Re: [RELEASE] Update 4.0 planning items

2012-12-17 Thread Shenfeng Liu
Hi, all,
  I updated the planning wiki and moved most proposed feature/enhancement
with no owner from
http://4.04.0https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Planningto
4.1https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning.
  And I left Encryption GUI still in 4.0 for now, since TJ is discussing
the UI design and trying to get developer volunteer for this item. So I
suggest we revisit this item later (January?).

  Next, I'd like our owners to double check the following proposed items
and confirm if each of them can/should be in 4.0 (current target is to
release in April 2013). Again, I will move out those having no confirmation
after 1 week. (of course, any one is free to propose them back any time).

enhanced extensions manager The extensions manager should support
multiple repositories. Either via UI or via configuration only. - jsc
OpenSocial support Enable 'sharing' to OpenSocial container's Activity
Streams for document, chart, or spreadsheet review  comment - Kevin
Grignon (UX design)
MacOS support with Java dropped  - Herbert Duerr
Usability improvement in Ctrl+A and mouse operations in tables and sections
- Cheng Jian Hong
Interoperability improvement with MS Word 2007/2010 on Shape support  -
Zhang Ying
XLS loading performance with multiple pivot tables  - Wang Lei
Speaker notes support in normal view   - Chen Jin Hua
Include ODF Toolkit- robweir

  Thanks!


- Shenfeng (Simon)



2012/12/8 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA512

 On 12/7/12 3:18 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
  On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:55:23AM -0500, TJ Frazier wrote:
  The Encryption GUI item has not attracted a sponsor. I added
  this per the resolution of a very long discussion in BZ [1].
  Subsequently, Jürgen wrote an extension to set SHA256 mode, and
  I wrote a macro[2] to toggle the settings; both are still
  available.  (I have no idea whether any or many users have used
  them.)
 
  [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090#c31
 
  [2] http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:TJFrazier/Encryption
  (this page includes text suitable for release notes)
 
  If somebody wants to pick up on this, and implement a GUI
  (probably in Tools  Options, possibly on the Save and Save As
  dialogs), that's wonderful. Lacking all fu for SVN and C++, I
  can't volunteer for this.
 
  the best way is to start a new thread asking for UX advice where
  to include the option. IMHO the Save dialogs are a no-go, the
  average user will have no idea what this means.
 
  On the other hand, Tools  Options  Load/Save  General has almost
  no space to add anything else, but may be a new Encryption
  options page is an overhead...
 

 Mmh, maybe directly over the Size optimization ... checkbox.

 I have thought initially about Tools - Options - OpenOffice.org -
 Security. There should be enough place for a checkbox with some
 explanation.

 Juergen

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
 Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQwhb+AAoJEM/u8xZRtf3oP2EP/jOzchb2sy8C+Pat1hygnzP8
 CHreoVW2K7Zgmxs9WPsAuhz6NEH6dhmwg2kHQsh+rP/6FbkXtcKdVuUavKF8JqqW
 SlqKIu52Od6c2DBznhX3yEjj2/qcUOEOGL303TEXnINIxOYc4Xr2jbInbsB6Weaq
 +RoxTUvRLIrP9l6j0iXR7GLmM2CKokKH6fzPXYn2jAVsYSMh9oeT55xTgOjww72m
 ZS6/6FZdAtsjTplqDGUqsDcAZXOVd+qhjBHLFxzFEAsE0gQzKglKKZJsszZ6EcIj
 b4PgpHfIHrkvcuIHOe0O+aDrxd0lwuYBONFHb9hA4+4JHi+rBnLHDxHAUkbHljC1
 IHNXxYJP+d8Sb7VDHuKilqxlefZtrTJAqbcIveY0sONPQBSm+8NluxN4p26ko+RZ
 TYXJEOHe4Xvz6FvG4bLyD2A2JwxgVLf8kVk/sayM3/x+QD+X0RLEUDQa4EhWYGdi
 CugUxj0jbIyvumvY2EIslxQetMGuykeRmDw62jvAu65XFaquKuPaIbDmP/gpFISx
 d+3dYO43wUVnCfrEQY1b3dJijSQbgjsC6GTr6JVF+YxcjNfJOIAe3gjvZsJal63X
 v4UJVwQpVDm/eLpyH+YT4M6wEPz0a1f9N+zgRcdXVIOEH0lrVckHmM3bUjeUTyjp
 GEb0OnjoK5eCGCfvUNx7
 =Q2xu
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [proposal]: Enhance visualisation of Handles

2012-12-17 Thread Armin Le Grand

Hi List,

On 16.12.2012 15:30, RGB ES wrote:

2012/12/16 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de


--- snip ---

The buildbot version has it now and I tried it. The transparency for the
anchor icon is really a large improvement. And the handles have a good
compromise between brightness and transparency. The draw center and mirror
axis markers are visible in front of dark backgrounds too.  So I think,
well done. :)

Thanks Regina. Be ensured - if you would have had concerns, I would take 
them serious ;-)

+1!!!

The new handlers are really nice, and the anchor transparency is just
gorgeous!

Thanks Ricardo :-)


Regards
Ricardo



Did someone try the HighContrast setting? (I did, but just to make sure...)
--
ALG


Re: Is mwiki down?

2012-12-17 Thread janI
The whole server is down

I will contact infra.

rgds
Jan I.


On 17 December 2012 12:22, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:

 I can not access mwiki now... Any one can help to check? Thanks!

 - Shenfeng (Simon)



Re: Is mwiki down?

2012-12-17 Thread tj

On 12/17/2012 06:22, Shenfeng Liu wrote:

I can not access mwiki now... Any one can help to check? Thanks!

- Shenfeng (Simon)


Hi, Simon,

Yes, it's down. The link below[1] is very handy for checking on things 
like this.


[1] http://monitoring.apache.org/status/


The mwiki is currently marked in red, which should mean that someone in 
Infra is already hustling to fix it.


/tj/



Re: Is mwiki down?

2012-12-17 Thread janI
I  am on IRC right nowIt was dead and have a power recyclehopefully
it comes up in a minute or two.

jan I.

On 17 December 2012 12:51, tj t...@apache.org wrote:

 On 12/17/2012 06:22, Shenfeng Liu wrote:

 I can not access mwiki now... Any one can help to check? Thanks!

 - Shenfeng (Simon)

  Hi, Simon,

 Yes, it's down. The link below[1] is very handy for checking on things
 like this.

 [1] 
 http://monitoring.apache.org/**status/http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
 


 The mwiki is currently marked in red, which should mean that someone in
 Infra is already hustling to fix it.

 /tj/




Re: Correction of mailing list addresses on AOO site and other things

2012-12-17 Thread RGB ES
2012/12/17 Gianluca Turconi m...@letturefantastiche.com

 Hello *,

 in this page:

 http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Contribute

 under Getting Started section, the Join the Apache OpenOffice.org
 Mailing List link is still pointing to
 ooo-dev-subscr...@incubator.apache.org rather than
 dev-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org

 Same thing under High Priority Tasks section.


They are ok now




 Furthermore, I'm currently testing Google Chrome browser and while
 accessing this secure URL:

 https://www.openoffice.org/support/index.html

 it displays a rather worrying huge red warning about the site safety... :'(


Same here with chromium, firefox, konqueror...

Regards
Ricardo





 BTW, was the documentation mailing list already created? I may have missed
 the announcement.

 Regards,
 --
 Gianluca Turconi




Re: Is mwiki down?

2012-12-17 Thread Shenfeng Liu
It's back now! Thanks for every one!

- Shenfeng (Simon)


2012/12/17 janI j...@apache.org

 I  am on IRC right nowIt was dead and have a power recyclehopefully
 it comes up in a minute or two.

 jan I.

 On 17 December 2012 12:51, tj t...@apache.org wrote:

  On 12/17/2012 06:22, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
 
  I can not access mwiki now... Any one can help to check? Thanks!
 
  - Shenfeng (Simon)
 
   Hi, Simon,
 
  Yes, it's down. The link below[1] is very handy for checking on things
  like this.
 
  [1] http://monitoring.apache.org/**status/
 http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
  
 
 
  The mwiki is currently marked in red, which should mean that someone in
  Infra is already hustling to fix it.
 
  /tj/
 
 



Re: Correction of mailing list addresses on AOO site and other things

2012-12-17 Thread Gianluca Turconi

Il 17/12/2012 14.06, RGB ES ha scritto:

Same here with chromium, firefox, konqueror...
It seems they display the warning because the domain is 
www.openoffice.org while the certification is for *.apache.org.


An average user may simply skip OO secure website. :(

Regards,

Gianluca


Re: Correction of mailing list addresses on AOO site and other things

2012-12-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti

Gianluca Turconi wrote:

Il 17/12/2012 14.06, RGB ES ha scritto:

Same here with chromium, firefox, konqueror...

It seems they display the warning because the domain is
www.openoffice.org while the certification is for *.apache.org.


This has been discussed in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5450

Fact is, did you find any links to the HTTPS site or did you (or a
browser extension for you!) decide to try the HTTPS version? We don't
publicly advertise the HTTPS version and https://ooo-site.apache.org/ is
the recommended URL if someone really wants HTTPS. It shouldn't display
warnings.


BTW, was the documentation mailing list already created? I may have
missed the announcement.


Still in Infra's pipeline... the request was sent but the list has not
been created yet.

Regards,
  Andrea.


Re: Correction of mailing list addresses on AOO site and other things

2012-12-17 Thread Gianluca Turconi

Il 17/12/2012 14.21, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto:

Gianluca Turconi wrote:

Il 17/12/2012 14.06, RGB ES ha scritto:

Same here with chromium, firefox, konqueror...

It seems they display the warning because the domain is
www.openoffice.org while the certification is for *.apache.org.


This has been discussed in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5450

Fact is, did you find any links to the HTTPS site or did you (or a
browser extension for you!) decide to try the HTTPS version? We don't
publicly advertise the HTTPS version and https://ooo-site.apache.org/ is
the recommended URL if someone really wants HTTPS. It shouldn't display
warnings.
The secure pages are provided as first result from the DuckDuckGo search 
engine for several AOO related results like this:


https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apache+openoffice+blogkl=it-it

In other search engines, when you use their secure version for the 
searches, they provide secure versions of any website higher in their 
results list (i.e. on https://www.bing.com/ and https://www.google.com/ 
if you're able to see my same list of results. You know, Bing and Google 
always want to *personalize* your search results... :'(


Regards,

Gianluca





Re: Spam on extensions website

2012-12-17 Thread FR web forum
Massive spam from several users (fake oxt)


Re: Spam on extensions website

2012-12-17 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:25 PM, FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr wrote:
 Massive spam from several users (fake oxt)

 Actually is one user who created about 10 fake extensions, not
properly spam I'd say.
 Anyway, all those have been erased, thanks for heads up.

Roberto

-- 

This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It 
may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately 
notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.



Re: [Blog Draft] Update about Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 @Dec 13

2012-12-17 Thread Yue Helen
I missed the great event...Thanks for the update! Looking forward to more
users and contributors from China.

Helen

2012/12/17 Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com

 Hi, all,
   I just want to give you an update that we had a successful Apache
 OpenOffice session last Thursday (Dec 13) on Apache Asia Road Show 2012
 Beijing.
   Thanks to Peter, Tao and Da Li for the speech! The topics covered AOO
 general introduction, contributions from local volunteers, how to join
 community and make contribution, and building social/cloud solutions by
 integrating with AOO. We also distributed AOO promotion materials that
 prepared by Da Li.
   We got more than 100 audience participated in the OpenOffice session
 14:00-15:00. Most of them are technical people from different companies and
 universities. Per my check during my speech, only 20 had used OpenOffice
 before. So it is really a good promotion of our product and community.

   We are refining the presentations and will publish them later.

   Thanks!


 - Shenfeng (Simon)



 2012/12/5 Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org

  OK.
 
  On 12/5/2012 4:55 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
   Peter,
  Thanks for your comments! I added the speaker names per the
 presenting
   sequence.
  
   
   Apache OpenOffice in Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 at December 13
  
   Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 will be held at December 13, and
  Apache
   OpenOffice will deliver a session in the conference.
   In the Apache OpenOffice session, Peter Junge, Apache OpenOffice PMC
   member, will give a speech to introduce Apache OpenOffice, its history
  and
   way in Apache. And other contributors in Beijing, Shenfeng Liu, Hongyun
  An,
   Tao Liu and Dali Liu, will also give their speech to share the best
   practice of contributing to the open source community, as well as
  building
   enterprise business and Cloud/Social solution on top of Apache
  OpenOffice.
   Please visit the Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 website and
 register:
   http://apacheasiaroadshow04.eventbrite.com . We are looking forward to
   seeing you there!
  
   
   Apache OpenOffice将在12月13日Apache Asia Road Show Beijing
 2012大会上介绍其发展及解决方案
  
   Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012将于12月13日在北京中关村软件园举行。届时Apache
   OpenOffice将在大会上介绍其发展及相关解决方案。
   在论坛上,Apache OpenOffice项目管理委员会成员Peter Junge将首先介绍Apache
   OpenOffice及其历史和发展方向。其他在北京的Apache
  OpenOffice志愿者,刘慎锋,安红云,刘涛,刘大力等,也会分享在Apache
   OpenOffice开源社区做贡献的经验,以及如何基于Apache OpenOffice开发企业应用和云计算及社交解决方案。
   欢迎大家到Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012网站注册:
   http://apacheasiaroadshow04.eventbrite.com!让我们共同关注Apache
   OpenOffice,共同推动开源社区的发展!
  
   
  
  
   - Shenfeng (Simon)
  
  
   2012/12/5 Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org
  
   I would also mention the names of the other speakers. Apart from that
  it's
   OK.
  
   Peter
  
  
   On 12/4/2012 11:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
  
   On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   Don,
   Thanks for your suggestion!
   Here is my draft of the blog, in English  Chinese. Please
 review
  and
   give your comments!
   I found myself not able to edit the blog directly, so I wonder
 if
  you
   or
   any one else can help to post? Thanks very much!
  
  
   Here is the post, in draft form on the blog:
   https://blogs.apache.org/**preview/OOo/?previewEntry=**
   apache_asia_road_show_beijing
 
 https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_asia_road_show_beijing
  
  
   Let me know if it is OK and I will publish it.
  
   -Rob
  
  
  
 --**--
   Apache OpenOffice in Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 at December
 13
  
   Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 will be held at December 13, and
   Apache
   OpenOffice will deliver a session in the conference.
   In the Apache OpenOffice session, Peter Junge, Apache OpenOffice PMC
   member, will give a speech to introduce Apache OpenOffice, its
 history
   and
   way in Apache. And other contributors in Beijing will also give
 their
   speech to share the best practice of contributing to the open source
   community, as well as building enterprise business and Cloud/Social
   solution on top of Apache OpenOffice.
   Please visit the Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 website and
  register:
   http://apacheasiaroadshow04.**eventbrite.com
  http://apacheasiaroadshow04.eventbrite.com. We are looking forward to
   seeing you there!
  
   --**--
   Apache OpenOffice将在12月13日Apache Asia Road Show Beijing
  2012大会上介绍其发展及解决方案
  
   Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012将于12月13日在北京中关村软件园举行。**届时Apache
   OpenOffice将在大会上介绍其发展及相关解决方案。
   在论坛上,Apache OpenOffice项目管理委员会成员Peter Junge将首先介绍Apache
   OpenOffice及其历史和发展方向。**其他在北京的Apache OpenOffice志愿者也会分享在Apache
   

Re: AOO trunk build fails with HSQLDB

2012-12-17 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello Kay;

 Yes, I can confirm after solving those two issues,we got OpenOffice building 
 with JDK 7 on FreeBSD:

 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/

 Pedro.

Hey -- thanks for this notice. Well, IMO, we should fix these
supposedly *trivial* issues and get on with java 7. Java 6 is out of
support for *some* time now. We can't expect users to keep an older
version like 6 around.

I will try this when I get a chance -- assuming I can deal with temp
file issues.


-- 

MzK

No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.

  -- Aesop


Re: AOO trunk build fails with HSQLDB

2012-12-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:10:09AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
  Hello Kay;
 
  Yes, I can confirm after solving those two issues,we got OpenOffice 
  building with JDK 7 on FreeBSD:
 
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/
 
  Pedro.
 
 Hey -- thanks for this notice. Well, IMO, we should fix these
 supposedly *trivial* issues and get on with java 7. Java 6 is out of
 support for *some* time now. We can't expect users to keep an older
 version like 6 around.

AFAIK the Java base is 1.5 (both source and target). Moving this to 1.7
is a bad idea.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpkTWpp6mSEV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [WEBSITE] Problem with .htm files

2012-12-17 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Hi Andrea,

 On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

 Dave Fisher wrote:
 I think that we can purge these *.htm duplicates, but if we do it
 will be a sledgehammer build.

 It will also be a problem, unless we accompany it with other changes: for 
 example, http://www.openoffice.org/pt/ would completely break, and all 
 external sites that now link to some of our .htm files would break too.

 Got it.

 It was intentional. Before doing so we would need to make a group
 decision about how to treat the two types of files.

 Regardless of what templates we apply, the best solution should:
 1) Allow a .htaccess redirect/rewrite from .htm to .html (to preserve 
 existing internal and external links)
 2) Have the SVN file names match the URLs: editing a file named news.htm 
 in SVN should not result in a change in a page with URL .../news.html. The 
 current handling confuses the CMS too (for example, no diff is reported). So 
 either we mass-rename files from .htm to .html and rely on 1) above, or we 
 don't change .htm to .html but publish .htm URLs.

 We need only do (1) and I would do it within the httpd config like our 
 existing redirects. Regardless if there are both file1.htm and file1.html in 
 the source, one of these must be removed from the source svn.

Dave, Andrea --

Only ONE copy is in source, the htm file. The duplicate gets
generated from CMS -- but the new html is the most recent copy (on
the actual web tree) -- generated from htm.

Could we fix our templating to just continue to allow for htm
instead of combing them as we're doing now? maybe that would work. The
web server seems happy enough to server up htm in addition to html

I don't know what this would do to the html file now on the web
server. maybe a  re-publish for say /pt/about would make this new
html file go away once we fixed the templating.

Thoughts?


 See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5668 for this request along 
 with a set to avoid an incubator redirect for certain links.

 We do not need to do (2) because we already are making this change in the 
 staging and publish. You see no diffs for the old htm files because they are 
 not changed. I do see diffs in the html versions of the pages. Even with the 
 redirect in place, it still makes sense to edit the pages to use *.html and 
 not *.htm in links.


 There are two different procedures from view.pm used:  ...
 There are several templates used from templates/.

 To me, .htm and .html are not different file types and were never used as 
 such: I mean, volunteers historically committed .htm or .html according to 
 their habits, but it doesn't make sense to have different ways of handling 
 them now. So I would tend to rename all .htm to .html and put the .htaccess 
 redirect in place, and have only one type of HTML files to handle.

 I think it is ok to force the pages to be *.html. We should have some 
 consistency. Maybe soon it will be time to start switching openoffice.org to 
 mdtext.

 Regards,
 Dave


 Regards,
  Andrea.




-- 

MzK

No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.

  -- Aesop


Re: AOO trunk build fails with HSQLDB

2012-12-17 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:10:09AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
  Hello Kay;
 
  Yes, I can confirm after solving those two issues,we got OpenOffice 
  building with JDK 7 on FreeBSD:
 
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/
 
  Pedro.

 Hey -- thanks for this notice. Well, IMO, we should fix these
 supposedly *trivial* issues and get on with java 7. Java 6 is out of
 support for *some* time now. We can't expect users to keep an older
 version like 6 around.

 AFAIK the Java base is 1.5 (both source and target). Moving this to 1.7
 is a bad idea.


 Regards
 --
 Ariel Constenla-Haile
 La Plata, Argentina

Ariel -- can you elaborate on this?



-- 

MzK

No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.

  -- Aesop


Re: [WEBSITE] Problem with .htm files

2012-12-17 Thread Dave Fisher

On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Hi Andrea,
 
 On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
 
 Dave Fisher wrote:
 I think that we can purge these *.htm duplicates, but if we do it
 will be a sledgehammer build.
 
 It will also be a problem, unless we accompany it with other changes: for 
 example, http://www.openoffice.org/pt/ would completely break, and all 
 external sites that now link to some of our .htm files would break too.
 
 Got it.
 
 It was intentional. Before doing so we would need to make a group
 decision about how to treat the two types of files.
 
 Regardless of what templates we apply, the best solution should:
 1) Allow a .htaccess redirect/rewrite from .htm to .html (to preserve 
 existing internal and external links)
 2) Have the SVN file names match the URLs: editing a file named news.htm 
 in SVN should not result in a change in a page with URL .../news.html. 
 The current handling confuses the CMS too (for example, no diff is 
 reported). So either we mass-rename files from .htm to .html and rely on 1) 
 above, or we don't change .htm to .html but publish .htm URLs.
 
 We need only do (1) and I would do it within the httpd config like our 
 existing redirects. Regardless if there are both file1.htm and file1.html in 
 the source, one of these must be removed from the source svn.
 
 Dave, Andrea --
 
 Only ONE copy is in source, the htm file. The duplicate gets
 generated from CMS -- but the new html is the most recent copy (on
 the actual web tree) -- generated from htm.
 
 Could we fix our templating to just continue to allow for htm
 instead of combing them as we're doing now?

It can be tried on a local copy. The prospective changes are required in 
lib/view.pm, but exactly what these changes are I am guessing at this point.

It will be something about determining which type of page htm vs. html and then 
make the appropriate call here:

I think, but do not know. If someone wants to experiment on a local build then 
I'll give pointers, but I may not have time to check for a day or two.

 maybe that would work. The
 web server seems happy enough to server up htm in addition to html
 
 I don't know what this would do to the html file now on the web
 server. maybe a  re-publish for say /pt/about would make this new
 html file go away once we fixed the templating.

Either way we need to republish those directories somehow to either remove the 
extra htm or the extra html files.

The redirect that has been requested will force all *.htm into *.html which I 
find to be simpler, but may be confusing to volunteers.

Regards,
Dave


 
 Thoughts?
 
 
 See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5668 for this request along 
 with a set to avoid an incubator redirect for certain links.
 
 We do not need to do (2) because we already are making this change in the 
 staging and publish. You see no diffs for the old htm files because they are 
 not changed. I do see diffs in the html versions of the pages. Even with the 
 redirect in place, it still makes sense to edit the pages to use *.html and 
 not *.htm in links.
 
 
 There are two different procedures from view.pm used:  ...
 There are several templates used from templates/.
 
 To me, .htm and .html are not different file types and were never used as 
 such: I mean, volunteers historically committed .htm or .html according to 
 their habits, but it doesn't make sense to have different ways of handling 
 them now. So I would tend to rename all .htm to .html and put the .htaccess 
 redirect in place, and have only one type of HTML files to handle.
 
 I think it is ok to force the pages to be *.html. We should have some 
 consistency. Maybe soon it will be time to start switching openoffice.org to 
 mdtext.
 
 Regards,
 Dave
 
 
 Regards,
 Andrea.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 
 MzK
 
 No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
 
  -- Aesop



Re: AOO trunk build fails with HSQLDB

2012-12-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Key,

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:30:43AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote:
  
   Yes, I can confirm after solving those two issues,we got OpenOffice 
   building with JDK 7 on FreeBSD:
  
   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/
  
   Pedro.
 
  Hey -- thanks for this notice. Well, IMO, we should fix these
  supposedly *trivial* issues and get on with java 7. Java 6 is out of
  support for *some* time now. We can't expect users to keep an older
  version like 6 around.
 
  AFAIK the Java base is 1.5 (both source and target). Moving this to 1.7
  is a bad idea.
 Ariel -- can you elaborate on this?

See Rony's mail.

In the discussion, two things are mixed:

- Java baseline
- supported Java version by our build environment

Currently, the build system does not support JDK 7. This is a draw back
for the people that builds OpenOffice if their system only comes with
JDK 7. So supporting JDK 7 in the build environment may be a good idea
as it would make building easier for new comers.

But we should keep the Java baseline as it is now (Java 1.5), both
source (the source files have code written without using new API
introduced post JDK 1.5) and target (the binaries generated are targeted
to run in a JRE 5). This is for compatibility: with old extensions, LTS
systems with older JRE, etc.

Note that a 1.7 JDK is able to build 1.5 sources and generate 1.5 targeted
binaries, so while supporting JDK 7 in the build environment, we must
ensure that the Java baseline is not touched - or, if the Java baseline
is going to be changed, this has to be carefully discussed (and Java
7 as a baseline is a no-go - AFAIK Mac OS does not support it).


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpu1Poi7Eyw7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [WEBSITE] Problem with .htm files

2012-12-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Dave Fisher wrote on Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:20:05 -0800:
 
 On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
 
  On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
  Hi Andrea,
  
  On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
  
  Dave Fisher wrote:
  I think that we can purge these *.htm duplicates, but if we do it
  will be a sledgehammer build.
  
  It will also be a problem, unless we accompany it with other changes: for 
  example, http://www.openoffice.org/pt/ would completely break, and all 
  external sites that now link to some of our .htm files would break too.
  
  Got it.
  
  It was intentional. Before doing so we would need to make a group
  decision about how to treat the two types of files.
  
  Regardless of what templates we apply, the best solution should:
  1) Allow a .htaccess redirect/rewrite from .htm to .html (to preserve 
  existing internal and external links)
  2) Have the SVN file names match the URLs: editing a file named 
  news.htm in SVN should not result in a change in a page with URL 
  .../news.html. The current handling confuses the CMS too (for example, 
  no diff is reported). So either we mass-rename files from .htm to .html 
  and rely on 1) above, or we don't change .htm to .html but publish .htm 
  URLs.
  
  We need only do (1) and I would do it within the httpd config like our 
  existing redirects. Regardless if there are both file1.htm and file1.html 
  in the source, one of these must be removed from the source svn.
  
  Dave, Andrea --
  
  Only ONE copy is in source, the htm file. The duplicate gets
  generated from CMS -- but the new html is the most recent copy (on
  the actual web tree) -- generated from htm.
  
  Could we fix our templating to just continue to allow for htm
  instead of combing them as we're doing now?
 
 It can be tried on a local copy. The prospective changes are required in 
 lib/view.pm, but exactly what these changes are I am guessing at this point.
 
 It will be something about determining which type of page htm vs. html and 
 then make the appropriate call here:
 
 I think, but do not know. If someone wants to experiment on a local build 
 then I'll give pointers, but I may not have time to check for a day or two.

I think you could define:

sub htm_page {
  my (@r) = html_page @_;
  $r[1] = 'html' if $r[1] eq 'htm';
  @r
}

and then use that in path.pm.


Re: [Templates site]Cannot register

2012-12-17 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:41 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/11/12 Roberto Galoppini rgalopp...@geek.net

 Investigating the problem on our side, I'll let you know in the next hours.


 It seems it's working now.

My apologies, we actually resolved the issue couple of days after your
first email, but I forgot to mention it here.

Roberto


 Regards
 Ricardo



 Roberto

 On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:38 PM, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I can just confirm that I have the same problem. To me it seems as if the
  site changes (from incubator) inhibeted the sending of mails. I trace the
  html post, and that seems to be ok.
 
  rgds
  Jan I.
 
  On 11 November 2012 23:28, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   An user on the ES mailing list have problems registering on the
 Templates
   site, so I tried the process... and failed as well.
  
   After filling the fields on the registering page(1) nothing arrived to
 my
   mailbox. Then, I selected the ask for a new password (Solicitar
 nueva
   contraseña) option and nothing happened: no mail to my mailbox.
  
   If I try to register again using the same username and/or email the
  system
   tell me that the user already exists and suggest me to ask for a new
   password... process that do not work.
  
   I never was offered to set a first password so the registration is
   completely locked.
  
   Any idea where the problem is?
  
   (1) http://templates.openoffice.org/es/user/register
  
   Regards
   Ricardo

-- 

This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It 
may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately 
notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.



Re: [WEBSITE] Problem with .htm files

2012-12-17 Thread Dave Fisher

On Dec 17, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:

 Dave Fisher wrote on Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:20:05 -0800:
 
 On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
 
 On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Hi Andrea,
 
 On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
 
 Dave Fisher wrote:
 I think that we can purge these *.htm duplicates, but if we do it
 will be a sledgehammer build.
 
 It will also be a problem, unless we accompany it with other changes: for 
 example, http://www.openoffice.org/pt/ would completely break, and all 
 external sites that now link to some of our .htm files would break too.
 
 Got it.
 
 It was intentional. Before doing so we would need to make a group
 decision about how to treat the two types of files.
 
 Regardless of what templates we apply, the best solution should:
 1) Allow a .htaccess redirect/rewrite from .htm to .html (to preserve 
 existing internal and external links)
 2) Have the SVN file names match the URLs: editing a file named 
 news.htm in SVN should not result in a change in a page with URL 
 .../news.html. The current handling confuses the CMS too (for example, 
 no diff is reported). So either we mass-rename files from .htm to .html 
 and rely on 1) above, or we don't change .htm to .html but publish .htm 
 URLs.
 
 We need only do (1) and I would do it within the httpd config like our 
 existing redirects. Regardless if there are both file1.htm and file1.html 
 in the source, one of these must be removed from the source svn.
 
 Dave, Andrea --
 
 Only ONE copy is in source, the htm file. The duplicate gets
 generated from CMS -- but the new html is the most recent copy (on
 the actual web tree) -- generated from htm.
 
 Could we fix our templating to just continue to allow for htm
 instead of combing them as we're doing now?
 
 It can be tried on a local copy. The prospective changes are required in 
 lib/view.pm, but exactly what these changes are I am guessing at this 
 point.
 
 It will be something about determining which type of page htm vs. html and 
 then make the appropriate call here:
 
 I think, but do not know. If someone wants to experiment on a local build 
 then I'll give pointers, but I may not have time to check for a day or two.
 
 I think you could define:
 
 sub htm_page {
  my (@r) = html_page @_;
  $r[1] = 'html' if $r[1] eq 'htm';
  @r
 }
 
 and then use that in path.pm.

Thank you. I'll give that a try in a few hours when I finish my work day.

Meanwhile it is likely that you will delay the JIRA issue. I'll keep you posted 
both here and there.

Regards,
Dave





Re: [WEBSITE] Problem with .htm files

2012-12-17 Thread Dave Fisher

On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:

 
 On Dec 17, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
 
 Dave Fisher wrote on Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:20:05 -0800:
 
 On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
 
 On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Hi Andrea,
 
 On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
 
 Dave Fisher wrote:
 I think that we can purge these *.htm duplicates, but if we do it
 will be a sledgehammer build.
 
 It will also be a problem, unless we accompany it with other changes: 
 for example, http://www.openoffice.org/pt/ would completely break, and 
 all external sites that now link to some of our .htm files would break 
 too.
 
 Got it.
 
 It was intentional. Before doing so we would need to make a group
 decision about how to treat the two types of files.
 
 Regardless of what templates we apply, the best solution should:
 1) Allow a .htaccess redirect/rewrite from .htm to .html (to preserve 
 existing internal and external links)
 2) Have the SVN file names match the URLs: editing a file named 
 news.htm in SVN should not result in a change in a page with URL 
 .../news.html. The current handling confuses the CMS too (for example, 
 no diff is reported). So either we mass-rename files from .htm to .html 
 and rely on 1) above, or we don't change .htm to .html but publish .htm 
 URLs.
 
 We need only do (1) and I would do it within the httpd config like our 
 existing redirects. Regardless if there are both file1.htm and file1.html 
 in the source, one of these must be removed from the source svn.
 
 Dave, Andrea --
 
 Only ONE copy is in source, the htm file. The duplicate gets
 generated from CMS -- but the new html is the most recent copy (on
 the actual web tree) -- generated from htm.
 
 Could we fix our templating to just continue to allow for htm
 instead of combing them as we're doing now?
 
 It can be tried on a local copy. The prospective changes are required in 
 lib/view.pm, but exactly what these changes are I am guessing at this 
 point.
 
 It will be something about determining which type of page htm vs. html and 
 then make the appropriate call here:
 
 I think, but do not know. If someone wants to experiment on a local build 
 then I'll give pointers, but I may not have time to check for a day or two.
 
 I think you could define:
 
 sub htm_page {
 my (@r) = html_page @_;
 $r[1] = 'html' if $r[1] eq 'htm';
 @r
 }
 
 and then use that in path.pm.
 
 Thank you. I'll give that a try in a few hours when I finish my work day.
 
 Meanwhile it is likely that you will delay the JIRA issue. I'll keep you 
 posted both here and there.

Actually the r[1] line needed to be reversed.

Here is the patch about to be applied:

Index: view.pm
===
--- view.pm (revision 1423170)
+++ view.pm (working copy)
@@ -101,6 +101,12 @@
 return Template($template)-render(\%args), html = \%args;
 }
 
+sub htm_page {
+ my (@r) = html_page @_;
+ $r[1] = 'htm' if $r[1] eq 'html';
+ @r
+}
+
 sub sitemap {
 my %args = @_;
 my $template = content$args{path};
Index: path.pm
===
--- path.pm (revision 1423170)
+++ path.pm (working copy)
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
[qr!rightnav.mdtext$!, single_narrative = { template = 
navigator.html }],
[qr!\.mdtext$!, single_narrative = { template = 
single_narrative.html }],
[qr!\.html$!, html_page = { template = html_page.html }],
-   [qr!\.htm$!, html_page = { template = html_page.html }],
+   [qr!\.htm$!, htm_page = { template = html_page.html }],
 ) ;
 
 # for specifying interdependencies between the files

We can discuss the cleanup of the old *.html files later.

Regards,
Dave

 
 Regards,
 Dave
 
 
 



OSCON CFP Open

2012-12-17 Thread Rob Weir
I've updated our events calendar
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Events+Calendar)
to add the OSCON Call for Participation:
http://www.oscon.com/oscon2013/public/cfp/251

The actual conference is not until July, so our 4.0 release should
already be out by then.

-Rob


Re: Help needed on CMS : How can we bypass template application?

2012-12-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Alternately you could write a positive
 regexp and a pass_thru view to view.pm
 a'la

 sub pass_thru {
 my %args = @_;
 open my $fh, $args{path} or die Can't open $args{path}:$!;
 read $fh, my $content, -s $fh;
 return $content, html = %args;
 }


Thanks, I like that approach.  After testing locally, and a with a
small modification, I've checked that in.

-Rob






 From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: Help needed on CMS : How can we bypass template application?

1 or 2 is the easiest to accomplish:
just alter the regexps in path.pm to ignore
those directories (you'll need a negative pattern
so be sure to test it before applying).






 From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:23 AM
Subject: Help needed on CMS : How can we bypass template application?

On the marketing list we're preparing a content experiment to try
different variations of social networking icon placement.  The idea is
to increase brand awareness by encouraging downloaders to share the
good news about AOO with their friends.

As part of this experiment we're creating several variations of the
download page.  But we're changing more than the body.  We're working
directly with the HTML, changing stuff that ordinarily would be done
via the template skeleton, header, footer, etc.  Don't worry, this is
just a mock up. Whatever we learn from this experiment would feed back
into the real template.  However, in order to do this experiment we
need to be able to freely change the page and make, in some cases, 9
different variations of it.

The problem is if we check in these mockups, the CMS will try to apply
the template.  And that makes a mess, since we already have the
template applied.  (Remember, we're starting from the full HTML).

So what we're looking for is some easy way we can avoid applying the
site-wide template to a set of web pages.  Since this experimentation
will likely be an ongoing effort, it would be good to have a way that
does not require mucking around with perl script every time.

Is there any way we can arrange it so:

1) All files in a given directory, say /content-experiment, are passed
through as-is with no template applied?

or

2) All files that match a given naming pattern, say,
-content-experiment.html, skip the templating process

or

3) All files with a given meta header such as meta
property=content-experiment value=true skip the templating
process

(I think 3 is the most flexible, but not sure how hard this is to code).

Regards,

-Rob







Re: Help needed on CMS : How can we bypass template application?

2012-12-17 Thread Dave Fisher

On Dec 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Rob Weir wrote:

 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Alternately you could write a positive
 regexp and a pass_thru view to view.pm
 a'la
 
 sub pass_thru {
my %args = @_;
open my $fh, $args{path} or die Can't open $args{path}:$!;
read $fh, my $content, -s $fh;
return $content, html = %args;
 }
 
 
 Thanks, I like that approach.  After testing locally, and a with a
 small modification, I've checked that in.

We've collided, fyi. I guess my full scan will follow yours. I was applying 
Daniel's htm suggestion with the same comment :-)

Regards,
Dave

 
 -Rob
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org dev@openoffice.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:25 AM
 Subject: Re: Help needed on CMS : How can we bypass template application?
 
 1 or 2 is the easiest to accomplish:
 just alter the regexps in path.pm to ignore
 those directories (you'll need a negative pattern
 so be sure to test it before applying).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:23 AM
 Subject: Help needed on CMS : How can we bypass template application?
 
 On the marketing list we're preparing a content experiment to try
 different variations of social networking icon placement.  The idea is
 to increase brand awareness by encouraging downloaders to share the
 good news about AOO with their friends.
 
 As part of this experiment we're creating several variations of the
 download page.  But we're changing more than the body.  We're working
 directly with the HTML, changing stuff that ordinarily would be done
 via the template skeleton, header, footer, etc.  Don't worry, this is
 just a mock up. Whatever we learn from this experiment would feed back
 into the real template.  However, in order to do this experiment we
 need to be able to freely change the page and make, in some cases, 9
 different variations of it.
 
 The problem is if we check in these mockups, the CMS will try to apply
 the template.  And that makes a mess, since we already have the
 template applied.  (Remember, we're starting from the full HTML).
 
 So what we're looking for is some easy way we can avoid applying the
 site-wide template to a set of web pages.  Since this experimentation
 will likely be an ongoing effort, it would be good to have a way that
 does not require mucking around with perl script every time.
 
 Is there any way we can arrange it so:
 
 1) All files in a given directory, say /content-experiment, are passed
 through as-is with no template applied?
 
 or
 
 2) All files that match a given naming pattern, say,
 -content-experiment.html, skip the templating process
 
 or
 
 3) All files with a given meta header such as meta
 property=content-experiment value=true skip the templating
 process
 
 (I think 3 is the most flexible, but not sure how hard this is to code).
 
 Regards,
 
 -Rob
 
 
 
 
 



Re: Google+ Community

2012-12-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/12/18 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org

 A follow up from a previous note.  We have a new Google+ Community set
 up for Apache OpenOffice.  You are welcome to join:


 https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/114598373874764163668/communities/103683488250592271079


 I get an error 404

try https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/103683488250592271079


Re: Google+ Community

2012-12-17 Thread Galileo Teco Juárez
Error 404 :(

El lunes, 17 de diciembre de 2012, Ariel Constenla-Haile escribió:

 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com javascript:;
 wrote:
  2012/12/18 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org javascript:;
 
  A follow up from a previous note.  We have a new Google+ Community set
  up for Apache OpenOffice.  You are welcome to join:
 
 
 
 https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/114598373874764163668/communities/103683488250592271079
 
 
  I get an error 404

 try https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/103683488250592271079



-- 
*Galileo Teco Juarez*
*Web:* http://80bits.wordpress.com
*Twitter:* @genitalico http://twitter.com/genitalico
*Linkedin:* http://mx.linkedin.com/pub/galileo-teco-ju%C3%A1rez/30/690/797


RE: Google+ Community

2012-12-17 Thread Maurice Howe
Hmmm.  Got a 404 error msg.

Maurice Howe 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] 
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:12 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: market...@openoffice.apache.org; us...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Google+ Community

A follow up from a previous note.  We have a new Google+ Community set up
for Apache OpenOffice.  You are welcome to join:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/114598373874764163668/communities/103683488250
592271079

We've been beta testing it for a couple of weeks with a smaller group.
One advantage, compared to the users mailing list, is the ease of sharing
images.

Regards,

-Rob

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/5965 - Release Date: 12/16/12



Re: Google+ Community

2012-12-17 Thread Albino Biasutti Neto
Hi

2012/12/17 Galileo Teco Juárez genital...@gmail.com:
 Error 404 :(

Page G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+openoffice/posts

Community G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/103683488250592271079

-- 
  Albino
www.albino.ws


Chinese list (was Re: [Blog Draft] Update about Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 @Dec 13)

2012-12-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello;

FWIW, one idea that I left floating during ApacheConEU was the creation of
a chinese list. Imacat was working on it, no idea if it the idea is still alive 
or
waiting for volunteers to help moderate, etc.

Pedro.


- Messaggio originale -
 Da: Yue Helen 
 
 I missed the great event...Thanks for the update! Looking forward to more
 users and contributors from China.
 
 Helen
 
 2012/12/17 Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com
 
  Hi, all,
    I just want to give you an update that we had a successful Apache
  OpenOffice session last Thursday (Dec 13) on Apache Asia Road Show 2012
  Beijing.
    Thanks to Peter, Tao and Da Li for the speech! The topics covered AOO
  general introduction, contributions from local volunteers, how to join
  community and make contribution, and building social/cloud solutions by
  integrating with AOO. We also distributed AOO promotion materials that
  prepared by Da Li.
    We got more than 100 audience participated in the OpenOffice session
  14:00-15:00. Most of them are technical people from different companies and
  universities. Per my check during my speech, only 20 had used 
 OpenOffice
  before. So it is really a good promotion of our product and community.
 
    We are refining the presentations and will publish them later.
 
    Thanks!
 
 
  - Shenfeng (Simon)
 
 
 
  2012/12/5 Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org
 
   OK.
  
   On 12/5/2012 4:55 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
Peter,
       Thanks for your comments! I added the speaker names per the
  presenting
sequence.
   

Apache OpenOffice in Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 at 
 December 13
   
Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 will be held at December 13, 
 and
   Apache
OpenOffice will deliver a session in the conference.
In the Apache OpenOffice session, Peter Junge, Apache OpenOffice 
 PMC
member, will give a speech to introduce Apache OpenOffice, its 
 history
   and
way in Apache. And other contributors in Beijing, Shenfeng Liu, 
 Hongyun
   An,
Tao Liu and Dali Liu, will also give their speech to share the 
 best
practice of contributing to the open source community, as well as
   building
enterprise business and Cloud/Social solution on top of Apache
   OpenOffice.
Please visit the Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 website and
  register:
http://apacheasiaroadshow04.eventbrite.com . We are looking 
 forward to
seeing you there!
   

Apache OpenOffice将在12月13日Apache Asia Road Show Beijing
  2012大会上介绍其发展及解决方案
   
Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012将于12月13日在北京中关村软件园举行。届时Apache
OpenOffice将在大会上介绍其发展及相关解决方案。
在论坛上,Apache OpenOffice项目管理委员会成员Peter Junge将首先介绍Apache
OpenOffice及其历史和发展方向。其他在北京的Apache
   OpenOffice志愿者,刘慎锋,安红云,刘涛,刘大力等,也会分享在Apache
OpenOffice开源社区做贡献的经验,以及如何基于Apache OpenOffice开发企业应用和云计算及社交解决方案。
欢迎大家到Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012网站注册:
http://apacheasiaroadshow04.eventbrite.com!让我们共同关注Apache
OpenOffice,共同推动开源社区的发展!
   

   
   
- Shenfeng (Simon)
   
   
2012/12/5 Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org
   
I would also mention the names of the other speakers. Apart 
 from that
   it's
OK.
   
Peter
   
   
On 12/4/2012 11:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
   
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Shenfeng Liu 
 liush...@gmail.com
   wrote:
   
Don,
        Thanks for your suggestion!
        Here is my draft of the blog, in English  
 Chinese. Please
  review
   and
give your comments!
        I found myself not able to edit the blog 
 directly, so I wonder
  if
   you
or
any one else can help to post? Thanks very much!
   
   
Here is the post, in draft form on the blog:
https://blogs.apache.org/**preview/OOo/?previewEntry=**
apache_asia_road_show_beijing
  
 
 https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_asia_road_show_beijing
   
   
Let me know if it is OK and I will publish it.
   
-Rob
   
   
   
     
 --**--
Apache OpenOffice in Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 
 2012 at December
  13
   
Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 will be held at 
 December 13, and
Apache
OpenOffice will deliver a session in the conference.
In the Apache OpenOffice session, Peter Junge, Apache 
 OpenOffice PMC
member, will give a speech to introduce Apache 
 OpenOffice, its
  history
and
way in Apache. And other contributors in Beijing will 
 also give
  their
speech to share the best practice of contributing to 
 the open source
community, as well as building enterprise business 
 and Cloud/Social
solution on top of Apache OpenOffice.
Please visit the Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 
 website and
   register:
http://apacheasiaroadshow04.**eventbrite.com
   

Re: Chinese list (was Re: [Blog Draft] Update about Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 @Dec 13)

2012-12-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello;

 FWIW, one idea that I left floating during ApacheConEU was the creation of
 a chinese list. Imacat was working on it, no idea if it the idea is still 
 alive or
 waiting for volunteers to help moderate, etc.


Interesting idea, but two of our committers in China are German
(Peter) and Canadian (Kevin).  So discussing local Chinese marketing
in English would possibly be better for them ;-)

-Rob

 Pedro.


 - Messaggio originale -
 Da: Yue Helen

 I missed the great event...Thanks for the update! Looking forward to more
 users and contributors from China.

 Helen

 2012/12/17 Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com

  Hi, all,
I just want to give you an update that we had a successful Apache
  OpenOffice session last Thursday (Dec 13) on Apache Asia Road Show 2012
  Beijing.
Thanks to Peter, Tao and Da Li for the speech! The topics covered AOO
  general introduction, contributions from local volunteers, how to join
  community and make contribution, and building social/cloud solutions by
  integrating with AOO. We also distributed AOO promotion materials that
  prepared by Da Li.
We got more than 100 audience participated in the OpenOffice session
  14:00-15:00. Most of them are technical people from different companies and
  universities. Per my check during my speech, only 20 had used
 OpenOffice
  before. So it is really a good promotion of our product and community.

We are refining the presentations and will publish them later.

Thanks!


  - Shenfeng (Simon)



  2012/12/5 Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org

   OK.
  
   On 12/5/2012 4:55 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
Peter,
   Thanks for your comments! I added the speaker names per the
  presenting
sequence.
   

Apache OpenOffice in Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 at
 December 13
   
Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 will be held at December 13,
 and
   Apache
OpenOffice will deliver a session in the conference.
In the Apache OpenOffice session, Peter Junge, Apache OpenOffice
 PMC
member, will give a speech to introduce Apache OpenOffice, its
 history
   and
way in Apache. And other contributors in Beijing, Shenfeng Liu,
 Hongyun
   An,
Tao Liu and Dali Liu, will also give their speech to share the
 best
practice of contributing to the open source community, as well as
   building
enterprise business and Cloud/Social solution on top of Apache
   OpenOffice.
Please visit the Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 website and
  register:
http://apacheasiaroadshow04.eventbrite.com . We are looking
 forward to
seeing you there!
   

Apache OpenOffice将在12月13日Apache Asia Road Show Beijing
  2012大会上介绍其发展及解决方案
   
Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012将于12月13日在北京中关村软件园举行。届时Apache
OpenOffice将在大会上介绍其发展及相关解决方案。
在论坛上,Apache OpenOffice项目管理委员会成员Peter Junge将首先介绍Apache
OpenOffice及其历史和发展方向。其他在北京的Apache
   OpenOffice志愿者,刘慎锋,安红云,刘涛,刘大力等,也会分享在Apache
OpenOffice开源社区做贡献的经验,以及如何基于Apache OpenOffice开发企业应用和云计算及社交解决方案。
欢迎大家到Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012网站注册:
http://apacheasiaroadshow04.eventbrite.com!让我们共同关注Apache
OpenOffice,共同推动开源社区的发展!
   

   
   
- Shenfeng (Simon)
   
   
2012/12/5 Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org
   
I would also mention the names of the other speakers. Apart
 from that
   it's
OK.
   
Peter
   
   
On 12/4/2012 11:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
   
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Shenfeng Liu
 liush...@gmail.com
   wrote:
   
Don,
Thanks for your suggestion!
Here is my draft of the blog, in English 
 Chinese. Please
  review
   and
give your comments!
I found myself not able to edit the blog
 directly, so I wonder
  if
   you
or
any one else can help to post? Thanks very much!
   
   
Here is the post, in draft form on the blog:
https://blogs.apache.org/**preview/OOo/?previewEntry=**
apache_asia_road_show_beijing
  

 https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_asia_road_show_beijing
   
   
Let me know if it is OK and I will publish it.
   
-Rob
   
   
   
   
 --**--
Apache OpenOffice in Apache Asia Road Show Beijing
 2012 at December
  13
   
Apache Asia Road Show Beijing 2012 will be held at
 December 13, and
Apache
OpenOffice will deliver a session in the conference.
In the Apache OpenOffice session, Peter Junge, Apache
 OpenOffice PMC
member, will give a speech to introduce Apache
 OpenOffice, its
  history
and
way in Apache. And other contributors in Beijing will
 also give
  their
speech to share the best practice of contributing to
 the open source
community, as well as building 

Re: Default Toolbar for Certain Languages

2012-12-17 Thread Fan Zheng
As we are considering about the side bar stuff currently, would you mind
giving us more specifications on your suggestions?


2012/11/26 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org

 On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:40 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
 wrote:
  I would like to ask if it is possible for a default toolbar for
  certain languages, but not all.  Out local community was asking a
  Chinese punctuation toolbar for a long time, which they were used to it
  since MS Office 97.  Unlike English punctuation, it is very trouble to
  input Chinese full-width punctuation.  This toolbar helped them a lot.
  I submit a request, and am amazed how fast words got spread and people
  are enthusiastic about getting this done.
 
  http://goo.gl/mod/GTi6
 
  I know it is easy to do it in with a extension of BASIC macros.   Is
  it possible to include it in the OpenOffice installation?  Or maybe
  hard-code it?
 

 Hi -- is this new Extension related?
 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/ROCtwTCP

 -Rob


  --
  Best regards,
  imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
  PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
 
  Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
  Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
  Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
  Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
  EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
  Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
 



Re: AOO trunk build fails with HSQLDB

2012-12-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni




- Messaggio originale -
 Da: Ariel Constenla-Haile 

 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:10:09AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote:
  On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
   Hello Kay;
  
   Yes, I can confirm after solving those two issues,we got OpenOffice 
 building with JDK 7 on FreeBSD:
  
   
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/
  
   Pedro.
 
  Hey -- thanks for this notice. Well, IMO, we should fix these
  supposedly *trivial* issues and get on with java 7. Java 6 is out of
  support for *some* time now. We can't expect users to keep an older
  version like 6 around.
 
 AFAIK the Java base is 1.5 (both source and target). Moving this to 1.7
 is a bad idea.
 

My understanding is that Java 1.5 is EOL. I agree that moving to 1.7
is a bad idea, so I would say 1.6 is what should be expected.

Of course we will have to clean the build for 1.7 anyways and the sooner
the better.

Pedro.


Re: wiki.open office Volunteer Application

2012-12-17 Thread 陶然
Hi,
   Thank you for the account!But I can not edit mwiki after I logged in.I
wonder that if I can get more permit to edit wiki?I am very interest in the
Symphony Sidebar.

Best regards,
Doreen

2012/12/13 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org

 On 12/12/2012 12:37 AM, 陶然 wrote:

 Hello,
 I'm a collage student ,and my major is industry design.I'm very interested
 in wiki open office,so I send you this letter to wonder that may I be a
 member of volunteers?
 I will be very Appreciate if you agree my joining !

 Best regards,
 Doreen

  Also, if you intend to edit content on the WIKI, respond to this email
 (be sure to include the mailing list) and indicate the username to use for
 your account.

 Note that you only require an account if you will edit WIKI content.

 --
 Andrew Pitonyak
 My Macro Document: 
 http://www.pitonyak.org/**AndrewMacro.odthttp://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
 Info:  http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php