Re: [discuss] 1.12.0 or 1.11.5...

[Joe Witt]

Team,

It looks like Andy and Nathan have resolved some important regressions that
came from the jetty and bouncycastle updates.  Namely it created
difficulties with the toolkit creating certs the way we like and with Jetty
understanding what to do in the event of multiple certs.  I'm going to
start forming up a 1.12.1 release to make these available so the ride for
folks on the 1.12 line is smoother.

1.12.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12348757

Thanks
Joe

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:41 PM Joe Witt  wrote:

> The build size concern was mostly incorrect.  I was looking at the result
> of a build on a java11 machine.  We have improvements we can make there but
> the reality is we've done quite a good job managing build size in this
> release  when done on a java 8 build which still works on java 8 and 11.
> So largely false alarm.
>
> I'll rekick the RC again once
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7723 lands though as this is
> good house keeping.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 8:54 AM Joe Witt  wrote:
>
>> Started the RC1 build today.  Then noticed the nifi assembly has grown
>> too large again.  Will review which nars are eligible for removal (either
>> by being new and better as optional includes or by being old and people can
>> pull them in as needed).  We added a kafka 2.6 nar which is part of it.
>> I'll see what else.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:07 AM Joe Witt  wrote:
>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> Looks like things are pretty good/stable to initiate an RC1 for 1.12.  I
>>> plan to do that today or early tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:33 PM Joe Witt  wrote:
>>>
 Hello

 Just an update on push to 1.12 release.  There have been a few items
 pop up that require resolution.  Keeping a close eye on these and will
 initiate the RC once we are looking stable.

 You can follow along and participate where appropriate by watching
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12346778

 Thanks

 On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:55 PM Joey Frazee
  wrote:

> I need to double check whether it needs rebased but there’s a docs PR
> for how to enable client TLS for ZooKeeper that I think would be good to
> include until the more integrated work is done:
>
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4092
>
> Would anyone have time to look?
>
> -joey
> On Aug 3, 2020, 11:47 AM -0700, Joe Witt , wrote:
> > ok cool. will keep an eye there once the other items land.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:26 AM Bryan Bende 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I was doing some testing and noticed some framework level classes
> like
> > > prioritizers and authorizers were getting class not found
> exceptions.
> > >
> > > I believe it is related to the module/classpath changes we made as
> part of
> > > NIFI-7592 [1], so we should hold on the RC until we can resolve
> that.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7592
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:51 PM Joe Witt 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > 7526 merged this weekend.
> > > > 7605 sounds like LoPresto is going to look at.
> > > >
> > > > There are a couple others (kafka 2.5 and smb stuff i'd like to
> get in
> > > > before I kick out the RC). Hopefully I can start that today.
> > > >
> > > > It is definitely time for 1.12!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:13 PM Mike Thomsen <
> mikerthom...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 7605 is the PR for the user agent discussion and 7526 is a
> small SSL
> > > > > refactor for the OAuth2TokenProvider that needs to be reviewed
> (as
> > > > > OAuth2TokenProvider is already part of master).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:14 PM Joe Witt 
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...ok looking like NiFi 1.12 is pretty well in hand. I plan
> early
> > > next
> > > > > > week to start pulling the release together.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 6:39 AM Pierre Villard <
> > > > > pierre.villard...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds good to me. Happy to take care of the RC duties for
> another
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > once the OIDC work is available.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le mar. 14 juil. 2020 à 21:31, Bryan Bende <
> bbe...@gmail.com> a
> > > > écrit
> > > > > :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Spoke with Nathan again and there is still more work to
> do for
> > > OIDC
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > registry.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If no one ob

Fwd: getting issue for nifi-stateless-operator

[supriya Kanawade]

Forwarded Conversation
Subject: getting issue for nifi-stateless-operator


From: supriya Kanawade 
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 17:35
To: 


Hello Team,
I am trying to use nifi-stateless-operator as mentioned here
https://github.com/B23admin/nifi-stateless-operator

 Its running successfully but while testing I am having some questions or
may  be issues[image: :slightly_smiling_face:]

   1.
   2. As per POC doc its saying flowfiles parameter is optional but its not
   allowing to run without flowflies ---
   3.
   
https://github.com/apache/nifi/tree/rel/nifi-1.10.0/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-stateless
   

   4.
   5. While running with flowflies , the flow requires input port as
   mandatory
   6. And due to lack of documents I am not able to understand how nifi fn
   is running the flow . Its giving success on container logs but I am not
   getting any confirmation from nifi UI and not from nifi container.



Note: I have posted the same issue on slack channel.
Thanks,
Supriya k