Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Let's continue the discussion on website in #17497 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-595544177
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Closed #17701. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#event-3103498526
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
It's not only about the API documentation. Installation instructions or tutorials will change over time. Building the website independently for different versions may be the simplest approach. I'm also fine with any other approach that enables users to look up documentation and instructions for their respective version. -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-594934176
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
@leezu @szha - We need a clear direction on what to do for the current site's docs generation. It isn't really website versioning. It's generating documentation from different branches. The core website jekyll should stay the same and be generated from master. However, the default docs for each API can be generated from a specific version/branch. -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-594925989
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Website versioning is tracked in https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17497 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-594916076
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Even for 1.x, the current instructions are not compatible with stable 1.6 release. We should build the website based on 1.6 release branch until a version selection is available. -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-593654044
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Let's switch the doc generation for the website to 1.x for now. 2.0 doc should be generated when version selection of the website is available. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-593653255
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Docs are currently generated from master. What's the proposal for what should be the default version of the docs on the website? Do we need to escalate the production of docs variations for different versions - like at a minimum, master(2.0) and 1.x? -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-593652733
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Pinging @apache/mxnet-committers again in case there's any more concern. Otherwise I will assume lazy consensus by the end of Wednesday of this week. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-593638561
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Contributors are encouraged to create PR against master branch. Since master branch is the development branch for 2.0, backward incompatible changes will be allowed, while 1.x branch only allows backward compatible changes. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-592984631
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Nice. It's an essential step towards MXNet 2.0. Curious to know that do we still encourage contributors to create PR against the master branch? And in what strategy we need pick a commit to branch 1.x? Or they need create two PRs against two branches simultaneously? -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-592947107
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
cc @apache/mxnet-committers -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-592944338
[apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Hi, I created the following branches in the MXNet repo: 1.x, 1.7.x. I propose that these branches will function as the following: - 1.7.x: release branch for 1.7.x versions. 1.7.0 roadmap is specified at https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16864 - 1.x: development branch for MXNet's future 1.x versions (e.g. 1.8.x, 1.9.x, ...) - master: development branch for 2.x. 2.0 roadmap is specified at https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16167 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701
