Re: ctrl-dot key combination clashes with default ibus config

[Moacir da Roza]

Look,  on Fedora with Plasma I'm using the (windows flag) key and
not CTRL.



[image: image.png]


Em qua., 12 de jun. de 2024 às 13:19, Simon IJskes - QCG 
escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> perhaps something for the website, or release notes, or other
> documentation.
>
> When running under linux, with ibus installed, the -
> keycombo conflicts with the keycombo for emojis in ibus.
>
> In order to get it working, you need to clear the "Emoji annotation"
> keyboard shortcut in "ibus-setup".
>
> I could not find this with a simple google query, is this something for
> a linux specific 'tip and tricks' ?
>
> Where do i need to file a ticket for this?
>
> Groet,
> Simon
>
> --
> create firmware without programming https://www.bendyroad.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br 

Re: ctrl-dot key combination clashes with default ibus config

[Moacir da Roza]

I think it's not a problem with netbeans, it's a relatively common problem
with ibus, that people "fix" configuring other shortcut on ibus-setup.


Em qua., 12 de jun. de 2024 às 13:19, Simon IJskes - QCG 
escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> perhaps something for the website, or release notes, or other
> documentation.
>
> When running under linux, with ibus installed, the -
> keycombo conflicts with the keycombo for emojis in ibus.
>
> In order to get it working, you need to clear the "Emoji annotation"
> keyboard shortcut in "ibus-setup".
>
> I could not find this with a simple google query, is this something for
> a linux specific 'tip and tricks' ?
>
> Where do i need to file a ticket for this?
>
> Groet,
> Simon
>
> --
> create firmware without programming https://www.bendyroad.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br 

Re: Brad Walker

[Moacir da Roza]

Hi, i followed this steps
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Step+by+step+guide+for+upload+NBM+to+Maven+Central

Em sáb., 2 de set. de 2023 às 19:36, Brad Walker 
escreveu:

> Let me provide some background on what's happening here, so that everyone
> is aware.
>
> I do embedded sw engineering for a living as well as FPGA development. I
> originally reached out to Peter because he has a Verilog plugin that I
> think would be really helpful to expand the scope of the project.
>
> In the past, I have been an active participant in cleaning up the code.
> That has slowed down recently as I have some personal issues going on.
> Nonetheless, Peter has been really proactive, kudos to him, with following
> up with me and asking how to proceed.
>
> I'm happy to mentor this project to help make this happen.
>
> So if someone could provide a list of the high-level steps needed to help
> get this plugin to become part of the portal would be really helpful for
> him and me.
>
> I'm happy to help mentor this and "guide" the work. Having Verilog support
> would be really helpful to those of use that use it as well as grow the
> project.
>
> -brad w.
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 9:39 AM Peter Cheung  wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >Mr Brad Walker contacted me months ago and we replied him, but we got
> > no reply from him. We are ok to share our plugins to Netbeans society.
> > thanks
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > >My name is Brad Walker and I work on the Netbeans project. My real job
> is
> > to work as an embedded developer. And that is why I'm sending this email.
> > >
> > >I'm in need of a good plugin for Verilog support on Netbeans. Would you
> > consider donating this to the Netbeans Foundation? I will make sure it
> gets
> > integrated and made into an >official plugin.
> > >
> > >Thanks for considering this. And if any questions, please let me know.
> > >
> > >Respectfully,
> > >
> > >Brad Walker
> >
>


-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br 

Re: NetBeans Plugin Verification - Changing Rules - suddenly not good enough anymore

[Moacir da Roza]

Ahh sorry Matthias Bläsing and Fabian Bahle.
I read again and understand.

Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 18:09, Fabian Bahle 
escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> I think Matthias Bläsing (correct me if I’m wrong) knows how to sign, but
> the question here is why do we need to sign plugins that were already
> verified for earlier NetBeans versions, what changed in NetBeans 17 that we
> need the signing now?
>
> I did get the same response for my plugins and I just signed them, but I
> was wondering why this is needed now as well.
> I thought I might missed something here and therefore just signed my
> plugins and did a new release.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Fabian
>
>
> > Am 30.01.2023 um 21:09 schrieb Moacir da Roza :
> >
> > Hi a more detailed explanation, believe they need to be signed with a key
> > included on keystore a more.
> >
> > *1-* Use java key tool on command line
> >
> > keytool -genkey -keyalg RSA -alias *my-key-alias-key* -keystore
> > *keystore.jks* -validity 365
> > Answer all question and password.
> >
> > *2-* Include on pom.xml
> >
> >org.apache.netbeans.utilities
> >nbm-maven-plugin
> >4.7
> >true
> >
> >Moacir da Roza flores-moaci...@gmail.com
> > 
> >GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
> > 3.0
> >LICENSE
> >
> > *${basedir}/keystore.jks*
> > 
> >
> > *${keypass}
> >my-key-alias-key *
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *3-  *Now build passing the password
> > *mvn -Dkeypass=password nbm:nbm*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 17:00, Moacir da Roza  >
> > escreveu:
> >
> >> I believe they need to be signed with a key included on keystore
> >>
> >> *1-* Use java key tool:
> >>
> >> keytool -genkey -keyalg RSA -alias my-key-alias-key -keystore
> keystore.jks
> >> -validity 365
> >>
> >>
> >> *2-* Include on pom.xml
> >>
> >>org.apache.netbeans.utilities
> >>nbm-maven-plugin
> >>4.7
> >>true
> >>
> >>
> >> ${netbeansInstalationPath}
> -->
> >>${basedir}/keystore.jks
> >>${keypass}
> >>my-key-alias-key
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >> Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 15:03, Matthias Bläsing
> >>  escreveu:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I asked for reverification of three plugins. These plugins:
> >>>
> >>> - PlantUML-NB
> >>> - LDIF Editor
> >>> - LDAP Explorer
> >>>
> >>> are verified for NB 11.0/12.0 till NB 16 version. Nothing was changed
> >>> on the plugins for 17 and now the plugins are not good enough anymore.
> >>> So what is going on?
> >>>
> >>> They are rejected, because they are not signed, fine, but then why is
> >>> that an issue? The signatures gain you nothing as there is no trust
> >>> anchor, we don't distribute blocked author certificates and the
> >>> download from plugin portal is protected by the checksums.
> >>>
> >>> This is bogus, so what changed and why was this not communicated? I
> >>> assume, that I was not the only one suprised by this. What is more, I'd
> >>> need to do a full release cycle without any code changes, without any
> >>> benefit.
> >>>
> >>> Greetings
> >>>
> >>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>> PS: Jiří I added you to direct CC as I'm not sure how closely you
> >>> monitor dev@
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Moacir R.F
> >> Desenvolvedor de Softwares
> >>
> >> https://www.moacirrf.com.br <http://www.moacirrf.com.br>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Moacir R.F
> > Desenvolvedor de Softwares
> >
> > https://www.moacirrf.com.br <http://www.moacirrf.com.br>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br <http://www.moacirrf.com.br>

Re: NetBeans Plugin Verification - Changing Rules - suddenly not good enough anymore

[Moacir da Roza]

 Hi a more detailed explanation, believe they need to be signed with a key
included on keystore a more.

*1-* Use java key tool on command line

keytool -genkey -keyalg RSA -alias *my-key-alias-key* -keystore
*keystore.jks* -validity 365
Answer all question and password.

*2-* Include on pom.xml

org.apache.netbeans.utilities
nbm-maven-plugin
4.7
true

Moacir da Roza flores-moaci...@gmail.com

GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
3.0
LICENSE

*${basedir}/keystore.jks*


*${keypass}
my-key-alias-key *




*3-  *Now build passing the password
*mvn -Dkeypass=password nbm:nbm*





Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 17:00, Moacir da Roza 
escreveu:

> I believe they need to be signed with a key included on keystore
>
> *1-* Use java key tool:
>
> keytool -genkey -keyalg RSA -alias my-key-alias-key -keystore keystore.jks
> -validity 365
>
>
> *2-* Include on pom.xml
> 
> org.apache.netbeans.utilities
> nbm-maven-plugin
> 4.7
> true
> 
>
> ${netbeansInstalationPath} -->
> ${basedir}/keystore.jks
> ${keypass}
> my-key-alias-key
>
> 
> 
> 
>
> Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 15:03, Matthias Bläsing
>  escreveu:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I asked for reverification of three plugins. These plugins:
>>
>> - PlantUML-NB
>> - LDIF Editor
>> - LDAP Explorer
>>
>> are verified for NB 11.0/12.0 till NB 16 version. Nothing was changed
>> on the plugins for 17 and now the plugins are not good enough anymore.
>> So what is going on?
>>
>> They are rejected, because they are not signed, fine, but then why is
>> that an issue? The signatures gain you nothing as there is no trust
>> anchor, we don't distribute blocked author certificates and the
>> download from plugin portal is protected by the checksums.
>>
>> This is bogus, so what changed and why was this not communicated? I
>> assume, that I was not the only one suprised by this. What is more, I'd
>> need to do a full release cycle without any code changes, without any
>> benefit.
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> PS: Jiří I added you to direct CC as I'm not sure how closely you
>> monitor dev@
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Moacir R.F
> Desenvolvedor de Softwares
>
> https://www.moacirrf.com.br <http://www.moacirrf.com.br>
>


-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br <http://www.moacirrf.com.br>

Re: NetBeans Plugin Verification - Changing Rules - suddenly not good enough anymore

[Moacir da Roza]

I believe they need to be signed with a key included on keystore

*1-* Use java key tool:

keytool -genkey -keyalg RSA -alias my-key-alias-key -keystore keystore.jks
-validity 365


*2-* Include on pom.xml

org.apache.netbeans.utilities
nbm-maven-plugin
4.7
true


${netbeansInstalationPath} -->
${basedir}/keystore.jks
${keypass}
my-key-alias-key





Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 15:03, Matthias Bläsing
 escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> I asked for reverification of three plugins. These plugins:
>
> - PlantUML-NB
> - LDIF Editor
> - LDAP Explorer
>
> are verified for NB 11.0/12.0 till NB 16 version. Nothing was changed
> on the plugins for 17 and now the plugins are not good enough anymore.
> So what is going on?
>
> They are rejected, because they are not signed, fine, but then why is
> that an issue? The signatures gain you nothing as there is no trust
> anchor, we don't distribute blocked author certificates and the
> download from plugin portal is protected by the checksums.
>
> This is bogus, so what changed and why was this not communicated? I
> assume, that I was not the only one suprised by this. What is more, I'd
> need to do a full release cycle without any code changes, without any
> benefit.
>
> Greetings
>
> Matthias
>
> PS: Jiří I added you to direct CC as I'm not sure how closely you
> monitor dev@
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br 

Questions about plugins and signatures

[Moacir da Roza]

Hi
1- How netbeans verify the signature of a plugin?
2- I must include digest on manifest or include the asc files inside of nbm
?
3- The individual asc files are not sufficient?

Thanks

Re: verilog plugin

[Moacir da Roza]

Nice plugin, good job.



Em qui., 29 de set. de 2022 às 06:25, Peter Cheung 
escreveu:

> i am stupid, this works textComponent.getClientProperty("text-zoom")
> 
> From: Peter Cheung 
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 5:20 PM
> To: dev@netbeans.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: verilog plugin
>
> this should work but it doesn't
>
> System.out.println("TEXT_ZOOM_PROPERTY=" +
> textComponent.getClientProperty("TEXT_ZOOM_PROPERTY"));
>
> 
> From: Peter Cheung 
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 5:14 PM
> To: dev@netbeans.apache.org 
> Subject: verilog plugin
>
> Hi
>1. I made this funny plugin can single-step the Verilog code
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPjEUe2uY8I
>2. I am using DefaultHighlighter to paint something on editor, but how
> can we get the editor zoom ratio in order to paint in correct position?
> thanks
>
>
> Thanks
>
> From Peter (System Architect, Quantr Limited https://www.quantr.hk ,
> Mobile : 96554595)
>


-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br 

Re: super confuse for years

[Moacir da Roza]

Lookups is like a bag of objects, you can have global lookups or local
lookups.
*Globals*
1-*Lookup.getDefault() *- Is default lookup in general it will have all
services that exists on META-INF/services.
2- *Utilities.actionsGlobalContext() *- In this you can have the lookup of
all that have focus on Netbeans
*Ex.:* Utilities.actionsGlobalContext().lookup(FileObject.class);
Will probably give you the file opened that have focus on Netbeans.
*Local*
All other classes that implements Lookup.Provider*. *
TopComponent.getRegistry().getActivated().getLookup(), note that this
lookup probably can have all items of the default with additional items of
the TopComponent, because the constructor of TopComponent receives a lookup.

TopComponent.getRegistry().getActivated().getLookup().lookup(FileObject.class);
Will give you same as
Utilities.actionsGlobalContext().lookup(FileObject.class);

*If I want to lookup all opened files, that mean all DataObjects. What I
should use?*

You must to find what is the default class responsible by editor, is a
TopComponent, so you must get all TopComponent Implementations and get his
lookup.

>   var list = TopComponent.getRegistry().getOpened();
>for(TopComponent item : list){
> if(item instanceof CloneableTopComponent){
>
> System.out.println(item.getLookup().lookup(FileObject.class));
> }
> }
>

Probably has other ways, but this way works.


Em ter., 27 de set. de 2022 às 01:00, Peter Cheung 
escreveu:

> Dear All
> I have been super confused by these for many years, what is the
> difference? when I use should which?
>
>
>   1.  Lookup.getDefault().lookupAll
>   2.
> DataObject.find(FileUtil.toFileObject(realFile)).getLookup().lookupAll
>   3.  Utilities.actionsGlobalContext().lookupAll
>   4.  TopComponent.getRegistry().getActivated().getLookup().lookupAll
>
> If I want to lookup all opened files, that mean all DataObjects. What I
> should use?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> From Peter (System Architect, Quantr Limited https://www.quantr.hk ,
> Mobile : 96554595)
>


-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

https://www.moacirrf.com.br 

Re: java extensions? spring?

[Moacir da Roza]

If the users are not using Spring Framework, i think you can remove:
Tools --> Libraries --> Spring Framework x.
remove from Netbeans.
and after, remove from directories.

If you want the Spring Version 5.3.20
https://repo.spring.io/ui/native/release/org/springframework/spring/5.3.20/
spring-5.3.20-dist.zip

You or the users must to know what they want, we don't know what features
your company will use.


Em qui., 25 de ago. de 2022 às 14:41, German Salazar 
escreveu:

> Sorry for my ignorance, I am not a user of netbeans, nor a java developer;
> I am just centrally installing a couple of IDEs to cater to a small user
> group..
>
> I have installed NetBeans 14 and now IT Security is complaining about some
> vulnerabilities; in particular:
>
> ./java/modules/ext/spring-3.0/spring-core-3.2.18.RELEASE.jar
> ./java/modules/ext/spring-4/spring-core-4.3.29.RELEASE.jar
> ./java/modules/ext/spring-5/spring-core-5.2.9.RELEASE.jar
>
>
> What are the contents of these spring-* subdirectories for?  Do I need all
> 3 of them?
> What feature/extension would I be taking away if I remove them?
> IT Security indicates that the patched version is
>
> spring-core-5.2.20.RELEASE.jar
>
> Where can I possibly find that?
>
> Thanks,
>


-- 
Moacir R.F
Desenvolvedor de Softwares

http://www.moacirrf.com.br

Re: Netbeans 8.2

[Moacir da Roza]

https://archive.org/details/jdk-8u111-nb-8_2

Em ter., 2 de ago. de 2022 11:52, Geertjan Wielenga
 escreveu:

> Quite some more context is needed here.
>
> And, for the free open source Apache NetBeans project, people like you are
> needed to join in and collaborate with us, in at least testing, but better
> than that, contributing code and fixes, will you and others working with
> you on that project be able to spend some time on that?
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:50 PM Marcelo Aleks 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> >   I need, for a legacy netbeans platform project, to use the old and good
> > Nb8.2, but the link to download it is not working. Do you know if I
> > can find  Nb8.2 on any mirror site?
> >
> >   Best regards, Marcelo Aleks
> >
>