Check Daily builds! Serious Option Dialog issue needs confirmation!

[Laszlo Kishalmi]

Dear all,

I'm experiencing an issue with the Options dialog. Whenever I apply the 
settings PHP the dialog disappears and PHP modules get turned on, then 
the dialog reappear.


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3714

Thank you,

Laszlo Kishalmi


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Re: Netbeans reports coming to users@infra

[Geoffrey Corey]

Just to clarify, this was the newest one. I have been seeing them come in
over the last couple months.

On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 12:33 AM antonio  wrote:

> Hi again, Geoffrey,
>
> I think that all installations of NetBeans IDEs are sending bug reports
> to https://netbeans.org/bugzilla, with is then redirected to
> https://bz.apache.org/netbeans/ [1]
> (can anyone confirm?)
>
> I can't tell how the bugzilla database was migrated from netbeans.org to
> apache infrastructure [2] a few days back.
>
> Maybe users still can login there with the same password? Or maybe that
> all the emails have been changed to us...@infra.apache.org, and that's
> why they're entering the users@infra mailing list?
>
> Shall we open an INFRA JIRA ticket to find out?
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>
>
> [1]
>
> ide/bugzilla/src/org/netbeans/modules/bugzilla/repository/NBRepositorySupport.java
>
> 42
>
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19304
>
> El 17/1/20 a las 20:10, antonio escribió:
> > Thanks, Geoffrey,
> >
> > This looks like an automatically generated bug report. IIRC, once upon a
> > time the IDE sent information somewhere @netbeans.org whenever it
> > detected a problem. Maybe those emails are being routed to a wrong
> > users@infra mailing list.
> >
> > Would it be possible for you to send us the whole email headers? That
> > would shed some light into the problem.
> >
> > We recently migrated the old bugzilla.netbeans.org to ASF
> infrastructure
> > [1] and maybe we have misconfigured something?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Antonio
> >
> > [1]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19304
> >
> > El 17/1/20 a las 19:57, Geoffrey Corey escribió:
> >> There is one right now in the moderation queue for users@infra (with
> >> an attached text file).
> >>
> >> Subject: Issue occurred
> >> Hello
> >> I apparently had a problem with NetBeans 10 which requested me to
> >> access the data and send it to you. It appeared to be a performance
> >> problem. I was running NetBeans on a Windows 10 PC. At the time I
> >> was debugging my JavaFX Application and was attempting to trigger a
> >> breakpoint in a MouseDragged Event. Certainly my PC was running
> >> slowly but it may have been a background Windows Update causing the
> >> problem. Restarting the 6 gig PC took a while.
> >> Hope this helps.
> >> Regards
> >> Pete
> >>
> >> Also attaching the log file they originally attached.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:56 AM antonio  >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Geoffrey,
> >>
> >> Which reports? Can you please forward us one of those?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Antonio
> >>
> >> El 8/1/20 a las 18:56, Geoffrey Corey escribió:
> >>  > I've been noticing quite a few netbeans related reports coming
> >> into
> >>  > the users@infra moderation queue lately.
> >>  >
> >>  > Anyone happen to know why they might be being sent to users@infra
> >>  > instead of the netbeans group itself?
> >>  >
> >>
>

Re: [POLL] Defaults for Binary to Source Resolution

[Kai Uwe Pel]

I prefer as follow:

-  switch, enabled


Cheers,
Kai


On 1/14/2020 10:30 PM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:

Dear all,

Please tell me how the IDE shall be working, regarding
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3115

Summary: When two otherwise independent Gradle projects has declared
dependency over a released artifact through a repository, shall
sources loaded from the available released sources.jar in the
repository, or shall we try to open the source form the opened project?

Right now the Gradle plugin behaves semantically correct as it is
opening the source from the released source jar file from the local
repository cache. Creating a composite build of these projects could
help. See: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1861

However I have another implementation which does not need the include
build (as that might be side effects). My question is the following.
Shall the resolving the third party source against opened projects be
the default behavior or shall it be put behind a switch and if it is
behind the switch what shall be the default behavior.

Let me do a poll on this, so reply with the following if you care,:

- enabled
- switch, enabled
- switch, disabled


The poll will be open for at least 3 days.

Thank you!



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Re: [POLL] Defaults for Binary to Source Resolution

[Josh Juneau]

Apologies for the late vote.  I vote: switch, enabled

Thanks

Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau




On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:30 PM Laszlo Kishalmi 
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please tell me how the IDE shall be working, regarding
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3115
>
> Summary: When two otherwise independent Gradle projects has declared
> dependency over a released artifact through a repository, shall sources
> loaded from the available released sources.jar in the repository, or
> shall we try to open the source form the opened project?
>
> Right now the Gradle plugin behaves semantically correct as it is
> opening the source from the released source jar file from the local
> repository cache. Creating a composite build of these projects could
> help. See: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1861
>
> However I have another implementation which does not need the include
> build (as that might be side effects). My question is the following.
> Shall the resolving the third party source against opened projects be
> the default behavior or shall it be put behind a switch and if it is
> behind the switch what shall be the default behavior.
>
> Let me do a poll on this, so reply with the following if you care,:
>
> - enabled
> - switch, enabled
> - switch, disabled
>
>
> The poll will be open for at least 3 days.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Re: Netbeans reports coming to users@infra

[antonio]

Hi again, Geoffrey,

I think that all installations of NetBeans IDEs are sending bug reports 
to https://netbeans.org/bugzilla, with is then redirected to 
https://bz.apache.org/netbeans/ [1]

(can anyone confirm?)

I can't tell how the bugzilla database was migrated from netbeans.org to 
apache infrastructure [2] a few days back.


Maybe users still can login there with the same password? Or maybe that 
all the emails have been changed to us...@infra.apache.org, and that's 
why they're entering the users@infra mailing list?


Shall we open an INFRA JIRA ticket to find out?

Thanks,
Antonio


[1]

ide/bugzilla/src/org/netbeans/modules/bugzilla/repository/NBRepositorySupport.java 
42


[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19304

El 17/1/20 a las 20:10, antonio escribió:

Thanks, Geoffrey,

This looks like an automatically generated bug report. IIRC, once upon a 
time the IDE sent information somewhere @netbeans.org whenever it 
detected a problem. Maybe those emails are being routed to a wrong 
users@infra mailing list.


Would it be possible for you to send us the whole email headers? That 
would shed some light into the problem.


We recently migrated the old bugzilla.netbeans.org to ASF infrastructure 
[1] and maybe we have misconfigured something?


Thanks,
Antonio

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19304

El 17/1/20 a las 19:57, Geoffrey Corey escribió:
There is one right now in the moderation queue for users@infra (with 
an attached text file).


    Subject: Issue occurred
    Hello
    I apparently had a problem with NetBeans 10 which requested me to
    access the data and send it to you. It appeared to be a performance
    problem. I was running NetBeans on a Windows 10 PC. At the time I
    was debugging my JavaFX Application and was attempting to trigger a
    breakpoint in a MouseDragged Event. Certainly my PC was running
    slowly but it may have been a background Windows Update causing the
    problem. Restarting the 6 gig PC took a while.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Pete

Also attaching the log file they originally attached.

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:56 AM antonio > wrote:


    Hi Geoffrey,

    Which reports? Can you please forward us one of those?

    Thanks,
    Antonio

    El 8/1/20 a las 18:56, Geoffrey Corey escribió:
 > I've been noticing quite a few netbeans related reports coming 
into

 > the users@infra moderation queue lately.
 >
 > Anyone happen to know why they might be being sent to users@infra
 > instead of the netbeans group itself?
 >



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists