. Please contact Yanping about getting role > permissions. > > Role permissions are needed in order to manage the jiras for the > project. e.g. who can be assigned jiras (e.g. contributor role) or who > can move jiras through the workflow (e.g. committer role), etc... > > Note that when you request a role you need to specify your _JIRA_ > username, which might not be the same as your apache id. > > I currently listed Yanping as an Admin, if there are other that would > like admin privs Yanping can address that as well. > > Patrick >
