[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-981) AssetMaint Component UI Improvement.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-981. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Ashish, Adrian, Your patch is in trunk rev. 540865 Thanks > AssetMaint Component UI Improvement. > > > Key: OFBIZ-981 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-981 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: assetmaint >Reporter: Ashish Vijaywargiya > Assigned To: Jacques Le Roux > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: AssetMaint_UI_Improvement_1.patch, > AssetMaint_UI_Improvement_1.txt > > > Hi, > I am creating this JIRA Issue for the UI improvement of the AssetMaint > component. > The patch will be based on the UI improvement guidelines proposed by Adrian > Crum and discussion that has been done in between the community. > Regards > Ashish Vijaywargiya -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-981) AssetMaint Component UI Improvement.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-981: --- Oops, Ashish has asked to keep open... > AssetMaint Component UI Improvement. > > > Key: OFBIZ-981 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-981 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: assetmaint >Reporter: Ashish Vijaywargiya > Assigned To: Jacques Le Roux > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: AssetMaint_UI_Improvement_1.patch, > AssetMaint_UI_Improvement_1.txt > > > Hi, > I am creating this JIRA Issue for the UI improvement of the AssetMaint > component. > The patch will be based on the UI improvement guidelines proposed by Adrian > Crum and discussion that has been done in between the community. > Regards > Ashish Vijaywargiya -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
How to add GEO data
Dear All; I wish to contribute details about India just like GeoData_US.xml. Please let me know how to add it and what changes/addition I need to do. Thanks and Regards; Vikash Anand.
GeoData for India
Dear All; I wish to contribute details about India just like GeoData_US.xml. Please let me know how to add it and what changes/addition I need to do. Thanks and Regards; Vikash Anand.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-830) Inventory balance for orders with picklists
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498145 ] Ray Barlow commented on OFBIZ-830: -- I applied the patch to my live system when I posted here so from my perspective it is running fine and has been for 2 months. The second scenario is still an issue and I'm thinking, certainly for now, that the process of triggering a rebalancing against any open lines would be the most appropriate. 95% of the time nothing will happen as most picklists are complete orders and get picked completely so it shouldn't introduce a major overhead. But it would be good to get thoughts on this area. > Inventory balance for orders with picklists > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-830 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-830 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: product >Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Environment: N/A >Reporter: Ray Barlow > Attachments: balance_inventory.patch > > > I'll break this in to two sections: > 1) The balanceInventoryItems service checks to see if any pick lists are > associated with the order id etc to exclude them from balancing to stop them > appearing on duplicate pick list. The side effect of the current SQL > condition is that part shipped orders don't get re-balanced as inventory > changes happen. > The scenario is an order for quantity 2 comes in you have 1 QOH so the order > sets up 1 available and 1 on backorder. The customer is keen for the product > so asks you to ship the first one which you do by splitting the shipment, > creating a pick list, packing it and completing the pick list. > You then receive more stock but the existing order will not clear the > backorder flag because the SQL condition only checks for not-equals to > PICKLIST_CANCELLED, there is a chance this will work IF the inventory > reservation picks two different inventoryIds. The attached patch adds > not-equals to PICKLIST_PICKED, as this is effectively a closed status for the > pick list. I'll commit this if nobody has any objections. > 2) The second scenario really relates to the same principle but occurs in a > slightly different time line: > You receive the order for a quantity of 2 and again only 1 QOH so the > customer asks you to split ship. The order goes to picking and a pick list is > generated and the picking packing process starts in the warehouse. But, if > before it completes you receive additional stock either through expected > goods receipting or even just adjustments after a shelf recount the second > item will not come off backorder because their is an active pick list. > The order item will remain on backorder now, even after the pick list is > closed, until additional manual intervention occurs, such as using webtools > to run the balance routine (not something you want average users doing!) or > additional stock changes are made to trigger a balance. > I don't have a solution for this scenario at the moment but wanted to suggest > possibly triggering a balance event against orders when pick lists are > canceled and also when they are completed in the case were the order is being > part shipped. Or do we need to find an alternative way to stop pick lists > allocating items that are on backorder? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Invoicing is not working in trunk
I think that the issue is resolved now... my guess is that the error was
caused by the missing tag in the init order entry screen.
After I've applied the patch from Adrian Crum, it is working pretty well.
Jacopo
Chris Howe wrote:
correction, the last role should be - BILL_FROM_VENDOR
--- Chris Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I created two additional orders.
From Ecommerce - WSCO10001 -- Works correctly
From Order Entry - WSCO10002 -- Works incorrectly, partyId "Customer"
put in wrong role (BILL_TO_CUSTOMER instead of BILL_TO_VENDOR).
--- Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here is an order:
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ordermgr/control/orderview?orderId=WSCO1
Jacopo
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Yes,
just create a random order in the demo server and try to quick
ship
it.
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
That is weird... Is thos for a sales order? Generally for those
the
BILL_FROM_VENDOR is the company (pay to, ie bill from) party on
the
ProductStore.
Do you have any more details about when this is happening? Is
there an
easy way to reproduce it on the demo site or a stock
checkout/build/install?
-David
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Any ideas about what is the cause for the missing
BILL_FROM_VENDOR
role in the order?
h.. this is weird
Jacopo
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having problems to create a sales invoice from an order.
The error is a NPE at line 207 of InvoiceServices:
String billFromVendorPartyId =
orh.getBillFromParty().getString("partyId");
So the problem seems caused by the missing role in the
order...
any
suggestion of what could have caused this?
Thanks,
Jacopo
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1011) purchase order process is broken in trunk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498165 ] Thomas Herzog commented on OFBIZ-1011: -- For me its working fine. Can we close it? Thomas > purchase order process is broken in trunk > - > > Key: OFBIZ-1011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1011 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: order >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Thomas Herzog > Assigned To: Jacopo Cappellato > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: ordermgr.patch > > > When I try to create a purchase order with [Order] ->[Order Entry] > ->[Continue], the [Continue] button is not working in the PO section. As > reported by Adrian the sales order entry element is never closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1011) purchase order process is broken in trunk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-1011. Resolution: Fixed > purchase order process is broken in trunk > - > > Key: OFBIZ-1011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1011 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: order >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Thomas Herzog > Assigned To: Jacopo Cappellato > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: ordermgr.patch > > > When I try to create a purchase order with [Order] ->[Order Entry] > ->[Continue], the [Continue] button is not working in the PO section. As > reported by Adrian the sales order entry element is never closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1012) Firebird 2.0 config improvement
Firebird 2.0 config improvement --- Key: OFBIZ-1012 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1012 Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Environment: Windows / Linux Reporter: Derryck Welas Hi, I have ofbiz/trunk running with Firebird 2.0 but there are some small changes needed in the config files . can someone commit this into the trunk. 1) in file "fieldtypefirebird.xml", change sql-type for blob and very-long 2) in file "entityengine.xml", change: after these changes you should be able to run ant "run-install" without a problem. Regards, Derryck -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: GeoData for India
Vikash, Do you have data file prepared for it already? If you already have data file then It will be nice to create a Jira Issue and Attach a Patch with modifications. If you are stuck somewhere in preparation of data file then upload what ever you will like share in Zip format. It will be lot easier to help that way. Regards Anil Patel On 5/23/07, Vikash Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear All; I wish to contribute details about India just like GeoData_US.xml. Please let me know how to add it and what changes/addition I need to do. Thanks and Regards; Vikash Anand.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1013) Keyword search does not work beyond 2nd result page
Keyword search does not work beyond 2nd result page --- Key: OFBIZ-1013 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1013 Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) Issue Type: Bug Components: ecommerce Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Environment: FC 5 and Postgres 8 Reporter: Rohit Sureka Hi, I guess the keyword search does not work beyond the 2nd page. If a search query shows many results spreading over multiple pages, the search keyword is not considered beyond page 2 and all the items are shown. For eg. a search keyword throws results across 4 pages, and if you click the next page button, then the page 3 shows all products and not only those related to the keyword. Rohit -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1014) Cybersource package needs to be upgrade to support the New API Field: Request Token
Cybersource package needs to be upgrade to support the New API Field: Request Token --- Key: OFBIZ-1014 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1014 Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) Issue Type: Improvement Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Reporter: Rohit Sureka Priority: Critical Cybersource has released a New Api field 'Request Token' and has been sending emails to customers to update the software. I believe ofbiz is affected by this and support needs to be implemented for the new API token in OFBIZ. More on this update can be read at http://www.cybersource.com/support/request_token/ As per information on Cybersource the last date for implementing this is 31st May 07. Thanks Rohit -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: How to structure CMS?
Hi Al, I've been playing with Apache Xindice on and off over the past weeks and months. Depending on how you plan on storing/ structuring content, an integration there may be a better way to go. I haven't thought about content much, but representing it in an RDBMS on its surface seems troublesome. Perhaps something along storing some meta data in the database along with the contentId and leaving the structuring to the xml database may be workable. Perhaps I just have a new hammer so everything looks like a nail. On its surface it seems a better way to store xml content instead of storing it as a blob in an RDBMS. Let me know your thoughts. --- Al Byers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it would be helpful to agree on how content management should > be > used. I am thinking primarily of things like news articles, blogs, > forums, > etc. They all have a lot of similarities and if there were patterns > for > designing them, it would allow for more reuse. > > Often with website content there is content and then there is a > summary > piece that may go on a front page and then points to the main > content. In > the past I have used "SUB_CONTENT" as the > ContentAssoc.contentAssocTypeIdvalue from the publish point to the > main content. Then I associate the > summary content to the main content with a > ContentAssoc.contentAssocTypeIdvalue = "SUMMARY". But I can see that > there will be situations in which > things get more complicated, where there will be comments and surveys > attached to the main content. Also, I recently made the main content > hang on > the summary because at the time it made more sense. > > Question #1: Should ContentAssoc.contentAssocTypeId be used to link > the > other types of content to the main content (ie. "COMMENTS", > "SURVEYS", etc.) > or should ContentAssoc.contentAssocPredicateId be used (ex. > "summarizes", > "comments", etc.) and the contentAssocTypeId always be SUB_CONTENT? > > Question #2: How should multiple page content of the same article be > structured? All content associated to the publish point as main > content > with incremented ContentAssoc.sequenceNums or should they come off of > the > main content and each page extend from the preceding page? > > Question #3: Should we do away with the idea of "main content" and > make an > "article" a complex, virtual content (sort of a placeholder) off of > which > all data content hangs (main, summary, comment, etc.)? > > -Al >
Updated and Reformatted OFBiz User List Page
Hello all, We've had some new clients going live so I was updating the User List page on docs.ofbiz.org and decided it was about time to put the info there into tables and add more to the details there. I moved all of our clients from the list into the table and a couple of others, but it'll be a bit of work to move all of them so I'm writing to invite everyone to move their sites or their client's sites to the table and add details as appropriate. Part of this change is to list service providers for the sites and categorize them a little better. So, for service providers this is your chance and place to show off a bit. Here is the page: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Apache+OFBiz+User+List Also on a side note for any service providers that aren't on it already, please add your listing to the service providers page: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Apache+OFBiz+Service+Providers Thanks, and enjoy! -David
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-796) WorkEffort Application aka Project Management Application
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498467 ] Shi Yusen commented on OFBIZ-796: - Great. With Oleg's comment, this tool will be great for us. I plan to pass CMM 4 in 3 years and I need this tool to accumulate and analyse our data. Has anybody started this development? > WorkEffort Application aka Project Management Application > - > > Key: OFBIZ-796 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-796 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: workeffort >Reporter: Amit Shinde > > WorkEffort Application aka Project Management Application - > Objective - > 1.> make project planning/organization easier and intuitive, > 2.> process requests in a better way, > 3.> improve iteration planning, > 4.> include ability to integrate seamlessly with invoices/billing , > 5.> generate detailed and snappy reports, > 6.> send email/ mobile notifications. > Process - > Project Tree - > 0 - Project/s (WE) > 1 - Sub Project/s (WE) > 2 - Task/s (WE) > 3 - Sub-Task/s (WE) > 1 - Task/s (WE) - These are not assigned to any sub-project > 0 - Task/s - These are not assigned to any project > 0 - Request/s- > 1 - Request Item/s > - Projects, Sub-projects and Tasks all are WorkEfforts of a respective type. > - Request is a CustRequest and can have many Request Items. > - Time Entry can be done from any level or type of WE > - Requests and WorkEfforts have many-to-many relationship > Effort - > Most of the screens and models are already in place. We definitely dont need > any changes in the models. We need to add new screens, forms and services. > Heres a list of todos - > Create Demo data of a project - I am working on this one right now. This will > be helpful for reports. We can import this and pick any of the reports and > start implement them. > Create Reports Menu page - Adrian Crum has helped with this. > Reports - These are planned to be pdfs but to start with we can start > implementing them in HTML. > 1. Task by priority (Iteration planning), - Amit > 2 Task over time estimate, > 3. Project summary (By Supervisor / By Client), > 4. Gantt for Project, > 5. Tasks of type project, > 6. Tasks completed, times task was reopened, Avg. time taken to fix a task > , Avg. number of tasks fixed per day, - Amit > 7. WE estimate versus actual. > UI - All these screens will be in HTML. > 1. Tasks assigned to me, - Amit > 2. Tasks not assigned, dropdown/popup assign to X > 3. Tasks not scheduled > 4. Tasks past schedule > 5. Estimated schedule/ workload for me > Email notifications - > 1. Tasks assigned to me > 2. Weekly project summary > Mobile Notifications - > 1. Send SMS alert on any event. - Need to do more research. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
application module suggestion
I have a import routine for supplier info and supplier inventory it has a ftl for the import, Java file for the events, and adds to the controller, xml for menus. Currently this resided in my module. I thought that it would be a good example for future imports. as well as useful. to create the patch should I use the example or another module. Also a suggestion where the menus should show up in the module.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-796) WorkEffort Application aka Project Management Application
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498478 ] Amit Shinde commented on OFBIZ-796: --- Nothing has started yet. But I hope to get this moving pretty soon. I am going to start with creating some test data for reports and a few base screens. We can then start implementing the reports mentioned above. > WorkEffort Application aka Project Management Application > - > > Key: OFBIZ-796 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-796 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: workeffort >Reporter: Amit Shinde > > WorkEffort Application aka Project Management Application - > Objective - > 1.> make project planning/organization easier and intuitive, > 2.> process requests in a better way, > 3.> improve iteration planning, > 4.> include ability to integrate seamlessly with invoices/billing , > 5.> generate detailed and snappy reports, > 6.> send email/ mobile notifications. > Process - > Project Tree - > 0 - Project/s (WE) > 1 - Sub Project/s (WE) > 2 - Task/s (WE) > 3 - Sub-Task/s (WE) > 1 - Task/s (WE) - These are not assigned to any sub-project > 0 - Task/s - These are not assigned to any project > 0 - Request/s- > 1 - Request Item/s > - Projects, Sub-projects and Tasks all are WorkEfforts of a respective type. > - Request is a CustRequest and can have many Request Items. > - Time Entry can be done from any level or type of WE > - Requests and WorkEfforts have many-to-many relationship > Effort - > Most of the screens and models are already in place. We definitely dont need > any changes in the models. We need to add new screens, forms and services. > Heres a list of todos - > Create Demo data of a project - I am working on this one right now. This will > be helpful for reports. We can import this and pick any of the reports and > start implement them. > Create Reports Menu page - Adrian Crum has helped with this. > Reports - These are planned to be pdfs but to start with we can start > implementing them in HTML. > 1. Task by priority (Iteration planning), - Amit > 2 Task over time estimate, > 3. Project summary (By Supervisor / By Client), > 4. Gantt for Project, > 5. Tasks of type project, > 6. Tasks completed, times task was reopened, Avg. time taken to fix a task > , Avg. number of tasks fixed per day, - Amit > 7. WE estimate versus actual. > UI - All these screens will be in HTML. > 1. Tasks assigned to me, - Amit > 2. Tasks not assigned, dropdown/popup assign to X > 3. Tasks not scheduled > 4. Tasks past schedule > 5. Estimated schedule/ workload for me > Email notifications - > 1. Tasks assigned to me > 2. Weekly project summary > Mobile Notifications - > 1. Send SMS alert on any event. - Need to do more research. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-983) New Italian ofbiz site available
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-983. --- Resolution: Fixed Marco, your patch is in rev. 541175 It will be published in the next few hours. > New Italian ofbiz site available > > > Key: OFBIZ-983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-983 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: site >Reporter: Marco Risaliti > Assigned To: Jacopo Cappellato >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: site.patch > > > From some days ago is available the Italian ofbiz site (www.ofbiz.it). > This patch add the link to this web site. > Thanks > Marco Risaliti -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Ideas about editing orders
In my opinion, one of the areas in which OFBiz could be greatly improved
is the order editing process in general.
The existing services and screens are well suited for sporadic changes
to already created orders, but they are not good enough when you need
more control over what you are doing or for use cases where orders are
big and complex and they are created and edited in multiple sessions.
I see two good path we could follow (and they are not mutually exclusive):
1) improve/enhance the edit quote screens; this will mostly address the
use case of complex orders; all the work will be done in the quote and
when it is good enough it will be transformed into a real order; however
we will need to enhance many aspects of the quotes (to take into account
billing/shipping addresses, geo rules, taxes, shipping costs etc...)
2) create new screens (e.g. adding new subscreens to the view order
screen) and services to edit order items, adjustments, addresses and
contact mechs, payment preferences and payment transactions, shipment
groups and reservations, etc...
For #2, in order to have a greater control of what is happening, I think
we should find a way to disable all the services running by ecas; the
best way of doing this is probably that of using a special flag (or
status) on the order to mark it as a "work-in-progress/on hold": if the
order is in this status no eca will run; as soon as the flag/status will
be removed all the checks/ecas will be executed and all the issues will
be shown in an screen ("issues with the current order") so that the user
can fix them before releasing the order.
Does it make any sense?
Jacopo
