Re: Migrate to Git?
Agreed, let’s see how it works and then move from there. FYI there is GitPubSub for the website so we could do Git for the site so long as we generate it offline and check into Git. On 8/19/16, 12:15 PM, "Joern Kottmann"wrote: For now the site will stay in svn since the CMS we use doesn't support git. Infra says they can only migrate us to separate repositories with their tooling. We can of course do what we like afterwards. The state after the initial migration will be: opennlp.git opennlp-sandbox.git opennlp-addons.git I suggest we wait a bit and see how this discussion turns out until we take further steps. Jörn On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 22:17 +0900, Anthony Beylerian wrote: > @Jörn @Richard > > I believe less bloat is always better for code housekeeping. > For example, although it is small, I think having the site code along > with > the toolkit code just seems a bit untidy. > > How about we at least separate those two? > It could also be useful to make a more feature rich site in the > future. > > Actually, the Spark team does that too: > > git://git.apache.org/spark.git > git://git.apache.org/spark-website.git > > > @Madhawa > > Did you mean to use branches for the sandboxed projects? > > Best, > > Anthony > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara < > madhaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > we can use branches instead of repositories. > > > > Thanks, > > Madhawa > > > > Madhawa > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Joern Kottmann > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, it would be nice to get the next release out with sentiment > > analysis! > > > > > > It is time for the next release anyway. > > > > > > Jörn > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Chris Mattmann > > org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Fantastic, Joern! I have some SentimentAnalysis stuff to > > > > hopefully > > commit > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > get refactored. Hopefully after that’s done we can ship a > > > > release soon > > > and > > > > > > > > publish to Central. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/18/16, 5:50 AM, "Joern Kottmann" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > We made some progress here, the repository is now switched > > > > to git. > > > > > > > > Please have a look here: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12209 > > > > > > > > And there are couple of things we have to do now: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-860 > > > > > > > > The new repository currently only contains the trunk and > > > > not the > > > other > > > > > > > > stuff like addons, site and sandbox, > > > > I already commented on the infra issue, we might want to > > > > change the > > > > layout > > > > of our repository a bit. > > > > Any thoughts on it? > > > > > > > > The old layout is: > > > > addons > > > > trunk > > > > sandbox > > > > site > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jörn > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > > > > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Jörn, > > > > > > > > > > #3 is a mirror on Github of our writeable Git repo from > > > > #1. Users > > > > > can submit PRs to it, and then it will flow through to > > > > dev list > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > the form of an email that links to information that we > > > > can use to > > > > > easily merge into our writeable ASF repo. Once merged, it > > > > will > > sync > > > > > > > > > > > > out to Github and close the PR. > > > > > > > > > > HTH! > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ++ > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > > > Chief Architect > > > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section > > > > (398) > > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > > > > > > > > > ++ > > > > > > > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
P.S. On convenience. Cloning into single directory and setting up single project makes it works just as well. Decent IDEs handle this easily. On tracking history. The need to track history of experimental code obfuscates its poor documentation. If the code if properly documented (including documenting design decisions), there is no need to search history. Moreover, if experimental code changed approach or algorithm radically (with reasons that should be documented), the history might confuse more than clarify. Modulo tracking history, multiple modular repos are more flexible than one jumbo repo. On 19 August 2016 at 18:01, Aliaksandr Autayeuwrote: > Separating site and code is not enough. Different code requires different > levels of maintenance, that's why it's better to separate sandbox and > add-ons from trunk too. Sandbox might become outdated or might not compile. > It might have a different test or code coverage criteria. It might allow > warnings on compilation. Such things tends to spread from > unstable\experimental code to cleaner and more stable places. For example, > 1 warning stands out and therefore is more likely to be fixed. 5 warnings > from sandbox might easily cloud 6th one from trunk. > > On 19 August 2016 at 16:21, Richard Eckart de Castilho < > richard.eck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Keeping site and code in separate repos: +1 >> >> -- Richard >> >> > On 19.08.2016, at 15:17, Anthony Beylerian >> wrote: >> > >> > @Jörn @Richard >> > >> > I believe less bloat is always better for code housekeeping. >> > For example, although it is small, I think having the site code along >> with >> > the toolkit code just seems a bit untidy. >> > >> > How about we at least separate those two? >> > It could also be useful to make a more feature rich site in the future. >> > >> > Actually, the Spark team does that too: >> > >> > git://git.apache.org/spark.git >> > git://git.apache.org/spark-website.git >> >> >
Re: Migrate to Git?
Keeping site and code in separate repos: +1 -- Richard > On 19.08.2016, at 15:17, Anthony Beylerian> wrote: > > @Jörn @Richard > > I believe less bloat is always better for code housekeeping. > For example, although it is small, I think having the site code along with > the toolkit code just seems a bit untidy. > > How about we at least separate those two? > It could also be useful to make a more feature rich site in the future. > > Actually, the Spark team does that too: > > git://git.apache.org/spark.git > git://git.apache.org/spark-website.git
Re: Migrate to Git?
@Jörn @Richard I believe less bloat is always better for code housekeeping. For example, although it is small, I think having the site code along with the toolkit code just seems a bit untidy. How about we at least separate those two? It could also be useful to make a more feature rich site in the future. Actually, the Spark team does that too: git://git.apache.org/spark.git git://git.apache.org/spark-website.git @Madhawa Did you mean to use branches for the sandboxed projects? Best, Anthony On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara < madhaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > we can use branches instead of repositories. > > Thanks, > Madhawa > > Madhawa > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Joern Kottmann> wrote: > > > Yes, it would be nice to get the next release out with sentiment > analysis! > > It is time for the next release anyway. > > > > Jörn > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Chris Mattmann > > wrote: > > > > > Fantastic, Joern! I have some SentimentAnalysis stuff to hopefully > commit > > > and > > > get refactored. Hopefully after that’s done we can ship a release soon > > and > > > publish to Central. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/18/16, 5:50 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > > > > > We made some progress here, the repository is now switched to git. > > > > > > Please have a look here: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12209 > > > > > > And there are couple of things we have to do now: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-860 > > > > > > The new repository currently only contains the trunk and not the > > other > > > stuff like addons, site and sandbox, > > > I already commented on the infra issue, we might want to change the > > > layout > > > of our repository a bit. > > > Any thoughts on it? > > > > > > The old layout is: > > > addons > > > trunk > > > sandbox > > > site > > > > > > BR, > > > Jörn > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > > > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Jörn, > > > > > > > > #3 is a mirror on Github of our writeable Git repo from #1. Users > > > > can submit PRs to it, and then it will flow through to dev list > in > > > > the form of an email that links to information that we can use to > > > > easily merge into our writeable ASF repo. Once merged, it will > sync > > > > out to Github and close the PR. > > > > > > > > HTH! > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > ++ > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > > Chief Architect > > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > > > ++ > > > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > > > > > ++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 1:23 PM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > > > > > > > >Can you explain 3, is that a writable mirror at Github? > > > > > > > > > >Jörn > > > > > > > > > >On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > > > >> My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > > > > >> > > > > >> 1. Use git-wp > > > > >> 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > > > > >> (i’m happy to adapt) > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > > > > >> 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > > > > >> > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > >> Chris > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ++ > > > > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > > >> Chief Architect > > > > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > > > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > > >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > > > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > > >> > > > ++ > > > > >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > > > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > > > >>
Re: Migrate to Git?
we can use branches instead of repositories. Thanks, Madhawa Madhawa On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Joern Kottmannwrote: > Yes, it would be nice to get the next release out with sentiment analysis! > It is time for the next release anyway. > > Jörn > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Chris Mattmann > wrote: > > > Fantastic, Joern! I have some SentimentAnalysis stuff to hopefully commit > > and > > get refactored. Hopefully after that’s done we can ship a release soon > and > > publish to Central. > > > > > > > > On 8/18/16, 5:50 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > > > We made some progress here, the repository is now switched to git. > > > > Please have a look here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12209 > > > > And there are couple of things we have to do now: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-860 > > > > The new repository currently only contains the trunk and not the > other > > stuff like addons, site and sandbox, > > I already commented on the infra issue, we might want to change the > > layout > > of our repository a bit. > > Any thoughts on it? > > > > The old layout is: > > addons > > trunk > > sandbox > > site > > > > BR, > > Jörn > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > > > Hi Jörn, > > > > > > #3 is a mirror on Github of our writeable Git repo from #1. Users > > > can submit PRs to it, and then it will flow through to dev list in > > > the form of an email that links to information that we can use to > > > easily merge into our writeable ASF repo. Once merged, it will sync > > > out to Github and close the PR. > > > > > > HTH! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chris > > > > > > ++ > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > Chief Architect > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > ++ > > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > > > ++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 1:23 PM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > > > > > >Can you explain 3, is that a writable mirror at Github? > > > > > > > >Jörn > > > > > > > >On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > > > >> My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > > > >> > > > >> 1. Use git-wp > > > >> 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > > > >> (i’m happy to adapt) > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > > > >> 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> Chris > > > >> > > > >> > > ++ > > > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > >> Chief Architect > > > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > >> > > ++ > > > >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > > >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > > > >> > > ++ > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann" > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hello all, > > > >> > > > > >> > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we > discussed > > > >> > it. > > > >> > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > > > >> > > > > >> > My +1 again. > > > >> > > > > >> > Jörn > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > > > >> > mail.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
I don't have a vote here, but I'd agree with Jörn: Separate repos will make it more uncomfortable to track changes across components. Should the project switch to a uniform versioning and joint releases, that would also be more problematic. The project is not particularly large. Having everything in a single repo is more convenient and traceable. Cheers, -- Richard > On 19.08.2016, at 11:48, Anthony Beylerian> wrote: > > +1 for separate repositories. > > Since they will be under the Apache Github Organization, it will also be > neater to browse them like this: > > https://github.com/apache?query=opennlp > > I recommend we keep the repository names starting with opennlp- > > For example : > > https://github.com/apache?query=hadoop > > What do you think? > > Best, > > Anthony > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu > wrote: > >>> >>> Why do you think it is better? >>> >> In general, separating apples from oranges. In practice, not having to go >> through irrelevant stuff while reading, searching, refactoring. Less stuff >> to clone for build automation. Smaller repos to clone in general. >> >> And you still can do all the above by cloning 4 repos into the same >> directory and setting up a single project in your favorite IDE, emulating >> current structure. But at least nothing forces you to do that as single >> repo forces you to. >> >> However, the above might be subjective. In this case commitocracy it is to >> decide. >>
Re: Migrate to Git?
+1 for separate repositories. Since they will be under the Apache Github Organization, it will also be neater to browse them like this: https://github.com/apache?query=opennlp I recommend we keep the repository names starting with opennlp- For example : https://github.com/apache?query=hadoop What do you think? Best, Anthony On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeuwrote: > > > > Why do you think it is better? > > > In general, separating apples from oranges. In practice, not having to go > through irrelevant stuff while reading, searching, refactoring. Less stuff > to clone for build automation. Smaller repos to clone in general. > > And you still can do all the above by cloning 4 repos into the same > directory and setting up a single project in your favorite IDE, emulating > current structure. But at least nothing forces you to do that as single > repo forces you to. > > However, the above might be subjective. In this case commitocracy it is to > decide. >
Re: Migrate to Git?
I don't see the advantage of having multiple repositories, because that makes it harder to check it out and move things around without loosing history (git mv). Why do you think it is better? Jörn On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Chris Mattmannwrote: > Fantastic, Joern! I have some SentimentAnalysis stuff to hopefully commit > and > get refactored. Hopefully after that’s done we can ship a release soon and > publish to Central. > > > > On 8/18/16, 5:50 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > We made some progress here, the repository is now switched to git. > > Please have a look here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12209 > > And there are couple of things we have to do now: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-860 > > The new repository currently only contains the trunk and not the other > stuff like addons, site and sandbox, > I already commented on the infra issue, we might want to change the > layout > of our repository a bit. > Any thoughts on it? > > The old layout is: > addons > trunk > sandbox > site > > BR, > Jörn > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > Hi Jörn, > > > > #3 is a mirror on Github of our writeable Git repo from #1. Users > > can submit PRs to it, and then it will flow through to dev list in > > the form of an email that links to information that we can use to > > easily merge into our writeable ASF repo. Once merged, it will sync > > out to Github and close the PR. > > > > HTH! > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > ++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Chief Architect > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++ > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > > ++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 1:23 PM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > > > >Can you explain 3, is that a writable mirror at Github? > > > > > >Jörn > > > > > >On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > > >> My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > > >> > > >> 1. Use git-wp > > >> 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > > >> (i’m happy to adapt) > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > > >> 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Chris > > >> > > >> > ++ > > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > >> Chief Architect > > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > >> > ++ > > >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > > >> > ++ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hello all, > > >> > > > >> > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed > > >> > it. > > >> > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > > >> > > > >> > My +1 again. > > >> > > > >> > Jörn > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > >> > mail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > > >> > > Tommaso > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi all, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to > > >> > > > migrate from > > >> > > > Subverion
Re: Migrate to Git?
Fantastic, Joern! I have some SentimentAnalysis stuff to hopefully commit and get refactored. Hopefully after that’s done we can ship a release soon and publish to Central. On 8/18/16, 5:50 AM, "Joern Kottmann"wrote: We made some progress here, the repository is now switched to git. Please have a look here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12209 And there are couple of things we have to do now: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-860 The new repository currently only contains the trunk and not the other stuff like addons, site and sandbox, I already commented on the infra issue, we might want to change the layout of our repository a bit. Any thoughts on it? The old layout is: addons trunk sandbox site BR, Jörn On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Jörn, > > #3 is a mirror on Github of our writeable Git repo from #1. Users > can submit PRs to it, and then it will flow through to dev list in > the form of an email that links to information that we can use to > easily merge into our writeable ASF repo. Once merged, it will sync > out to Github and close the PR. > > HTH! > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++ > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 1:23 PM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > >Can you explain 3, is that a writable mirror at Github? > > > >Jörn > > > >On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > >> My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > >> > >> 1. Use git-wp > >> 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > >> (i’m happy to adapt) > >> http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > >> 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> ++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Chief Architect > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++ > >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > >> ++ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > >> > >> > Hello all, > >> > > >> > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed > >> > it. > >> > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > >> > > >> > My +1 again. > >> > > >> > Jörn > >> > > >> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili >> > mail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > >> > > Tommaso > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > >> > > > >> > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > >> > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to > >> > > > migrate from > >> > > > Subverion to Git. > >> > > > > >> > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I > >> > > > suggest to > >> > > > wait until the > >> > > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our > >> > > > build > >> > > > process. > >> > > > > >> > > > Do have all committers experience with git? > >> > > > > >> > > > Jörn > >> > > > > >> > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
Sounds like great news to me. Few words on setting up access? For the layout I'd prefer to have separate things in separate repos. Is that hard to do? On 18 August 2016 at 14:50, Joern Kottmannwrote: > We made some progress here, the repository is now switched to git. > > Please have a look here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12209 > > And there are couple of things we have to do now: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-860 > > The new repository currently only contains the trunk and not the other > stuff like addons, site and sandbox, > I already commented on the infra issue, we might want to change the layout > of our repository a bit. > Any thoughts on it? > > The old layout is: > addons > trunk > sandbox > site > > BR, > Jörn > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > Hi Jörn, > > > > #3 is a mirror on Github of our writeable Git repo from #1. Users > > can submit PRs to it, and then it will flow through to dev list in > > the form of an email that links to information that we can use to > > easily merge into our writeable ASF repo. Once merged, it will sync > > out to Github and close the PR. > > > > HTH! > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > ++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Chief Architect > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++ > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > > ++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 1:23 PM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > > > >Can you explain 3, is that a writable mirror at Github? > > > > > >Jörn > > > > > >On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > > >> My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > > >> > > >> 1. Use git-wp > > >> 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > > >> (i’m happy to adapt) > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > > >> 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Chris > > >> > > >> ++ > > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > >> Chief Architect > > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > >> ++ > > >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > > >> ++ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hello all, > > >> > > > >> > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed > > >> > it. > > >> > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > > >> > > > >> > My +1 again. > > >> > > > >> > Jörn > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili > >> > mail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > > >> > > Tommaso > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi all, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to > > >> > > > migrate from > > >> > > > Subverion to Git. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I > > >> > > > suggest to > > >> > > > wait until the > > >> > > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our > > >> > > > build > > >> > > > process. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Do have all committers experience with git? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Jörn > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
We made some progress here, the repository is now switched to git. Please have a look here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12209 And there are couple of things we have to do now: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-860 The new repository currently only contains the trunk and not the other stuff like addons, site and sandbox, I already commented on the infra issue, we might want to change the layout of our repository a bit. Any thoughts on it? The old layout is: addons trunk sandbox site BR, Jörn On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Jörn, > > #3 is a mirror on Github of our writeable Git repo from #1. Users > can submit PRs to it, and then it will flow through to dev list in > the form of an email that links to information that we can use to > easily merge into our writeable ASF repo. Once merged, it will sync > out to Github and close the PR. > > HTH! > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++ > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 1:23 PM, "Joern Kottmann"wrote: > > >Can you explain 3, is that a writable mirror at Github? > > > >Jörn > > > >On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > >> My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > >> > >> 1. Use git-wp > >> 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > >> (i’m happy to adapt) > >> http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > >> 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> ++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Chief Architect > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++ > >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > >> ++ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > >> > >> > Hello all, > >> > > >> > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed > >> > it. > >> > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > >> > > >> > My +1 again. > >> > > >> > Jörn > >> > > >> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili >> > mail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > >> > > Tommaso > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > >> > > > >> > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > >> > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to > >> > > > migrate from > >> > > > Subverion to Git. > >> > > > > >> > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I > >> > > > suggest to > >> > > > wait until the > >> > > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our > >> > > > build > >> > > > process. > >> > > > > >> > > > Do have all committers experience with git? > >> > > > > >> > > > Jörn > >> > > > > >> > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
+1 r On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Joern Kottmannwrote: > Thanks for your advice, if there are no concerns I will follow Chris > suggestion. > > The first step is to get us setup on git-wp. I will fill an issue with > infra to do this for us. > > Jörn > > On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: >> My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: >> >> 1. Use git-wp >> 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it >> (i’m happy to adapt) >> http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit >> 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> ++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Chief Architect >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++ >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ >> ++ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: >> >> > Hello all, >> > >> > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed it. >> > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. >> > >> > My +1 again. >> > >> > Jörn >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 >> > > Tommaso >> > > >> > > >> > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann >> > > >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > >> > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from >> > > > Subverion to Git. >> > > > >> > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to >> > > > wait until the >> > > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build >> > > > process. >> > > > >> > > > Do have all committers experience with git? >> > > > >> > > > Jörn >> > > > >> > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
Thanks for your advice, if there are no concerns I will follow Chris suggestion. The first step is to get us setup on git-wp. I will fill an issue with infra to do this for us. Jörn On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 15:35 +, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > > 1. Use git-wp > 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > (i’m happy to adapt) > http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++ > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann"wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed it. > > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > > > > My +1 again. > > > > Jörn > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > wrote: > > > > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > > > Tommaso > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from > > > > Subverion to Git. > > > > > > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to > > > > wait until the > > > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build > > > > process. > > > > > > > > Do have all committers experience with git? > > > > > > > > Jörn > > > > > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
If can vote, here is my +1. On 4 Jul 2016 18:35, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > My +1 as well..I would suggest, specifically: > > 1. Use git-wp > 2. Borrow and adapt this guide which suggests how to do it > (i’m happy to adapt) > http://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit > 3. Turn on writeable git wp mirror’ing to apache/opennlp > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++ > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/4/16, 7:36 AM, "Joern Kottmann"wrote: > > >Hello all, > > > >do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed it. > >I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > > > >My +1 again. > > > >Jörn > > > >On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili < > tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> in my opinion that would be good, +1 > >> Tommaso > >> > >> > >> 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from > >> > Subverion to Git. > >> > > >> > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest > to > >> > wait until the > >> > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build > >> > process. > >> > > >> > Do have all committers experience with git? > >> > > >> > Jörn > >> > > >> >
Re: Migrate to Git?
+1 2016-07-04 11:59 GMT-03:00 Tommaso Teofili: > +1 > > Il giorno lun 4 lug 2016 alle ore 16:41 Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara < > madhaw...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > +1 > > > > Madhawa > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Anthony Beylerian < > > anthony.beyler...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Joern Kottmann > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed it. > > > > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > > > > > > > > My +1 again. > > > > > > > > Jörn > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili < > > > > tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > > > > > Tommaso > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate > > > from > > > > > > Subverion to Git. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I > > suggest > > > to > > > > > > wait until the > > > > > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our > > build > > > > > > process. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do have all committers experience with git? > > > > > > > > > > > > Jörn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
+1 Madhawa On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Anthony Beylerian < anthony.beyler...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Joern Kottmann> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed it. > > I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. > > > > My +1 again. > > > > Jörn > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofili < > > tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > > > Tommaso > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate > from > > > > Subverion to Git. > > > > > > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest > to > > > > wait until the > > > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build > > > > process. > > > > > > > > Do have all committers experience with git? > > > > > > > > Jörn > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
Hello all, do we still want to do this? Has been a while since we discussed it. I am happy to get it done if we reach consensus on it again. My +1 again. Jörn On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tommaso Teofiliwrote: > in my opinion that would be good, +1 > Tommaso > > > 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann > > > Hi all, > > > > I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from > > Subverion to Git. > > > > Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to > > wait until the > > 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build > > process. > > > > Do have all committers experience with git? > > > > Jörn > > >
Re: Migrate to Git?
+1, definitely. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:59 PM, William Colen william.co...@gmail.comwrote: +1 to move after 1.5.3 William Colen On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:09 PM, James Kosin james.ko...@gmail.com wrote: I've used both Only thing is I find SVN a little easier on the beginner. Git has many options that aren't so obvious as to the purpose... until you get your hands dirty. I've had several git projects get in a state of not updating as a result. James Kosin On 12/19/2012 4:05 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote: I'm in favor, I use it anyway, it's much faster. I'd also wait till 1.5.3 release. Aliaksandr On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from Subverion to Git. Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to wait until the 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build process. Do have all committers experience with git? Jörn -- Jason Baldridge Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics The University of Texas at Austin http://www.jasonbaldridge.com http://twitter.com/jasonbaldridge
Re: Migrate to Git?
in my opinion that would be good, +1 Tommaso 2012/12/19 Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com Hi all, I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from Subverion to Git. Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to wait until the 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build process. Do have all committers experience with git? Jörn
Migrate to Git?
Hi all, I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from Subverion to Git. Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to wait until the 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build process. Do have all committers experience with git? Jörn
Re: Migrate to Git?
I'm in favor, I use it anyway, it's much faster. I'd also wait till 1.5.3 release. Aliaksandr On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from Subverion to Git. Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to wait until the 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build process. Do have all committers experience with git? Jörn
Re: Migrate to Git?
I've used both Only thing is I find SVN a little easier on the beginner. Git has many options that aren't so obvious as to the purpose... until you get your hands dirty. I've had several git projects get in a state of not updating as a result. James Kosin On 12/19/2012 4:05 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote: I'm in favor, I use it anyway, it's much faster. I'd also wait till 1.5.3 release. Aliaksandr On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I heard at ApacheCon Europe that it should be possible to migrate from Subverion to Git. Is there any interest in doing that? If we decide to do it I suggest to wait until the 1.5.3 release is done so we have a bit time to also migrate our build process. Do have all committers experience with git? Jörn