[CODE]: obsolete binfilter module deleted

2013-04-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt 
Hi,

just a short notice that I have deleted the obsolete binfilter module
from svn.

I think Ariel has disabled the filters some time ago and Pavel did some
further necessary preparation to get rid of binfilter. I finally have
deleted the binfilter now from svn.

This will help all people who work with the code and will shrink our src
release as well. The binfilter module had over 50Mb on disk.

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo

2013-04-17 Thread Samer Mansour 
Rob,

Would I be able to gain access to create this poll? Could you set me up and
send me the details?

I complete the test poll you sent out, there was a couple options shown off
in that.  I'd have to see if it allows us to post an image right inside the
survey so they don't need to turn to another tab.

Sam
On Apr 17, 2013 8:08 PM, "Rob Weir"  wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Kevin Grignon <
> kevingrignon...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Sorry, i haven't had cycles to work on this.
> > >
> > > Please consider these votes a selection of direction as final
> adjustments
> > > will need to be made to the graphics and text.
> > >
> > > It appears there is interest in a flat treatment. Other than that,
> > > palette, fonts and relation ship to app icons and other graphics is
> still
> > > open.
> > >
> > > Sorry to open a can of worms, but design is not linear, is not well
> > suited
> > > for polls. Rather, select a direction, say flat, then open a quick
> > > iteration to explore flat. Incremental decisions will allow us to
> refine.
> > > It is not all or nothing. Also, consider the synergy which is possible
> by
> > > combining elements from different designs.
> > >
> >
> > I think the 5 or 6 (flat design) choices would be well-suited to a poll.
> > Design is not linear as you point out, but a lot of time has already been
> > spent on these proposals I would think.
> >
> > To me, there is no harm in a simple poll at this point.  I would think
> > predominant participation would be from existing OpenOffice users, but I
> > could be wrong about this.
> >
> >
>
> If we want I can put a poll up on http://openofficesurvey.org.   I could
> make it a ranked preference poll, where we can sort all of the options.
> The survey can also have a box for comments.
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > On Apr 15, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Samer Mansour 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Summary of feedback (which I found made points):
> > > >>
> > > >> Samer - Lets go flat, its strong in all aspects brought up.
> > > >> Kay S. - Agrees with flat logo. Poll should be limited to few.
> > > >> Robin - Wordmarks need more attention (not logo specific), Vasilis
> > logo
> > > is
> > > >> cool, downside too different. Robin made a similar refresh
> > with/without
> > > >> feather. Scales his orb down, no indication for his logo preference
> > (he
> > > did
> > > >> submit one more). Agrees technical aspect of print, but its not
> > deciding
> > > >> factor (I agree but it should be satisfied).
> > > >> Dave F - Wordmark needs attention as well, likes flat logo.
> > > >> Dennis - Check with trademark@
> > > >> Andrea - Likes orb, not a fan of flat (as its been used as a
> surrogate
> > > in
> > > >> the past due to limitations).
> > > >> Alexandro - alters Robins logo.
> > > >> Juergen - What about stand alone logo for buttons, stickers.
> Proposes
> > we
> > > >> should poll.
> > > >> Kadal - "Because companies do it, we shouldn't?" - not sure that is
> > > >> convincing b/c they pay expert designers.
> > > >> Vasilis - Likes flat, but wordmark not so much.
> > > >> Milo - Likes flat, but workmark needs changing, TM placement too.
> > > >> Rob - Poll, but its not decision making. PMC decides in end. PMC
> likes
> > > >> data, more the better (ie. poll data). "Consider conferences and
> booth
> > > >> materials, CD prints, etc."
> > > >> Janl - Agrees poll for decision is bad idea, but poll for data is
> > good.
> > > >> "Keep it similar to classic orb". "Doesn't have to be flat" but Janl
> > > >> doesn't state outright if flat is bad.
> > > >> Graham L - "Logo is not a computer icon". Print is a huge part of
> > > >> marketing. Print good -> electronically good, but not necessarily
> > other
> > > way
> > > >> around.
> > > >>
> > > >> I could set up a visual poll and share multiple time over facebook
> and
> > > >> social media.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/app/showpoll.asp?qid=244375&sid=xz7athj6ytcg4mb244375&new=True
> > > >>
> > > >> Respond with your favourite 3 logo please, or top 2 or 1. The logos
> > that
> > > >> score the least will be eliminated:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Flattened Logo
> > > >> 2. Kevin G. Flat Feather.
> > > >> 3. third pick abstained.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I would also include:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/31818000/OO_4_final_design_Robin-Fowler.jpg?version=1&modificationDate=1365884183026
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the feather is a bit too big but it could be made smaller...
> > > >
> > > > I guess we work on lettering after the logo?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all this work by everybody!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Ian Lynch 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 13 April 2013 16:25, Grah

Re: std::stringstream aStrStream

2013-04-17 Thread jorge ivan poot diaz 
Hello,
Thanks you,  I have already changed the string as you said me. This is the
result:
::rtl::OUString aName ( aEdtName.GetText() );

And then I put this code

std::stringstream aStrStream;
aStrStream << "\nThis is " << aName << " and " << aName << "
genial!"  On 17.04.2013 17:09, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
>
>> I don't see a definition of aName, but from the error message assume that
>>>
>> it is String.
>> http://imagebin.org/254354
>>
>>  That is because the String class has no << operator defined. Try to use
>>>
>> aName.getStr() instead of just aName.
>> http://imagebin.org/254355
>>
>> As you can see from the picture, I already made the change, but I have the
>> following error:
>> http://imagebin.org/254357
>>
>> I try with aEdtName.GetText () instead of aName.getStr() but yet does not
>> compile:
>> http://imagebin.org/254361
>>
>> Help, ragards.
>>
>
> Sorry, I do not use String anymore and had to guess and apparently guessed
> wrong.  If you can, you probably should use ::rtl::OUString instead of
> String.  The conversion to char* looks like this:
>   ::rtl::OUString sText (::rtl::OUString::**createFromAscii("some text"));
>   ::std::cout << ::rtl::OUStringToOString(**sText,
> RTL_TEXTENCODING_ASCII_US).**getStr() << ::std::endl;
> or something very similar to this.
>
> If you still want to use String then cosv/inc/cosv/string.hxx suggests to
> use c_str() to obtain a char*.
>
> -Andre
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/17 Andre Fischer 
>>
>>  On 17.04.2013 01:46, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hello,

 I am modifying this code in AOO:
 http://opengrok.adfinis-**sygr**oup.org/source/xref/aoo-**
 trunk/main/cui/source/tabpages/tpcolor.cxx#465>>> //opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.**org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/**
 main/cui/source/tabpages/**tpcolor.cxx#465
 >


 I'm trying to concatenate with stringstream but I have errors when I'am
 building:

 1- I already included:
 #include 

 2- I have added the following code:
 http://imagebin.org/254288

  I don't see a definition of aName, but from the error message assume
>>> that
>>> it is String.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  3- This is the error:
 http://imagebin.org/254289

  That is because the String class has no << operator defined. Try to use
>>> aName.getStr() instead of just aName.
>>>
>>> -Andre
>>>
>>>
>>>  Help me, regards!!


  --**
>>> --**-
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**a**pache.org
>>> 
>>> >
>>>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo

2013-04-17 Thread Rob Weir 
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Kevin Grignon  >wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Sorry, i haven't had cycles to work on this.
> >
> > Please consider these votes a selection of direction as final adjustments
> > will need to be made to the graphics and text.
> >
> > It appears there is interest in a flat treatment. Other than that,
> > palette, fonts and relation ship to app icons and other graphics is still
> > open.
> >
> > Sorry to open a can of worms, but design is not linear, is not well
> suited
> > for polls. Rather, select a direction, say flat, then open a quick
> > iteration to explore flat. Incremental decisions will allow us to refine.
> > It is not all or nothing. Also, consider the synergy which is possible by
> > combining elements from different designs.
> >
>
> I think the 5 or 6 (flat design) choices would be well-suited to a poll.
> Design is not linear as you point out, but a lot of time has already been
> spent on these proposals I would think.
>
> To me, there is no harm in a simple poll at this point.  I would think
> predominant participation would be from existing OpenOffice users, but I
> could be wrong about this.
>
>

If we want I can put a poll up on http://openofficesurvey.org.   I could
make it a ranked preference poll, where we can sort all of the options.
The survey can also have a box for comments.

-Rob



>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> > On Apr 15, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Samer Mansour 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Summary of feedback (which I found made points):
> > >>
> > >> Samer - Lets go flat, its strong in all aspects brought up.
> > >> Kay S. - Agrees with flat logo. Poll should be limited to few.
> > >> Robin - Wordmarks need more attention (not logo specific), Vasilis
> logo
> > is
> > >> cool, downside too different. Robin made a similar refresh
> with/without
> > >> feather. Scales his orb down, no indication for his logo preference
> (he
> > did
> > >> submit one more). Agrees technical aspect of print, but its not
> deciding
> > >> factor (I agree but it should be satisfied).
> > >> Dave F - Wordmark needs attention as well, likes flat logo.
> > >> Dennis - Check with trademark@
> > >> Andrea - Likes orb, not a fan of flat (as its been used as a surrogate
> > in
> > >> the past due to limitations).
> > >> Alexandro - alters Robins logo.
> > >> Juergen - What about stand alone logo for buttons, stickers. Proposes
> we
> > >> should poll.
> > >> Kadal - "Because companies do it, we shouldn't?" - not sure that is
> > >> convincing b/c they pay expert designers.
> > >> Vasilis - Likes flat, but wordmark not so much.
> > >> Milo - Likes flat, but workmark needs changing, TM placement too.
> > >> Rob - Poll, but its not decision making. PMC decides in end. PMC likes
> > >> data, more the better (ie. poll data). "Consider conferences and booth
> > >> materials, CD prints, etc."
> > >> Janl - Agrees poll for decision is bad idea, but poll for data is
> good.
> > >> "Keep it similar to classic orb". "Doesn't have to be flat" but Janl
> > >> doesn't state outright if flat is bad.
> > >> Graham L - "Logo is not a computer icon". Print is a huge part of
> > >> marketing. Print good -> electronically good, but not necessarily
> other
> > way
> > >> around.
> > >>
> > >> I could set up a visual poll and share multiple time over facebook and
> > >> social media.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/app/showpoll.asp?qid=244375&sid=xz7athj6ytcg4mb244375&new=True
> > >>
> > >> Respond with your favourite 3 logo please, or top 2 or 1. The logos
> that
> > >> score the least will be eliminated:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Flattened Logo
> > >> 2. Kevin G. Flat Feather.
> > >> 3. third pick abstained.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I would also include:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/31818000/OO_4_final_design_Robin-Fowler.jpg?version=1&modificationDate=1365884183026
> > >
> > > Yes, the feather is a bit too big but it could be made smaller...
> > >
> > > I guess we work on lettering after the logo?
> > >
> > > Thanks for all this work by everybody!
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Ian Lynch 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 13 April 2013 16:25, Graham Lauder  wrote:
> > >>>
> > > Hi Milos,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:45:18PM +0200, Milosh Vujnovic wrote:
> > >> Hi guys,
> > >>
> > >> just a quick comment and clarification regarding printing and
> > >> logos.
> > >> Print-friendly version (vector, CMYK) is crucial to be prepared
> > >> during logo design process. This includes color and black&white
> > >> version (on light and dark background).
> > >>
> > >> I must disagree with the comments on that printing is rarely used
> > >> anymore - few examples include billboards, fair stands, business
> > >> cards, letterheads and other stationer

Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
Hi

I did it all again, look[1].

1 - http://pastebin.com/mnB26Rk3

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo

2013-04-17 Thread Kay Schenk 
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Sorry, i haven't had cycles to work on this.
>
> Please consider these votes a selection of direction as final adjustments
> will need to be made to the graphics and text.
>
> It appears there is interest in a flat treatment. Other than that,
> palette, fonts and relation ship to app icons and other graphics is still
> open.
>
> Sorry to open a can of worms, but design is not linear, is not well suited
> for polls. Rather, select a direction, say flat, then open a quick
> iteration to explore flat. Incremental decisions will allow us to refine.
> It is not all or nothing. Also, consider the synergy which is possible by
> combining elements from different designs.
>

I think the 5 or 6 (flat design) choices would be well-suited to a poll.
Design is not linear as you point out, but a lot of time has already been
spent on these proposals I would think.

To me, there is no harm in a simple poll at this point.  I would think
predominant participation would be from existing OpenOffice users, but I
could be wrong about this.



>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Samer Mansour 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Summary of feedback (which I found made points):
> >>
> >> Samer - Lets go flat, its strong in all aspects brought up.
> >> Kay S. - Agrees with flat logo. Poll should be limited to few.
> >> Robin - Wordmarks need more attention (not logo specific), Vasilis logo
> is
> >> cool, downside too different. Robin made a similar refresh with/without
> >> feather. Scales his orb down, no indication for his logo preference (he
> did
> >> submit one more). Agrees technical aspect of print, but its not deciding
> >> factor (I agree but it should be satisfied).
> >> Dave F - Wordmark needs attention as well, likes flat logo.
> >> Dennis - Check with trademark@
> >> Andrea - Likes orb, not a fan of flat (as its been used as a surrogate
> in
> >> the past due to limitations).
> >> Alexandro - alters Robins logo.
> >> Juergen - What about stand alone logo for buttons, stickers. Proposes we
> >> should poll.
> >> Kadal - "Because companies do it, we shouldn't?" - not sure that is
> >> convincing b/c they pay expert designers.
> >> Vasilis - Likes flat, but wordmark not so much.
> >> Milo - Likes flat, but workmark needs changing, TM placement too.
> >> Rob - Poll, but its not decision making. PMC decides in end. PMC likes
> >> data, more the better (ie. poll data). "Consider conferences and booth
> >> materials, CD prints, etc."
> >> Janl - Agrees poll for decision is bad idea, but poll for data is good.
> >> "Keep it similar to classic orb". "Doesn't have to be flat" but Janl
> >> doesn't state outright if flat is bad.
> >> Graham L - "Logo is not a computer icon". Print is a huge part of
> >> marketing. Print good -> electronically good, but not necessarily other
> way
> >> around.
> >>
> >> I could set up a visual poll and share multiple time over facebook and
> >> social media.
> >>
> >>
> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/app/showpoll.asp?qid=244375&sid=xz7athj6ytcg4mb244375&new=True
> >>
> >> Respond with your favourite 3 logo please, or top 2 or 1. The logos that
> >> score the least will be eliminated:
> >>
> >> 1. Flattened Logo
> >> 2. Kevin G. Flat Feather.
> >> 3. third pick abstained.
> >>
> >
> > I would also include:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/31818000/OO_4_final_design_Robin-Fowler.jpg?version=1&modificationDate=1365884183026
> >
> > Yes, the feather is a bit too big but it could be made smaller...
> >
> > I guess we work on lettering after the logo?
> >
> > Thanks for all this work by everybody!
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Ian Lynch 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 13 April 2013 16:25, Graham Lauder  wrote:
> >>>
> > Hi Milos,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:45:18PM +0200, Milosh Vujnovic wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> just a quick comment and clarification regarding printing and
> >> logos.
> >> Print-friendly version (vector, CMYK) is crucial to be prepared
> >> during logo design process. This includes color and black&white
> >> version (on light and dark background).
> >>
> >> I must disagree with the comments on that printing is rarely used
> >> anymore - few examples include billboards, fair stands, business
> >> cards, letterheads and other stationery, and so on.
> >
> > But OpenOffice is a desktop application. For me, this means the main
> > focus should be in a logo that looks good everywhere where it is
> >> mainly
> > used, in the user's desktop (even in the window title bar) and the
> > website (even in the website favicon). Thus, IMHO, printing has the
> > lowest priority.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> 
>  I have been keeping out of this conversation because I don't have time
> >> at
>  the
>  moment to gi

Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64

2013-04-17 Thread Pavel Janík 

On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:26 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:

> 2013/4/17 Pavel Janík :
>> cd sw
>> build
> 
> Look [1].
> 
> 

/home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main/solver/400/unxlngx6.pro/workdir/SdiTarget/sw/sdi/swslots.hxx:9874:5:
 error: 'FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG' was not declared in this scope

This is not your fault. Start again from scratch... It was deleted today. Start 
with the clean checkout and do clean build.
-- 
Pavel Janík




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
2013/4/17 Pavel Janík :
> cd sw
> build

Look [1].

http://pastebin.com/EX8zuSb5

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
2013/4/17 Albino B Neto :
> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
> by running:
>
> build --all:sw

When I running command "buid --all:sw", look:

==
build -- version: 275224
Cannot determine source directory/repository for
/home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main at
/home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main/solenv/bin/build.pl line 1151
==

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64

2013-04-17 Thread Pavel Janík 

On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:19 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:

> ==
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
> /home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main/sw/prj
> 
> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
> by running:
> 
>build --all:sw
> ==
> 
> I can't find solution.

We can't help you, you have to show us the actual error. Show us

cd sw
build

and copy the error...
-- 
Pavel Janík




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
Hi

I am compiling the AOO on Debian amd64, and is showing me this error:

==
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main/sw/prj

When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
by running:

build --all:sw
==

I can't find solution.

I am using the files of svn "trunk/". I found a solution to apply a
patch, but that was last year's email.

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

The "PrOOo-Box" is back

2013-04-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt 
Hello,

I would like to inform only short, the well-known "PrOOo box", a CD / DVD with 
Apache OpenOffice (in the past with OpenOffice.org), since today is available 
again.

The homepage is http://www.prooo-box.org.



Greetings
Jörg


Here is the text of the German press release:
-

Die PrOOo-Box ist wieder da

Nach zwei Jahren Pause meldet sich die PrOOo-Box mit einer
aktualisierten Sammlung verschiedener Open-Source-Anwendungen zurück.
Kernstück der Sammlung ist die freie Office-Suite Apache OpenOffice™ in
der Version 3.4.1.

Die Softwaresammlung der PrOOo-Box enthält als Kernstück den offiziellen
Nachfolger von OpenOffice.org™, welches nun als Apache OpenOffice™
weiterentwickelt wird. Apache OpenOffice bleibt weiterhin eine
kostenlose professionelle Office-Suite.
Apache-OpenOffice enthält die auch bisher bekannten Bestandteile,
bestehend aus Writer, der leistungsfähigen Textverarbeitung, Calc, einer
Tabellenkalkulation mit umfangreichen Funktionen, der
Präsentationssoftware Impress, dem Zeichenmodul Draw sowie Base, der
integrierten Datenbank und Datenbankschnittstelle. Weiter sind viele
sinnvolle integrierte Funktionen enthalten, wie z.B. ein Formeleditor
und ein Serienbrief und -mailmodul.
Apache OpenOffice wurde in den vergangenen Monaten vollständig
überarbeitet und hinsichtlich Stabilität und Geschwindigkeit optimiert.
Die aktuelle Version ist Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 ist in der Box für die
Betriebssysteme Windows, Linux, Mac OS verfügbar.
Zusätzlich befinden sich weitere interessante Programme, wir z.B. der
Browser Firefox, das Mailprogramm Thunderbird oder die Grafikanwendung
Inkscape in der Box. Auch diese bekannten Anwendungen sind so aktuell
wie irgend möglich gehalten, und liegen für die wichtigsten
Betriebssysteme vor. Dazu kommen eine große Auswahl an freien Vorlagen,
Grafiken und Anleitungen.
Die PrOOo-Box wird als ISO-Datei zum Download und demnächst auch als
bestellbare DVD angeboten. Neue Programmversionen werden kurzfristig
aktualisiert, und die ISO-Datei ist immer aktuell. Für Nutzer, die nicht
über einen ausreichend schnellen Internetzugang verfügen, ist die DVD
gedacht.
Weitere Informationen und die PrOOo-Box finden Sie unter
www.prooo-box.org auch als sog. 'Live-Version'. Die PrOOo-Box ist
kostenlos und finanziert sich durch Spenden. Auch werden immer
Mitstreiter gesucht. Wer mithelfen möchte, meldet sich bitte einfach
unter i...@prooo.box.org.



Pressekontakt:
Ansprechpartner für PrOOo-Box.org
Detlef Nannen, Sternstr. 11, 73312 Geislingen
kont...@prooo-box.org
Mobil 0174 3561721



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: "Easy hack" for website

2013-04-17 Thread Michal Hriň 
Dňa Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:03:53 +0200 Andrea Pescetti   
napísal:



On 15/04/2013 Michal Hriň wrote:

I added little patch to BZ, can you check it ?
If everything will be all right, I'll continue with this work.


Michal, remember you are a committer. So, when you are confident, you  
can use "svn commit" and commit your code directly to the repository.  
The website will be actually updated only when someone (can be you, but  
any other committer too) publishes your changes.




Yes, yesterday I used SVN and BZ for the first time .. so I needed some
help. (& Rob's link about svn basics fell to benefit )


So, if it is more comfortable for you, you can commit your changes and  
ask on the list for someone to review and publish them. This should be  
more straightforward than generating and submitting a patch.




All right :)

Regards, Michal Hriň



Regards,
   Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




--
Táto správa bola vytvorená poštovým klientom v prehliadači Opera:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: GSOC 2013

2013-04-17 Thread Alexandro Colorado 
On 4/17/13, Rob Weir  wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Rajath Shashidhara <
> rajaths.raja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Mr. Alexandro Colorado,
>>
>> Ariel Constela-Haile  suggested that one who suggested the idea on GSOC
>> idea page is the mentor for that project. So I'm contacting you for help.
>>
>> I have a problem. I thought that the mentor will be the best guy to
>> discuss
>> with.
>>
>
>
> Hi Rajath,
>
> I'm a mentor on a different AOO proposal, but I mentored GSoC last year as
> well, so maybe I can help a little here by sharing some high level
> thoughts.
>
>
>
>> My end-semester exams are starting from April 25th. So I will not be able
>> to spend a lot of time for the coming days.(till May 12th). As the
>> mentoring organizations will announce the list of students by April 22nd,
>> I
>> wanted to know what more I can do to prove myself that I'm a capable
>> candidate for GSOC 2013. I have worked on two bugs  on your page till
>> now.
>>
>
>
> IMHO, this is very good.  We all know that it is a very busy time for
> students now, with exams, etc.   So the fact that you made this much
> progress is a good thing.
>
>
>> I have partially solved one of them(got response from a people that I
>> have
>> done the right thing to solve the bug), although I was unable to produce
>> a
>> patch due to my tight schedule. My holidays are starting from May13th,
>> I'll
>> be able to spend a lot of time on this later. I am getting used to your
>> huge code base, and during my holidays I'll be able to work on this with
>> more ease as time passes.
>>
>>
> Yes.
>
>
>> My suggestion to your proposal:
>> We could also add a feature called "Import from Google SpreadSheet" and
>> "Export to Google SpreadSheet" which adds the feature of cloud storage to
>> openoffice!.
>>
>> Also I wanted some suggestion on writing my application. Should I include
>> the above suggestion in it? I will draft my application and please
>> suggest
>> any modifications to it.
>>
>>
> With my students I look for a well-thought out proposal. The ideas that we
> post from Apache are just the starting point.  In a proposal you might
> include:
>
> 1) Some background information about you and your programming experience.
>
> 2)  A summary of your proposed technical solution, i.e., a high-level
> design.
>
> 3) A project plan.  That plan might dedicate some time to detailed, time to
> coding and test, and maybe a wrap up effort at the end to improve
> documentation.
>
> The proposal is whatever you want to do this summer.  The idea we mentors
> posted are just starting points, ideas for your consideration.  But you
> should adapt them as you wish.
>
> So I'd recommend working on the proposal now.

+1 I agree with Rob.

>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
>> Please help me! I am very excited about being a part of your community!!!
>> --
>> Rajath S,
>> M.Sc(Hons.) Physics,
>> Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani,
>> Pilani
>>
>


-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://es.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: GSOC 2013

2013-04-17 Thread Rob Weir 
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Rajath Shashidhara <
rajaths.raja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Mr. Alexandro Colorado,
>
> Ariel Constela-Haile  suggested that one who suggested the idea on GSOC
> idea page is the mentor for that project. So I'm contacting you for help.
>
> I have a problem. I thought that the mentor will be the best guy to discuss
> with.
>


Hi Rajath,

I'm a mentor on a different AOO proposal, but I mentored GSoC last year as
well, so maybe I can help a little here by sharing some high level thoughts.



> My end-semester exams are starting from April 25th. So I will not be able
> to spend a lot of time for the coming days.(till May 12th). As the
> mentoring organizations will announce the list of students by April 22nd, I
> wanted to know what more I can do to prove myself that I'm a capable
> candidate for GSOC 2013. I have worked on two bugs  on your page till now.
>


IMHO, this is very good.  We all know that it is a very busy time for
students now, with exams, etc.   So the fact that you made this much
progress is a good thing.


> I have partially solved one of them(got response from a people that I have
> done the right thing to solve the bug), although I was unable to produce a
> patch due to my tight schedule. My holidays are starting from May13th, I'll
> be able to spend a lot of time on this later. I am getting used to your
> huge code base, and during my holidays I'll be able to work on this with
> more ease as time passes.
>
>
Yes.


> My suggestion to your proposal:
> We could also add a feature called "Import from Google SpreadSheet" and
> "Export to Google SpreadSheet" which adds the feature of cloud storage to
> openoffice!.
>
> Also I wanted some suggestion on writing my application. Should I include
> the above suggestion in it? I will draft my application and please suggest
> any modifications to it.
>
>
With my students I look for a well-thought out proposal. The ideas that we
post from Apache are just the starting point.  In a proposal you might
include:

1) Some background information about you and your programming experience.

2)  A summary of your proposed technical solution, i.e., a high-level
design.

3) A project plan.  That plan might dedicate some time to detailed, time to
coding and test, and maybe a wrap up effort at the end to improve
documentation.

The proposal is whatever you want to do this summer.  The idea we mentors
posted are just starting points, ideas for your consideration.  But you
should adapt them as you wish.

So I'd recommend working on the proposal now.

Regards,

-Rob



> Please help me! I am very excited about being a part of your community!!!
> --
> Rajath S,
> M.Sc(Hons.) Physics,
> Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani,
> Pilani
>

Build fail in packimages module

2013-04-17 Thread Claudio Filho 
Hi

Strangely, after I updated my env, I can't build without problems a new
version.

After libwpd, is time of packimages, where returns the msg bellow.

Some idea or tip?

Bests,
Claudio

=
Building module packimages
=

Entering /home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/packimages/pack

find
/home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/default_images/res/commandimagelist
-name "*.png" | sed
"s#/home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/default_images/res#%GLOBALRES%#"
| /usr/bin/perl /home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/solenv/bin/sort.pl >
../unxlngx6.pro/res/img/commandimagelist.ilst.unxlngx6.pro
/usr/bin/perl /home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/solenv/bin/diffmv.pl../
unxlngx6.pro/res/img/commandimagelist.ilst.unxlngx6.pro ../
unxlngx6.pro/res/img/commandimagelist.ilst
"../unxlngx6.pro/res/img/commandimagelist.ilst" unchanged.
/usr/bin/perl /home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/solenv/bin/
packimages.pl  -g /home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/default_images -m
/home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/default_images -c .. -l
/home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/solver/400/unxlngx6.pro/res/img -s
../unxlngx6.pro/res/img/sorted.lst -l ../unxlngx6.pro/res/img -o ../
unxlngx6.pro/bin/images.zip
packimages -- version: 1.17
Can't call method "desiredCompressionLevel" on an undefined value at
/usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm line 249.
dmake:  Error code 2, while making '../unxlngx6.pro/bin/images.zip'
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/home/filhocf/projetos/aoo/source/main/packimages/pack

GSOC 2013

2013-04-17 Thread Rajath Shashidhara 
Hello Mr. Alexandro Colorado,

Ariel Constela-Haile  suggested that one who suggested the idea on GSOC
idea page is the mentor for that project. So I'm contacting you for help.

I have a problem. I thought that the mentor will be the best guy to discuss
with.
My end-semester exams are starting from April 25th. So I will not be able
to spend a lot of time for the coming days.(till May 12th). As the
mentoring organizations will announce the list of students by April 22nd, I
wanted to know what more I can do to prove myself that I'm a capable
candidate for GSOC 2013. I have worked on two bugs  on your page till now.
I have partially solved one of them(got response from a people that I have
done the right thing to solve the bug), although I was unable to produce a
patch due to my tight schedule. My holidays are starting from May13th, I'll
be able to spend a lot of time on this later. I am getting used to your
huge code base, and during my holidays I'll be able to work on this with
more ease as time passes.

My suggestion to your proposal:
We could also add a feature called "Import from Google SpreadSheet" and
"Export to Google SpreadSheet" which adds the feature of cloud storage to
openoffice!.

Also I wanted some suggestion on writing my application. Should I include
the above suggestion in it? I will draft my application and please suggest
any modifications to it.

Please help me! I am very excited about being a part of your community!!!
-- 
Rajath S,
M.Sc(Hons.) Physics,
Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani,
Pilani

Re: GSOC Idea

2013-04-17 Thread Rob Weir 
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:52:20PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > > Any idea why this was marked as a "simple" bug?  I'm surprised
> > > > that layout-related issues would be proposed for someone's first
> > > > bug fix.
> > >
> > > the bug activity tells you
> > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_activity.cgi?id=121546
> > >
> >
> > OK.   By one of the new testers.  Perhaps they thought it referred to
> > how easy it was to verify the bug or something?
> >
> > I'll send a note to the QA list reminding them what this field means.
> > It should typically only be set by a more experienced developer who
> > knows already what would be required to fix it.
>
> Please do so. The other bug chosen by Rajath was also set by QA
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_activity.cgi?id=119445
> IMO only developers should set that field, and the one who sets it
> should make him/herself responsible for guiding/mentoring the volunteer
> trying to fix it ;)
>
>
Done.   I also renamed the field to "Developer difficulty" which should
make this more clear.

-Rob



>
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina
>

Re: std::stringstream aStrStream

2013-04-17 Thread Andre Fischer 

On 17.04.2013 17:09, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:

I don't see a definition of aName, but from the error message assume that

it is String.
http://imagebin.org/254354


That is because the String class has no << operator defined. Try to use

aName.getStr() instead of just aName.
http://imagebin.org/254355

As you can see from the picture, I already made the change, but I have the
following error:
http://imagebin.org/254357

I try with aEdtName.GetText () instead of aName.getStr() but yet does not
compile:
http://imagebin.org/254361

Help, ragards.


Sorry, I do not use String anymore and had to guess and apparently 
guessed wrong.  If you can, you probably should use ::rtl::OUString 
instead of String.  The conversion to char* looks like this:

  ::rtl::OUString sText (::rtl::OUString::createFromAscii("some text"));
  ::std::cout << ::rtl::OUStringToOString(sText, 
RTL_TEXTENCODING_ASCII_US).getStr() << ::std::endl;

or something very similar to this.

If you still want to use String then cosv/inc/cosv/string.hxx suggests 
to use c_str() to obtain a char*.


-Andre






2013/4/17 Andre Fischer 


On 17.04.2013 01:46, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:


Hello,

I am modifying this code in AOO:
http://opengrok.adfinis-**sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-**
trunk/main/cui/source/**tabpages/tpcolor.cxx#465

I'm trying to concatenate with stringstream but I have errors when I'am
building:

1- I already included:
#include 

2- I have added the following code:
http://imagebin.org/254288


I don't see a definition of aName, but from the error message assume that
it is String.




3- This is the error:
http://imagebin.org/254289


That is because the String class has no << operator defined. Try to use
aName.getStr() instead of just aName.

-Andre



Help me, regards!!



--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: GSOC Idea

2013-04-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile 
Hi Rajath Shashidhara,

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:34:36PM +0530, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
> Is there a mentor alloted to the import extension gsoc idea? I would
> be happy to contact him.

In theory, the one that proposed the idea is the one who will mentor it
(as it doesn't sound fair to propose ideas for others to mentor).


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpBhxpNpfx6F.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: GSOC Idea

2013-04-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile 
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:52:20PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > Any idea why this was marked as a "simple" bug?  I'm surprised
> > > that layout-related issues would be proposed for someone's first
> > > bug fix.
> >
> > the bug activity tells you
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_activity.cgi?id=121546
> >
> 
> OK.   By one of the new testers.  Perhaps they thought it referred to
> how easy it was to verify the bug or something?
> 
> I'll send a note to the QA list reminding them what this field means.
> It should typically only be set by a more experienced developer who
> knows already what would be required to fix it.

Please do so. The other bug chosen by Rajath was also set by QA
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_activity.cgi?id=119445
IMO only developers should set that field, and the one who sets it
should make him/herself responsible for guiding/mentoring the volunteer
trying to fix it ;)


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgp6J2mn98WNb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: std::stringstream aStrStream

2013-04-17 Thread jorge ivan poot diaz 
> I don't see a definition of aName, but from the error message assume that
it is String.
http://imagebin.org/254354

> That is because the String class has no << operator defined. Try to use
aName.getStr() instead of just aName.
http://imagebin.org/254355

As you can see from the picture, I already made the change, but I have the
following error:
http://imagebin.org/254357

I try with aEdtName.GetText () instead of aName.getStr() but yet does not
compile:
http://imagebin.org/254361

Help, ragards.




2013/4/17 Andre Fischer 

> On 17.04.2013 01:46, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am modifying this code in AOO:
>> http://opengrok.adfinis-**sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-**
>> trunk/main/cui/source/**tabpages/tpcolor.cxx#465
>>
>> I'm trying to concatenate with stringstream but I have errors when I'am
>> building:
>>
>> 1- I already included:
>> #include 
>>
>> 2- I have added the following code:
>> http://imagebin.org/254288
>>
>
> I don't see a definition of aName, but from the error message assume that
> it is String.
>
>
>
>> 3- This is the error:
>> http://imagebin.org/254289
>>
>
> That is because the String class has no << operator defined. Try to use
> aName.getStr() instead of just aName.
>
> -Andre
>
>
>> Help me, regards!!
>>
>>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Compile AOO on Debian

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
Hi

Is going right. :-)

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: AOO 4.0 getting rid of the 3 layer office, part 1

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
2013/4/16 Claudio Filho :
> Sorry by my newbie understanding about the question. I am studing the
> requeriment to build into debian way, getting many "problems" to bring the
> code to be "debianized", breaking in some parts (at this moment in
> pdfimport module) and to know more about this question can help.

+1

I'm also trying. ;-)

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [CODE]: useless teste.txt file in svn

2013-04-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt 
On 4/17/13 1:29 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:
> 2013/4/17 Jürgen Schmidt :
>> I notice a new file in trunk/teste.txt which seems to be a test file.
> 
> The file removed. ;-)

perfect ;-) And don't get me wrong testing is fine but we should be
careful with checking in useless files. Everything can be removed but it
will remain in the logs.

Juergen


> 
> Albino
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Sidebar merged into trunk

2013-04-17 Thread Andre Fischer 

On 17.04.2013 09:37, Shenfeng Liu wrote:

Andre,


2013/4/17 Andre Fischer 


On 17.04.2013 09:06, Shenfeng Liu wrote:


Hi, RGB,
Thanks for your trying of the sidebar!
Here are my comments below.

- Shenfeng (Simon)


2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile 

  Hi Ricardo,

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:29 PM, RGB ES  wrote:


Maybe there are some gremlins after all... I downloaded the build made
by
Ariel from here


  http://people.apache.org/~**arielch/developer-snapshots/**

snapshot/linux_x86-64/


(rpm: as commented on other thread I cannot download the ARC build),
installed it (without the desktop integration, though) fresh with a
clean
profile and obtained exactly the same problems as before with the


buildbot:


the sub and superscript buttons on sidebar do not work,


(1) This issues sounds like the defect 122047.



  the icons on the

Paragraph panel are on the wrong place


(2) I'm not quite sure about this issue you mentioned. From what I see

from
the screenshot from Arial, Vertical Alignment buttons appears, but they
should not. Is it the issue you want to say?



  and the sidebar navigator on Draw

  (3) We don't have any sidebar panel for Draw. We should disable it.

Could
you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?


Symphony did not have a sidebar for Draw.  Apache OpenOffice does. Most
property panels are as helpful in Draw as they are in Impress (line style
and area style of shapes, text properties, etc.,  only the page layouts can
not be applied)

Thanks for your explanation! Then it sounds like a designed behavior, since
there is no object selected at the beginning, so the properties panel shows
nothing.
Or, for a better user experience, should we set another tab (e.g. Gallery)
in front as default for Draw?


Yes, that is one of the questions that we have to answer before release.
The gallery is one good candidate.  But I would prefer a property panel, 
so that on a context change you can see the relevant property panels.
Line and area style would make sense to be shown in Draw without a 
selected shape.  This allows the user to change the default line and 
area style.


-Andre










  and Impress show nothing...

(4) Could you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?



  Can someone else download the Linux packages and check if they work?

I can reproduce it in my notebook, fedora 18 64 bits:
http://people.apache.org/~**arielch/images/sidebar/**paraprops_b.png

I cannot reproduce it in 32 bits, so these might be not gremlins, but
use of C++ primitive types instead of SAL types.

Regards

--**--**
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [CODE]: useless teste.txt file in svn

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
2013/4/17 Jürgen Schmidt :
> I notice a new file in trunk/teste.txt which seems to be a test file.

The file removed. ;-)

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [CODE]: useless teste.txt file in svn

2013-04-17 Thread Albino B Neto 
2013/4/17 Jürgen Schmidt :
> Hi,

Hi

> I notice a new file in trunk/teste.txt which seems to be a test file.
> Can I propose that we don't check in such files please and that this
> file gets removed.

I file is mime. I was doing a test in svn [1].

1 - http://openoffice.apache.org/svn-basics.html

Sorry all !

Albino

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo

2013-04-17 Thread Armin Le Grand 

Hi Samer,

On 16.04.2013 22:06, Samer Mansour wrote:

Armin,

The application icons may differ from the logo.  Are you talking about
these:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/02+-+Design+Proposal+Samer+Mansour+2013.03.03

It may have been the first version of that that I removed a few months
back. There was some design faux pas in that icon set.


It was something like that, I'm not 100% sure (time kills pixels in 
memory ;-)) I checked the history, so it may have been version 1.0 of 
that page. I ought to remember that there were "both" gulls in that 
App-like logo. Hmmm...


It remember it was as a reply to my mail around Januar 
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201301.mbox/%3c50e41265.1040...@me.com%3E) 
which contained my Logo-Mockup 
(http://people.apache.org/~alg/Logos/AOOLogo.png 
). Someone grepped 
the idea and extended it, but I cannot find it anymore.





Please check sibling pages. I haven't deleted anything in the wiki. I've
copied pages and then deleted content to make summaries.
On Apr 16, 2013 9:03 AM, "Armin Le Grand"  wrote:


 Hi Samer,

thanks for working on the overview! Despite that, I'm missing the
'App-Icon'-like ones, I do no longer know whwre these were or from whom.
It's the rectangular ones (like the famous 'App'-icons for various
AppStores, in our Blue, with the Seagulls, also with slight lighting
effect. I consider these a good and modern alternative.
Could we please add these to the selection (if we find them again, of
course)...?

Sincerely,
 Armin

On 14.04.2013 00:42, Samer Mansour wrote:


Summary of feedback (which I found made points):

Samer - Lets go flat, its strong in all aspects brought up.
Kay S. - Agrees with flat logo. Poll should be limited to few.
Robin - Wordmarks need more attention (not logo specific), Vasilis logo is
cool, downside too different. Robin made a similar refresh with/without
feather. Scales his orb down, no indication for his logo preference (he
did
submit one more). Agrees technical aspect of print, but its not deciding
factor (I agree but it should be satisfied).
Dave F - Wordmark needs attention as well, likes flat logo.
Dennis - Check with trademark@
Andrea - Likes orb, not a fan of flat (as its been used as a surrogate in
the past due to limitations).
Alexandro - alters Robins logo.
Juergen - What about stand alone logo for buttons, stickers. Proposes we
should poll.
Kadal - "Because companies do it, we shouldn't?" - not sure that is
convincing b/c they pay expert designers.
Vasilis - Likes flat, but wordmark not so much.
Milo - Likes flat, but workmark needs changing, TM placement too.
Rob - Poll, but its not decision making. PMC decides in end. PMC likes
data, more the better (ie. poll data). "Consider conferences and booth
materials, CD prints, etc."
Janl - Agrees poll for decision is bad idea, but poll for data is good.
"Keep it similar to classic orb". "Doesn't have to be flat" but Janl
doesn't state outright if flat is bad.
Graham L - "Logo is not a computer icon". Print is a huge part of
marketing. Print good -> electronically good, but not necessarily other
way
around.

I could set up a visual poll and share multiple time over facebook and
social media.
http://freeonlinesurveys.com/**app/showpoll.asp?qid=244375&**
sid=xz7athj6ytcg4mb244375&new=**True

Respond with your favourite 3 logo please, or top 2 or 1. The logos that
score the least will be eliminated:

1. Flattened Logo
2. Kevin G. Flat Feather.
3. third pick abstained.



On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Ian Lynch  wrote:

  On 13 April 2013 16:25, Graham Lauder  wrote:

  Hi Milos,

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:45:18PM +0200, Milosh Vujnovic wrote:


Hi guys,

just a quick comment and clarification regarding printing and logos.
Print-friendly version (vector, CMYK) is crucial to be prepared
during logo design process. This includes color and black&white
version (on light and dark background).

I must disagree with the comments on that printing is rarely used
anymore - few examples include billboards, fair stands, business
cards, letterheads and other stationery, and so on.


But OpenOffice is a desktop application. For me, this means the main
focus should be in a logo that looks good everywhere where it is mainly
used, in the user's desktop (even in the window title bar) and the
website (even in the website favicon). Thus, IMHO, printing has the
lowest priority.


Regards


I have been keeping out of this conversation because I don't have time
at
the
moment to give sufficient focus to OO, but I have been reading the list


as


I
am able.  The above statement however prompts me to respond.

The main focus of the logo is to identify and attract. The statement


above


shows a limited understanding of marketing.  The advent of computers has
far
from given us a paperless office,

[CODE]: useless teste.txt file in svn

2013-04-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt 
Hi,

I notice a new file in trunk/teste.txt which seems to be a test file.
Can I propose that we don't check in such files please and that this
file gets removed.

Thanks

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

2013-04-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt 
On 4/17/13 10:13 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> Juergen , Ariel and all,
>   Thanks so much for your great work to have the 4.0 developer snapshot
> ready!
>   According to the 4.0
> plan,
> the next step should be start the regression testing.
>   While I checked the wiki and found many feature/enhancement items are
> still in open status. I think we need to check the status and update the
> wiki. For some of the items ( e.g. Interoperability Improvement, Gallery,
> Gradients, Pallette...) I think maybe we can close here, harvest the
> current achievements in 4.0, and leave further improvements in 4.1. And for
> some other items (e.g. Accessibility, Patch, Encryption UI), it looks like
> we can not contain them in 4.0, and I suggest to defer them out, and move
> to 4.1. Then QE team can make the regression test plan accordingly and
> start testing using the 4.0 developer snapshot.
>   Any suggestion?

I agree that we can move these open items to a 4.1. Especially
everything that is related to translation.

Juergen

> 
> - Shenfeng (Simon)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile 
> 
>> Hi Ricardo,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:52 PM, RGB ES  wrote:
>>> I tried a couple of times to download the ARC file but failed: kget
>>> complains that cannot check the integrity and in fact the checksums do
>> not
>>> match. The rpm pack downloaded without problems.
>>
>> It seems there was a problem uploading that file (all the others pass
>> gpg --verify), I uploaded it again, now it should be fine.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

2013-04-17 Thread Shenfeng Liu 
Juergen , Ariel and all,
  Thanks so much for your great work to have the 4.0 developer snapshot
ready!
  According to the 4.0
plan,
the next step should be start the regression testing.
  While I checked the wiki and found many feature/enhancement items are
still in open status. I think we need to check the status and update the
wiki. For some of the items ( e.g. Interoperability Improvement, Gallery,
Gradients, Pallette...) I think maybe we can close here, harvest the
current achievements in 4.0, and leave further improvements in 4.1. And for
some other items (e.g. Accessibility, Patch, Encryption UI), it looks like
we can not contain them in 4.0, and I suggest to defer them out, and move
to 4.1. Then QE team can make the regression test plan accordingly and
start testing using the 4.0 developer snapshot.
  Any suggestion?

- Shenfeng (Simon)




2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile 

> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:52 PM, RGB ES  wrote:
> > I tried a couple of times to download the ARC file but failed: kget
> > complains that cannot check the integrity and in fact the checksums do
> not
> > match. The rpm pack downloaded without problems.
>
> It seems there was a problem uploading that file (all the others pass
> gpg --verify), I uploaded it again, now it should be fine.
>
> Regards
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Sidebar merged into trunk

2013-04-17 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 

Hi,

On 17.04.2013 09:16, Andre Fischer wrote:

On 17.04.2013 09:06, Shenfeng Liu wrote:


[snip]



and the sidebar navigator on Draw


(3) We don't have any sidebar panel for Draw. We should disable it. Could
you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?


Symphony did not have a sidebar for Draw.  Apache OpenOffice does. Most
property panels are as helpful in Draw as they are in Impress (line
style and area style of shapes, text properties, etc.,  only the page
layouts can not be applied)



I strongly agree to Andre.
Especially the property sidebar panels are very very useful for Draw, 
because in Draw I am having different objects whose properties I want to 
change easy with the property sidebar panels.


Best regards, Oliver.



[snip]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Sidebar merged into trunk

2013-04-17 Thread Shenfeng Liu 
Andre,


2013/4/17 Andre Fischer 

> On 17.04.2013 09:06, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>
>> Hi, RGB,
>>Thanks for your trying of the sidebar!
>>Here are my comments below.
>>
>> - Shenfeng (Simon)
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile 
>>
>>  Hi Ricardo,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:29 PM, RGB ES  wrote:
>>>
 Maybe there are some gremlins after all... I downloaded the build made
 by
 Ariel from here


  http://people.apache.org/~**arielch/developer-snapshots/**
>>> snapshot/linux_x86-64/
>>>
 (rpm: as commented on other thread I cannot download the ARC build),
 installed it (without the desktop integration, though) fresh with a
 clean
 profile and obtained exactly the same problems as before with the

>>> buildbot:
>>>
 the sub and superscript buttons on sidebar do not work,

>>> (1) This issues sounds like the defect 122047.
>>
>>
>>
>>  the icons on the
>>>
 Paragraph panel are on the wrong place

>>> (2) I'm not quite sure about this issue you mentioned. From what I see
>> from
>> the screenshot from Arial, Vertical Alignment buttons appears, but they
>> should not. Is it the issue you want to say?
>>
>>
>>
>>  and the sidebar navigator on Draw
>>>
>>>  (3) We don't have any sidebar panel for Draw. We should disable it.
>> Could
>> you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?
>>
>
> Symphony did not have a sidebar for Draw.  Apache OpenOffice does. Most
> property panels are as helpful in Draw as they are in Impress (line style
> and area style of shapes, text properties, etc.,  only the page layouts can
> not be applied)

Thanks for your explanation! Then it sounds like a designed behavior, since
there is no object selected at the beginning, so the properties panel shows
nothing.
Or, for a better user experience, should we set another tab (e.g. Gallery)
in front as default for Draw?



>
>
>
>>
>>  and Impress show nothing...

>>> (4) Could you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?
>>
>>
>>
>>  Can someone else download the Linux packages and check if they work?

>>> I can reproduce it in my notebook, fedora 18 64 bits:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**arielch/images/sidebar/**paraprops_b.png
>>>
>>> I cannot reproduce it in 32 bits, so these might be not gremlins, but
>>> use of C++ primitive types instead of SAL types.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> --**--**
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Sidebar merged into trunk

2013-04-17 Thread Andre Fischer 

On 17.04.2013 03:12, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

Hi Ricardo,

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:29 PM, RGB ES  wrote:

Maybe there are some gremlins after all... I downloaded the build made by
Ariel from here

http://people.apache.org/~arielch/developer-snapshots/snapshot/linux_x86-64/

(rpm: as commented on other thread I cannot download the ARC build),
installed it (without the desktop integration, though) fresh with a clean
profile and obtained exactly the same problems as before with the buildbot:
the sub and superscript buttons on sidebar do not work, the icons on the
Paragraph panel are on the wrong place and the sidebar navigator on Draw
and Impress show nothing...

Can someone else download the Linux packages and check if they work?

I can reproduce it in my notebook, fedora 18 64 bits:
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/images/sidebar/paraprops_b.png

I cannot reproduce it in 32 bits, so these might be not gremlins, but
use of C++ primitive types instead of SAL types.


Is that not just another name for gremlins? :-)  But you may be right.  
The Symphony code still used some old data types (like USHORT) that are 
not supported anymore in AOO.  Maybe the these have not been correctly 
migrated in all cases.


-Andre



Regards

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Sidebar merged into trunk

2013-04-17 Thread Andre Fischer 

On 17.04.2013 09:06, Shenfeng Liu wrote:

Hi, RGB,
   Thanks for your trying of the sidebar!
   Here are my comments below.

- Shenfeng (Simon)


2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile 


Hi Ricardo,

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:29 PM, RGB ES  wrote:

Maybe there are some gremlins after all... I downloaded the build made by
Ariel from here



http://people.apache.org/~arielch/developer-snapshots/snapshot/linux_x86-64/

(rpm: as commented on other thread I cannot download the ARC build),
installed it (without the desktop integration, though) fresh with a clean
profile and obtained exactly the same problems as before with the

buildbot:

the sub and superscript buttons on sidebar do not work,

(1) This issues sounds like the defect 122047.




the icons on the

Paragraph panel are on the wrong place

(2) I'm not quite sure about this issue you mentioned. From what I see from
the screenshot from Arial, Vertical Alignment buttons appears, but they
should not. Is it the issue you want to say?




and the sidebar navigator on Draw


(3) We don't have any sidebar panel for Draw. We should disable it. Could
you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?


Symphony did not have a sidebar for Draw.  Apache OpenOffice does. Most 
property panels are as helpful in Draw as they are in Impress (line 
style and area style of shapes, text properties, etc.,  only the page 
layouts can not be applied)






and Impress show nothing...

(4) Could you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?




Can someone else download the Linux packages and check if they work?

I can reproduce it in my notebook, fedora 18 64 bits:
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/images/sidebar/paraprops_b.png

I cannot reproduce it in 32 bits, so these might be not gremlins, but
use of C++ primitive types instead of SAL types.

Regards

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: std::stringstream aStrStream

2013-04-17 Thread Andre Fischer 

On 17.04.2013 01:46, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:

Hello,

I am modifying this code in AOO:
http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/cui/source/tabpages/tpcolor.cxx#465

I'm trying to concatenate with stringstream but I have errors when I'am
building:

1- I already included:
#include 

2- I have added the following code:
http://imagebin.org/254288


I don't see a definition of aName, but from the error message assume 
that it is String.




3- This is the error:
http://imagebin.org/254289


That is because the String class has no << operator defined. Try to use 
aName.getStr() instead of just aName.


-Andre



Help me, regards!!




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Sidebar merged into trunk

2013-04-17 Thread Shenfeng Liu 
Hi, RGB,
  Thanks for your trying of the sidebar!
  Here are my comments below.

- Shenfeng (Simon)


2013/4/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile 

> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:29 PM, RGB ES  wrote:
> > Maybe there are some gremlins after all... I downloaded the build made by
> > Ariel from here
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/developer-snapshots/snapshot/linux_x86-64/
> >
> > (rpm: as commented on other thread I cannot download the ARC build),
> > installed it (without the desktop integration, though) fresh with a clean
> > profile and obtained exactly the same problems as before with the
> buildbot:
> > the sub and superscript buttons on sidebar do not work,
>
(1) This issues sounds like the defect 122047.



> the icons on the
> > Paragraph panel are on the wrong place
>
(2) I'm not quite sure about this issue you mentioned. From what I see from
the screenshot from Arial, Vertical Alignment buttons appears, but they
should not. Is it the issue you want to say?



> and the sidebar navigator on Draw
>
(3) We don't have any sidebar panel for Draw. We should disable it. Could
you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?


> > and Impress show nothing...
>
(4) Could you please raise a defect in BZ, with [sidebar] on summary?



> >
> > Can someone else download the Linux packages and check if they work?
>
> I can reproduce it in my notebook, fedora 18 64 bits:
> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/images/sidebar/paraprops_b.png
>
> I cannot reproduce it in 32 bits, so these might be not gremlins, but
> use of C++ primitive types instead of SAL types.
>
> Regards
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Blog account

2013-04-17 Thread Andre Fischer 

On 16.04.2013 21:11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

Am 04/15/2013 02:27 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer:

On 10.04.2013 14:17, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Andre Fischer  
wrote:



Hi,

I would like to blog about the sidebar but do not yet have an account.
What should be my next steps? Is there any documentation?



First need to get an account through Infra, and then have an AOO blog
admin
add you as an editor:


I got the account, now I would need an invitation from one of the local
blog admins.
Please?


I've sent you an invitation. I hope it arrives as I don't have seen a 
confirmation.


Got it.  Thank you.

-Andre



Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org