Re: jira spam

[Gavin McDonald]

User disabled and spam deleted.

Thanks

Gav…

> On 14 Apr 2015, at 7:09 am, Deepak Dixit  
> wrote:
> 
> Again..
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?focusedCommentId=14493617&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14493617
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?focusedCommentId=14493620&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14493620
> 
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> —
> Deepak Dixit
> 
>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Mark Thomas  wrote:
>> 
>> On 15/03/2015 13:06, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Le 12/03/2015 13:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
 Le 24/02/2015 09:34, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Thanks Hans,
> 
> I have removed the comment.
> 
> Please infra team could you remove the top3rdjaiho Jira user? Thanks!
> 
> Jacques
> 
> Le 24/02/2015 08:44, Hans Bakker a écrit :
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?focusedCommentId=14334519&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14334519
>> 
 
 S/he (or more surely it, a bot) did it again, 1 hour ago in the same
 OFBIZ-5522.
 I guess it's a bot, because it does not make sense for a human to make
 several same comments, even for a spammer
 And last time it was also on this issue. So could be based on
 websocket word?
 
 Nobody knows about a Jira spammer bot?
 
 In any case, please infra team could you remove the ns5219139 Jira user?
 
 I will then remove the comments, in case they help investigating before
 
 Thanks!
 
 Jacques
 
>>> 
>>> Hi Infra team,
>>> 
>>> Could someone please take care of this?
>>> 
>>> Else I will simply remove the comment, et voilà (does not seem to spread)
>> 
>> User disabled and comments deleted.
>> 
>> For the benefit of infra folks that aren't aware, any one with full Jira
>> admin privs has access to this page:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/admin/cleancommentspam.jsp
>> 
>> which makes cleaning up spam nice and easy.
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
> 

Re: OFBiz and projects-new.apache.org and

[Jacques Le Roux]

Yes that should not be a problem but to the R13.07 releases

I agree we can have more categories, now the question: is that not too much?

Jacques

Le 14/04/2015 07:57, Pierre Smits a écrit :

There are more categories with only one reference, so that shouldn't be an
issue.

And yes, it can be in the Project Management category, like it can be in
the categories of:

- Accounting
- Community Management,
- Manufacturing
- Warehousing
- etc.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM *
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Ron Wheeler 
wrote:
I think that the main thing is to get into the categories that people
looking for "something like OFBiz" would look.

I suspect that if it was in the project-management category, we would get
people who are upset that they have to load up so much software to get a PM
tool.

We would be alone in Application.

Ron



On 13/04/2015 4:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:


In the doap file we currently have

 http://projects.apache.org/category/web-
framework" />
 http://projects.apache.org/category/database";
/>
 http://projects.apache.org/category/network-
server" />
 http://projects.apache.org/category/xml"; />
 http://projects.apache.org/category/http"; />
 http://projects.apache.org/category/content";
/>

So content does not show yet, I added it 3 months ago

I agree aboutbeing in "frameworks and tools" category.
I wonder if OFBiz would not be alone in an application category ;)
What about "project-management"? We have a good component.

Jacques


Le 13/04/2015 16:03, Ron Wheeler a écrit :


The category chosen for OFBiz is a bit odd.
It is in the "Database" category. https://projects-new.apache.
org/projects.html?category

"Frameworks and tools" looks like a more accurate choice given the
exiting categories.

Perhaps we could ask for a new category "Application" to be added.

The rank by number of committers looks good with OFBiz in the top 1/3 of
projects.

Ron


On 13/04/2015 3:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:


Thanks Pierre,

I will take care of that as soon as I will get a chance...

Jacques

Le 13/04/2015 08:43, Pierre Smits a écrit :


Hi all,

IIt seems that the registration of our project at
http://projects-new.apache.org is not correct as it isn't listed in
the
overview of Projects by PMC (
https://projects-new.apache.org/projects.html?pmc). The reason is
explained
below.

Could we have this fixed please?

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM *
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

-- Forwarded message --
From: Hervé BOUTEMY 
Date: Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: projects-new.apache.org
To: d...@community.apache.org


I finally found time to investigate:

this is because ofbiz is not in pmcs reference list [1] used by the
site to
create pmcs.json [2]

it seems one step was missed during OFBiz TLP creation [3]

As PMC Chair and/or member, you should be able to fix it [4]

Once done, just tell and I'll regenerate the pmcs.json file

Regards,

Hervé


[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/
trunk/projects/data_files/

[2] https://projects-new.apache.org/json/foundation/pmcs.json

[3]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/
trunk/projects/data_files/aareadme.txt

[4] http://projects.apache.org/create.html#submit

Le lundi 30 mars 2015 08:54:46 Pierre Smits a écrit :


Hi. I don't see Apache OFBiz when looking at the 'Projects by PMC'


overview.


Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM *
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY 
Now that every committer has commit privs, I continued my
improvements
(about
Attic, whimsy, categories) and added an About page:
https://projects-new.apache.org/about.html

It is pretty basic at the moment, but tells important things to
contribute.
The format is quite simple, but since it's handwritten html...

Now what remains to do before we can switch projects.a.o to
projects-new
content?
I made a list of "TbD" in the About page listing content that exists
in
previous site that should be somthing like imported IMHO

WDYT?


Notice that the Comdev PMC does not have any DOAP file, then no page
to
describe its structure. Same applies to special comittees


(Infrastructure,
Travel Assistance, Security Team, Legal Affairs and Brand Management).

Don't
you think we should list these PMCs like any other?

Regards,

Hervé






--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6218) Unit tests throw exception in DBCP

[Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14493756#comment-14493756
 ] 

Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6218:


Thanks Nicolas, indeed remains the question about the root cause. I think we 
should start a thread on dev ML, or here if people prefer?

> Unit tests throw exception in DBCP
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6218
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6218
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Adrian Crum
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6218.patch
>
>
> Details in comments.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6218) Unit tests throw exception in DBCP

[Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14493790#comment-14493790
 ] 

Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6218:


Ha forgot to say, it's successful here also (Win7)

> Unit tests throw exception in DBCP
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6218
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6218
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Adrian Crum
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6218.patch
>
>
> Details in comments.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6223) Move special purpose/jetty to attic

[Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-6223:
--

Assignee: Jacques Le Roux  (was: Pierre Smits)

> Move special purpose/jetty to attic
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6223
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6223
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Trunk
>Reporter: Pierre Smits
>Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
>  Labels: cleanup, jetty
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6223-JettyRemoval.patch, OFBIZ-6223-SVNStatus.txt
>
>
> As per outcome of http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/xoqjhbitdj5fi3bl remove 
> special purpose/jetty from the trunk branch and add a notification to the 
> attic document.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Re: Review Multi-Tenancy Setup regarding OFBIZ-5898, commit r1645310 and OFBIZ-5986

[Arun Patidar]

Hi Jacques,

I have discussed these issues with Pierre on Skype chat. It seems that 
these issues needs more discussions to come up with a proper fix. 
Currently I am not working on these issues so any one who wants to work 
and have proper fix can start on same.


Thanks & Regards
---
Arun Patidar
Manager,Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Media
www.hotwaxsystems.com

On Friday 10 April 2015 07:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

Hi Arun,

What is the situation here please? Should other people work on it or 
are you still expecting to fix it? Did I miss a Jira with the fix?


Thanks

Jacques

Le 19/03/2015 23:43, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Le 19/03/2015 23:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Hi Arun,

Sorry it was hard to follow, are there Jiras?


Ah, Pierre created them:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6065
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6066

BTW from Pierre message I guess the committer is also committed...

Jacques



For 2. Pierre Smits does not seem to agree: 
http://markmail.org/message/pjqjw4s4mzwkczvz


Did you get a chance to look at it, is it done?

Thanks

Jacques

Le 09/02/2015 21:44, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Thanks for the update Arun!

Le 09/02/2015 13:54, Arun Patidar a écrit :

A). Below are the two issues on which I will work:

 1. Domain name should not create for tenant if its left empty 
during tenant creation.

 2. Tenant component should not visible to other tenant or default.
  -- Its not related to my patch and changes but I will give a 
try to fix this issue as this should not be the case.


That's what I have remembered from the discussion

Looking forward

Jacques

Re: Review Multi-Tenancy Setup regarding OFBIZ-5898, commit r1645310 and OFBIZ-5986

[Jacques Le Roux]

Thanks for the feedback Arun.

Jacques

Le 14/04/2015 08:34, Arun Patidar a écrit :

Hi Jacques,

I have discussed these issues with Pierre on Skype chat. It seems that these issues needs more discussions to come up with a proper fix. Currently I 
am not working on these issues so any one who wants to work and have proper fix can start on same.


Thanks & Regards
---
Arun Patidar
Manager,Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Media
www.hotwaxsystems.com

On Friday 10 April 2015 07:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

Hi Arun,

What is the situation here please? Should other people work on it or are you 
still expecting to fix it? Did I miss a Jira with the fix?

Thanks

Jacques

Le 19/03/2015 23:43, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Le 19/03/2015 23:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Hi Arun,

Sorry it was hard to follow, are there Jiras?


Ah, Pierre created them:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6065
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6066

BTW from Pierre message I guess the committer is also committed...

Jacques



For 2. Pierre Smits does not seem to agree: 
http://markmail.org/message/pjqjw4s4mzwkczvz

Did you get a chance to look at it, is it done?

Thanks

Jacques

Le 09/02/2015 21:44, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Thanks for the update Arun!

Le 09/02/2015 13:54, Arun Patidar a écrit :

A). Below are the two issues on which I will work:

 1. Domain name should not create for tenant if its left empty during tenant 
creation.
 2. Tenant component should not visible to other tenant or default.
  -- Its not related to my patch and changes but I will give a try to fix 
this issue as this should not be the case.


That's what I have remembered from the discussion

Looking forward

Jacques

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5169) Removing Javolution from framework components

[Martin Becker (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14494135#comment-14494135
 ] 

Martin Becker commented on OFBIZ-5169:
--

I wonder why the LinkedList was chosen as the default replacement of FastList 
in Java code instead if an ArrayList (see comment from Jacopo Cappellato 
above). Although it could be a very complex question which implementation to 
choose respecting the concrete logic and the underlying environment, I would 
prefer to use ArrayList as default on the basis of the memory consumption and 
general performance impacts of LinkedList alone. The cases at OFBiz where the 
main benefit of faster insert/remove in the middle/beginning of a large 
LinkedList is relevant should be very rare, especially with moderate list 
sizes. The  disadvantage of ArrayList in growing over the initial capacity 
should always be encountered by specifying an appropriate initial capacity 
where possible.

See short description from oracle:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/collections/implementations/list.html

Another conspicuity: The migrated groovy scripts instead often using the 
default list implementation which is ArrayList by only using „[]“ without 
specifying LinkedList as concrete type.

> Removing Javolution from framework components
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5169
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5169
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Varun Bhansaly
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: framework-FastList-removed.patch
>
>
> a. Remove static instances of Javolution objects.
> b. Remove other uses of Javolution objects.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6252) Release branches fail to compile with JDK 1.8

[Martin Becker (JIRA)]

Martin Becker created OFBIZ-6252:


 Summary: Release branches fail to compile with JDK 1.8
 Key: OFBIZ-6252
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6252
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: framework
Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Release Branch 13.07, Release 
Branch 12.04
Reporter: Martin Becker


Due to a bug that was already fixed in trunk by Adrian C. (Jan 2015) but not in 
the current release branches (I checked 12.04, 13.07 and 14.12), the branches  
could not be compiled using JDK 1.8 because it discovers an "variable operator 
might not have been initialized" error in ModelViewController.java.

Furthermore this is also a logical bug that leads to an incomplete error 
message.

So the trivial fix should be applied to the release branches, I will attach one 
for 14.12.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6252) Release branches fail to compile with JDK 1.8

[Martin Becker (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Martin Becker updated OFBIZ-6252:
-
Attachment: ModelViewController_14-12.patch

> Release branches fail to compile with JDK 1.8
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6252
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6252
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, Release 
> Branch 14.12
>Reporter: Martin Becker
> Attachments: ModelViewController_14-12.patch
>
>
> Due to a bug that was already fixed in trunk by Adrian C. (Jan 2015) but not 
> in the current release branches (I checked 12.04, 13.07 and 14.12), the 
> branches  could not be compiled using JDK 1.8 because it discovers an 
> "variable operator might not have been initialized" error in 
> ModelViewController.java.
> Furthermore this is also a logical bug that leads to an incomplete error 
> message.
> So the trivial fix should be applied to the release branches, I will attach 
> one for 14.12.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6146) LookupInventoryItem not functional

[Christian Carlow (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14494436#comment-14494436
 ] 

Christian Carlow commented on OFBIZ-6146:
-

Hey Nicolas,

I like your simplification better.  I don't remember why I implemented it the 
original way.  Feel free to replace.

> LookupInventoryItem not functional
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6146
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: product
>Reporter: Christian Carlow
>Assignee: Nicolas Malin
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6146.patch
>
>
> LookupInventoryItem is not functional.  The dropdown results are not 
> implemented and the popup is implemented by LookupInventoryItems.ftl which 
> lacks search options leading to empty results.
> This was encountered for OFBIZ-6145 for purchase return issuance which 
> employs the lookup.
> It should be implemented based on the existing lookups which use form widgets 
> rather than FTL files.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6093) Create _NA_ party and STANDARD shipment method as seed data

[Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14494747#comment-14494747
 ] 

Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6093:


A patch would be appreciated

> Create _NA_ party and STANDARD shipment method as seed data
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6093
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Christian Carlow
>Priority: Minor
>
> Finalizing purchase orders after only loading seed data throws an error that 
> the _NA_ party and STANDARD shipment method type do not exist.  Seems that 
> data should exist after loading seed data. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)