Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Jacques Le Roux]

+1 (from today)

I agree with Deepak, best place for this information

Jacques

Le 11/07/2016 à 11:32, Deepak Dixit a écrit :

+1

assuming 12 months from today, We can add these support date on release
page as well
https://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html

Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Taher Alkhateeb  wrote:


12 months seems a reasonable timeframe to me.

Jacopo

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga 
wrote:


Hi Everyone

Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.

I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting

bug

fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
other people think?

Thanks
Sharan

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Ashish Vijaywargiya]

12 months time frame looks good to me!

--
Kind Regards
Ashish Vijaywargiya
HotWax Systems - est. 1997
Connect with me on LinkedIn -
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashishvijaywargiya1

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Sharan Foga  wrote:

> Hi Everyone
>
> Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
>
> I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting bug
> fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> other people think?
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Pierre Smits]

Sharan,

I know the difference between a vote and a discussion.

My +1 expresses nothing more than that I can find myself in the proposal.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Sharan Foga  wrote:

> Hi Pierre
>
> Thank very much for your support, although this is not a vote, just a
> simple show of support (or not) from any community member that wishes to do
> so.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 2016-07-11 13:17 (+0200), Pierre Smits  wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > ORRTIZ.COM 
> > OFBiz based solutions & services
> >
> > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone
> > >
> > > Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> > > consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
> > >
> > > I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting
> bug
> > > fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> > > other people think?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Sharan
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Sharan Foga]

Hi Pierre

Thank very much for your support, although this is not a vote, just a simple 
show of support (or not) from any community member that wishes to do so. 

Thanks
Sharan

On 2016-07-11 13:17 (+0200), Pierre Smits  wrote: 
> +1 (non-binding).
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Pierre Smits
> 
> ORRTIZ.COM 
> OFBiz based solutions & services
> 
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Everyone
> >
> > Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> > consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
> >
> > I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting bug
> > fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> > other people think?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
> >
> >
> 

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Pierre Smits]

+1 (non-binding).

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga  wrote:

> Hi Everyone
>
> Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
>
> I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting bug
> fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> other people think?
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Sharan Foga]

Good catch everyone - yes I mean 12 months from today, (so we'd be looking at 
July 2017 to stop the back porting.)

Also once we get consensus on the timeframe we can update the website.

Thanks
Sharan

On 2016-07-11 11:32 (+0200), Deepak Dixit  
wrote: 
> +1
> 
> assuming 12 months from today, We can add these support date on release
> page as well
> https://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
> www.hotwaxsystems.com
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Taher Alkhateeb  > wrote:
> 
> > +1
> >
> > 12 months seems a reasonable time frame for people to adjust to the
> > changes. I am assuming 12 months from today, not from the branch creation
> > date right?
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > > 12 months seems a reasonable timeframe to me.
> > >
> > > Jacopo
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Everyone
> > > >
> > > > Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> > > > consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting
> > > bug
> > > > fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> > > > other people think?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Sharan
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Michael Brohl]

+1

Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH
www.ecomify.de


Am 11.07.16 um 11:14 schrieb Sharan Foga:

Hi Everyone

Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the consensus to 
leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.

I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting bug 
fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do other 
people think?

Thanks
Sharan






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Deepak Dixit]

+1

assuming 12 months from today, We can add these support date on release
page as well
https://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html

Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Taher Alkhateeb  wrote:

> +1
>
> 12 months seems a reasonable time frame for people to adjust to the
> changes. I am assuming 12 months from today, not from the branch creation
> date right?
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>
> > 12 months seems a reasonable timeframe to me.
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone
> > >
> > > Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> > > consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
> > >
> > > I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting
> > bug
> > > fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> > > other people think?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Sharan
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[gil portenseigne]

I answered the wrong thread but +1 !

Assuming from today too :)

Gil

On 11/07/2016 11:19, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:

+1

12 months seems a reasonable time frame for people to adjust to the
changes. I am assuming 12 months from today, not from the branch creation
date right?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:


12 months seems a reasonable timeframe to me.

Jacopo

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga 
wrote:


Hi Everyone

Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.

I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting

bug

fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
other people think?

Thanks
Sharan

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Taher Alkhateeb]

+1

12 months seems a reasonable time frame for people to adjust to the
changes. I am assuming 12 months from today, not from the branch creation
date right?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:

> 12 months seems a reasonable timeframe to me.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone
> >
> > Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> > consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
> >
> > I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting
> bug
> > fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> > other people think?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
> >
> >
>

Re: Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Jacopo Cappellato]

12 months seems a reasonable timeframe to me.

Jacopo

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Sharan Foga  wrote:

> Hi Everyone
>
> Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the
> consensus to leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.
>
> I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting bug
> fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do
> other people think?
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>

Support timeframe for 14.12 and 15.12 unreleased branches

[Sharan Foga]

Hi Everyone

Following on from the discussion on the user mailing list and the consensus to 
leave 14.12 and 15.12 as unreleased branches.

I'd like to start thinking about the support timeframe for backporting bug 
fixes into these branches. My initial suggestion is 12 months. What do other 
people think?

Thanks
Sharan