Graduation?
Are we missing any major requirements to graduate to Top Level Project? If no showstoppers, how does everyone feel about starting the discuss thread at the incubator? Cheers, Nathan
Re: Graduation?
>From the license perspective we should be ready until next weekend Best regards Alin On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, 18:01 Nathan Hartman, wrote: > Are we missing any major requirements to graduate to Top Level Project? > > If no showstoppers, how does everyone feel about starting the discuss > thread at the incubator? > > Cheers, > Nathan >
Re: Graduation?
Nice! I can't get used to this strange github name: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx BTW, is there some way to let github to automatically redirect git clone repo incubator-nuttx to /nuttx after graduation? BR, Alan On 2/9/22, Alin Jerpelea wrote: > From the license perspective we should be ready until next weekend > > Best regards > Alin > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, 18:01 Nathan Hartman, wrote: > >> Are we missing any major requirements to graduate to Top Level Project? >> >> If no showstoppers, how does everyone feel about starting the discuss >> thread at the incubator? >> >> Cheers, >> Nathan >> >
Re: Graduation?
This is taken care of by infra. Major outstanding bits are around the export control stuff which is mostly just paperwork and there apache org has good documentation for. There is also some code still in the repo with restrictions on use to a single microcontroller. That have come up in votes before. --Brennan On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 9:13 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Nice! I can't get used to this strange github name: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx > > BTW, is there some way to let github to automatically redirect git > clone repo incubator-nuttx to /nuttx after graduation? > > BR, > > Alan > > On 2/9/22, Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > From the license perspective we should be ready until next weekend > > > > Best regards > > Alin > > > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, 18:01 Nathan Hartman, > wrote: > > > >> Are we missing any major requirements to graduate to Top Level Project? > >> > >> If no showstoppers, how does everyone feel about starting the discuss > >> thread at the incubator? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nathan > >> > > >
Re: Graduation?
How long does infra + paperwork take? When we are ready with everything I will start the 11.0 release cycle Best regards Alin On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, 18:30 Brennan Ashton, wrote: > This is taken care of by infra. > > Major outstanding bits are around the export control stuff which is mostly > just paperwork and there apache org has good documentation for. > > There is also some code still in the repo with restrictions on use to a > single microcontroller. That have come up in votes before. > > --Brennan > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 9:13 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis > wrote: > > > Nice! I can't get used to this strange github name: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx > > > > BTW, is there some way to let github to automatically redirect git > > clone repo incubator-nuttx to /nuttx after graduation? > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > On 2/9/22, Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > > From the license perspective we should be ready until next weekend > > > > > > Best regards > > > Alin > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, 18:01 Nathan Hartman, > > wrote: > > > > > >> Are we missing any major requirements to graduate to Top Level > Project? > > >> > > >> If no showstoppers, how does everyone feel about starting the discuss > > >> thread at the incubator? > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Nathan > > >> > > > > > >
Re: Graduation?
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 12:30 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > There is also some code still in the repo with restrictions on use to a > single microcontroller. That have come up in votes before. Can we wrap code like that with a Kconfig, e.g., ALLOW_NONFREE_CODE, like we already have for GPL and BSD components? Cheers, Nathan
Using Nuttx with the CORTEXM33 STM32U5
To whom it may concern, I am reaching out on behalf of my organization (GEOTAB) regarding kernel support for the CORTEXM33, specifically the STM32U5 MCU. We are curious if there are any plans to offer support for this chipset or if there may be an avenue for us to contribute to one if no plans exist. We thank you and look forward to your response. -- Aaron Rito Lat-Lon, a Geotab Company Embedded Engineer | BS Electrical and Computer Engineering Direct +1 (XXX) XXX- Toll-free +1 (800) 397-7102 Visit www.geotab.com
Re: Using Nuttx with the CORTEXM33 STM32U5
Hi Aaron, On Wednesday, February 9, 2022, Aaron Rito wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > I am reaching out on behalf of my organization (GEOTAB) regarding kernel > support for the CORTEXM33, specifically the STM32U5 MCU. We are curious if > there are any plans to offer support for this chipset or if there may be an > avenue for us to contribute to one if no plans exist. We thank you and look > forward to your response. > > Since it is a relatively new MCU I think nobody started porting it yet. And because ARM Cortex-M33 is already supported and probably many peripherals are same/similar from others STM32 chips, this port should be fast to do (I hope). It was a good idea to post about it here to avoid duplicated efforts and also it could encourage others with some STM32U5 board to contribute with this port. Please follow the coding style running the nxstyle or the checkpatch -f from start, this way you will avoid issues when submitting the PR. BR, Alan
Re: Using Nuttx with the CORTEXM33 STM32U5
There is good support for ARMv8-M and there are contributors using proprietary ARMv8-M parts (probably Cortex-M33???), but no support for any specific chips or boards have been contributed. On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:07 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022, Aaron Rito > wrote: > > > To whom it may concern, > > > > I am reaching out on behalf of my organization (GEOTAB) regarding kernel > > support for the CORTEXM33, specifically the STM32U5 MCU. We are curious > if > > there are any plans to offer support for this chipset or if there may be > an > > avenue for us to contribute to one if no plans exist. We thank you and > look > > forward to your response. > > > > > Since it is a relatively new MCU I think nobody started porting it yet. > > And because ARM Cortex-M33 is already supported and probably many > peripherals are same/similar from others STM32 chips, this port should be > fast to do (I hope). > > It was a good idea to post about it here to avoid duplicated efforts and > also it could encourage others with some STM32U5 board to contribute with > this port. > > Please follow the coding style running the nxstyle or the checkpatch -f > from start, this way you will avoid issues when submitting the PR. > > BR, > > Alan >
Re: Using Nuttx with the CORTEXM33 STM32U5
Here is the chip use M33: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/tree/master/arch/arm/src/rtl8720c On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:12 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > There is good support for ARMv8-M and there are contributors using > proprietary ARMv8-M parts (probably Cortex-M33???), but no support for any > specific chips or boards have been contributed. > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:07 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis > wrote: > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022, Aaron Rito > > > wrote: > > > > > To whom it may concern, > > > > > > I am reaching out on behalf of my organization (GEOTAB) regarding > kernel > > > support for the CORTEXM33, specifically the STM32U5 MCU. We are curious > > if > > > there are any plans to offer support for this chipset or if there may > be > > an > > > avenue for us to contribute to one if no plans exist. We thank you and > > look > > > forward to your response. > > > > > > > > Since it is a relatively new MCU I think nobody started porting it yet. > > > > And because ARM Cortex-M33 is already supported and probably many > > peripherals are same/similar from others STM32 chips, this port should be > > fast to do (I hope). > > > > It was a good idea to post about it here to avoid duplicated efforts and > > also it could encourage others with some STM32U5 board to contribute with > > this port. > > > > Please follow the coding style running the nxstyle or the checkpatch -f > > from start, this way you will avoid issues when submitting the PR. > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > >
