Great I'm calling it.
Also, if anyone wants to test or provide feedback on
https://github.com/apache/incubator-myriad/pull/64 that would be awesome.
It still needs work, but if you have hdfs up it takes about a half hour to
get a Myriad up, I'm working on streamlining it a bit. Would also like to
get the base docker images hosted on something other than my personal
dockerhub.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Santosh Marella
wrote:
> Agreed. Let's just do a 0.2.0 rather than a 0.1.1.
>
> Santosh
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Swapnil Daingade
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Another change to the roadmap was to move the security work to 0.3
> release.
> >
> > Regards
> > Swapnil
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Adam Bordelon
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to skipping 0.1.1 if 0.2.0 is coming soon enough
> > > I don't think we have any production users eagerly awaiting the 0.1.1
> > fixes
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Darin Johnson <
> dbjohnson1...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey Zachary! Thanks, for the upvote.
> > > >
> > > > Also if you're looking for projects ping me! I'm going to be adding
> > more
> > > > tickets in the next few days.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Zachary Jaffee
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If I recall the original reason for the 0.1.1 release was that it
> > would
> > > > be
> > > > > able to get it out earlier than the 0.2.0 release. Since it looks
> > like
> > > > they
> > > > > will be released at the same time essentially, the reason to
> release
> > > > 0.1.1
> > > > > over just waiting to release 0.2.0 goes away.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Darin Johnson <
> > > dbjohnson1...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > During the dev sync today we discussed the upcoming 0.1.1 and
> 0.2.0
> > > > > > releases. Currently, the only out standing issue for 0.1.1 is
> > > > MYRIAD-192
> > > > > > (Cgroups), for Myriad 0.2.0 the outstanding issues are Myriad-36
> > and
> > > > > Myriad
> > > > > > 192 (Configuration and Docker/Appc support). Currently I have a
> > WIP
> > > PR
> > > > > for
> > > > > > Docker Support which I'd like some feedback on (it's should be
> > super
> > > > easy
> > > > > > to test), I'll probably complete Myriad 192 and part of that PR
> as
> > > > it's a
> > > > > > natural fit. I estimate I can get all patches done by early may
> > and
> > > > > > hopefully get a release or release candidate out by May 11
> > > (ApacheCon).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Due to the Alpha nature of Myriad and the significant value of
> > Docker
> > > > and
> > > > > > Configuration support, I think most people would opt for 0.2.0
> over
> > > > 0.1.1
> > > > > > and don't feel it's worth the effort to provide both releases at
> > this
> > > > > > time. I suggest simply doing a 0.2.0 release. Are there any
> > > > objections?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Darin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Zach Jaffee
> > > > > B.S. Computer Science
> > > > > Case Western Reserve University Class of 2017
> > > > > Operations Director | WRUW FM 91.1 Cleveland
> > > > > (917) 881-0646
> > > > > zjaffee.com
> > > > > linkedin.com/in/zjaffee
> > > > > github.com/ZJaffee
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
