Re: [DISCUSS] First Release of NiFi Registry

2017-12-08 Thread Bryan Bende
Mike,

You brought up a good point... documentation is one of the things that
still needs to be done.

There is some information that might be helpful though...

I would suggest reading this Wiki page for the feature proposal of
"Configuration Management of Flows" [1].

There is also a JIRA from a few months ago with initial mock ups for
the registry UI [2].

As part of the RC I can provide some instructions on how it can be
tested with NiFi using PR 2219.

Thanks,

Bryan

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Configuration+Management+of+Flows
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-3


On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Mike Thomsen  wrote:
> Is there a good description/detail page somewhere going over the registry?
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Pierre Villard 
> wrote:
>
>> Strong +1!!
>>
>> Really impressed by all the work you guys did on the registry stuff. Very
>> impatient to use it in official releases!
>>
>> Le 7 déc. 2017 18:52, "Jeff"  a écrit :
>>
>> Bryan,
>>
>> +1 to getting an initial release of NiFi Registry out to the community.
>> Definitely a huge step in the evolution of NiFi!
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM Russell Bateman 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Our down-stream users are excited at the prospect of using this registry
>> > capability for their flows. So, we're eager to see it integrated into
>> > the earliest NiFi version you can choose (1.5.0?).
>> >
>> > Russ
>> >
>> > On 12/07/2017 08:49 AM, Kevin Doran wrote:
>> > > Thanks for kicking off this discussion thread, Bryan.
>> > >
>> > > I support prepping a release of NiFi Registry and making it version
>> > 0.1.0 as you propose.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > > Kevin
>> > >
>> > > On 12/7/17, 10:45, "Joe Witt"  wrote:
>> > >
>> > >  Bryan - very exciting and awesome.  Having experimented with the
>> > >  registry on the JIRAs/PRs you mention I must say this is going to
>> > be a
>> > >  huge step forward for NiFi!
>> > >
>> > >  Since we'll also be doing a NiFi release soon (1.5.0?) I am happy
>> to
>> > >  volunteer to RM that as well if needed.
>> > >
>> > >  Thanks
>> > >
>> > >  On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Bryan Bende 
>> > wrote:
>> > >  > Hey folks,
>> > >  >
>> > >  > There has been a lot of great work done on the NiFi Registry [1]
>> > and I
>> > >  > think we are probably very close to an initial release focused
>> on
>> > >  > storing "versioned flows".
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Since NiFi will have a dependency on client code provided by the
>> > >  > registry, the first release of the registry would need to occur
>> > before
>> > >  > the first release of NiFi that integrates with it. The work on
>> the
>> > >  > NiFi side is being done as part of NIFI-4436, which can be
>> > followed
>> > >  > along on PR 2219 [2].
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Currently nifi-registry master is set to 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT, but I
>> > would
>> > >  > propose the first release should be 0.1.0.
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Let me know if anyone has any thoughts or comments.  I'm happy
>> to
>> > act
>> > >  > as RM if no one else is interested in doing so, and we can start
>> > the
>> > >  > process of going through JIRA to see what is left.
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Thanks,
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Bryan
>> > >  >
>> > >  > [1] https://nifi.apache.org/registry.html
>> > >  > [2] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2219
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>


Re: MiNiFi (Java) 0.3.0

2017-12-08 Thread Aldrin Piri
Scoped out the current outstanding issues and I think we are at a good
point to kick out the release.

I made a JIRA issue to track [1] and will base off
commit 4e6d28747ee009b1785dd19c981e1459d50d56c2.

If there are no objections or no other takers for RM, I'll look to get the
RC composed over the weekend.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-414

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Aldrin Piri  wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> Yes, I think we are certainly overdue and it has been on my list of items
> to get discussion around a release going.  Makes a lot of sense to me.
> I'll create a JIRA to get this in motion.
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jeff Zemerick 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious what the community thinks about a Java MiNiFi 0.3.0 release.
>> Looks like 18 tasks [1] have been closed in 0.3.0 and there are no open
>> pull requests. Is there anything outstanding that is waiting to be
>> addressed and should go into a 0.3.0?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeff
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> ctId=12319921&version=12340598
>>
>
>