[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4045) Small XML handling issues
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972753#action_12972753 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4045: Fixed at r1050099+1050186, could you please confirm and close Georg? Thanks Small XML handling issues - Key: OFBIZ-4045 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: commonext/setup, framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 10.04 Environment: Windows XP, Java 1.6.0_22 Reporter: Georg Koester Assignee: Christian Geisert Priority: Minor Fix For: Release Branch 10.04 Attachments: better_xml_props_handling.patch, xml_props_problem.PNG Original Estimate: 0.5h Remaining Estimate: 0.5h Create component does not presever encoding during copy and UtilProperties.xmlToProperties does not help in discovering the problem - nothing logged. This is quite nasty, it cost me a lot of time to track it down. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3978) Ecommerce Migration
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972754#action_12972754 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3978: Someone knows the status of this issue? Ecommerce Migration --- Key: OFBIZ-3978 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3978 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Reporter: Ankit Jain Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: CheckoutProcess.patch, CheckoutProcess.patch, OFBIZ-3978_ecommerceMigration.patch, OFBIZ-3978_onePageCheckOutMigration.patch, OFBIZ-3978_onePageCheckOutMigration.patch, OFBIZ-3978_onePageCheckOutMigration.patch, OFBIZ-3978_ProductImageHoverFix.patch, OFBIZ-3978_ProductImageHoverFix.patch, popup issue.jpg, smoothness.zip All ecommerce js migration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3991) Order Manager / REQUEST /STATUS / STATUS_ID 2 ACCEPTED
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972755#action_12972755 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3991: Could you please try to reproduce on the trunk demo, and give an URL with request Id if possible. The demo is updated daily... Order Manager / REQUEST /STATUS / STATUS_ID 2 ACCEPTED -- Key: OFBIZ-3991 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3991 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: humanres, order, specialpurpose/workflow Affects Versions: Release Branch 10.04 Environment: MYSQL / OFBIZ 10.4 Reporter: patrick LE BLAN While trying to change a request to accepted in order to create a task following problem occurs The Following Errors Occurred: Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: Service invocation error (Could not commit transaction for service [updateCustRequest] call: Roll back error, could not commit transaction, was rolled back instead because of: Error in Service [sendMail]: [CON] Connection error when sending message to [ m] from [] cc [null] bcc [null] subject [OFBiz - Your Request is received: 'FORMAT_DATE' #CR10043 [To: , Cc: null, Bcc: null]]) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Marketing campaigns and contact lists
IMO the complete contactlist package should be moved away from the marketing component and put in party. The reason of this is that a contactlist could be used to notify a group of users of something appening in ANY application. This could be also considered for the framework-only installation. What do you think about? Regards, Bruno 2010/12/14 BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net Contact list can be used for many operations. with a many to many relationship then it is achieved with out extra entities. Unless you are adding other fields then there maybe a reason. the model from the data model book is to use enumeration and types to define extra info. just sharing, not against you doing it that way. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ean Schuessler sent the following on 12/13/2010 4:10 PM: MarketingCampaignContactList makes more sense to me. It seems in line with tables such as PartyContactMech or ProductStoreCatalog. On 12/13/10 10:33, BJ Freeman wrote: the appl as I understand it is a many to many interface. to my knowledge no one has discussed migration, in detail, as an (semi)automated process but I think it would be a good thread.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3990) Ui bug in Reviews Pending Approval page
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3990. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Thanks Atul, Your patch is in trunk at r1050602, R10.04 at r1050626 Ui bug in Reviews Pending Approval page --- Key: OFBIZ-3990 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3990 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: product Reporter: Atul Vani Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Minor Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk, jQuery Attachments: ReviewsPendingApprovalUiFix.patch, Screenshot.png When the product is reviewed by an un-registered user, Reviews Pending Approval page breaks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Marketing campaigns and contact lists
Sure, we could move the whole staff, after the patch is committed. Regards, Bruno 2010/12/18 Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com That is fine if you let me commit the contactlist upgrades from chattree this week...? On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 10:31 +0100, Bruno Busco wrote: IMO the complete contactlist package should be moved away from the marketing component and put in party. The reason of this is that a contactlist could be used to notify a group of users of something appening in ANY application. This could be also considered for the framework-only installation. What do you think about? Regards, Bruno 2010/12/14 BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net Contact list can be used for many operations. with a many to many relationship then it is achieved with out extra entities. Unless you are adding other fields then there maybe a reason. the model from the data model book is to use enumeration and types to define extra info. just sharing, not against you doing it that way. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ean Schuessler sent the following on 12/13/2010 4:10 PM: MarketingCampaignContactList makes more sense to me. It seems in line with tables such as PartyContactMech or ProductStoreCatalog. On 12/13/10 10:33, BJ Freeman wrote: the appl as I understand it is a many to many interface. to my knowledge no one has discussed migration, in detail, as an (semi)automated process but I think it would be a good thread. -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com http://twitter.com/hansbak%0AAntwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
Re: ofbiz help formatting
Hans: on my localhost 1.8ghz cpu the time is 152. sec( laptop has an average of 35% cpu without the ofbiz running) on my Dedicated server 3.8ghz cpu the time is 52 sec (I have 5 ofbiz instances, mail server, and many websites) on the Demo-trunk Apache server the time is 2 sec. this is for the full technical and user docs. Also the processing for help is a chapter or Section level of docbook code which is less. my guess is that help will be in milliseconds. if I create a patch would you be willing to check it out. I will be doing this for my versions. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Hans Bakker sent the following on 12/17/2010 10:19 PM: we cannot use the docbook xsl files because that is too slow and takes a lot of processing. ftl is much quicker here.so in the help files we use a limited docbook functionality Regards, Hans On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 17:40 -0800, BJ Freeman wrote: it seems that help does not use the docbooks xsl files to generated the output. if it did it would use the docbook.css. the end result is that the formatting elemments in the docbook files are not generated in the help output of the files. I would like to move to the docbook output so the top level help will see the TOC in the right pain. At this point I am not going to try to do anything with the left navigation. clip the url. select the TOC and below for a view source then open up help on any app and click on setup to see the difference view the source of the help. Opinions?
Re: Marketing campaigns and contact lists
+1 for party not sure framework needs the contactlist to operate but considering the pattern of putting things in common that is a possibility. if put in framework a text readme should include where it was put for those that may look for it in party. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Bruno Busco sent the following on 12/18/2010 1:31 AM: IMO the complete contactlist package should be moved away from the marketing component and put in party. The reason of this is that a contactlist could be used to notify a group of users of something appening in ANY application. This could be also considered for the framework-only installation. What do you think about? Regards, Bruno 2010/12/14 BJ Freemanbjf...@free-man.net Contact list can be used for many operations. with a many to many relationship then it is achieved with out extra entities. Unless you are adding other fields then there maybe a reason. the model from the data model book is to use enumeration and types to define extra info. just sharing, not against you doing it that way. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ean Schuessler sent the following on 12/13/2010 4:10 PM: MarketingCampaignContactList makes more sense to me. It seems in line with tables such as PartyContactMech or ProductStoreCatalog. On 12/13/10 10:33, BJ Freeman wrote: the appl as I understand it is a many to many interface. to my knowledge no one has discussed migration, in detail, as an (semi)automated process but I think it would be a good thread.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3990) Ui bug in Reviews Pending Approval page
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972786#action_12972786 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3990: Also in R9.04 at r1050637 Ui bug in Reviews Pending Approval page --- Key: OFBIZ-3990 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3990 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: product Reporter: Atul Vani Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Minor Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, jQuery, SVN trunk Attachments: ReviewsPendingApprovalUiFix.patch, Screenshot.png When the product is reviewed by an un-registered user, Reviews Pending Approval page breaks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Marketing campaigns and contact lists
Yes BJ, putting it in the framework instead of party was next option. This can be considered now that also Adrian is trying to split party and move some of it in common (at least I understood this was his idea). -Bruno 2010/12/18 BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net +1 for party not sure framework needs the contactlist to operate but considering the pattern of putting things in common that is a possibility. if put in framework a text readme should include where it was put for those that may look for it in party. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Bruno Busco sent the following on 12/18/2010 1:31 AM: IMO the complete contactlist package should be moved away from the marketing component and put in party. The reason of this is that a contactlist could be used to notify a group of users of something appening in ANY application. This could be also considered for the framework-only installation. What do you think about? Regards, Bruno 2010/12/14 BJ Freemanbjf...@free-man.net Contact list can be used for many operations. with a many to many relationship then it is achieved with out extra entities. Unless you are adding other fields then there maybe a reason. the model from the data model book is to use enumeration and types to define extra info. just sharing, not against you doing it that way. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Ean Schuessler sent the following on 12/13/2010 4:10 PM: MarketingCampaignContactList makes more sense to me. It seems in line with tables such as PartyContactMech or ProductStoreCatalog. On 12/13/10 10:33, BJ Freeman wrote: the appl as I understand it is a many to many interface. to my knowledge no one has discussed migration, in detail, as an (semi)automated process but I think it would be a good thread.
Re: ofbiz help formatting
sounds good. I just refrain from using my URL for the mailing list. since I know it is ok will use my server from now on. :D = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/18/2010 5:56 AM: From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net I apologize on using the URL. thought since it was fixed that it would be ok. I will use my server from now on. Thanks BJ, I just retried, last time it was 30 sec, I got it in 15 sec, this time (4GB, jdk_1.6.23). Anyway it's better to keep it at home... Jacques = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/17/2010 11:31 PM: From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com we cannot use the docbook xsl files because that is too slow and takes a lot of processing. ftl is much quicker here.so in the help files we use a limited docbook functionality Regards, Hans Yes, now that it works again, on demo trunk it takes 30 sec to perform https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML BJ: as we already spoken about that, I know you only used it as an example. For the others please don't use this link on demo, use only the Online Help (question Mark button)! Thanks Jacques PS: for users (I already sent to dev list), we have now 4GB of memory for our demo instances and I have fixed a bag locking threads bug yesterday. So you should have a better experience now. Though we still have an issue related to this bug http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916062. We use 6u22-rev(b04) which has a buggy Hot Spot, I will upgrade to 6u22-rev(b09) soon. Then we should be able to run 3 demos when needed, I mean R9.04, R10.04 and trunk... On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 17:40 -0800, BJ Freeman wrote: it seems that help does not use the docbooks xsl files to generated the output. if it did it would use the docbook.css. the end result is that the formatting elemments in the docbook files are not generated in the help output of the files. I would like to move to the docbook output so the top level help will see the TOC in the right pain. At this point I am not going to try to do anything with the left navigation. https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML#N20080 select the TOC and below for a view source then open up help on any app and click on setup to see the difference view the source of the help. Opinions? -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4062) Fix Portal Drag'n'Drop
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972790#action_12972790 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-4062: This is a minor comment but please use two spaces indentation for .ftl files and not four. Fix Portal Drag'n'Drop -- Key: OFBIZ-4062 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4062 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/myportal Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-4062_FixPortalDragnDrop.patch Hi, during the last works on the my portal module, the Drag'n'Drop functionality was lost. Here is a fix which enables the Drag'n'Drop again. Have a goody day Sascha -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Framework Independence
By clicking on the party's name in the header the user is directed to this screen: https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?partyId=admin Here there are lots of links and information related to all kind of things: orders, invoices, visits etc. In a framework-only installation this screen should only allow the user to access to its personal information, password, preferences etc. How could we get this? Could we replace this screen with a (non user-editable) PortalPage where every installed application could add their screenlets? Thank you, Bruno 2010/12/16 David E Jones d...@me.com Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the framework more (or totally) independent from the applications and specialpurpose components. The only question is the best way to do that, and it looks like as far as a general approach goes (moving minimal needed parts from application components to framework components) a fair consensus is being reached quickly. Of course, this is helped by lots of previous discussion on this topic. -David On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own frame work as I did. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 10:40 AM: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
IMO the best way to go at this point is to move the ui for the administration of user logins and permissions from the party to the webtools web application. In this way, in a framework only setup, we will have some screens to create new user accounts and administer them. I don't think that we have to provide screens addressed to users (not administrators) to manage their user preferences: the nature of this ui would be too much dependent on the nature of the custom applications that will be used with the framework. Kind regards, Jacopo On Dec 18, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: By clicking on the party's name in the header the user is directed to this screen: https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?partyId=admin Here there are lots of links and information related to all kind of things: orders, invoices, visits etc. In a framework-only installation this screen should only allow the user to access to its personal information, password, preferences etc. How could we get this? Could we replace this screen with a (non user-editable) PortalPage where every installed application could add their screenlets? Thank you, Bruno 2010/12/16 David E Jones d...@me.com Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the framework more (or totally) independent from the applications and specialpurpose components. The only question is the best way to do that, and it looks like as far as a general approach goes (moving minimal needed parts from application components to framework components) a fair consensus is being reached quickly. Of course, this is helped by lots of previous discussion on this topic. -David On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own frame work as I did. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 10:40 AM: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
I will be working on that today. -Adrian --- On Sat, 12/18/10, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: IMO the best way to go at this point is to move the ui for the administration of user logins and permissions from the party to the webtools web application. In this way, in a framework only setup, we will have some screens to create new user accounts and administer them. I don't think that we have to provide screens addressed to users (not administrators) to manage their user preferences: the nature of this ui would be too much dependent on the nature of the custom applications that will be used with the framework. Kind regards, Jacopo On Dec 18, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: By clicking on the party's name in the header the user is directed to this screen: https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?partyId=admin Here there are lots of links and information related to all kind of things: orders, invoices, visits etc. In a framework-only installation this screen should only allow the user to access to its personal information, password, preferences etc. How could we get this? Could we replace this screen with a (non user-editable) PortalPage where every installed application could add their screenlets? Thank you, Bruno 2010/12/16 David E Jones d...@me.com Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the framework more (or totally) independent from the applications and specialpurpose components. The only question is the best way to do that, and it looks like as far as a general approach goes (moving minimal needed parts from application components to framework components) a fair consensus is being reached quickly. Of course, this is helped by lots of previous discussion on this topic. -David On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own frame work as I did. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 10:40 AM: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
Great! ;-) 2010/12/18 Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com I will be working on that today. -Adrian --- On Sat, 12/18/10, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: IMO the best way to go at this point is to move the ui for the administration of user logins and permissions from the party to the webtools web application. In this way, in a framework only setup, we will have some screens to create new user accounts and administer them. I don't think that we have to provide screens addressed to users (not administrators) to manage their user preferences: the nature of this ui would be too much dependent on the nature of the custom applications that will be used with the framework. Kind regards, Jacopo On Dec 18, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: By clicking on the party's name in the header the user is directed to this screen: https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?partyId=admin Here there are lots of links and information related to all kind of things: orders, invoices, visits etc. In a framework-only installation this screen should only allow the user to access to its personal information, password, preferences etc. How could we get this? Could we replace this screen with a (non user-editable) PortalPage where every installed application could add their screenlets? Thank you, Bruno 2010/12/16 David E Jones d...@me.com Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the framework more (or totally) independent from the applications and specialpurpose components. The only question is the best way to do that, and it looks like as far as a general approach goes (moving minimal needed parts from application components to framework components) a fair consensus is being reached quickly. Of course, this is helped by lots of previous discussion on this topic. -David On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own frame work as I did. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 10:40 AM: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4065) bug in UtilIO.copy(Reader reader, boolean closeIn, Appendable out)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972820#action_12972820 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4065: --- for future this was resolved by JVm -Original Message- From: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com] Hi, After having fixed the trunk bug (no more threads running for long time). We got another hs_err_pid29490.log one hour ago. It appears that it could be a JVM 64bits issue. The symptom is near the one found here http://confluence.atlassian.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=219023686. The reason I'm inclined to think so is because the chunk of memory asked is 2GB! We are using $ java -version java version 1.6.0_22 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03, mixed mode) I only upgraded to that a week or two ago. From http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=eda2515610ea5b524779 629b4d53?bug_id=6916062 Could we try to use 6u22-rev(b09)? You could try b09 if you install it manually. Your VM is fully upto date on the apt-get system and the version you have currently is the latest one for the distribution (10.04 LTS) , so either wait for the next one or install an alternative java manually. We really need to do something. Since I fixed the issue yesterday, we got 3 same crashes, 2 for trunk, one for stable, always: # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: requested 2147483664 bytes for Chunk::new. Out of swap space? # # Internal Error (allocation.cpp:215), pid=29944, tid=140101784344320 # Error: Chunk::new Following http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916062 I will update to 6u22-rev(b09). If it does not work I will downgrade to Java 6 update 17. Why is this going to ofbiz-private ? I don't see anything sensitive here, and who knows, maybe a community member might be able to help you. Right, I just followed the previous thread Thanks Jacques Gav... Thanks Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com OK, I have fixed the (a?) trunk deadlock issue at r1050364 It came from http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1040798 in org.ofbiz.base.util.UtilIO.copy(UtilIO.java:111) To relaunch, I had to kill the trunk process because it was not responding to stopofbiz.sh. But I think we lost memory somewhere. Because we are using 3GB at all, and far less for both OFBiz running threads. I don't know how to recover this memory... There are still leaks in stable but that's less a problem for the demo, at least for now... Without the increased memory quota it would have been a bit longer to understand, thanks again! Jacques bug in UtilIO.copy(Reader reader, boolean closeIn, Appendable out) -- Key: OFBIZ-4065 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4065 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-4065_UtilIO.copy.patch If you append cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML to a local instance or the trunk demo, like (don't use it) https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML you will never get any result. It works at http://demo-trunk.businessesnetwork.com/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML (BJ's demo instance) but I don't know why (and have no ways to find it out) I'm not quite sure the attached patch is the right solution, but at least it works locally. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4045) Small XML handling issues
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972824#action_12972824 ] Christian Geisert commented on OFBIZ-4045: -- I've committed this to trunk only for now but I'll do it for the branch too. Small XML handling issues - Key: OFBIZ-4045 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: commonext/setup, framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 10.04 Environment: Windows XP, Java 1.6.0_22 Reporter: Georg Koester Assignee: Christian Geisert Priority: Minor Fix For: Release Branch 10.04 Attachments: better_xml_props_handling.patch, xml_props_problem.PNG Original Estimate: 0.5h Remaining Estimate: 0.5h Create component does not presever encoding during copy and UtilProperties.xmlToProperties does not help in discovering the problem - nothing logged. This is quite nasty, it cost me a lot of time to track it down. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4045) Small XML handling issues
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972825#action_12972825 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4045: --- thanks for your effort. I just pulled the files into an editor that set the right character set. yours is a lot better. Small XML handling issues - Key: OFBIZ-4045 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: commonext/setup, framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 10.04 Environment: Windows XP, Java 1.6.0_22 Reporter: Georg Koester Assignee: Christian Geisert Priority: Minor Fix For: Release Branch 10.04 Attachments: better_xml_props_handling.patch, xml_props_problem.PNG Original Estimate: 0.5h Remaining Estimate: 0.5h Create component does not presever encoding during copy and UtilProperties.xmlToProperties does not help in discovering the problem - nothing logged. This is quite nasty, it cost me a lot of time to track it down. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: jquey
hi, i have found a few bugs in the ecommerce app, related to jQuery...since a jira is already open for the ecommerce migration, i am not sure if i should open a new jira issue for individual bugs/errors in the ecommerce application or add them to comments of jira relation to the ecommerce migration. please advice... thanks rohit - http://www.saanjhi.com saanjhi.com -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jquey-tp3068464p3093809.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: jquey
For now you can use the Jira issue. If you feel that the bug is important and will be difficult to track mixed with others please open a new one Thanks Jacques From: rohit rohitksur...@yahoo.com hi, i have found a few bugs in the ecommerce app, related to jQuery...since a jira is already open for the ecommerce migration, i am not sure if i should open a new jira issue for individual bugs/errors in the ecommerce application or add them to comments of jira relation to the ecommerce migration. please advice... thanks rohit - http://www.saanjhi.com saanjhi.com -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jquey-tp3068464p3093809.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4045) Small XML handling issues
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972876#action_12972876 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4045: Thanks Christian, it's clear now Small XML handling issues - Key: OFBIZ-4045 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4045 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: commonext/setup, framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 10.04 Environment: Windows XP, Java 1.6.0_22 Reporter: Georg Koester Assignee: Christian Geisert Priority: Minor Fix For: Release Branch 10.04 Attachments: better_xml_props_handling.patch, xml_props_problem.PNG Original Estimate: 0.5h Remaining Estimate: 0.5h Create component does not presever encoding during copy and UtilProperties.xmlToProperties does not help in discovering the problem - nothing logged. This is quite nasty, it cost me a lot of time to track it down. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4065) bug in UtilIO.copy(Reader reader, boolean closeIn, Appendable out)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972877#action_12972877 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4065: BJ, No, it was not the same problem. # I fixed the UtilIO.copy issue as at [r1050452|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1050452view=rev] # I then discovered (I was already tracking it for few days) that we often crossed a JVM 1.6 bug, which has been fixed by -Sun- err... Oracle :( after 1.6.22_b09. On trunk we use now 1.6.23, seems to be smooth so far... bug in UtilIO.copy(Reader reader, boolean closeIn, Appendable out) -- Key: OFBIZ-4065 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4065 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-4065_UtilIO.copy.patch If you append cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML to a local instance or the trunk demo, like (don't use it) https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML you will never get any result. It works at http://demo-trunk.businessesnetwork.com/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML (BJ's demo instance) but I don't know why (and have no ways to find it out) I'm not quite sure the attached patch is the right solution, but at least it works locally. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4003) OnePageCheckout isn't displayed right
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972926#action_12972926 ] Rohit Sureka commented on OFBIZ-4003: - hi.. with the jQuery branch being merged into the trunk...the display problem has been resolved. however, 2 new issues have been identified till now, and they are: 1) the remove item link does not work in the shoppingcart panel, and 2) the cart is not updated if cart quantity is changed or promo codes are entered. Rohit OnePageCheckout isn't displayed right - Key: OFBIZ-4003 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4003 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk Environment: Ubuntu 10.10 (Firefox and Chrome) and Windows XP SP2 (Firefox, Chrome, IE7 and IE8) Reporter: David - DiSiD Technologies Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk Attachments: bugOnePageCheckout.jpg, bugOnePageCheckout_fireBug.jpg OnePageCheckout isn't displayed right when go to Step 2 of the checkout process. To repeat, go to https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org:8443/ecommerce/control/onePageCheckout (login and add an item to cart if needed) and try to go to Step 2. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3814) jQuery Implementtion - Umbrella Main Task
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972927#action_12972927 ] Rohit Sureka commented on OFBIZ-3814: - hi.. with the jQuery branch being merged into the trunk, 2 new issues have been identified in the onepagecheckout, and they are: 1) the remove item link does not work in the shoppingcart panel, and 2) the cart is not updated if cart quantity is changed or promo codes are entered. Rohit jQuery Implementtion - Umbrella Main Task - Key: OFBIZ-3814 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: ALL COMPONENTS Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES Fix For: jQuery, SVN trunk This task is to group the related sub-tasks. -We plan to replace all prototype/ dojo based javascript Code with jQuery based code.- -For this task a special development branch exists: jquery.- -It will be merged into the trunk after all problems/issue are solved.- *The jQuery branch have been merged in trunk. A beforejQuery tag has been put.* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
