Re: OFBIZ-3972
This has been done at r#1793300 Added generateMySqlFileWithAlterTableForTimestamps service to generate sql alter statement for date-time and time filed. Also update Data Migration <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/LoBr> wiki page with revision and migration service detail. Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> wrote: > +1 Deepak > > Thanks, > > Michael > > Am 15.03.17 um 05:10 schrieb Deepak Dixit: > > Can we conclude this? >> >> Thanks & Regards >> -- >> Deepak Dixit >> www.hotwaxsystems.com >> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Interesting related blog - LINK >>> <https://blog.sqlauthority.com/2014/02/14/mysql-when-to- >>> use-timestamp-or-datetime-difference-between-timestamp-or-datetime/> >>> One more conversation - >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5989539/when-to-use- >>> datetime-or-timestamp >>> >>> It says it depends on the context of the field for which it is used. >>> DATETIME seems to be good choice as we will be updating field type, and >>> it >>> may applicable to many places. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> Rishi Solanki >>> Sr. Manager, Enterprise Software Development >>> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. >>> Direct: +91-9893287847 >>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < >>> slidingfilame...@gmail.com >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> I think I would prefer DATETIME. Some reasons are found here -> >>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/409286/should-i-use- >>>> field-datetime-or-timestamp. >>>> Given that OFBiz takes care of conversions, DATETIME seems like a more >>>> appropriate choice >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> At OFBIZ-3972 Deepak suggested >>>>> >>>>> <>>>> As we have only DATETIME set as sql type and this does not support >>>>> Milliseconds, we need to use DATETIME(3) or DATETIME(6).>> >>>>> >>>>> I suggested >>>>> >>>>> <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/ >>>>> >>>> refman/5.6/en/datetime.html >>>> >>>>> Deepak rightly mentioned that in both cases we need to create an entry >>>>> >>>> in >>> >>>> "data migration" wiki page >>>>> >>>>> << we need to run alter query manually (if someone want to upgrade >>>>> >>>> custom >>> >>>> solution to latest)>> >>>>> >>>>> Please let know your thoughts and suggestions if any >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > >
Re: OFBIZ-3972
Here is the ticket for this discussion https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9337 Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > It's OK with me, I was just asking a question and it seems it has been > answered > > Jacques > > > > Le 15/03/2017 à 05:10, Deepak Dixit a écrit : > >> Can we conclude this? >> >> Thanks & Regards >> -- >> Deepak Dixit >> www.hotwaxsystems.com >> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Interesting related blog - LINK >>> <https://blog.sqlauthority.com/2014/02/14/mysql-when-to- >>> use-timestamp-or-datetime-difference-between-timestamp-or-datetime/> >>> One more conversation - >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5989539/when-to-use- >>> datetime-or-timestamp >>> >>> It says it depends on the context of the field for which it is used. >>> DATETIME seems to be good choice as we will be updating field type, and >>> it >>> may applicable to many places. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> Rishi Solanki >>> Sr. Manager, Enterprise Software Development >>> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. >>> Direct: +91-9893287847 >>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < >>> slidingfilame...@gmail.com >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> I think I would prefer DATETIME. Some reasons are found here -> >>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/409286/should-i-use- >>>> field-datetime-or-timestamp. >>>> Given that OFBiz takes care of conversions, DATETIME seems like a more >>>> appropriate choice >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> At OFBIZ-3972 Deepak suggested >>>>> >>>>> <>>>> As we have only DATETIME set as sql type and this does not support >>>>> Milliseconds, we need to use DATETIME(3) or DATETIME(6).>> >>>>> >>>>> I suggested >>>>> >>>>> <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/ >>>>> >>>> refman/5.6/en/datetime.html >>>> >>>>> Deepak rightly mentioned that in both cases we need to create an entry >>>>> >>>> in >>> >>>> "data migration" wiki page >>>>> >>>>> << we need to run alter query manually (if someone want to upgrade >>>>> >>>> custom >>> >>>> solution to latest)>> >>>>> >>>>> Please let know your thoughts and suggestions if any >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >
Re: OFBIZ-3972
It's OK with me, I was just asking a question and it seems it has been answered Jacques Le 15/03/2017 à 05:10, Deepak Dixit a écrit : Can we conclude this? Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> wrote: Interesting related blog - LINK <https://blog.sqlauthority.com/2014/02/14/mysql-when-to- use-timestamp-or-datetime-difference-between-timestamp-or-datetime/> One more conversation - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5989539/when-to-use- datetime-or-timestamp It says it depends on the context of the field for which it is used. DATETIME seems to be good choice as we will be updating field type, and it may applicable to many places. Thanks! Rishi Solanki Sr. Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com wrote: I think I would prefer DATETIME. Some reasons are found here -> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/409286/should-i-use- field-datetime-or-timestamp. Given that OFBiz takes care of conversions, DATETIME seems like a more appropriate choice On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Hi, At OFBIZ-3972 Deepak suggested <> I suggested <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/ refman/5.6/en/datetime.html Deepak rightly mentioned that in both cases we need to create an entry in "data migration" wiki page << we need to run alter query manually (if someone want to upgrade custom solution to latest)>> Please let know your thoughts and suggestions if any Jacques
Re: OFBIZ-3972
Can we conclude this? Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting related blog - LINK > <https://blog.sqlauthority.com/2014/02/14/mysql-when-to- > use-timestamp-or-datetime-difference-between-timestamp-or-datetime/> > One more conversation - > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5989539/when-to-use- > datetime-or-timestamp > > It says it depends on the context of the field for which it is used. > DATETIME seems to be good choice as we will be updating field type, and it > may applicable to many places. > > Thanks! > > > Rishi Solanki > Sr. Manager, Enterprise Software Development > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > Direct: +91-9893287847 > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > slidingfilame...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > I think I would prefer DATETIME. Some reasons are found here -> > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/409286/should-i-use- > > field-datetime-or-timestamp. > > Given that OFBiz takes care of conversions, DATETIME seems like a more > > appropriate choice > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > At OFBIZ-3972 Deepak suggested > > > > > > < > > As we have only DATETIME set as sql type and this does not support > > > Milliseconds, we need to use DATETIME(3) or DATETIME(6).>> > > > > > > I suggested > > > > > > <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/ > > refman/5.6/en/datetime.html > > > >> > > > > > > Deepak rightly mentioned that in both cases we need to create an entry > in > > > "data migration" wiki page > > > > > > << we need to run alter query manually (if someone want to upgrade > custom > > > solution to latest)>> > > > > > > Please let know your thoughts and suggestions if any > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > >
Re: OFBIZ-3972
Interesting related blog - LINK <https://blog.sqlauthority.com/2014/02/14/mysql-when-to-use-timestamp-or-datetime-difference-between-timestamp-or-datetime/> One more conversation - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5989539/when-to-use-datetime-or-timestamp It says it depends on the context of the field for which it is used. DATETIME seems to be good choice as we will be updating field type, and it may applicable to many places. Thanks! Rishi Solanki Sr. Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com > wrote: > I think I would prefer DATETIME. Some reasons are found here -> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/409286/should-i-use- > field-datetime-or-timestamp. > Given that OFBiz takes care of conversions, DATETIME seems like a more > appropriate choice > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > At OFBIZ-3972 Deepak suggested > > > > < > As we have only DATETIME set as sql type and this does not support > > Milliseconds, we need to use DATETIME(3) or DATETIME(6).>> > > > > I suggested > > > > <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/ > refman/5.6/en/datetime.html > > >> > > > > Deepak rightly mentioned that in both cases we need to create an entry in > > "data migration" wiki page > > > > << we need to run alter query manually (if someone want to upgrade custom > > solution to latest)>> > > > > Please let know your thoughts and suggestions if any > > > > Jacques > > > > >
Re: OFBIZ-3972
I think I would prefer DATETIME. Some reasons are found here -> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/409286/should-i-use-field-datetime-or-timestamp. Given that OFBiz takes care of conversions, DATETIME seems like a more appropriate choice On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > At OFBIZ-3972 Deepak suggested > > < As we have only DATETIME set as sql type and this does not support > Milliseconds, we need to use DATETIME(3) or DATETIME(6).>> > > I suggested > > <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/datetime.html > >> > > Deepak rightly mentioned that in both cases we need to create an entry in > "data migration" wiki page > > << we need to run alter query manually (if someone want to upgrade custom > solution to latest)>> > > Please let know your thoughts and suggestions if any > > Jacques > >
OFBIZ-3972
Hi, At OFBIZ-3972 Deepak suggested <> I suggested <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/datetime.html>> Deepak rightly mentioned that in both cases we need to create an entry in "data migration" wiki page << we need to run alter query manually (if someone want to upgrade custom solution to latest)>> Please let know your thoughts and suggestions if any Jacques
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-3972) user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3972. -- Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Since 5.6 is officially released this is less a problem with mySql (probability of race condition divided by 1000. It still exists and should not use a timestamp (hitStartDateTime) in its PK, there is another related Jira http://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/5.6/en/ https://blogs.oracle.com/MySqlOnWindows/entry/milliseconds_value_support_on_datetime I close this issue as a duplicate of OFBIZ-2208 user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit --- Key: OFBIZ-3972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Pierre Smits Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: SVN trunk When a user is active in a tenant and he/she logs off, server_hits are generated. However the persistence is rolled back. See excerpt of error.log below. 2010-10-01 11:34:12,169 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-5) [ GenericDelegator.java:889:ERROR] exception report -- Failure in create operation for entity [ServerHit]: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)). Rolling back transaction. Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException Message: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)) cause - Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException Message: SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-3972) user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13549584#comment-13549584 ] Paul Piper commented on OFBIZ-3972: --- If your database is MySQL then I second Jacques opinion. Unless you purchase the Enterprise edition of mysql, mysql will not handle timestamps correctly, which in turn can generate duplicate server-hit entries and also cause misfiring of events. I would propose for you to switch to postgres and close the issue here... user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit --- Key: OFBIZ-3972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Pierre Smits Fix For: SVN trunk When a user is active in a tenant and he/she logs off, server_hits are generated. However the persistence is rolled back. See excerpt of error.log below. 2010-10-01 11:34:12,169 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-5) [ GenericDelegator.java:889:ERROR] exception report -- Failure in create operation for entity [ServerHit]: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)). Rolling back transaction. Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException Message: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)) cause - Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException Message: SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3972) user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12985276#action_12985276 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3972: Pierre, Was this with mySql? Because there is a know issue: mySql does not handle milliseconds in transaction. Actually this problem can occurs as well with other DBMS fut much more rarely (1000 time less). user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit --- Key: OFBIZ-3972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Pierre Smits Fix For: SVN trunk When a user is active in a tenant and he/she logs off, server_hits are generated. However the persistence is rolled back. See excerpt of error.log below. 2010-10-01 11:34:12,169 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-5) [ GenericDelegator.java:889:ERROR] exception report -- Failure in create operation for entity [ServerHit]: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)). Rolling back transaction. Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException Message: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)) cause - Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException Message: SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3972) user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit
user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit --- Key: OFBIZ-3972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Pierre Smits Fix For: SVN trunk When a user is active in a tenant and he/she logs off, server_hits are generated. However the persistence is rolled back. See excerpt of error.log below. 2010-10-01 11:34:12,169 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-5) [ GenericDelegator.java:889:ERROR] exception report -- Failure in create operation for entity [ServerHit]: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)). Rolling back transaction. Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException Message: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:ServerHit][contentId,catalog.logout(java.lang.String)][createdStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitStartDateTime,2010-10-01 11:34:11.732(java.sql.Timestamp)][hitTypeId,REQUEST(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2010-10-01 11:34:12.138(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][referrerUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/main?externalLoginKey=EL814028348655(java.lang.String)][requestUrl,https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/logout(java.lang.String)][runningTimeMillis,406(java.lang.Long)][serverHostName,zase(java.lang.String)][serverIpAddress,10.0.0.125(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,DEMO55-admin(java.lang.String)][visitId,10024(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.)) cause - Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException Message: SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.SERVER_HIT (VISIT_ID, CONTENT_ID, HIT_START_DATE_TIME, HIT_TYPE_ID, NUM_OF_BYTES, RUNNING_TIME_MILLIS, USER_LOGIN_ID, STATUS_ID, REQUEST_URL, REFERRER_URL, SERVER_IP_ADDRESS, SERVER_HOST_NAME, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP, INTERNAL_CONTENT_ID, PARTY_ID, ID_BY_IP_CONTACT_MECH_ID, REF_BY_WEB_CONTACT_MECH_ID) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin). The statement has been rolled back.) cause - Exception: java.sql.SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException Message: INSERT on table 'SERVER_HIT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'SERVER_HIT_USER' for key (DEMO55-admin
