Failed: OOZIE-3542 PreCommit Build #1219
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1219/ ### ## LAST 100 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 2.17 MB...] [TRACE] Full summary file size is 6701 bytes [TRACE] File [/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/test-patch/tmp/SPOTBUGS_DIFF/diff/findbugs-diff-0.1.0-all.jar] removed [TRACE] File [/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/test-patch/tmp/SPOTBUGS_DIFF/diff/findbugs-diff-0.1.0-all.jar.md5] removed Running test-patch task BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY Running test-patch task TESTS Running test-patch task DISTRO Running test-patch task MODERNIZER Running modernizer op=report [TRACE] grep -c '.*ERROR.*Prefer' /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/test-patch/reports/MODERNIZER-clean.txt [TRACE] Modernizer errors before patch: 69 [TRACE] grep -c '.*ERROR.*Prefer' /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/test-patch/reports/MODERNIZER-patch.txt [TRACE] Modernizer errors after patch: 69 Testing JIRA OOZIE-3542 Cleaning local git workspace +1 PATCH_APPLIES +1 CLEAN +1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS +1 the patch does not introduce any @author tags +1 the patch does not introduce any tabs +1 the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces +1 the patch does not introduce any star imports +1 the patch does not introduce any line longer than 132 +1 the patch adds/modifies 2 testcase(s) +1 RAT +1 the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT warnings +1 JAVADOC +1 Javadoc generation succeeded with the patch +1 the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc warning(s) +1 COMPILE +1 HEAD compiles +1 patch compiles +1 the patch does not seem to introduce new javac warnings -1 There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in total that must be fixed. -1 There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in [tools] that must be fixed, listing only the first [5] ones. You can find the SpotBugs diff here (look for the red and orange ones): tools/findbugs-new.html The top [5] most important SpotBugs errors are: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: This use of java/sql/Statement.executeUpdate(Ljava/lang/String;)I can be vulnerable to SQL injection At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 574]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 573] At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 577]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 575] At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 579]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 578] At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 581] +1 There are no new bugs found in [core]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [examples]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [webapp]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/git]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [fluent-job/fluent-job-api]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [client]. 0 There are [4] new bugs found in [server] that would be nice to have fixed. You can find the SpotBugs diff here: server/findbugs-new.html +1 There are no new bugs found in [docs]. +1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY +1 the patch does not change any JPA Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations +1 the patch does not modify JPA files +1 TESTS Tests run: 3180 Tests failed at first run: TestCoordActionsKillXCommand#testActionKillCommandDate For the complete list of flaky tests, see TEST-SUMMARY-FULL files. +1 DISTRO +1 distro tarball builds with the patch +1 MODERNIZER -1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s) The full output of the test-patch run is available at https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1219/ Adding comment to JIRA % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed 0 00 00 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0100 41750 0 100 4175 0 3063 0:00:01 0:00:01 --:--:--
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928004#comment-16928004
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-3542:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-3542
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any star imports
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
132
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch adds/modifies 2 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} Javadoc generation succeeded with the patch
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:red}-1{color} There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in total
that must be fixed.
.{color:red}-1{color} There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in
[tools] that must be fixed, listing only the first [5] ones.
.You can find the SpotBugs diff here (look for the red and orange ones):
tools/findbugs-new.html
.The top [5] most important SpotBugs errors are:
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: This use of
java/sql/Statement.executeUpdate(Ljava/lang/String;)I can be vulnerable to SQL
injection
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 574]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 573]
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 577]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 575]
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 579]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 578]
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 581]
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [webapp].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/git].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in
[fluent-job/fluent-job-api].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
.{color:orange}0{color} There are [4] new bugs found in [server] that would
be nice to have fixed.
.You can find the SpotBugs diff here: server/findbugs-new.html
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 3180
.{color:orange}Tests failed at first run:{color}
TestCoordActionsKillXCommand#testActionKillCommandDate
.For the complete list of flaky tests, see TEST-SUMMARY-FULL files.
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:green}+1 MODERNIZER{color}
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1219/
> Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
> --
>
> Key: OOZIE-3542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tools
>Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy
>Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch,
> OOZIE-3542-4.patch
>
>
> Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the
> necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927932#comment-16927932 ] Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-3542: -- PreCommit-OOZIE-Build started > Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler > -- > > Key: OOZIE-3542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tools >Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy >Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy >Priority: Major > Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch, > OOZIE-3542-4.patch > > > Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the > necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the > namenode implementation is old, it could throw a > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with > RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it. > In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to > succeed. > This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927884#comment-16927884 ] Zsombor Gegesy commented on OOZIE-3542: --- Sorry, I wasn't near to a laptop. I've renamed the test class in patch #4, but the SystemErasureCodingPolicies unfortunately called from ECPolicyDisabler with reflection - so it's not obvious that you couldn't change it. When Oozie could depend on Hadoop 3 directly, the mocking could be much simpler > Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler > -- > > Key: OOZIE-3542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tools >Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy >Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy >Priority: Major > Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch, > OOZIE-3542-4.patch > > > Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the > necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the > namenode implementation is old, it could throw a > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with > RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it. > In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to > succeed. > This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zsombor Gegesy updated OOZIE-3542: -- Attachment: OOZIE-3542-4.patch > Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler > -- > > Key: OOZIE-3542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tools >Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy >Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy >Priority: Major > Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch, > OOZIE-3542-4.patch > > > Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the > necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the > namenode implementation is old, it could throw a > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with > RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it. > In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to > succeed. > This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927534#comment-16927534
]
Julia Kinga Marton commented on OOZIE-3542:
---
[~dionusos], I yesterday [~zsombor] mentioned offline that the
{{SystemErasureCodingPolicies}} is called using reflection, so is not a good
idea to rename it. I think that the test failures are caused by this rename.
Sorry for the confusion.
> Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
> --
>
> Key: OOZIE-3542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tools
>Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy
>Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch
>
>
> Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the
> necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the
> namenode implementation is old, it could throw a
> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with
> RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it.
> In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to
> succeed.
> This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927439#comment-16927439
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-3542:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-3542
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any star imports
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
132
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch adds/modifies 2 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} Javadoc generation succeeded with the patch
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:red}-1{color} There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in total
that must be fixed.
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in
[fluent-job/fluent-job-api].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
.{color:red}-1{color} There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in
[tools] that must be fixed, listing only the first [5] ones.
.You can find the SpotBugs diff here (look for the red and orange ones):
tools/findbugs-new.html
.The top [5] most important SpotBugs errors are:
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: This use of
java/sql/Statement.executeUpdate(Ljava/lang/String;)I can be vulnerable to SQL
injection
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 574]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 573]
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 577]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 575]
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 579]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 578]
.At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 581]
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [webapp].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/git].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 3180
.Tests failed : 4
.Tests in error : 0
.Tests timed out : 0
{color:red}-1{color} [ERROR] There are [4] test failures in [tools]. Listing
only the first [5] ones
testOtherRuntimeExceptionThrown:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler
testOkNotChanged:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler
testOkChanged:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler
testServerNotSupports:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler
Check console output for the full list of errors/failures
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:green}+1 MODERNIZER{color}
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1218/
> Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
> --
>
> Key: OOZIE-3542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tools
>Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy
>Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy
>Priority: Major
>
Failed: OOZIE-3542 PreCommit Build #1218
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1218/ ### ## LAST 100 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 3.10 MB...] Running test-patch task MODERNIZER Running modernizer op=report [TRACE] grep -c '.*ERROR.*Prefer' /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/test-patch/reports/MODERNIZER-clean.txt [TRACE] Modernizer errors before patch: 69 [TRACE] grep -c '.*ERROR.*Prefer' /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/test-patch/reports/MODERNIZER-patch.txt [TRACE] Modernizer errors after patch: 69 Testing JIRA OOZIE-3542 Cleaning local git workspace +1 PATCH_APPLIES +1 CLEAN +1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS +1 the patch does not introduce any @author tags +1 the patch does not introduce any tabs +1 the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces +1 the patch does not introduce any star imports +1 the patch does not introduce any line longer than 132 +1 the patch adds/modifies 2 testcase(s) +1 RAT +1 the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT warnings +1 JAVADOC +1 Javadoc generation succeeded with the patch +1 the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc warning(s) +1 COMPILE +1 HEAD compiles +1 patch compiles +1 the patch does not seem to introduce new javac warnings -1 There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in total that must be fixed. +1 There are no new bugs found in [core]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [client]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [docs]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [fluent-job/fluent-job-api]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [server]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [examples]. -1 There are [15] new bugs found below threshold in [tools] that must be fixed, listing only the first [5] ones. You can find the SpotBugs diff here (look for the red and orange ones): tools/findbugs-new.html The top [5] most important SpotBugs errors are: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: This use of java/sql/Statement.executeUpdate(Ljava/lang/String;)I can be vulnerable to SQL injection At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 574]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 573] At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 577]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 575] At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 579]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 578] At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 584]: At OozieDBCLI.java:[line 581] +1 There are no new bugs found in [webapp]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig]. +1 There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/git]. +1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY +1 the patch does not change any JPA Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations +1 the patch does not modify JPA files -1 TESTS Tests run: 3180 Tests failed : 4 Tests in error : 0 Tests timed out : 0 -1 [ERROR] There are [4] test failures in [tools]. Listing only the first [5] ones testOtherRuntimeExceptionThrown:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler testOkNotChanged:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler testOkChanged:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler testServerNotSupports:org.apache.oozie.tools.TestECPolicyDisabler Check console output for the full list of errors/failures +1 DISTRO +1 distro tarball builds with the patch +1 MODERNIZER -1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s) The full output of the test-patch run is available at https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1218/ Adding comment to JIRA % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed 0 00 00 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0100 44070 0 100 4407 0 3565 0:00:01 0:00:01 --:--:--
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927340#comment-16927340 ] Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-3542: -- PreCommit-OOZIE-Build started > Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler > -- > > Key: OOZIE-3542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tools >Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy >Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy >Priority: Major > Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch > > > Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the > necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the > namenode implementation is old, it could throw a > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with > RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it. > In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to > succeed. > This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927333#comment-16927333 ] Julia Kinga Marton commented on OOZIE-3542: --- Thanks [~dionusos]! LGTM, +1, let's wait for the pending Jenkins and I will merge the change. > Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler > -- > > Key: OOZIE-3542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tools >Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy >Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy >Priority: Major > Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch > > > Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the > necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the > namenode implementation is old, it could throw a > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with > RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it. > In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to > succeed. > This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927321#comment-16927321 ] Denes Bodo commented on OOZIE-3542: --- Thanks [~kmarton] for your comments. [~zsombor] if you do not mind I've uploaded the requested changes. > Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler > -- > > Key: OOZIE-3542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tools >Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy >Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy >Priority: Major > Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch > > > Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the > necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the > namenode implementation is old, it could throw a > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with > RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it. > In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to > succeed. > This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-3542) Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Denes Bodo updated OOZIE-3542: -- Attachment: OOZIE-3542-3.patch > Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler > -- > > Key: OOZIE-3542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tools >Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy >Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy >Priority: Major > Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch > > > Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the > necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the > namenode implementation is old, it could throw a > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with > RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it. > In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to > succeed. > This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)
[jira] Subscription: Oozie Patch Available
Issue Subscription Filter: Oozie Patch Available (93 issues) Subscriber: ooziedaily Key Summary OOZIE-3542 Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542 OOZIE-3536 oozie-main(pom.xml) plugin maven-javadoc-plugin upgrade version caused configuration can't find the Tag https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3536 OOZIE-3529 Oozie not supported for s3 as filesystem https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3529 OOZIE-3482 Fix bug in CoordSubmitXCommand#validateCoordinatorJob https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3482 OOZIE-3480 Add windowactionstatus metrics in DBLiteWorkflowStoreService https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3480 OOZIE-3461 CoordMaterializeTriggerService code cleanup https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3461 OOZIE-3449 Make spark-2 as the default profile https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3449 OOZIE-3447 Run test case in local : It shows oozie-hsqldb-orm.xml exception https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3447 OOZIE-3418 Upgrade to Guava 27 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3418 OOZIE-3405 SSH action shows empty error Message and Error code https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3405 OOZIE-3404 The env variable of SPARK_HOME needs to be set when running pySpark https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3404 OOZIE-3375 Can't use empty in coordinator https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3375 OOZIE-3367 Using && in EL expressions in oozie bundle.xml files generates parse errors https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3367 OOZIE-3366 Update workflow status and subworkflow status on suspend command https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3366 OOZIE-3364 Rerunning Oozie bundle jobs starts the coordinators in indeterminate order https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3364 OOZIE-3362 When killed, SSH action should kill the spawned processes on target host https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3362 OOZIE-3335 Cleanup parseFilter methods https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3335 OOZIE-3328 Create Hive compatibility action executor to run hive actions using beeline https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3328 OOZIE-3320 Oozie ShellAction should support absolute bash file path https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3320 OOZIE-3319 Log SSH action callback error output https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3319 OOZIE-3301 Update NOTICE file https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3301 OOZIE-3274 Remove slf4j https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3274 OOZIE-3266 Coord action rerun support RERUN_SKIP_NODES option https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3266 OOZIE-3256 refactor OozieCLI class https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3256 OOZIE-3254 [coordinator] LAST_ONLY and NONE execution modes: possible OutOfMemoryError when there are too many coordinator actions to materialize https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3254 OOZIE-3199 Let system property restriction configurable https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3199 OOZIE-3196 Authorization: restrict world readability by user https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3196 OOZIE-3179 Adding a configurable config-default.xml location to a workflow https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3179 OOZIE-3170 Oozie Diagnostic Bundle tool fails with NPE due to missing service class https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3170 OOZIE-3137 Add support for log4j2 in HiveMain https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3137 OOZIE-3135 Configure log4j2 in SqoopMain https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3135 OOZIE-3091 Oozie Sqoop Avro Import fails with "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/avro/mapred/AvroWrapper" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3091 OOZIE-3071 Oozie 4.3 Spark sharelib ueses a different version of commons-lang3 than Spark 2.2.0 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3071 OOZIE-3063 Sanitizing variables that are part of openjpa.ConnectionProperties https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3063 OOZIE-3062 Set HADOOP_CONF_DIR for spark action https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3062 OOZIE-2952 Fix Findbugs warnings in oozie-sharelib-oozie https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2952 OOZIE-2834 ParameterVerifier logging non-useful warning for workflow definition https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2834 OOZIE-2812 SparkConfigurationService should support loading configurations from multiple Spark versions
