Re: Security : seed-initial

2016-08-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Thanks for the suggestion Scott, I think it's enough indeed, done at revision: 
1755390

Jacques


Le 06/08/2016 à 00:56, Scott Gray a écrit :

It's demo data, what's wrong with it using the demo reader?  Any number of
issues can arise when you modify demo data in the database and then reload
it. e.g. shipping a demo order and then reloading the XML would leave the
shipment and issuances in place but revert the order to approved.

Perhaps it should be renamed to PasswordSecurityDemoData.xml

Regards
Scott

On 6 August 2016 at 02:04, Jacques Le Roux 
wrote:


Mmm, yes you are right, it can't be seed-initial. But also not ext-demo,
it's only for adopters. I finally think we should keep as is or introduce
another specialised reader, not a big deal and not for today...

Thanks

Jacques



Le 05/08/2016 à 15:54, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :


I think by convention seed-initial does not setup users or passwords, that
should be either demo or ext-demo or something like that. Not entirely
sure
of this though.

On Aug 5, 2016 1:37 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" 
wrote:

Hi,

I stumbled upon this by chance

  
  
  
  

Should we not use seed-initial rather than demo here?

Jacques







Re: Security : seed-initial

2016-08-05 Thread Scott Gray
It's demo data, what's wrong with it using the demo reader?  Any number of
issues can arise when you modify demo data in the database and then reload
it. e.g. shipping a demo order and then reloading the XML would leave the
shipment and issuances in place but revert the order to approved.

Perhaps it should be renamed to PasswordSecurityDemoData.xml

Regards
Scott

On 6 August 2016 at 02:04, Jacques Le Roux 
wrote:

> Mmm, yes you are right, it can't be seed-initial. But also not ext-demo,
> it's only for adopters. I finally think we should keep as is or introduce
> another specialised reader, not a big deal and not for today...
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 05/08/2016 à 15:54, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>
>> I think by convention seed-initial does not setup users or passwords, that
>> should be either demo or ext-demo or something like that. Not entirely
>> sure
>> of this though.
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2016 1:37 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I stumbled upon this by chance
>>>
>>>  
>>>  >> location="data/PasswordSecurityData.xml"/>
>>>  >> location="data/SecurityGroupDemoData.xml"/>
>>>  >> location="data/SecurityTypeDemoData.xml"/>
>>>
>>> Should we not use seed-initial rather than demo here?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>
>


Re: Security : seed-initial

2016-08-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Mmm, yes you are right, it can't be seed-initial. But also not ext-demo, it's only for adopters. I finally think we should keep as is or introduce 
another specialised reader, not a big deal and not for today...


Thanks

Jacques


Le 05/08/2016 à 15:54, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :

I think by convention seed-initial does not setup users or passwords, that
should be either demo or ext-demo or something like that. Not entirely sure
of this though.

On Aug 5, 2016 1:37 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" 
wrote:


Hi,

I stumbled upon this by chance

 
 
 
 

Should we not use seed-initial rather than demo here?

Jacques






Re: Security : seed-initial

2016-08-05 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
I think by convention seed-initial does not setup users or passwords, that
should be either demo or ext-demo or something like that. Not entirely sure
of this though.

On Aug 5, 2016 1:37 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I stumbled upon this by chance
>
> 
>  location="data/PasswordSecurityData.xml"/>
>  location="data/SecurityGroupDemoData.xml"/>
>  location="data/SecurityTypeDemoData.xml"/>
>
> Should we not use seed-initial rather than demo here?
>
> Jacques
>
>


Security : seed-initial

2016-08-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Hi,

I stumbled upon this by chance






Should we not use seed-initial rather than demo here?

Jacques