I ported Micropython to various platforms (CPU and FPGA), including
peripherals like Video output, so I can help with porting to NuttX:
See my developments:
https://github.com/suarezvictor/micropython/tree/litex-rebase/ports/litex#readme
Who else can contribute?
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:27 PM Sebastien Lorquet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure I'm going to wait24Q3 :-) I'm certainly not focussed enough :-)
>
> https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/13632
>
> Let's see what they think.
>
> The only real issue is "how to build a micropython port that links to a
> static lib" :)
>
> And maybe how to avoid duplicating mbedtls and some other libs in some
> cases... but that can wait.
>
> Sebastien
>
> Le 09/02/2024 à 18:16, Tomek CEDRO a écrit :
> > Yes exactly, I was also thinking to make MicroPython a NuttX
> > application, just like we have Python on desktop, so it builds out of
> > the box and provides generic access no matter what arch/board, no
> > hardcoded hardware specific stuff, all hardware interaction done
> > though /dev :-)
> >
> > I am switching from hardware project right now more into a software
> > development right now but I am still rushing so I will have more time
> > for that around 2024Q3 but we can create a dedicated fork repo and
> > play there when stuff is ready we can push to both upstreams..? :-)
> >
> > --
> > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 6:07 PM Sebastien Lorquet
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I found the deletion commit:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/commit/abcb66cb20d85b910d55854de51b197eaa468e8b
> >>
> >> I think it should not work like that today.
> >>
> >> Also, it looks like it does not come with micropython libraries...
> >>
> >> We should contribute anything required in micropython itself so it can
> >> be built as a kind of library, and have the absolute required minimum in
> >> nuttx-apps to allow linking with this lib.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Sebastien
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 09/02/2024 à 16:09, Tomek CEDRO a écrit :
> >>> Hey there Sebastien :-)
> >>>
> >>> NuttX is so well organized that writing bare C here is far more
> >>> efficient "rapid prototyping" so I had no more need to use MicoPython
> >>> as it turned out memory hungry for bigger applications.
> >>>
> >>> But still I am fan of Python so we could resurrect the idea :-)
> >>>
> >>> Tomek
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:04 PM Sebastien Lorquet
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I may like to have micropython work again on NuttX.
>
> Where can I find the latest efforts on this project, to try my hand
> on it?
>
> Sebastien
>
>
> Le 26/10/2021 à 04:16, Tomasz CEDRO a écrit :
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 7:45 PM Xiang Xiao wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:37 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:44 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
> MicroPython was integrated in NuttX at some time ago, but it
> started
> to crash and was removed.
> >>> Yup, I saw some websites stating it work here but I could not find
> >>> among interpreters. Thanks for the hint Alan :-)
> >>>
> I think someone started a discussion about it on discord, but I
> don't
> know what happened later.
> >>> I would prefer to keep critical discussions here on the list as
> they
> >>> are easier to find later on and may give hints to the others :-)
> Stuff
> >>> like IRC or Discord I may prefer for short term tasks :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> As I told you ESP32-C3 has a good support on NuttX and Xiaomi is
> already using it internally (it passed on their certification
> process).
> >>> Yup :-) NuttX claims full support for ESP32-C3 while Zephyr lags
> >>> behind in this area (only GPIO, UART and BLE is currently
> >>> implemented). I know that already, thanks :-)
> >>>
> >>> But my question was closely related to MicroPython and NuttX and
> SoC
> >>> driver support / architecture that is still unknown to me, sorry,
> >>> maybe this will clarify:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Is there some sort of HAL in NuttX that when driver for a SoC is
> >>> ported makes it available freely for every other functionality
> already
> >>> implemented (like in Zephyr)?
> >>>
> >> No, NuttX doesn't like HAL, but NuttX defines many device driver
> >> interfaces(from uart, i2c, spi to gpio...).
> >> All expose their functionality as device files(e.g. /dev/ttyS0,
> /dev/gpio).
> >> Other complex devices expose through:
> >>
> >> 1. File system API(e.g. block device, flash, mtd...)
> >> 2. Socket API(e.g. ethernet, WiFi, CAN...)
> > Thank you Xiao! Looks more and more like Unix on MCU :-)
> >
> >
> >>> 2. Would dedicated functionalities, like MicroPython, require
>
