Request for invitation to the slack channel
Hi, Can you please add me to the MXNet slack for the channels #mxnet and #mxnet-scala. -Ashutosh
Re: joining slack channel
Invite sent. -Qing On 1/9/19, 2:18 PM, "louisfeng.list@" wrote: Could I please get an invite to the Slack channel too? Thanks, Louis On 2019/01/04 16:09:03, "Lv, Tao A" wrote: > Invitation is sent to mue...@amazon.com. You can find mxnet in ASF channels. > > -Original Message- > From: Muenz, Edison [mailto:mue...@amazon.com.INVALID] > Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 11:46 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: joining slack channel > > Hi, can I get an invite to the Slack channel as well? > > From: Aaron Markham > Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 3:42 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: joining slack channel > > I sent you an invite. > Cheers, > Aaron > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:12 PM István Fehérvári wrote: > > > Please add me to the slack channel. > > > > Thank you, > > Istvan > > > > > > Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH > Krausenstr. 38 > 10117 Berlin > Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Schlaeger, Ralf Herbrich > Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879 > Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B > > >
Re: RE: joining slack channel
Could I please get an invite to the Slack channel too? Thanks, Louis On 2019/01/04 16:09:03, "Lv, Tao A" wrote: > Invitation is sent to mue...@amazon.com. You can find mxnet in ASF channels. > > -Original Message- > From: Muenz, Edison [mailto:mue...@amazon.com.INVALID] > Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 11:46 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: joining slack channel > > Hi, can I get an invite to the Slack channel as well? > > From: Aaron Markham > Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 3:42 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: joining slack channel > > I sent you an invite. > Cheers, > Aaron > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:12 PM István Fehérvári wrote: > > > Please add me to the slack channel. > > > > Thank you, > > Istvan > > > > > > Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH > Krausenstr. 38 > 10117 Berlin > Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Schlaeger, Ralf Herbrich > Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879 > Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B > > >
PR follow up: [NGRAPH] MXNet - nGraph initial integration #12502
Happy New Year! I want to follow up on this PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12502 It looks like it's been reviewed, passed all tests and ready to be merged, could anyone help and finalize it? Thanks, Louis
Re: Order of includes in cpplint
I think this is a nit and it is hard to argue which one is best, everyone has their own preference. In this case, Google C style is a simple convention that everyone can refer to, and I would suggest we just stick with that convention Tianqi On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:44 PM Pedro Larroy wrote: > Hi MXNet community > > cpplint seems to complain when the order of includes is not [own, > system, other] > > But the general best practice in C++ is [own, project, 3rd party, > system] for the reasons explained in this stackoverflow answer: ( > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/614302/c-header-order ) > > A contribution to cpplint could be made to make this configurable: > > https://github.com/cpplint/cpplint/blob/master/cpplint.py#L605 > > Thoughts? > > Pedro. >
Re: Order of includes in cpplint
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:44 PM Pedro Larroy wrote: > Hi MXNet community > > cpplint seems to complain when the order of includes is not [own, > system, other] > > But the general best practice in C++ is [own, project, 3rd party, > system] for the reasons explained in this stackoverflow answer: ( > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/614302/c-header-order ) > > A contribution to cpplint could be made to make this configurable: > > https://github.com/cpplint/cpplint/blob/master/cpplint.py#L605 > > Thoughts? > > Pedro. >
