[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2018-02-04 Thread Chris Mattmann 
Hi,

 

This VOTE has PASSED with the following tallies:

 

+1

Chris Mattmann

Tom Barber

Sean Kelly

Lewis John McGibbney

 

I’ll push it out, ahead of Tom spinning a 1.2.2.

 

Thanks for VOTE’ing!

 

Cheers,

Chris

 

 

 

From: Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Date: Sunday, November 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM
To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

 

Hi Folks,

 

I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 release. The

source code is at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/

 

For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on

release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT

release process, documented on the Wiki here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process

 

The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:

https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/ 

 

A staged Maven repository is available at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/ 

 

Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote is

open for at least the next 72 hours.

 

Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the

release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes

if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.

 

[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1

 

[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

 

Thanks!

 

Chris

 

P.S. Here is my +1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2018-02-01 Thread Tom Barber 

Fair enough, I figured it had just stalled into the ether :)

+1 ship it and we'll roll another off the back of it.

On 02/02/18 03:32, Mattmann, Chris A (1761) wrote:

The vote kinda already passed let’s just roll a new 1.2.2 give me 24hr to 
finish please

Sent from my iPhone


On Feb 1, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Tom Barber  wrote:

Okay, I'm digging this one back up.

I'm changing my vote to -1 because of OODT-968 which causes data loss.

I fixed it a few weeks ago, so what I propose is that we can this vote, and 
I'll roll a 1.2.1 RC2 tomorrow or Saturday and reopen the vote with that 
included.

Tom


On 21/12/17 18:12, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
+1 current state of RC is good.
Usual checks carried out.
Thanks for pushing Chris


On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:04 BW  wrote:

Trying to make up for my missed vote. ;)


On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:38 AM Sean Kelly  wrote:

BW is too fast for me! ^_^

Take care
--k

Sean Kelly wrote:

Chris:

This time I get:

gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann "

So I am now +1 to release!

Thanks Chris!
--k

PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the
go-to.


Chris Mattmann wrote:

Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my
new KEY. For whatever
reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since
master always has the latest
and greatest.



On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:

Thanks Chris!

I imported the KEYS but I still get

gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not

in

the KEYS file?

--k

Chris Mattmann wrote:

KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (



On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:

Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam

folder.

Here goes:

MD5: ✓
SHA1: ✓
Python tests: ✓
Java tests: ✓
Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release

dir?

Take care
--k

Chris Mattmann
2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
Ping (

Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s

kind

of needed for DRAT.
We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really

love

to release this. Thanks.

Cheers,
Chris




On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"

wrote:

Hi Folks,



I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
release. The

source code is at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/



For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file

for

details on

release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

the OODT

release process, documented on the Wiki here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process



The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:

https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/



A staged Maven repository is available at:



https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/


Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The

vote is

open for at least the next 72 hours.



Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to

check the

release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The

vote passes

if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.



[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1



[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...



Thanks!



Chris



P.S. Here is my +1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2018-02-01 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (1761) 
The vote kinda already passed let’s just roll a new 1.2.2 give me 24hr to 
finish please 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 1, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Tom Barber  wrote:
> 
> Okay, I'm digging this one back up.
> 
> I'm changing my vote to -1 because of OODT-968 which causes data loss.
> 
> I fixed it a few weeks ago, so what I propose is that we can this vote, and 
> I'll roll a 1.2.1 RC2 tomorrow or Saturday and reopen the vote with that 
> included.
> 
> Tom
> 
>> On 21/12/17 18:12, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
>> +1 current state of RC is good.
>> Usual checks carried out.
>> Thanks for pushing Chris
>> 
>>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:04 BW  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Trying to make up for my missed vote. ;)
>>> 
 On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:38 AM Sean Kelly  wrote:
 
 BW is too fast for me! ^_^
 
 Take care
 --k
 
 Sean Kelly wrote:
> Chris:
> 
> This time I get:
> 
> gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann "
> 
> So I am now +1 to release!
> 
> Thanks Chris!
> --k
> 
> PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the
> go-to.
> 
> 
> Chris Mattmann wrote:
>> Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my
>> new KEY. For whatever
>> reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since
>> master always has the latest
>> and greatest.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Chris!
>> 
>> I imported the KEYS but I still get
>> 
>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>> 
>> Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not
>>> in
>> the KEYS file?
>> 
>> --k
>> 
>> Chris Mattmann wrote:
>>> KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:
>>> 
>>> Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam
>> folder.
>>> Here goes:
>>> 
>>> MD5: ✓
>>> SHA1: ✓
>>> Python tests: ✓
>>> Java tests: ✓
>>> Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>> 
>>> Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release
>> dir?
>>> Take care
>>> --k
 Chris Mattmann
 2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
 Ping (
 
 Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s
 kind
 of needed for DRAT.
 We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really
>>> love
 to release this. Thanks.
 
 Cheers,
 Chris
 
 
 
 
 On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"
>>> wrote:
 Hi Folks,
 
 
 
 I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
 release. The
 
 source code is at:
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
 
 
 
 For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file
>>> for
 details on
 
 release contents and latest changes. The release was made using
>> the OODT
 release process, documented on the Wiki here:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
 
 
 
 The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
 
 https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
 
 
 
 A staged Maven repository is available at:
 
 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
 
 
 Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The
>> vote is
 open for at least the next 72 hours.
 
 
 
 Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to
>> check the
 release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The
>> vote passes
 if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
 
 
 
 [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
 
 
 
 [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
 
 
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 
 Chris
 
 
 
 P.S. Here is my +1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2018-02-01 Thread Tom Barber 

Okay, I'm digging this one back up.

I'm changing my vote to -1 because of OODT-968 which causes data loss.

I fixed it a few weeks ago, so what I propose is that we can this vote, 
and I'll roll a 1.2.1 RC2 tomorrow or Saturday and reopen the vote with 
that included.


Tom

On 21/12/17 18:12, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:

+1 current state of RC is good.
Usual checks carried out.
Thanks for pushing Chris

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:04 BW  wrote:


Trying to make up for my missed vote. ;)

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:38 AM Sean Kelly  wrote:


BW is too fast for me! ^_^

Take care
--k

Sean Kelly wrote:

Chris:

This time I get:

gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann "

So I am now +1 to release!

Thanks Chris!
--k

PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the
go-to.


Chris Mattmann wrote:

Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my
new KEY. For whatever
reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since
master always has the latest
and greatest.



On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:

Thanks Chris!

I imported the KEYS but I still get

gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not

in

the KEYS file?

--k

Chris Mattmann wrote:

KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (



On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:

Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam

folder.

Here goes:

MD5: ✓
SHA1: ✓
Python tests: ✓
Java tests: ✓
Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release

dir?

Take care
--k

Chris Mattmann
2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
Ping (

Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s

kind

of needed for DRAT.
We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really

love

to release this. Thanks.

Cheers,
Chris




On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"

wrote:

Hi Folks,



I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
release. The

source code is at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/



For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file

for

details on

release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

the OODT

release process, documented on the Wiki here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process



The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:

https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/



A staged Maven repository is available at:



https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/



Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The

vote is

open for at least the next 72 hours.



Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to

check the

release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The

vote passes

if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.



[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1



[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...



Thanks!



Chris



P.S. Here is my +1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-21 Thread lewis john mcgibbney 
+1 current state of RC is good.
Usual checks carried out.
Thanks for pushing Chris

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:04 BW  wrote:

> Trying to make up for my missed vote. ;)
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:38 AM Sean Kelly  wrote:
>
> > BW is too fast for me! ^_^
> >
> > Take care
> > --k
> >
> > Sean Kelly wrote:
> > > Chris:
> > >
> > > This time I get:
> > >
> > > gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann "
> > >
> > > So I am now +1 to release!
> > >
> > > Thanks Chris!
> > > --k
> > >
> > > PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the
> > > go-to.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris Mattmann wrote:
> > >> Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my
> > >> new KEY. For whatever
> > >> reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since
> > >> master always has the latest
> > >> and greatest.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Chris!
> > >>
> > >> I imported the KEYS but I still get
> > >>
> > >> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > >>
> > >> Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not
> in
> > >> the KEYS file?
> > >>
> > >> --k
> > >>
> > >> Chris Mattmann wrote:
> > >> > KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam
> > >> folder.
> > >> >
> > >> > Here goes:
> > >> >
> > >> > MD5: ✓
> > >> > SHA1: ✓
> > >> > Python tests: ✓
> > >> > Java tests: ✓
> > >> > Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > >> >
> > >> > Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release
> > >> dir?
> > >> >
> > >> > Take care
> > >> > --k
> > >> > > Chris Mattmann
> > >> > > 2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
> > >> > > Ping (
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s
> > kind
> > >> > > of needed for DRAT.
> > >> > > We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really
> love
> > >> > > to release this. Thanks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Cheers,
> > >> > > Chris
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"
> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi Folks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
> > >> > > release. The
> > >> > >
> > >> > > source code is at:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file
> for
> > >> > > details on
> > >> > >
> > >> > > release contents and latest changes. The release was made using
> > >> the OODT
> > >> > >
> > >> > > release process, documented on the Wiki here:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > A staged Maven repository is available at:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The
> > >> vote is
> > >> > >
> > >> > > open for at least the next 72 hours.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to
> > >> check the
> > >> > >
> > >> > > release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The
> > >> vote passes
> > >> > >
> > >> > > if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks!
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Chris
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > P.S. Here is my +1.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
-- 
http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
@hectorMcSpector
http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread Sean Kelly 

BW is too fast for me! ^_^

Take care
--k

Sean Kelly wrote:

Chris:

This time I get:

gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann "

So I am now +1 to release!

Thanks Chris!
--k

PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the
go-to.


Chris Mattmann wrote:

Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my
new KEY. For whatever
reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since
master always has the latest
and greatest.



On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:

Thanks Chris!

I imported the KEYS but I still get

gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not in
the KEYS file?

--k

Chris Mattmann wrote:
> KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (
>
>
>
> On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:
>
> Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam
folder.
>
> Here goes:
>
> MD5: ✓
> SHA1: ✓
> Python tests: ✓
> Java tests: ✓
> Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release
dir?
>
> Take care
> --k
> > Chris Mattmann
> > 2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
> > Ping (
> >
> > Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind
> > of needed for DRAT.
> > We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love
> > to release this. Thanks.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
> > release. The
> >
> > source code is at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
> >
> >
> >
> > For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for
> > details on
> >
> > release contents and latest changes. The release was made using
the OODT
> >
> > release process, documented on the Wiki here:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
> >
> >
> >
> > The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
> >
> >
> >
> > A staged Maven repository is available at:
> >
> >
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
> >
> >
> >
> > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The
vote is
> >
> > open for at least the next 72 hours.
> >
> >
> >
> > Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to
check the
> >
> > release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The
vote passes
> >
> > if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
> >
> >
> >
> > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > P.S. Here is my +1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread BW 
https://www.hackdiary.com/2004/01/18/revoking-a-gpg-key/

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:15 AM Chris Mattmann  wrote:

> Thanks Sean, appreciate it. Do you know the magic command to do that
> revocation? (
>
>
>
> On 12/20/17, 9:14 AM, "Sean Kelly"  wrote:
>
> Chris:
>
> This time I get:
>
> gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann "
>
> So I am now +1 to release!
>
> Thanks Chris!
> --k
>
> PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the
> go-to.
>
>
> Chris Mattmann wrote:
> > Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has
> my new KEY. For whatever
> > reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since
> master always has the latest
> > and greatest.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly"  wrote:
> >
> >  Thanks Chris!
> >
> >  I imported the KEYS but I still get
> >
> >   gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> >
> >  Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key
> that's not in
> >  the KEYS file?
> >
> >  --k
> >
> >  Chris Mattmann wrote:
> >  >  KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >  On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly"
>  wrote:
> >  >
> >  >   Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up
> in my spam folder.
> >  >
> >  >   Here goes:
> >  >
> >  >   MD5: ✓
> >  >   SHA1: ✓
> >  >   Python tests: ✓
> >  >   Java tests: ✓
> >  >   Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> >  >
> >  >   Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file
> in the release dir?
> >  >
> >  >   Take care
> >  >   --k
> >  >   >   Chris Mattmann
> >  >   >   2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
> >  >   >   Ping (
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this
> release out? It’s kind
> >  >   >   of needed for DRAT.
> >  >   >   We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but
> would really love
> >  >   >   to release this. Thanks.
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   Cheers,
> >  >   >   Chris
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"<
> mattm...@apache.org>   wrote:
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   Hi Folks,
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   I have posted a 1st release candidate for the
> Apache OODT 1.2.1
> >  >   >   release. The
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   source code is at:
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   For more detailed information, see the included
> CHANGES.txt file for
> >  >   >   details on
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   release contents and latest changes. The release
> was made using the OODT
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   release process, documented on the Wiki here:
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   A staged Maven repository is available at:
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache
> OODT 1.2.1. The vote is
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   open for at least the next 72 hours.
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are
> welcome to check the
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   release candidate and voice their approval or
> disapproval. The vote passes
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >
> >  >   >   [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
> >  >   >
> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread Chris Mattmann 
Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my new KEY. 
For whatever
reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since master 
always has the latest 
and greatest. 



On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly"  wrote:

Thanks Chris!

I imported the KEYS but I still get

gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not in 
the KEYS file?

--k

Chris Mattmann wrote:
> KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (
>
>
>
> On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly"  wrote:
>
>  Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam 
folder.
>
>  Here goes:
>
>  MD5: ✓
>  SHA1: ✓
>  Python tests: ✓
>  Java tests: ✓
>  Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
>  Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release 
dir?
>
>  Take care
>  --k
>  >  Chris Mattmann
>  >  2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
>  >  Ping (
>  >
>  >  Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s 
kind
>  >  of needed for DRAT.
>  >  We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really 
love
>  >  to release this. Thanks.
>  >
>  >  Cheers,
>  >  Chris
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"  
wrote:
>  >
>  >  Hi Folks,
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
>  >  release. The
>  >
>  >  source code is at:
>  >
>  >  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file 
for
>  >  details on
>  >
>  >  release contents and latest changes. The release was made using 
the OODT
>  >
>  >  release process, documented on the Wiki here:
>  >
>  >  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
>  >
>  >  https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  A staged Maven repository is available at:
>  >
>  >  
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The 
vote is
>  >
>  >  open for at least the next 72 hours.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to 
check the
>  >
>  >  release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The 
vote passes
>  >
>  >  if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  Thanks!
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  Chris
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  P.S. Here is my +1.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread Sean Kelly 

Thanks Chris!

I imported the KEYS but I still get

gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not in 
the KEYS file?


--k

Chris Mattmann wrote:

KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (



On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly"  wrote:

 Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam folder.

 Here goes:

 MD5: ✓
 SHA1: ✓
 Python tests: ✓
 Java tests: ✓
 Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

 Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release dir?

 Take care
 --k
 >  Chris Mattmann
 >  2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
 >  Ping (
 >
 >  Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind
 >  of needed for DRAT.
 >  We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love
 >  to release this. Thanks.
 >
 >  Cheers,
 >  Chris
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >  On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:
 >
 >  Hi Folks,
 >
 >
 >
 >  I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
 >  release. The
 >
 >  source code is at:
 >
 >  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
 >
 >
 >
 >  For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for
 >  details on
 >
 >  release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT
 >
 >  release process, documented on the Wiki here:
 >
 >  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
 >
 >
 >
 >  The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
 >
 >  https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
 >
 >
 >
 >  A staged Maven repository is available at:
 >
 >  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
 >
 >
 >
 >  Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote 
is
 >
 >  open for at least the next 72 hours.
 >
 >
 >
 >  Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the
 >
 >  release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote 
passes
 >
 >  if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
 >
 >
 >
 >  [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
 >
 >
 >
 >  [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
 >
 >
 >
 >  Thanks!
 >
 >
 >
 >  Chris
 >
 >
 >
 >  P.S. Here is my +1.
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread Chris Mattmann 
KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (



On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly"  wrote:

Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam folder.

Here goes:

MD5: ✓
SHA1: ✓
Python tests: ✓
Java tests: ✓
Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release dir?

Take care
--k
> Chris Mattmann 
> 2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
> Ping (
>
> Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind 
> of needed for DRAT.
> We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love 
> to release this. Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 
> release. The
>
> source code is at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
>
>
>
> For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for 
> details on
>
> release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT
>
> release process, documented on the Wiki here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>
>
>
> The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
>
> https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
>
>
>
> A staged Maven repository is available at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote is
>
> open for at least the next 72 hours.
>
>
>
> Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the
>
> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes
>
> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
>
>
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> P.S. Here is my +1.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread Sean Kelly 

Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam folder.

Here goes:

MD5: ✓
SHA1: ✓
Python tests: ✓
Java tests: ✓
Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release dir?

Take care
--k

Chris Mattmann 
2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
Ping (

Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind 
of needed for DRAT.
We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love 
to release this. Thanks.


Cheers,
Chris




On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:

Hi Folks,



I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 
release. The


source code is at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/



For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for 
details on


release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT

release process, documented on the Wiki here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process



The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:

https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/



A staged Maven repository is available at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/



Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote is

open for at least the next 72 hours.



Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the

release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes

if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.



[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1



[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...



Thanks!



Chris



P.S. Here is my +1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread Tom Barber 

Checked it out and ran it through its paces looks GTG from my end

+1

On 20/12/17 14:47, Ramirez, Paul M (398N) wrote:

+1

Thanks,
Paul

  
==

Paul Ramirez
Group Supervisor - Science Data System Operations Engineering (398N)
Acting Group Supervisor - Computer Science for Data Intensive Applications 
(398M)
NASA - Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Dr.
Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Mailstop: 158-242
Office: 818-354-1015
Cell: 818-395-8194
==

On 12/19/17, 6:50 PM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:

 Ping (
 
 Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind of needed for DRAT.

 We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love to 
release this. Thanks.
 
 Cheers,

 Chris
 
 
 
 
 On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:
 
 Hi Folks,
 
  
 
 I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 release. The
 
 source code is at:
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
 
  
 
 For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on
 
 release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT
 
 release process, documented on the Wiki here:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
 
  
 
 The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
 
 https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
 
  
 
 A staged Maven repository is available at:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
 
  
 
 Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote is
 
 open for at least the next 72 hours.
 
  
 
 Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the
 
 release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes
 
 if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
 
  
 
 [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
 
  
 
 [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
 
  
 
 Thanks!
 
  
 
 Chris
 
  
 
 P.S. Here is my +1.
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 




--


Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. 
Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston Road, 
Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.



All engagements are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. 
This email and its contents are intended solely for the individual to whom 
it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. 
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The 
company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted 
by this email. If you have received this message in error, please notify us 
immediately by reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of 
legal notice cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-20 Thread Ramirez, Paul M (398N) 
+1

Thanks,
Paul

 
==
Paul Ramirez  
Group Supervisor - Science Data System Operations Engineering (398N)
Acting Group Supervisor - Computer Science for Data Intensive Applications 
(398M)
NASA - Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Dr.
Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Mailstop: 158-242
Office: 818-354-1015
Cell: 818-395-8194
== 

On 12/19/17, 6:50 PM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:

Ping (

Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind of 
needed for DRAT.
We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love to 
release this. Thanks.

Cheers,
Chris




On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:

Hi Folks,

 

I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 
release. The

source code is at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/

 

For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for 
details on

release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT

release process, documented on the Wiki here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process

 

The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:

https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/ 

 

A staged Maven repository is available at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/ 

 

Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote 
is

open for at least the next 72 hours.

 

Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the

release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote 
passes

if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.

 

[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1

 

[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

 

Thanks!

 

Chris

 

P.S. Here is my +1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-12-19 Thread Chris Mattmann 
Ping (

Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind of needed 
for DRAT.
We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love to release 
this. Thanks.

Cheers,
Chris




On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"  wrote:

Hi Folks,

 

I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 release. The

source code is at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/

 

For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for 
details on

release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT

release process, documented on the Wiki here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process

 

The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:

https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/ 

 

A staged Maven repository is available at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/ 

 

Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote is

open for at least the next 72 hours.

 

Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the

release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes

if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.

 

[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1

 

[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

 

Thanks!

 

Chris

 

P.S. Here is my +1.

[VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

2017-11-12 Thread Chris Mattmann 
Hi Folks,

 

I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 release. The

source code is at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/

 

For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on

release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT

release process, documented on the Wiki here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process

 

The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:

https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/ 

 

A staged Maven repository is available at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/ 

 

Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote is

open for at least the next 72 hours.

 

Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the

release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes

if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.

 

[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1

 

[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

 

Thanks!

 

Chris

 

P.S. Here is my +1.