[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6841) Remove Facilities.groovy from hhfacility as it isn't being used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6841: --- Fix Version/s: 15.12.01 14.12.01 > Remove Facilities.groovy from hhfacility as it isn't being used > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6841 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6841 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: specialpurpose/hhfacility >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Pierre Smits > Fix For: 14.12.01, 15.12.01 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6841-actions.patch > > > There are no references anywhere to Facilities.groovy in the hhfacility > component. > Deleting this from the code base decreases confusion and complexity. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7011) Failure in Payment Capture process when ERROR is returned in referenceNum in paymentGatewayResponse
Avnindra Sharma created OFBIZ-7011: -- Summary: Failure in Payment Capture process when ERROR is returned in referenceNum in paymentGatewayResponse Key: OFBIZ-7011 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7011 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: accounting Reporter: Avnindra Sharma Fix For: Trunk -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7008) Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vishal Chhabria updated OFBIZ-7008: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-7008.patch > Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Vishal Chhabria >Assignee: Mridul Pathak >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: OFBIZ-7008.patch, OFBIZ-7008.patch, SampleData.xml > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-1585) Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244150#comment-15244150 ] Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-1585: - After discussion with Jacques on chat we concluded that tests are running successfully locally, so Jacques will revert his commit 1736164 . Thanks [~jacques.le.roux] > Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout > process > > > Key: OFBIZ-1585 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce > Environment: Ubuntu 7.10, Firefox 2.0.0.11 >Reporter: Raj Saini >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-1585.patch, OFBIZ-1585.patch, > credit-card-validation.png, credit-card-validation2.png > > > If a credit card is selected as payment method and process button is pressed > without adding all mandatory fields of credit card, order will be summited > despite showing the validation error on credit card and user have no choice > of rectifying the validation errors. > Screenshot is attached showing this behavior -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-1585) Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-1585: -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux (was: Divesh Dutta) > Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout > process > > > Key: OFBIZ-1585 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce > Environment: Ubuntu 7.10, Firefox 2.0.0.11 >Reporter: Raj Saini >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-1585.patch, OFBIZ-1585.patch, > credit-card-validation.png, credit-card-validation2.png > > > If a credit card is selected as payment method and process button is pressed > without adding all mandatory fields of credit card, order will be summited > despite showing the validation error on credit card and user have no choice > of rectifying the validation errors. > Screenshot is attached showing this behavior -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5938) GlAccountOrganizations manually added using accounting forms do not appear on trial report because fromDate gets set to NULL
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244147#comment-15244147 ] Akash Jain commented on OFBIZ-5938: --- This bug will be fixed in trunk and 14.12. > GlAccountOrganizations manually added using accounting forms do not appear on > trial report because fromDate gets set to NULL > > > Key: OFBIZ-5938 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5938 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: accounting >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Christian Carlow >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-5938.patch > > > To reproduce: > 1. Manually assign a glAccount to an organization (Accounting->Global GL > Settings->Chart Of Accounts->Assign Gl Account or Accounting->Organization GL > Settings->Setup->Chart of Accounts) > 2. Perform operations that create transactions for the organizations > glAccount > 3. Run the Accounting->Organization GL Settings->Accounting->Reports->Trial > Balance > Notice that the glAccountId assigned in step 1 is not listed in the results. > This is due to TrialBalance.groovy applying a fromDate filter to > GlAccountOrganizationAndClass which is not set in step 1. Updating > glAccountOrganization fromDate to something within the trial balance range > resolves the problem. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6373) CategoryWorker.getRelatedCategoriesRet ignores recursive-flag
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6373: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > CategoryWorker.getRelatedCategoriesRet ignores recursive-flag > - > > Key: OFBIZ-6373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6373 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: product >Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Trunk, 13.07.01 >Reporter: Sebastian Leitner >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: CategoryWorker.patch > > > Some of the CategoryWorker.getRelatedCategoriesRet methods have a flag in > their signature (boolean) to switch on/off recursiveness. But they ignore > this flag and pass 'false' to further processing. > Will attach a patch in a second. > Might also affect 14.x releases as it's in trunk and 13.07.01 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5610) Labels for UK date formats
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-5610: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) > Labels for UK date formats > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-5610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5610 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Release Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Trunk >Reporter: Gareth Carter >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: gb_labels.patch > > > Date formats displayed in the title of the input field are not correctly > showing the default format for UK but the actual date itself is correct -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6738) Enhance PartyTypeAttr with a description field
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244148#comment-15244148 ] Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-6738: - I like the idea. It allows us to store additional information on dynamic attributes. > Enhance PartyTypeAttr with a description field > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6738 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6738 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: party >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Pierre Smits > Attachments: OFBIZ-6738-entitymodel.xml.patch > > > Currently the PartyTypeAttr entity doesn't have a means to store a > description for a PartyTypeAttr record. Having it enhances the user > experience. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5610) Labels for UK date formats
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-5610: - Fix Version/s: 14.12.01 > Labels for UK date formats > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-5610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5610 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Release Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Trunk >Reporter: Gareth Carter >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: gb_labels.patch > > > Date formats displayed in the title of the input field are not correctly > showing the default format for UK but the actual date itself is correct -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6310) createConditionList doesn't handle widget dropdown multi-submitted values when called by performFind
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6310: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > createConditionList doesn't handle widget dropdown multi-submitted values > when called by performFind > > > Key: OFBIZ-6310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6310 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Christian Carlow >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6310.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5938) GlAccountOrganizations manually added using accounting forms do not appear on trial report because fromDate gets set to NULL
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Akash Jain updated OFBIZ-5938: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-5938.patch I am able to recreate issue with provided steps. I have fixed this issue and attaching patch for the same. > GlAccountOrganizations manually added using accounting forms do not appear on > trial report because fromDate gets set to NULL > > > Key: OFBIZ-5938 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5938 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: accounting >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Christian Carlow >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-5938.patch > > > To reproduce: > 1. Manually assign a glAccount to an organization (Accounting->Global GL > Settings->Chart Of Accounts->Assign Gl Account or Accounting->Organization GL > Settings->Setup->Chart of Accounts) > 2. Perform operations that create transactions for the organizations > glAccount > 3. Run the Accounting->Organization GL Settings->Accounting->Reports->Trial > Balance > Notice that the glAccountId assigned in step 1 is not listed in the results. > This is due to TrialBalance.groovy applying a fromDate filter to > GlAccountOrganizationAndClass which is not set in step 1. Updating > glAccountOrganization fromDate to something within the trial balance range > resolves the problem. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6398) Print Pick Sheet PDF using orderId.pdf as attachement name.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6398: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Print Pick Sheet PDF using orderId.pdf as attachement name. > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6398 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: order >Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Deepak Dixit >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > > Print Pick Sheet PDF using .pdf as attachement name. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6238) Give the order notification email attachment the orderId as filename
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6238: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Give the order notification email attachment the orderId as filename > > > Key: OFBIZ-6238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6238 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order >Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Martin Becker >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: Trunk, 14.12.01 > > Attachments: OrderServices.patch > > > According to customer needs I've made a change to > OrderServices.sendOrderNotificationScreen to fill the attachmentName > parameter of the sendMailFromScreen context with the orderId to override the > default in sendMailFromScreen, so that the PDF attachments in standard order > notifications have a name like "WS10001.pdf" instead of "Details.pdf" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4480) Need to have an option to pass file name as OrderId for the generated confirmation or invoice PDF.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-4480: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Need to have an option to pass file name as OrderId for the generated > confirmation or invoice PDF. > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-4480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4480 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order >Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch > Environment: OS - Ubuntu >Reporter: Ganesh Bawne >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Labels: filename, order, pdf > Fix For: Trunk, 14.12.01 > > Attachments: orderPdf-FileName.patch > > > Need to have set the order pdf file name to its order number when we open the > pdf from backoffice orderdetail page > (/ordermgr/control/order.pdf?orderId=X). > Currently, the default name of the pdf is always "order.pdf", instead need to > have an option to set the default pdf name to its order number? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5679) Functionality to add WebSitePathAlias records is missing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-5679: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Functionality to add WebSitePathAlias records is missing > > > Key: OFBIZ-5679 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5679 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: content >Affects Versions: 11.04.04, 12.04.03, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Fix For: 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: addWebSitePathAlias.diff > > > On websites in Content Mgr an overview to show path aliases (WebSitePathAlias > entity) is available. > However, the functionality to add path aliases is not available in the menu > for the website. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6629) Duplicate calculation and typo in ShoppingCart.getGrandTotal()
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6629: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Duplicate calculation and typo in ShoppingCart.getGrandTotal() > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6629 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6629 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: order >Affects Versions: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, Release > Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Martin Becker >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, Trunk, > 14.12.01 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6629.patch > > > The shopping cart grand total ist calculated twice in getGrandTotal(). > In addition, the Method getOrderGlobalAdjusments() is misspelled. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6526) ordermgr/control/searchorders findOrders service returns incorrect orderCount and therefore viewSize
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6526: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > ordermgr/control/searchorders findOrders service returns incorrect orderCount > and therefore viewSize > > > Key: OFBIZ-6526 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6526 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: order >Affects Versions: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, Release > Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Christian Carlow >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Fix For: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, > Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6526.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6317) Missing BIRT libs in eclipse .classpath file
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6317: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Missing BIRT libs in eclipse .classpath file > > > Key: OFBIZ-6317 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6317 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework, specialpurpose/birt >Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Martin Becker >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6317.patch, OFBIZ-6317_14-12.patch, > OFBIZ-6317_trunk_framework-base-config.patch > > > Because of missing JARs from the specialpurpose component birt in the eclipse > .classpath file OFBiz could not be startet within eclipse without errors > (NoClassDefFoundError while starting birt component). > With "starting within eclipse" I mean the configuration with hot code > replacement like this: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Running+and+Debugging+OFBiz+in+Eclipse#RunningandDebuggingOFBizinEclipse-debuggingInEclipseHotClasses > I will provide a patch for the .classpath file with 4 added libs from the > specialpurpose/birt/lib folder. > It would be beneficial, at least for simple contribution of jira issue fixes, > if the default configuration of OFBiz from trunk is runnable as is (in a > common development scenario like the above), without the need to modify > config files which are under version control (.classpath for example). The > alternative could be to not put files under version control, that are related > to individual development environments. > By the way, it would also be nice to have the framework/base/config folder as > src in the .classpath file as described in the wiki article above, so that > the configuration of an eclipse debug/run target for starting OFBiz in > eclipse is done by only selecting the project + start-class and giving some > JVM args. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6631) Optimize ShoppingCart.removeCartItem (skip price calc and inventory check)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6631: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Optimize ShoppingCart.removeCartItem (skip price calc and inventory check) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6631 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6631 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order >Affects Versions: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, Release > Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Martin Becker >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, > Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6631-Optimized-RemoveCartItem.patch > > > Based on the standard parameter completion from the overloaded API of > ShoppingCartItem.setQuantity, the use of the ShoppingCart.removeCartItem > method leads to an unnecessary price calculation and inventory check for the > item being removed. > By using the setQuantity method with full parameter list in this case, this > can be avoided. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6621) MapContext.entrySet() slows down when ByteBuffer objects are in the context
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6621:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12)
14.12.01
> MapContext.entrySet() slows down when ByteBuffer objects are in the context
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6621
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6621
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch
>Reporter: Gareth Carter
>Assignee: Michael Brohl
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch
>
> Attachments: MapContext-v2.patch, MapContext.patch
>
>
> When MapContext is used anywhere (eg FlexibleStringExpander) and the context
> contains ByteBuffer objects (either key or value), java will slow down when
> calling MapContext.entrySet().
> Here is the code in ofbiz, highlighted is the line of code that I believe is
> the culprit
> {code:title=MapContext.java}
> public Set> entrySet() {
> // walk the stackList and the entries for each Map and if nothing is in
> for the current key, put it in
> Set resultKeySet = new HashSet();
> culprit --> Set> resultEntrySet = new
> ListSet>();
> for (Map curMap: this.stackList) {
> for (Map.Entry curEntry: curMap.entrySet()) {
> if (!resultKeySet.contains(curEntry.getKey())) {
> resultKeySet.add(curEntry.getKey());
> resultEntrySet.add(curEntry);
> }
> }
> }
> return Collections.unmodifiableSet(resultEntrySet);
> }
> {code}
> Looking at the java api for Map.Entry, the hashCode method for Map.Entry is
> the result of the hashCode from both key and value. ByteBuffer hash code is
> dependent upon its content. If a 2mb file is uploaded, the hashCode method
> of ByteBuffer will scan 2mb to generate the hashCode
> ByteBuffer
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/ByteBuffer.html#hashCode()
> {quote}Because buffer hash codes are content-dependent, it is inadvisable to
> use buffers as keys in hash maps or similar data structures unless it is
> known that their contents will not change.{quote}
> Map.Entry
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Map.Entry.html#hashCode()
> {quote}(e.getKey()==null ? 0 : e.getKey().hashCode()) ^ (e.getValue()==null
> ? 0 : e.getValue().hashCode()){quote}
> HashSet
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/HashSet.html
> {quote}This class implements the Set interface, backed by a hash table
> (actually a HashMap instance{quote}
> Example where ByteBuffer objects are created
> {code}org.ofbiz.webapp.event.ServiceEventHandler{code}
> Example stack trace
> {noformat}
> "ajp-bio-8009-exec-1894" daemon prio=10 tid=0x7fa52c07 nid=0x5c73
> runnable [0x7fa51151b000]
>java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at java.nio.HeapByteBuffer.ix(HeapByteBuffer.java:131)
> at java.nio.HeapByteBuffer.get(HeapByteBuffer.java:139)
> at java.nio.ByteBuffer.hashCode(ByteBuffer.java:1083)
> at java.util.Objects.hashCode(Objects.java:96)
> at java.util.HashMap$Entry.hashCode(HashMap.java:847)
> at java.util.AbstractMap.hashCode(AbstractMap.java:494)
> at java.util.Objects.hashCode(Objects.java:96)
> at java.util.HashMap$Entry.hashCode(HashMap.java:847)
> at java.util.HashMap.hash(HashMap.java:362)
> at java.util.HashMap.put(HashMap.java:492)
> at java.util.HashSet.add(HashSet.java:217)
> at
> org.ofbiz.base.util.collections.MapContext.entrySet(MapContext.java:306)
> at java.util.HashMap.putAll(HashMap.java:642)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.model.ModelFormField$ListOptions.addOptionValues(ModelFormField.java:2716)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.model.ModelFormField$FieldInfoWithOptions.getAllOptionValues(ModelFormField.java:1985)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.macro.MacroFormRenderer.renderDropDownField(MacroFormRenderer.java:747)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.model.ModelFormField$DropDownField.renderFieldString(ModelFormField.java:1739)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.model.ModelFormField.renderFieldString(ModelFormField.java:693)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.FormRenderer.renderSingleFormString(FormRenderer.java:1195)
> at org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.FormRenderer.render(FormRenderer.java:261)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.model.ModelScreenWidget$Form.renderWidgetString(ModelScreenWidget.java:1052)
> at
> org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.macro.MacroScreenRenderer.renderScreenletSubWidget(MacroScreenRenderer.java:677)
> at
>
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6632) Incorrect comparison in TemporalExpressionWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6632:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12)
14.12.01
> Incorrect comparison in TemporalExpressionWorker.java
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6632
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6632
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch
>Reporter: Vyom Jain
>Assignee: Michael Brohl
> Fix For: 14.12.01, 12.04.06, 13.07.03, Upcoming Branch
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6632-Fixed-exprAssocType-values.patch
>
>
> Line 128 in TemporalExpressionWorker.java does incorrect comparison
> {code}
> if ("SUBSTITUTION".equals(childExpression.get("exprAssocType"))) {
> {code} should be
> {code}
> if ("SUBSTITUTE".equals(childExpression.get("exprAssocType"))) {
> {code}
> Also documentation of field exprAssocType in entity definition of
> TemporalExpressionAssoc needs to be fixed. INCLUDED & EXCLUDED should be
> INCLUDE & EXCLUDE respectively.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6515) partymgr/control/EditPartyRelationships add odd-row="alternate-row" for ListPartRelationships and remove navigation-form-name for containing screenlet for better UI
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6515: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > partymgr/control/EditPartyRelationships add odd-row="alternate-row" for > ListPartRelationships and remove navigation-form-name for containing > screenlet for better UI > > > Key: OFBIZ-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6515 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: themes >Affects Versions: Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Christian Carlow >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6515.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6630) Update ShoppingCartItem locale if ShoppingCart locale is changed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6630: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Update ShoppingCartItem locale if ShoppingCart locale is changed > > > Key: OFBIZ-6630 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6630 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: order >Affects Versions: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, Release > Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Martin Becker >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, > Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6630-KeepCartItemLocalInSync.patch > > > If the locale of the cart is changed, for example by choosing the language in > frontend and setting the locale by CommonEvents.setSessionLocale and updating > the cart locale by keepCartUpdated event, the locale stored in each cart item > isn't updated. A call to item.getName() for example uses the wrong locale > afterwards. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7010) Shipping method is shown on all Promo Conditions when any single condition includes Shipping Method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Swapnil M Mane updated OFBIZ-7010:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-7010.patch
> Shipping method is shown on all Promo Conditions when any single condition
> includes Shipping Method
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7010
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7010
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch, Release Branch 15.12, 13.07.04
>Reporter: Swapnil M Mane
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7010.patch
>
>
> If we create any Promo condition by selecting any Shipping Method.
> Now for all the conditions, we create after this, automatically includes the
> previously selected Shipping Method.
> ___
> Reason:
> Basically, it's a UI issue, the Promo Condition created in the database are
> correct.
> In EditProductPromoRules.ftl, we assign 'carrierShippingMethod' and
> 'carrierParty' in iteration with the Promotion condition 'productPromoConds'
> {{code}}
> <#list productPromoConds as productPromoCond>
> ...
><#assign carrierShippingMethod = productPromoCond.otherValue!>
> ...
> {{code}}
> ___
> Solution:
> Before assigning the 'carrierShippingMethod' and 'carrierParty' from Promo
> Condition, reset the previously set value.
> for e.g.
> <#assign carrierShippingMethod = ""/>
> <#if otherValue?has_content && otherValue.contains("@")>
> <#assign carrierShippingMethod = productPromoCond.otherValue!>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-1585) Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244138#comment-15244138 ] Divesh Dutta edited comment on OFBIZ-1585 at 4/16/16 10:58 AM: --- [~jacques.le.roux] I ran all the tests locally and all tests were successful after applying this patch. Also there was no compile timer error. Should I commit the patch again ? was (Author: diveshdut): [~jacques.le.roux] I ran all the tests locally and all tests were successful after applying this patch. > Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout > process > > > Key: OFBIZ-1585 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce > Environment: Ubuntu 7.10, Firefox 2.0.0.11 >Reporter: Raj Saini >Assignee: Divesh Dutta >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-1585.patch, OFBIZ-1585.patch, > credit-card-validation.png, credit-card-validation2.png > > > If a credit card is selected as payment method and process button is pressed > without adding all mandatory fields of credit card, order will be summited > despite showing the validation error on credit card and user have no choice > of rectifying the validation errors. > Screenshot is attached showing this behavior -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7008) Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vishal Chhabria updated OFBIZ-7008: --- Attachment: SampleData.xml Attached sample data for promotion 'Free Shipping in Utah state'. > Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Vishal Chhabria >Assignee: Mridul Pathak >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: OFBIZ-7008.patch, SampleData.xml > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-6841) Remove Facilities.groovy from hhfacility as it isn't being used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anil K Patel closed OFBIZ-6841. --- > Remove Facilities.groovy from hhfacility as it isn't being used > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6841 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6841 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: specialpurpose/hhfacility >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Pierre Smits > Attachments: OFBIZ-6841-actions.patch > > > There are no references anywhere to Facilities.groovy in the hhfacility > component. > Deleting this from the code base decreases confusion and complexity. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7010) Shipping method is shown on all Promo Conditions when any single condition includes Shipping Method
Swapnil M Mane created OFBIZ-7010:
-
Summary: Shipping method is shown on all Promo Conditions when any
single condition includes Shipping Method
Key: OFBIZ-7010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7010
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: product
Affects Versions: Release Branch 15.12, 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch, 13.07.04
Reporter: Swapnil M Mane
Priority: Minor
If we create any Promo condition by selecting any Shipping Method.
Now for all the conditions, we create after this, automatically includes the
previously selected Shipping Method.
___
Reason:
Basically, it's a UI issue, the Promo Condition created in the database are
correct.
In EditProductPromoRules.ftl, we assign 'carrierShippingMethod' and
'carrierParty' in iteration with the Promotion condition 'productPromoConds'
{{code}}
<#list productPromoConds as productPromoCond>
...
<#assign carrierShippingMethod = productPromoCond.otherValue!>
...
{{code}}
___
Solution:
Before assigning the 'carrierShippingMethod' and 'carrierParty' from Promo
Condition, reset the previously set value.
for e.g.
<#assign carrierShippingMethod = ""/>
<#if otherValue?has_content && otherValue.contains("@")>
<#assign carrierShippingMethod = productPromoCond.otherValue!>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-7008) Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mridul Pathak reassigned OFBIZ-7008: Assignee: Mridul Pathak > Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Vishal Chhabria >Assignee: Mridul Pathak >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: OFBIZ-7008.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6953) Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and screenshot)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6953: --- Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch Description: :ERROR MESSAGE: org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. was: :ERROR MESSAGE: org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. Component/s: themes I put the concerned component (theme) and the fixed version (Upcoming branch) > Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and > screenshot) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: themes >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Supachai Chaima-ngua (Tor) >Assignee: Anil K Patel > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: TomahawkThemeCanNotGotoProfile.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > :ERROR MESSAGE: > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request > [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-1585) Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244138#comment-15244138 ] Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-1585: - [~jacques.le.roux] I ran all the tests locally and all tests were successful after applying this patch. > Credit card valdation does not work properly during anonymous quick checkout > process > > > Key: OFBIZ-1585 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1585 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce > Environment: Ubuntu 7.10, Firefox 2.0.0.11 >Reporter: Raj Saini >Assignee: Divesh Dutta >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-1585.patch, OFBIZ-1585.patch, > credit-card-validation.png, credit-card-validation2.png > > > If a credit card is selected as payment method and process button is pressed > without adding all mandatory fields of credit card, order will be summited > despite showing the validation error on credit card and user have no choice > of rectifying the validation errors. > Screenshot is attached showing this behavior -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-6900) EFT payment method in party profile can't be associated with a financial account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244018#comment-15244018 ] Rahul Singh edited comment on OFBIZ-6900 at 4/16/16 10:32 AM: -- Hi [~pfm.smits], did you get chance to look into this issue? was (Author: rahul.kushwah): Hi Pierre, did you get chance to look into this issue? > EFT payment method in party profile can't be associated with a financial > account > > > Key: OFBIZ-6900 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6900 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: accounting, party >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits > Labels: EFT, payment, payment-method > Attachments: EFTSetup.png, FinAccountSetup.png, financialAccount.png > > > In order to be able to generate payments that will be processed through an > EFT account, there must be an association between a financial account and an > EFT account. > However, this can't be set in either the appropriate accounting function > (financial account) or in the party function (set payment method). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6977) Update content type data - sql queries
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244135#comment-15244135 ] Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-6977: - Pierre, Please help us understand the possible uses of the new content type. Are we trying to save queries for reporting purpose? > Update content type data - sql queries > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6977 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: content >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Pierre Smits >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-6977-ContentTypeData.xml.patch > > > Adding a new content type for sql queries -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6896) Financial Account Transactions can't be modified
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244132#comment-15244132 ] Aditi Patidar commented on OFBIZ-6896: -- Thanks Pierre for reporting the issue. Can you please provide the steps to regenerate this issue. > Financial Account Transactions can't be modified > > > Key: OFBIZ-6896 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6896 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: accounting >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits > > When a financial transaction is incomplete, it should be possible to correct > the situation. However, this is not possible. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7009) webpos/control/passwordChange breaks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-7009:
---
Description:
To reproduce the issue. In Tomahawk theme, the party profile link of the logged
in user redirects to error page.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Change the visual theme to Tomahawk
2) Go to any application other than partymgr. For example, go to
https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/main
3) From here, click on link to logged in user profile page on top right section
Here is the error
{code}
[java] 2016-04-16 12:06:09,610 |ttp-nio-8080-exec-10 |ControlServlet
|E| Error in request handler:
[java] org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
[passwordChange]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:205)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
{code}
was:
Here is the error
{code}
[java] 2016-04-16 12:06:09,610 |ttp-nio-8080-exec-10 |ControlServlet
|E| Error in request handler:
[java] org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
[passwordChange]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:205)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
{code}
> webpos/control/passwordChange breaks
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7009
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/webpos, themes
>Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
>
> To reproduce the issue. In Tomahawk theme, the party profile link of the
> logged in user redirects to error page.
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1) Change the visual theme to Tomahawk
> 2) Go to any application other than partymgr. For example, go to
> https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/main
> 3) From here, click on link to logged in user profile page on top right
> section
> Here is the error
> {code}
> [java] 2016-04-16 12:06:09,610 |ttp-nio-8080-exec-10 |ControlServlet
>|E| Error in request handler:
> [java] org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
> [passwordChange]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
> [java] at
> org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:205)
> ~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7009) webpos/control/passwordChange breaks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244130#comment-15244130
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-7009:
This is similar to OFBIZ-6953 but in older version (only trunk was concerned by
OFBIZ-6953)
> webpos/control/passwordChange breaks
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7009
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/webpos, themes
>Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
>
> Here is the error
> {code}
> [java] 2016-04-16 12:06:09,610 |ttp-nio-8080-exec-10 |ControlServlet
>|E| Error in request handler:
> [java] org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
> [passwordChange]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
> [java] at
> org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:205)
> ~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7009) webpos/control/passwordChange breaks
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-7009:
--
Summary: webpos/control/passwordChange breaks
Key: OFBIZ-7009
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7009
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/webpos, themes
Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
Here is the error
{code}
[java] 2016-04-16 12:06:09,610 |ttp-nio-8080-exec-10 |ControlServlet
|E| Error in request handler:
[java] org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
[passwordChange]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:205)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6915) Upgrade Tomcat to 8.0.33
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244128#comment-15244128 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6915: Thanks Chatree, I'll update https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/How+to+upgrade+the+embedded+Tomcat > Upgrade Tomcat to 8.0.33 > > > Key: OFBIZ-6915 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6915 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk > Environment: Ubuntu 14.04 >Reporter: Chatree Srichart >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > Fix For: 15.12.01 > > Attachments: tomcat-8.0.32-libs.zip, tomcat-8.0.33-libs.zip, > upgrade_tomcat_to_8.0.32.patch, upgrade_tomcat_to_8.0.33.patch, > upgrade_tomcat_to_8.0.33.status > > > I am working on a library which requires Tomcat 8 but it cannot work on the > current trunk which is using Tomcat 7. Would it be possible to upgrade Tomcat > to version 8? I also provides a patch and libraries for Tomcat 8.0.32. > Migrating from 7.0.x to 8.0.x > https://tomcat.apache.org/migration-8.html > Tomcat 8 Security > https://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html > Tomcat 8 Changelog > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/changelog.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5935) Sales tax adjustments manually added to purchase orders cause creation of another adjustment undoing the first
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244124#comment-15244124 ] Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-5935: - Yes, adding sales tax make sense when you create purchase order. This is because, when you are raising a purchase order to supplier, and when that supplier will send invoice to you, he will include sales tax in that invoice. Purchase order is agreement between supplier and you and this agreement will say what items supplier will send to you at what price and along with it what will be other charges included. So it make sense that you create a purchase order and add sales tax in it to make the order total near to exact total of invoice which supplier will send to you. > Sales tax adjustments manually added to purchase orders cause creation of > another adjustment undoing the first > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-5935 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5935 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: order >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Christian Carlow >Priority: Minor > Attachments: Image 094.png > > > For example, if a sales tax adjustment of 0.20 is manually added to a > purchase order, another adjustment will be created for -0.20. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7008) Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244117#comment-15244117 ] Vishal Chhabria commented on OFBIZ-7008: Working on sample data for this feature. I will attach the sample data and provide steps to test it. > Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Vishal Chhabria >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: OFBIZ-7008.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6808) Calling Groovy as Event generates error when delegator.find used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244115#comment-15244115 ] Swapnil M Mane commented on OFBIZ-6808: --- Dear Jacopo and Jacques, thanks so much for such a detailed discussion :-) As per the suggestion above, We have created the patch for starting the transaction and committing it for the following handlers. 1.) GroovyEventHandler 2.) JavaEventHandler 3.) SimpleEventHandler For the following handlers, there is already the support of transaction 1.) ServiceEventHandle 2.) ServiceMultiEventHandler 3.) ServiceStreamHandler For the following handler, we need your thoughts, should we also provide transaction support for these handlers as well 1.) SOAPEventHandler 2.) XmlRpcEventHandler 3.) RomeEventHandler 4.) ScriptEventHandler We request you to kindly review the patch and let us know your kind feedback. > Calling Groovy as Event generates error when delegator.find used > > > Key: OFBIZ-6808 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6808 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Swapnil M Mane > Attachments: OFBIZ-6808.patch > > > We are using Groovy as event in the controller request, everything works fine > for us but as we used delegator.find() > it generates the following error > --- > ERROR: Cannot do a find that returns an EntityListIterator with no > transaction in place. Wrap this call in a transaction. > [java] java.lang.Exception: Stack Trace > [java] at > org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.find(GenericDelegator.java:1757) > [ofbiz-entity.jar:?] > [java] at org.ofbiz.entity.Delegator$find.call(Unknown Source) > [ofbiz-entity.jar:?] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:45) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:108) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > ProductInventory$_run_closure1.doCall(ProductInventory.groovy:18) [script:?] > [java] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:90) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod(ClosureMetaClass.java:272) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:909) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:423) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:439) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.DefaultGroovyMethods.each(DefaultGroovyMethods.java:1324) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.DefaultGroovyMethods.each(DefaultGroovyMethods.java:1296) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.dgm$147.invoke(Unknown Source) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite$PojoMetaMethodSiteNoUnwrapNoCoerce.invoke(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:271) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite.call(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:53) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:45) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:108) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at ProductInventory.run(ProductInventory.groovy:11) [script:?] > [java] at > org.ofbiz.webapp.event.GroovyEventHandler.invoke(GroovyEventHandler.java:107) > [ofbiz-webapp.jar:?] > [java] at >
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6808) Calling Groovy as Event generates error when delegator.find used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Swapnil M Mane updated OFBIZ-6808: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-6808.patch > Calling Groovy as Event generates error when delegator.find used > > > Key: OFBIZ-6808 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6808 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Swapnil M Mane > Attachments: OFBIZ-6808.patch > > > We are using Groovy as event in the controller request, everything works fine > for us but as we used delegator.find() > it generates the following error > --- > ERROR: Cannot do a find that returns an EntityListIterator with no > transaction in place. Wrap this call in a transaction. > [java] java.lang.Exception: Stack Trace > [java] at > org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.find(GenericDelegator.java:1757) > [ofbiz-entity.jar:?] > [java] at org.ofbiz.entity.Delegator$find.call(Unknown Source) > [ofbiz-entity.jar:?] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:45) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:108) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > ProductInventory$_run_closure1.doCall(ProductInventory.groovy:18) [script:?] > [java] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) > ~[?:1.8.0_60] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:90) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod(ClosureMetaClass.java:272) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:909) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:423) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:439) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.DefaultGroovyMethods.each(DefaultGroovyMethods.java:1324) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.DefaultGroovyMethods.each(DefaultGroovyMethods.java:1296) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.dgm$147.invoke(Unknown Source) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite$PojoMetaMethodSiteNoUnwrapNoCoerce.invoke(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:271) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite.call(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:53) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:45) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:108) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116) > [groovy-all-2.2.1.jar:2.2.1] > [java] at ProductInventory.run(ProductInventory.groovy:11) [script:?] > [java] at > org.ofbiz.webapp.event.GroovyEventHandler.invoke(GroovyEventHandler.java:107) > [ofbiz-webapp.jar:?] > [java] at > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.runEvent(RequestHandler.java:763) > [ofbiz-webapp.jar:?] > [java] at > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:476) > [ofbiz-webapp.jar:?] > [java] at > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doGet(ControlServlet.java:210) > [ofbiz-webapp.jar:?] > [java] at > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doPost(ControlServlet.java:89) > [ofbiz-webapp.jar:?] > [java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:646) > [servlet-api-3.0.jar:?] > [java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727) > [servlet-api-3.0.jar:?] > [java] at >
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-6953) Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and screenshot)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244105#comment-15244105 ] Anil K Patel edited comment on OFBIZ-6953 at 4/16/16 9:06 AM: -- Applied the patch. Thanks Supachai, Mohd. and Jacques. rev# 1739425 was (Author: anilpatel): Applied the patch. Thanks Supachai, Mohd. and Jacques. > Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and > screenshot) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Supachai Chaima-ngua (Tor) >Assignee: Anil K Patel > Attachments: TomahawkThemeCanNotGotoProfile.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > :ERROR MESSAGE: > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request > [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-6953) Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and screenshot)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anil K Patel closed OFBIZ-6953. --- > Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and > screenshot) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Supachai Chaima-ngua (Tor) >Assignee: Anil K Patel > Attachments: TomahawkThemeCanNotGotoProfile.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > :ERROR MESSAGE: > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request > [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Resolved] (OFBIZ-6953) Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and screenshot)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anil K Patel resolved OFBIZ-6953. - Resolution: Fixed Applied the patch. Thanks Supachai, Mohd. and Jacques. > Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and > screenshot) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Supachai Chaima-ngua (Tor) >Assignee: Anil K Patel > Attachments: TomahawkThemeCanNotGotoProfile.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > :ERROR MESSAGE: > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request > [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7008) Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vishal Chhabria updated OFBIZ-7008: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-7008.patch Attached patch for the feature. > Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Vishal Chhabria >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: OFBIZ-7008.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7008) Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine
Vishal Chhabria created OFBIZ-7008: -- Summary: Support to add condition for Geo Location in Promo Engine Key: OFBIZ-7008 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7008 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Vishal Chhabria Priority: Trivial -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6915) Upgrade Tomcat to 8.0.33
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244096#comment-15244096
]
Chatree Srichart commented on OFBIZ-6915:
-
I see that these classes are in tomcat-8.0.33-tomcat-util-scan.jar :
{quote}
org.apache.tomcat.util.descriptor.web.FilterDef
org.apache.tomcat.util.descriptor.web.FilterMap
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner
{quote}
so we need it.
I see that tomcat-8.0.33-tomcat-jni.jar is also needed, otherwise this
exception will be occurred :
{quote}
[java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tomcat/jni/LibraryNotFoundError
[java] at
org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector.setProtocol(Connector.java:564)
[java] at org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector.(Connector.java:66)
[java] at
org.ofbiz.catalina.container.CatalinaContainer.createConnector(CatalinaContainer.java:442)
{quote}
I see that tomcat-util.jar of Tomcat 7 is also not in extras.
https://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.65/bin/extras/
It is a default library.
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/class-loader-howto.html
also in version 8
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/class-loader-howto.html
https://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.33/bin/extras/
> Upgrade Tomcat to 8.0.33
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6915
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6915
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
> Environment: Ubuntu 14.04
>Reporter: Chatree Srichart
>Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Fix For: 15.12.01
>
> Attachments: tomcat-8.0.32-libs.zip, tomcat-8.0.33-libs.zip,
> upgrade_tomcat_to_8.0.32.patch, upgrade_tomcat_to_8.0.33.patch,
> upgrade_tomcat_to_8.0.33.status
>
>
> I am working on a library which requires Tomcat 8 but it cannot work on the
> current trunk which is using Tomcat 7. Would it be possible to upgrade Tomcat
> to version 8? I also provides a patch and libraries for Tomcat 8.0.32.
> Migrating from 7.0.x to 8.0.x
> https://tomcat.apache.org/migration-8.html
> Tomcat 8 Security
> https://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html
> Tomcat 8 Changelog
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/changelog.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6953) Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and screenshot)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244082#comment-15244082 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6953: Got it, thanks! > Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and > screenshot) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Supachai Chaima-ngua (Tor) >Assignee: Anil K Patel > Attachments: TomahawkThemeCanNotGotoProfile.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > :ERROR MESSAGE: > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request > [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
buildbot success in on ofbiz-trunk
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/566 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler scheduler named 'on-ofbiz-commit' triggered this build Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1739425 Blamelist: apatel Build succeeded! Sincerely, -The Buildbot
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6662) PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6662: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 15.12.01) > PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6662 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party >Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, Release Branch 12.04, Release > Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Forrest Rae >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Labels: patch > Fix For: 14.12.01, 13.07.04 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6662-partymgr.patch > > > When adding a PartyRelationship the value selected for SecurityGroupId is > ignored as createPartyRelationship service expects the parameter to be named > securityGroupId. The AddOtherPartyRelationship form incorrectly names the > field groupId causing the value to be missed in the set-nonpk-fields call in > applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/party/PartyServices.xml at line 821. > This bug can be traced back 7 years and 1 month to when the code was > originally committed, showing that it never worked in the first place :( > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz?cs=688484 > Repo: > 1) While adding a relationship, select something in the Security Group ID > select menu. > 2) Submit > 3) Webtools -> Entity Engine -> PartyRelationship -> Find > 4) Search for the PartyRelationship > 5) Not that the securityGroupId field is empty even though you selected one > in step 1. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6662) PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244078#comment-15244078 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6662: Thanks Michael! > PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6662 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party >Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, Release Branch 12.04, Release > Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Forrest Rae >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Labels: patch > Fix For: 14.12.01, 13.07.04 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6662-partymgr.patch > > > When adding a PartyRelationship the value selected for SecurityGroupId is > ignored as createPartyRelationship service expects the parameter to be named > securityGroupId. The AddOtherPartyRelationship form incorrectly names the > field groupId causing the value to be missed in the set-nonpk-fields call in > applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/party/PartyServices.xml at line 821. > This bug can be traced back 7 years and 1 month to when the code was > originally committed, showing that it never worked in the first place :( > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz?cs=688484 > Repo: > 1) While adding a relationship, select something in the Security Group ID > select menu. > 2) Submit > 3) Webtools -> Entity Engine -> PartyRelationship -> Find > 4) Search for the PartyRelationship > 5) Not that the securityGroupId field is empty even though you selected one > in step 1. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6662) PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244077#comment-15244077 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6662: Ooops, my bad, it was then committed in R12.04.06 but we have not here is now so I can't put it back. Not a problem since it's already released, so the release note is OK :) Also, I wonder if in this case we should put Upcoming branch or 15.12.01. Because when it was committed the R15.12 branch did not exist and the fix was only put in trunk. Actually I believe we should not put either, sorry for the mess, I slowly get used to it :D > PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6662 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party >Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, Release Branch 12.04, Release > Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Forrest Rae >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Labels: patch > Fix For: 14.12.01, 15.12.01, 13.07.04 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6662-partymgr.patch > > > When adding a PartyRelationship the value selected for SecurityGroupId is > ignored as createPartyRelationship service expects the parameter to be named > securityGroupId. The AddOtherPartyRelationship form incorrectly names the > field groupId causing the value to be missed in the set-nonpk-fields call in > applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/party/PartyServices.xml at line 821. > This bug can be traced back 7 years and 1 month to when the code was > originally committed, showing that it never worked in the first place :( > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz?cs=688484 > Repo: > 1) While adding a relationship, select something in the Security Group ID > select menu. > 2) Submit > 3) Webtools -> Entity Engine -> PartyRelationship -> Find > 4) Search for the PartyRelationship > 5) Not that the securityGroupId field is empty even though you selected one > in step 1. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6662) PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6662: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 13.07) (was: Release Branch 12.04) (was: Trunk) 13.07.04 15.12.01 Note: we no longer officially support the R12.04 branch > PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6662 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party >Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, Release Branch 12.04, Release > Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Forrest Rae >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Labels: patch > Fix For: 14.12.01, 15.12.01, 13.07.04 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6662-partymgr.patch > > > When adding a PartyRelationship the value selected for SecurityGroupId is > ignored as createPartyRelationship service expects the parameter to be named > securityGroupId. The AddOtherPartyRelationship form incorrectly names the > field groupId causing the value to be missed in the set-nonpk-fields call in > applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/party/PartyServices.xml at line 821. > This bug can be traced back 7 years and 1 month to when the code was > originally committed, showing that it never worked in the first place :( > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz?cs=688484 > Repo: > 1) While adding a relationship, select something in the Security Group ID > select menu. > 2) Submit > 3) Webtools -> Entity Engine -> PartyRelationship -> Find > 4) Search for the PartyRelationship > 5) Not that the securityGroupId field is empty even though you selected one > in step 1. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7006) Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-7006: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 13.07) 13.07.04 > Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Reporter: Rahul Bhooteshwar >Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 14.12.01, 13.07.04 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-7006-13.07.patch, OFBIZ-7006-14.12.patch, > OFBIZ-7006-trunk.patch > > > Action links under Cache Maintenance section are overlapping with each other > in Flat Grey visual theme. It is very difficult to identify if there are > three different control actions available . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7006) Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-7006: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Trunk) > Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Reporter: Rahul Bhooteshwar >Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 14.12.01, 13.07.04 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-7006-13.07.patch, OFBIZ-7006-14.12.patch, > OFBIZ-7006-trunk.patch > > > Action links under Cache Maintenance section are overlapping with each other > in Flat Grey visual theme. It is very difficult to identify if there are > three different control actions available . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-7007) POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException".
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-7007. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch Thanks Amardeep, fixed at revision 1739427. > POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException". > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/webpos >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Amardeep Singh Jhajj >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Critical > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > > WebPos login page getting error "FileNotFoundException" at latest trunk. Here > is the error: > Error rendering included template at location > [component://webpos/template/Login.ftl]: java.io.FileNotFoundException: -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7007) POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException".
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-7007: --- Description: WebPos login page getting error "FileNotFoundException" at latest trunk. Here is the error: Error rendering included template at location [component://webpos/template/Login.ftl]: java.io.FileNotFoundException: was: POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException" at latest trunk. Here is the error: Error rendering included template at location [component://webpos/template/Login.ftl]: java.io.FileNotFoundException: Component/s: (was: specialpurpose/pos) specialpurpose/webpos Hi Amardeep, Thanks, it's not related to the POS component but the WebPos one > POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException". > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/webpos >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Amardeep Singh Jhajj >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Critical > > WebPos login page getting error "FileNotFoundException" at latest trunk. Here > is the error: > Error rendering included template at location > [component://webpos/template/Login.ftl]: java.io.FileNotFoundException: -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7007) POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException".
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amardeep Singh Jhajj updated OFBIZ-7007: Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException". > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/pos >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Amardeep Singh Jhajj >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Critical > > POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException" at latest trunk. Here is > the error: > Error rendering included template at location > [component://webpos/template/Login.ftl]: java.io.FileNotFoundException: -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7007) POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException".
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244066#comment-15244066 ] Amardeep Singh Jhajj commented on OFBIZ-7007: - Hi Jaques, This issue is due to the change done in r1736869. "Login.ftl" was not moved but its reference was changed in "specialpurpose/webpos/widget/CommonScreens.xml ". I found one more file which was not moved "RequirePasswordChange.ftl". Please have a look on it. Thanks. > POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException". > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/pos >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Amardeep Singh Jhajj >Priority: Critical > > POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException" at latest trunk. Here is > the error: > Error rendering included template at location > [component://webpos/template/Login.ftl]: java.io.FileNotFoundException: -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7007) POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException".
Amardeep Singh Jhajj created OFBIZ-7007: --- Summary: POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException". Key: OFBIZ-7007 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7007 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: specialpurpose/pos Affects Versions: Trunk Reporter: Amardeep Singh Jhajj Priority: Critical POS login page getting error "FileNotFoundException" at latest trunk. Here is the error: Error rendering included template at location [component://webpos/template/Login.ftl]: java.io.FileNotFoundException: -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6953) Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and screenshot)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anil K Patel reassigned OFBIZ-6953: --- Assignee: Anil K Patel > Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and > screenshot) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Supachai Chaima-ngua (Tor) >Assignee: Anil K Patel > Attachments: TomahawkThemeCanNotGotoProfile.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > :ERROR MESSAGE: > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request > [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6662) PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6662: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6662 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party >Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, Release Branch 12.04, Release > Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Forrest Rae >Assignee: Michael Brohl > Labels: patch > Fix For: Release Branch 12.04, Release Branch 13.07, Trunk, > 14.12.01 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6662-partymgr.patch > > > When adding a PartyRelationship the value selected for SecurityGroupId is > ignored as createPartyRelationship service expects the parameter to be named > securityGroupId. The AddOtherPartyRelationship form incorrectly names the > field groupId causing the value to be missed in the set-nonpk-fields call in > applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/party/PartyServices.xml at line 821. > This bug can be traced back 7 years and 1 month to when the code was > originally committed, showing that it never worked in the first place :( > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz?cs=688484 > Repo: > 1) While adding a relationship, select something in the Security Group ID > select menu. > 2) Submit > 3) Webtools -> Entity Engine -> PartyRelationship -> Find > 4) Search for the PartyRelationship > 5) Not that the securityGroupId field is empty even though you selected one > in step 1. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7006) Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-7006: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Reporter: Rahul Bhooteshwar >Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, Trunk, 14.12.01 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-7006-13.07.patch, OFBIZ-7006-14.12.patch, > OFBIZ-7006-trunk.patch > > > Action links under Cache Maintenance section are overlapping with each other > in Flat Grey visual theme. It is very difficult to identify if there are > three different control actions available . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6635) Old UserLogin from userLoginId-change is not correctly disabled
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6635: - Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 14.12) 14.12.01 > Old UserLogin from userLoginId-change is not correctly disabled > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6635 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6635 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Release Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Upcoming > Branch >Reporter: Martin Becker >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Critical > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6635-FixedDisablingOldUserLogin.patch > > > If a userLoginId of an existing user is updated by > LoginServices.updateUserLoginId, a new UserLogin value is created with the > data of the old one and the old one is disabled afterwards. In addition to > switch the enabled flag to "N" the disabledDateTime is set to current date. > This is wrong because this makes it possible to reenable the old UserLogin by > just do a login with the old userLoginId (standard mechanism to lock the > login for a while after subsequent failed login requests). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6953) Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and screenshot)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244048#comment-15244048 ] Mohammad Kathawala commented on OFBIZ-6953: --- I think the patch provided is correct. I was able to reproduce the issue. In Tomahawk theme, the party profile link of the logged in user redirects to error page. Steps to reproduce: 1) Change the visual theme to Tomahawk 2) Go to any application other than partymgr. For example, go to [https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/main] 3) From here, click on link to logged in user profile page on top right section > Can not go to "viewprofile" if you is on webtools (see description and > screenshot) > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6953 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Supachai Chaima-ngua (Tor) > Attachments: TomahawkThemeCanNotGotoProfile.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > :ERROR MESSAGE: > org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request > [viewprofile]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-7006) Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-7006: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya > Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Reporter: Rahul Bhooteshwar >Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-7006-13.07.patch, OFBIZ-7006-14.12.patch, > OFBIZ-7006-trunk.patch > > > Action links under Cache Maintenance section are overlapping with each other > in Flat Grey visual theme. It is very difficult to identify if there are > three different control actions available . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7006) Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244035#comment-15244035 ] Rahul Bhooteshwar commented on OFBIZ-7006: -- We can simply use CommonTabBarMenu for the better visibility of the actions. > Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Reporter: Rahul Bhooteshwar >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Release Branch 13.07, Release Branch 14.12, Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-7006-13.07.patch, OFBIZ-7006-14.12.patch, > OFBIZ-7006-trunk.patch > > > Action links under Cache Maintenance section are overlapping with each other > in Flat Grey visual theme. It is very difficult to identify if there are > three different control actions available . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
