Re: Community over code 2024, Bratislava
Hi Gil, it's a great opportunity to meet! I confirm that my colleague Giulio and I will be present. See you soon. Nicola On 22/03/24 11:20, gil.portenseigne wrote: Hello everyone, Some people from Nereide Team are planning to attend the Community Over Code Europe Event in Bratislava this summer. We would love to see members of Apache OFBiz community there and would like to know if any of you are also planning to come. It would be great to plan something to get to know more each other and better build our community, we could discuss some specific subjects, like OFBiz modularity (Eugen contribution) or others current subjects. It seems to me that Nicola Mazzoni [1] had already express his wish to go and would be happy to see more participants familiar with OFBiz Looking forward reading you, Regards, Gil [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/pfkks77tb91kwy4wyox8lq99so82wb10
Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.07
+1 On 06/04/23 12:01, Aditya Sharma wrote: +1 Thanks and regards, Aditya Sharma On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:18 PM Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.07", seventh and probably final release from the release18.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-18.12.07.zip * KEYS: text file with keys * apache-ofbiz-18.12.07.zip.asc: the detached signature file * apache-ofbiz-18.12.07.zip.sha512: checksum file Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). Vote: [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 18.12.07 [ -1] do not release This vote is open for at least 5 days. For more details about this process please refer to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -- *Nicola Mazzoni* | /CEO/CTO/ Mobile: +39 347 990 5529 *Mp Style srl* Via Meucci, 37 | 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) p.i / c.f IT03679300362
Re: OFBiz re-architecture thoughts
Hi Taher, From my experience I have chosen OFBiz because the only "coherent" framework with a data model and related services. Completely different from all frameworks that are architectural only but remain an "empty box" for building applications from scratch. I think there are many developers who need a business application framework (with an underlying data model) but they don't come close to OFBiz, I think because of the complexity and being, paradoxically, too complete. For example, the zip distribution already suggests an "all or nothing" use. Perhaps these things do not bring new potential users of OFBiz closer. I think that an OOP logic is perfectly compatible with the entity and service engines, xml-dsl etc etc; indeed, they can be used as a basis to create a higher level of abstraction, which through OOP makes it more accessible. With this I don't think of "changing" OFBiz for what it is, for the backward compatibility and for the solidity of the solutions based on OFBiz. It could be interesting, if there are interested community members, to try a different path, with the solid foundations of OFBiz but on a different paradigm. I don't know if this POC could be interesting enough to become a sub-project or it could simply remain a POC; but if anyone is interested it would be interesting to try! Regards, Nicola On 03/04/22 19:12, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: Hi Nicola, Thank you for sharing your thoughts. It's good to have a practical perspective. If we try to maybe list what OFBiz offers as highest value (guessing on behalf of folks) I would think it would include: - The entity and service engines with their APIs - The data model represented by entities - The services that serve the data model - The XML DSL that abstracts away the underlying technologies (widgets, actions, entities, etc ...) So OFBiz in that sense is a radical departure from OO since it all depends on the abstractions of services (SAO) with an XML-based DSL to manage everything. Maybe this is what people like or want the most out of it. So whether or not we should attempt a PoC depends on whether people actually want that different architecture since a DDD perspective is a significant shift (especially with bounded contexts in an OO style) from what OFBiz offers. Maybe more opinions here might shed light. Cheers, Taher On 4/2/22 20:29, Nicola Mazzoni wrote: Hi Taher, I think it's a very interesting discussion. She made me think a lot. I agree with your thoughts, but working as OFBiz "system integrator" I fully agree with Michael. OFBiz is not a ready-to-use ERP system but it is a fantastic framework for developing custom ERP solutions. ERPs have a long, very long life cycle and are less sensitive to technological innovations. Often ERP and legacy are synonymous, while all the surrounding applications change, the ERPs remain. My clients in Erp, as in the "traditional" management of existing business processes, do not ask for a "cutting-edge" system. Also working on the IBM mainframe I know the subject, and I often suffer the consequences, not being able to "move forward" Since the beginning of 2022 I have had to take over the design "from scratch" of a business application and lead a small DevOps team to follow the development. I've waited 3 months to reply to your email to share this new experience with a quarter of feedback behind it. The project is not a "complete" ERP, but it is part of it. I didn't start from OFBiz, it was a solution with technological requirements very far from OFBiz and too tied to an already existing datamodel. But most of all, I wanted to experiment with a new (for me) approach. Just as OFBiz is closely linked to Len Silverstone's fantastic "Datamodel resource book", I wanted to find Eric Evans' "Domain Driven Design" as a "literary reference". I don't like ORMs and therefore a very light persistance framework (like MyBatis) has been used, keeping the queries "handwritten" and not generated by the system. The goal was to make a completely object oriented, clean and simple system, not heavily tied to any existing framework. I followed the DDD approach (not in a dogmatic way ...) avoiding any third party libraries (excluding Jackson, Apache Commons, Apache Commons Pool, Apache CXF). I could have used Spring / Spring data; but I didn't. I have nothing against Spring, but I would like to use only frameworks that I know well, otherwise it is easy to become a victim. I would never want to tell a client "you know, my program is broken because there's something under the hood that I don't know that doesn't make it work anymore" In short? It was very interesting! The most significant effect (for the development team / qa) was certainly the simplicity with which the junior deve
Re: OFBiz re-architecture thoughts
ivately and come back perhaps when it is in a more ready state and see if it garners any momentum. IF people are interested in collaborating, then perhaps you can approach me and we can team up. Thank you again. Regards, -- Eugen Stan +40770 941 271 /https://www.netdava.com -- *Nicola Mazzoni* | /CEO/CTO/ Mobile: +39 347 990 5529 *Mp Style srl* Via Meucci, 37 | 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) p.i / c.f IT03679300362
Re: Welcome to Nicola Mazzoni and Giulio Speri as new committers
Thank you! I hope that I (and my team) can make a contribution to OFBiz, working together with the community! On 22/03/22 18:09, Priya Sharma wrote: Congratulations Nicola and Giulio !! On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 18:02, Swapnil Shah wrote: Welcome aboard Nicola & Giulio !! Regards, Swapnil -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato Sent: 22 March 2022 01:56 AM To: Dev list Subject: Welcome to Nicola Mazzoni and Giulio Speri as new committers The OFBiz PMC has invited Nicola Mazzoni and Giulio Speri as new committers and we are glad to announce that they have accepted the nomination. On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board! -- *Nicola Mazzoni* | /CEO/CTO/ Mobile: +39 347 990 5529 *Mp Style srl* Via Meucci, 37 | 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) p.i / c.f IT03679300362
Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.01
+1 On 23/10/21 17:08, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.01", the first release from the release17.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-18.12.01.zip * KEYS: text file with keys * apache-ofbiz-18.12.01.zip.asc: the detached signature file * apache-ofbiz-18.12.01.zip.sha512: checksum file Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). Vote: [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 18.12.01 [ -1] do not release This vote will be open for 5 days. For more details about this process please refer to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Best Regards, Jacopo -- *Nicola Mazzoni* Mobile: +39 347 990 5529 *Mp Style srl* Via Meucci, 37 | 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) p.i / c.f IT03679300362
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.06 - Second attempt
+1 Il dom 14 mar 2021, 10:40 Jacopo Cappellato ha scritto: > This is the vote thread (second attempt) to release a new bug fix > release for the > release17.12 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.06" will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.06.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.06.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.06.zip.sha512: checksum file > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for > instructions on testing the signatures see > http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). > > Vote: > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.06 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.06
+1 Il dom 14 mar 2021, 09:21 Jacopo Cappellato ha scritto: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release17.12 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.06" will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.06.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.06.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.06.zip.sha512: checksum file > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for > instructions on testing the signatures see > http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). > > Vote: > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.06 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >
Re: FYI: 18.12.01 release and more
+1 Il giorno lun 15 feb 2021 alle ore 21:08 Nicolas Malin < nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> ha scritto: > Hi, > > +1, Same here, this plan feel good. > > Nicolas > > On 11/02/2021 12:28, Pawan Verma wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > +1 for release 17.12.06 asap. > > +1 for release 18.12 asap. > > > > We should start migrating the trunk to JDK11 then create R21 asap. > > Stabilize and release R21 maybe in 2021 itself or in the first half of > 2022 > > sooner the better. > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.05 - Second attempt
+1 Il giorno lun 4 gen 2021 alle ore 11:32 Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > This is the vote thread (second attempt) to release a new bug fix release > for the release17.12 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.05" will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > > Please consider that this may be the last release in the 17.12 series and > in the future releases will be published from the newer series, which is > 18.12. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.05.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.05.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.05.zip.sha512: checksum file > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Please cast your vote: > > [ +1] release Apache OFBiz 17.12.05 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: Customer journey with an E-commerce
+1 Il giorno lun 28 dic 2020 alle ore 05:50 Pritam Kute < pritam.k...@hotwaxsystems.com> ha scritto: > +1 Arpit. Count me in. > > Kind Regards, > -- > Pritam Kute > > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 11:02 PM John Lee > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I agree! Understanding the market and its expectation is crucial to our > > development of a product the market actually wants. > > > > John Lee > > Engineering – Bright Star Controls > > Office (626) 605-1188 > > Direct (626) 605-1177 > > Mobile – SMS (626) 365-7510 > > > > From: Arpit Mor > > Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2020 10:41 PM > > To: u...@ofbiz.apache.org; dev@ofbiz.apache.org > > Subject: Customer journey with an E-commerce > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I am planning to schedule a discussion series on "Customer journey with > an > > E-commerce." The following point can be discussed in these sessions: > > > >- The expectations of a customer while buying from an e-commerce v/s > the > >expectation of a customer while buying from a brick and mortar store > >- Improving customer experience while buying from an e-commerce > >- Order life cycle and communicating with the customer during various > >order life cycle events > >- Role of mobile-first, omnichannel, buy online and pickup in store > >(BOPIS), buy online and return in store (BORIS) strategies in > improving > >customer experience > > > > If anyone would like to a part of the discussion, please let me know. We > > can work out a suitable time for all the interested parties. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Kind Regards, > > Arpit Mor > > ENTERPRISE QUALITY ENGINEER > > mobile: +91 9098005893 > > email: arpit@hotwaxsystems.com > > *www.hotwax.co <http://www.hotwax.co/>* > > > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.05
+1 Thanks Jacopo! Il ven 25 dic 2020, 19:12 Jacopo Cappellato ha scritto: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release17.12 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.05" will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > > Please consider that this may be the last release in the 17.12 series and > in the future releases will be published from the newer series, which is > 18.12. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.05.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.05.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.05.zip.sha512: checksum file > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Please cast your vote: > > [ +1] release Apache OFBiz 17.12.05 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Thanks!!! >
Re: Releasing 17.12.05, 18.12.01 and freezing R20
+1 I totally agree with Michael Il giorno lun 21 dic 2020 alle ore 14:57 Michael Brohl < michael.br...@ecomify.de> ha scritto: > +1 for the initial proposal > > with an additional idea: maybe better skip r20 and make a r21 right at > the beginning of the year with the chance to release also in 21. > > This would allow us to catch up and have a more up-to-date release > cycle. It seems a bit outdated to read that r18 is released in 2021... > > What do you think? > > Also +1 for 3 years support of r17 and 5 years support starting with r18. > > Thanks, > > Michael Brohl > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > Am 21.12.20 um 10:54 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > > Hi Deepak, > > > > The reason I propose that is because it's more and more difficult to > > backport to R17, when for R18 it's still OK. Also 3 years seems good > > enough for me. > > > > Of course if people think 5 years would be better then the backporting > > question should be discussed... > > > > We could revise that later, because there was much change between R17 > > an trunk and there are less and less now. So we could support R18 for > > 5 years > > > > Jacques > > > > Le 21/12/2020 à 10:38, Deepak Dixit a écrit : > >> +1 > >> > >> I have a question regarding the following point, rest looks good to me. > >> > >> What is the minimum supported year for a release? > >> Do we have any policy regarding this? > >> > >> We should support a release for at least 5 year. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Thanks & Regards > >> -- > >> Deepak Dixit > >> ofbiz.apache.org > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:51 PM Jacopo Cappellato < > >> jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: Kickoff Meeting - Apache OFBiz Tutorial Project
+1 Il giorno mer 9 dic 2020 alle ore 10:28 Aditya Sharma < adityasha...@apache.org> ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks and regards, > Aditya Sharma > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:09 PM Pranay Pandey < > pranay.pan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > Hello Tutorial Project Volunteers, > > > > First of all thank you so much for showing interest in volunteering the > > Apache OFBiz Tutorial Project. > > > > With this email I want to propose an online meeting to kickoff the > project. > > This meeting will help us in knowing each other. After this meeting we > will > > continue doing offline communication on email, OFBiz mailing list, Slack > > Channel to make progress with our work. We can surely plan online > meetings > > in future as well as and when needed. This way the community will also be > > updated all the time. > > > > It's a great opportunity for all of us to learn from each other and to > also > > prepare some robust content for OFBiz developers/users/evaluators. What > > we'll generate will be a next level set of tutorials and guides for the > > community and will be a proven asset for the project. > > > > How about meeting on this Friday 1:00 PM GMT? Does this day and time work > > for all of you? Please confirm your availability and we'll go from there. > > > > Available: +1 > > May be: 0 > > Not Available: -1 > > > > Kind regards, > > Pranay Pandey > > https://ofbiz.apache.org/ > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: Welcome Mridul Pathak as new PMC member!!
Congratulations Mridul! Regards, N Il giorno ven 18 set 2020 alle ore 10:05 Arvind Singh Tomar < arvind.to...@hotwaxsystems.com> ha scritto: > Many Congratulations Mridul!!! > > Regards > -- > Arvind Singh Tomar > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:55 PM Ashish Vijaywargiya > wrote: > > > The OFBiz PMC has invited Mridul Pathak to become a member of the > committee > > and we are glad to announce that he has accepted the nomination. > > > > On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board Mridul! > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: ERD Diagram and Seed Data
Hi Xinhuan, to understand the data model (and save a lot of time!) it was very useful for me to read "Data Model Resource Book", which is the basis of the OFBiz data model. Best regards N Il giorno mar 8 set 2020 alle ore 10:41 Wei Zhang ha scritto: > Hi Xinhuan, > > A Product is a description of a service, facility use, asset use, or a > digital or physical good for sale. An Asset commonly represents an instance > of a Product, or in other words the physical item that the Product record > describes. > > Regarding hierarchy structure data, you may interest in BOM data > structure, see > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/%5BWIP%5D+Getting+Started+with+Apache+OFBiz+Manufacturing+and+MRP+in+5+Easy+Steps > > > > 在 2020/9/8 下午3:35，“Xinhuan Zheng” 写入: > > Good Afternoon, > > I'm a developer working for some digital company. My use case is not > too general, and is simpler than OFBiz. It is for a small business. I have > maintained a few Excel spreadsheet for a few years for some business asset. > The spreadsheet are not formal modeled, and from time to time we maintain > and query those sheets. The data present characteristics of hierarchy > structure and different attribute sets for different kind types. > Maintaining those data in database may require formal data modeling and I > am not clear how it works. > > I came across an old publication about Universal E-Catalog, and I > learned about OFBiz project. I want to learn Key-Value pair modeling > pattern. I downloaded the OFBiz ERD diagrams. I studied the ERD diagrams > for a couple days, and what I'm interested is Product, ProductType, > Content, ContentType, Entities that use Universal E-Catalog pattern. You > can correct me if that is not the case. This modeling pattern needs to have > seed data to understand, and I found the best way to view the seed data is > using Excel spreadsheet. I found the project on Github containing Seed > data, however, all Seed data are XML format. Is there any possibilities to > extract some XML seed data to convert to CSV format? From the ERD diagram, > I think I need Product, ProductType, ProductTypeAttr, Content, ContentType, > ContentAttr seed data. > > Thank you! > > Xinhuan Zheng > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: [VOTE] to use Lombok inside OFBiz
-1 Lombok helps reduce code when using an orm. Fortunately ofbiz uses the generic value; a db record is a map and not an object Il mar 8 set 2020, 09:37 Jacques Le Roux ha scritto: > Hi, > > Following our discussions about using Lombok inside OFBiz, as it's not > clear if we should, here is a vote to decide about that. > > The question is: "should we use Lombok inside OFBiz?" > > Please cast your vote: > > [+1]to use Lombok inside OFBiz > [0] to abstain > [-1]to not use Lombok inside OFBiz > > This vote will be open for a week. > > Thanks > > Jacques > >
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.02
+1 Il lun 13 apr 2020, 07:10 Suraj Khurana ha scritto: > +1 > > -- > Best Regards, > Suraj Khurana > Senior technical Consultant > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:36 PM Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > > release17.12 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.02" will > > supersede the previous release from the same branch. > > > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.02.zip > > * KEYS: text file with keys > > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.02.zip.asc: the detached signature file > > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.02.zip.sha512: checksum file > > > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for > instructions > > on testing the signatures see > http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > ). > > > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.02 > > [ -1] do not release > > > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > > > > For more details about this process please refer to > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Jacopo > > >
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 (full version), vote #3
+1 Il gio 27 feb 2020, 18:40 Jacques Le Roux ha scritto: > +1 > > Jacques > > Le 27/02/2020 à 18:09, Michael Brohl a écrit : > > +1 > > > > ~/Projects/apache-ofbiz/dist-apache-ofbiz-17.12.01 > ../ofbiz-tools/verify-ofbiz-release.sh apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip > > sha check of file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip > > Using sha file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip.sha512 > > apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip: 3E92DF0F 92E71B33 0FEF2B7C FBEE2E51 88F98E3B > 76614824 2A40C84F 922DDB08 B0760B76 8667EAF4 E35F2939 44757CD7 658C9A72 > > 5B8A5358 36208F4A D26DEB40 > > apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip: 3E92DF0F 92E71B33 0FEF2B7C FBEE2E51 88F98E3B > 76614824 2A40C84F 922DDB08 B0760B76 8667EAF4 E35F2939 44757CD7 658C9A72 > > 5B8A5358 36208F4A D26DEB40 > > sha checksum OK > > > > GPG verification output > > gpg: Signature made Thu Feb 27 10:36:12 2020 CET using RSA key ID > 847AF9E0 > > gpg: Good signature from "Jacopo Cappellato (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > jaco...@apache.org>" [ultimate] > > > > > > ./gradlew loadAll testIntegration > > > > ... > > > > :testIntegration > > > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael Brohl > > > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > > > > Am 27.02.20 um 10:49 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: > >> This is the vote thread (3nd attempt) to release "Apache OFBiz > 17.12.01": > >> this is the first release, containing the framework, applications and > all > >> the plugins from the 17.12 release branches. > >> > >> The release files can be downloaded from here: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > >> > >> and are: > >> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip > >> * KEYS: text file with keys > >> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip.asc: the detached signature file > >> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.01.zip.sha512: checksum file > >> > >> Please download the zip file, build and test OFBiz and verify the > signature > >> and checksum (for instructions on testing the signatures see > >> http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). > >> > >> Vote: > >> > >> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 > >> [ -1] do not release > >> > >> This vote will be open for 5 days. > >> For more details about this process please read > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >> > > >
Re: In preparation for the first release from 17.12
Sorry, +1 to release "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins) +1 to release "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework) N Il giorno mar 11 feb 2020 alle ore 15:08 Deepak Dixit ha scritto: > >>>Should we release two products or just one as in the past? > Two products mean: > "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" > and > "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01" > > Thanks Michael, sorry for the confusing reply, > I replied +1 for the above proposal > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > ofbiz.apache.org > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:19 PM Michael Brohl > wrote: > > > Hi Deepak, > > > > to which of the alternatives do you refer with your +1 ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael Brohl > > > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > > > > Am 11.02.20 um 13:05 schrieb Deepak Dixit: > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > -- > > > Deepak Dixit > > > ofbiz.apache.org > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jacopo Cappellato < > > > jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the > > first > > >> release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the > > first > > >> one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a > > >> few decisions to take. > > >> > > >> Should we release two products or just one as in the past? > > >> Two products mean: > > >> "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" > > >> and > > >> "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01" > > >> One product mean" > > >> "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins) > > >> > > >> Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times; > > first > > >> publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year > > >> publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen > > then we > > >> could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the > > same > > >> release of the framework. > > >> > > >> One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones > > that > > >> we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Jacopo > > >> > > > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: In preparation for the first release from 17.12
+1 Il giorno mar 11 feb 2020 alle ore 13:05 Deepak Dixit ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > ofbiz.apache.org > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the first > > release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the > first > > one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a > > few decisions to take. > > > > Should we release two products or just one as in the past? > > Two products mean: > > "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" > > and > > "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01" > > One product mean" > > "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins) > > > > Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times; > first > > publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year > > publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen then > we > > could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the same > > release of the framework. > > > > One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones > that > > we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jacopo > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Re: Welcome Pranay Pandey as a new PMC member
Congratulations Pranay!!! N Il giorno gio 26 set 2019 alle ore 08:50 Nicolas Malin < nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> ha scritto: > Bienvenu, > > It will a pleasure to see you on board. > > Nicolas > > On 9/24/19 5:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > The OFBiz PMC has invited Pranay Pandey to become a new member of the > > committee and we are glad to announce that he has accepted the > > nomination. > > > > Welcome on board Pranay! > > > > Jacques (on behalf of the OFBiz PMC) > > > > > -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Bug "scoreboard is full, not at MaxRequestWorkers" solved!
Hello All, On a clustered installation we have two "front" nodes with OfBiz + Http2 (connected with Ajp). The system, even with modest loads, saturated the memory and crashed the system signaling "scoreboard is full, not at MaxRequestWorkers" in the logs. Needless to say, the continuous cluster crashes and performance drops caused us many problems with the customer! Everything was due to a bug in Apache Http2 (Bug 53555), fixed in version 2.4.25. After updating Apache http2 on all nodes, 3 months apart, after carrying out several stress tests, the problem never reappeared. I hope my "bad experience" can help anyone. Regards -- Nicola Mazzoni *Mp Styl**e Srl* via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 www.mpstyle.it
Broken pipe (write failed) [BUG]
Hello everyone, I'd like to ask you about an issue regarding ecommerce app . We are monitoring our OFBiz ecommerce application with NewRelic and we noticed that there are *lots* (8000 occurrences in 7 days) of this error: *org.apache.catalina.connector.ClientAbortException: java.net.SocketException: Broken pipe (Write failed)* This cause slowness and sometimes unreacheability of the site. We are using OFBiz v13.07.03 with MariaDB (fork of MySQL),with jvm memory setting of 20Gb and the heap is always under 10Gb. Do someone have an idea of what could be the cause of this issue and how we can solve it? Thank you in advance. Nicola -- Nicola Mazzoni Mp Style Srl via Meucci, 37 41019 Limidi di Soliera (MO) T 059/684916 M 347/9905529 <(347)%20990-5529> www.mpstyle.it
