Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released
+1 -- Kind Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the > latest official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face > any issues related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport > the jar to the 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official > Freemarker jars, and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix > releases from the Freemarker community. > > Jacopo > > > On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > > > Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a > patched version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs > reported below. > > > > News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released > and it is available for download: > > > > http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html > > > > Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special > conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved: > > > > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/ > > > > Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat > submitted a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 > release we are using, was not resolved in this release: > > > > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/ > > > > Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly > follow up with him? > > > > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98 > > > > "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the > patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to > *try* redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM > object wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can > chose between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now > this 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release > without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when > this and some other smaller things are done..." > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jacopo > > > >
Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released
+1 Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit On Aug 14, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the latest > official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face any issues > related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport the jar to the > 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official Freemarker jars, > and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix releases from the > Freemarker community. > > Jacopo > > > On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato > wrote: > >> Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a patched >> version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs reported >> below. >> >> News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released and >> it is available for download: >> >> http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html >> >> Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special >> conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/ >> >> Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat submitted >> a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 release we are >> using, was not resolved in this release: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/ >> >> Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly follow up >> with him? >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98 >> >> "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the >> patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to *try* >> redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM object >> wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can chose >> between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now this >> 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release >> without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when >> this and some other smaller things are done..." >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jacopo >> > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released
+1 Jacques - Original Message - From: "Jacopo Cappellato" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:50 AM Subject: Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released > If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the latest > official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face any issues > related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport the jar to the > 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official Freemarker jars, > and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix releases from the > Freemarker community. > > Jacopo > > > On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato > wrote: > >> Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a patched >> version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs reported >> below. >> >> News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released and >> it is available for download: >> >> http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html >> >> Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special >> conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/ >> >> Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat submitted >> a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 release we are >> using, was not resolved in this release: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/ >> >> Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly follow up >> with him? >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98 >> >> "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the >> patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to *try* >> redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM object >> wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can chose >> between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now this >> 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release >> without this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when >> this and some other smaller things are done..." >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jacopo >> > >
Re: Freemarker 2.3.20 is released
If there are no objections I would like to upgrade the trunk with the latest official 2.3.20 release; then after some time, if we will not face any issues related to the overloaded methods in templates I will backport the jar to the 13.07 branch: in this way we will distribute the official Freemarker jars, and it will be easy to stay updated with the new bug fix releases from the Freemarker community. Jacopo On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Current situation: in OFBiz we are currently using/distributing a patched > version of Freemarker 2.3.19; the patch version addresses the bugs reported > below. > > News: the new version of Freemarker (2.3.20) has been finally released and it > is available for download: > > http://freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_20.html > > Good News: the deadlock issue that was affecting OFBiz (under special > conditions) that we have reported and helped to fix, has been resolved: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/361/ > > Bad News: the "Wrong overloaded method" issue, for which Adam Heat submitted > a patch to the Freemarker community and patched the 2.3.19 release we are > using, was not resolved in this release: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/ > > Adam, could you please check this comment from Daniel and possibly follow up > with him? > > http://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?limit=10&page=1#bb98 > > "I'm looking into the overloaded method related parts (I don't mean the > patch) and... there are other issues as well. Certainly I will have to *try* > redesign/rewrite this stuff pretty much (it's tricky because of FM object > wrapping), and of course, I will have to add switch where you can chose > between old and the new implementation, globally or per template. Now this > 100% won't be finished in two days, so I guess 2.3.20 will be release without > this, but then I continue working on this, and release 2.3.21 when this and > some other smaller things are done..." > > Thanks, > > Jacopo >
