Re: Contributor access request

[Matt Burgess]

Tamás,

I have added you as a contributor to the NIFI, NIFIREG, and NIFILIBS
projects. Welcome! Looking forward to your contributions.

Regards,
Matt

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:23 PM Bunth Tamás  wrote:
>
> Dear Developers,
>
> I would like to assign NIFI-7296[1] to myself, but in order to do
> that, I need contributor access to the NiFi project. Could you please
> grant me that?
>
> My username is: Wastack
>
> Thank you in advance.
> Best regards,
> Tamás Bunth
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7296

Contributor access request

[Bunth Tamás]

Dear Developers,

I would like to assign NIFI-7296[1] to myself, but in order to do
that, I need contributor access to the NiFi project. Could you please
grant me that?

My username is: Wastack

Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Tamás Bunth

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7296

Re: [discuss] 1.12.0 or 1.11.5...

[Joe Witt]

Ok thanks for the heads up Bence

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:50 AM Simon Bence 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> If the community decides to go on with 1.11.5, I kindly ask to include
> NIFI-7292 in order to fix the issue reported in NIFI-7454. Thank you!
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7454 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7454>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7292 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7292>
>
> Regards,
> Bence
>
>
> > On 2020. May 18., at 16:18, Joe Witt  wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I will be unavailable to conduct release management now for probably the
> > next week or two.  I'll come back to this thread when able to dive in.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:11 PM Joe Witt  wrote:
> >
> >> K - sounds good.  Will circle back in a few days.
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:56 PM Andy LoPresto 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for starting this thread Joe. I agree the back-pressure fix is
> one
> >>> that will help the community a lot. I am currently working on a couple
> >>> security features which would also greatly benefit users. I’d like to
> see
> >>> these get in 1.12.0 if possible, especially as there are some changes
> that
> >>> have already gone into master which I don’t think are ready to be
> released
> >>> and then required to be supported. Some are already up as PRs.
> >>>
> >>> My preferences, ranked:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Wait a few days on 1.12.0, release it with the new security features
> >>> and the back-pressure fix (along with the other 170+)
> >>> 2. Release 1.11.5 immediately for the back-pressure fix
> >>> 3. Release 1.12.0 immediately for the back-pressure fix and the
> security
> >>> features have to wait for 1.13.0
> >>>
> >>> Andy LoPresto
> >>> alopre...@apache.org
> >>> alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
> >>> He/Him
> >>> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
> >>>
>  On May 13, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Joe Witt  wrote:
> 
>  Team,
> 
>  A couple folks have recently reported slowness in the UI in the recent
>  releases particularly with larger and more production style flows.  It
>  appears to be related to when back pressure prediction is enabled [1].
> 
>  It also appears this is already fixed [2] and on 1.12.0-SNAPSHOT.
> 
>  I'd like to produce a release which captures this.  It isn't clear
> that
>  1.12 is ready to roll but happy to look into that path if so.  There
> are
>  already 177+ closed JIRAs on that thing!!
> 
>  Alternatively if easier I could kick out another on 1.11 which would
> be
>  1.11.5 and go looking opportunistically for other bits to grab as
> well.
> 
>  Any thoughts?
> 
>  [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7437
>  [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7087
> 
>  Thanks
>  Joe
> >>>
> >>>
>
>

Re: [discuss] 1.12.0 or 1.11.5...

[Simon Bence]

Hi,

If the community decides to go on with 1.11.5, I kindly ask to include 
NIFI-7292 in order to fix the issue reported in NIFI-7454. Thank you!

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7454 

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7292 


Regards,
Bence


> On 2020. May 18., at 16:18, Joe Witt  wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> I will be unavailable to conduct release management now for probably the
> next week or two.  I'll come back to this thread when able to dive in.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:11 PM Joe Witt  wrote:
> 
>> K - sounds good.  Will circle back in a few days.
>> 
>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:56 PM Andy LoPresto 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for starting this thread Joe. I agree the back-pressure fix is one
>>> that will help the community a lot. I am currently working on a couple
>>> security features which would also greatly benefit users. I’d like to see
>>> these get in 1.12.0 if possible, especially as there are some changes that
>>> have already gone into master which I don’t think are ready to be released
>>> and then required to be supported. Some are already up as PRs.
>>> 
>>> My preferences, ranked:
>>> 
>>> 1. Wait a few days on 1.12.0, release it with the new security features
>>> and the back-pressure fix (along with the other 170+)
>>> 2. Release 1.11.5 immediately for the back-pressure fix
>>> 3. Release 1.12.0 immediately for the back-pressure fix and the security
>>> features have to wait for 1.13.0
>>> 
>>> Andy LoPresto
>>> alopre...@apache.org
>>> alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
>>> He/Him
>>> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
>>> 
 On May 13, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Joe Witt  wrote:
 
 Team,
 
 A couple folks have recently reported slowness in the UI in the recent
 releases particularly with larger and more production style flows.  It
 appears to be related to when back pressure prediction is enabled [1].
 
 It also appears this is already fixed [2] and on 1.12.0-SNAPSHOT.
 
 I'd like to produce a release which captures this.  It isn't clear that
 1.12 is ready to roll but happy to look into that path if so.  There are
 already 177+ closed JIRAs on that thing!!
 
 Alternatively if easier I could kick out another on 1.11 which would be
 1.11.5 and go looking opportunistically for other bits to grab as well.
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7437
 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7087
 
 Thanks
 Joe
>>> 
>>>