Re: AOOTest-277
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: can someone please check whether test descriptions for above mentioned test are correct? Thanks to Sandhya Sivakumar, who left a comment in the Bug. CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: openoffice4 not recognize different fonts
On 3/14/14 2:40 AM, panghon...@163.com wrote: > Hi, > > openoffice4 not recognize different Chinese fonts, but libreoffice4 can > identify. Annex word document. we need more information to get a more detailed picture of the problem. - which fonts, please provide the names etc. - a test document - your operating system Juergen > > thanks. > == > peter pang > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Bug 124426] Pop-up errors when open various files on Mac
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.0_release_blocker: Bug 124426: Pop-up errors when open various files on Mac https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124426 --- Additional Comments from fanyuz...@gmail.com Reported by Michael Rutherford (Thanks!): I'm using the AOO 4.1 Beta on my Mac (OS X 10.9.2) and just wanted you to know that I'm seeing a number of pop-up errors when I open various files. Please note that once I click on "OK" for each of these errors, the file is opened and I can edit successfully. I can provide details as necessary. Confirmed by Clarence Guo (Thanks!): Yes, I can confirm this problem on my MAC 10.9.0 with the latest snapshot build 1573601. But I cannot reproduce the problem on the same OS with build 1566593. So it seems a regression defect happened in the very recent days. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DOCUMENTATION] better installation guide - issue 124400 and issue 124408
Hi, On 13.03.2014 21:52, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/13/2014 09:36 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 12.03.2014 21:15, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/12/2014 12:30 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, Rainer recently noticed that our installation guides needs improvement - see issues 124343 and 124400. I am volunteering to take corresponding actions. But I need support and feedback - I am neither a web designer nor a technical writer I can support you with the webdesign. Maybe it's gets a bit hard (when I read Kay's mail ;-) ) but I would try. Issue 124343: This is about the visibility of the headings. My suggestion here is to make the font used for the headings (all levels) bold. Thus, I would like to propose to change our corresponding CSS [1]. Please provide feedback regarding my suggestion. This is a central CSS file. Changes here would affect nearly all webpages. This needs to be treated very carefully. Does it makes sense to make more or less all headings on our website bold? No, I'm pretty sure here and there it wouldn't be the intended style. Are there alternatives to improve the visibility of heading? Should we make all heading italic or larger? Again no. ;-) Such a feedback does not help as you only say no, no, no, ... without any alternative suggestion :-) I'm sorry when you expected some code or else. But without looking closer into the CSS styling I wouldn't do anything. No, I do not expect any code. Just feedback as you have given, but also alternative suggestions, when my proposed changes are not your favorites. I would start with improving the text content. Then we should think about the formatting. BTW: This was my suggestion. Maybe you have overlooked it. ;-) No, but I mad a mistake - see below. What do you think? Hm. We have issue 124343 for the formatting and issue 124400 for the content. Changing the words of a heading will not improve its visibility. Thus, I think that these issues can be treated separately. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124400 Website: Installation guides: Headings do not look like headings https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124343 Website: Bugzilla documentation: Headings do not look like headings For me it's the same - just 2 different websites. I've adjusted the issue summaries. Damn, now I know what went wrong. I referenced the wrong issues - I am sorry. It is 124400 for the formatting on the installation guide website and 124408 [1] for the content on the installation guide website. That is why I was puzzled by your suggestion to 'start improving content and then look on formatting'. Thus, content and formatting of our installation guide is what I want to work on [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124408 - Improve AOO Installation Guide Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: openoffice.lst, can wJRE be deleted?
On 13.03.2014 23:15, Kay Schenk wrote: On 03/13/2014 06:49 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all In openoffice.lst there is still a configuration for the with JRE build. We have anymor Builds with JRE, and I doubt that we will have in future. The license of Java is not ALv2 compatible, right. So the question is, can we delete this part? Greetings Raphael I would think so unless others have a different opinion. I agree that removing this entry from openoffice.lst is a good idea. Raphael, do you want to do it or shall I? I already have two modules on my to-remove list for Monday already. -Andre - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Document Freedom Day 2014 @Taiwan
Dear all, We are holding the Document Freedom Day 2014 at Taiwan, on 2014/3/26(Wed). There will be two DFD 2014 meetings in Taiwan: * Taipei: 2014/3/23(Wed) 18:30 at WaWa Book 2nd Floor http://imacat.kktix.cc/events/dfd2014 2F., No.3, Sec. 2, Bade Rd., Da’an Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan imacat will be sharing "from doc, docx to odt and GoogleDocs". We'll also share the latest development of OpenOffice 4.1 and LibreOffice 4.2.1. * Hualian: 2014/3/23(Wed) 19:30 at Yuri Suangan Caf'e https://www.facebook.com/events/597139773708958/ Please come to join us if you are at Taiwan at that time. -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc <> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: openoffice.lst, can wJRE be deleted?
On 3/14/14 8:55 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 13.03.2014 23:15, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >> On 03/13/2014 06:49 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> In openoffice.lst there is still a configuration for the with JRE >>> build. We have anymor Builds with JRE, and I doubt that we will have >>> in future. The license of Java is not ALv2 compatible, right. So the >>> question is, can we delete this part? >>> >>> Greetings Raphael >> >> I would think so unless others have a different opinion. > > I agree that removing this entry from openoffice.lst is a good idea. > > Raphael, do you want to do it or shall I? I already have two modules on > my to-remove list for Monday already. removing the word perfect wrapper files is potentially Beta relevant. Just to keep it separated ;-) Juergen > > -Andre > >> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Beta Survey
The purpose of having a beta release of 4.1 is to gather feedback from users. Reports to Bugzilla or the mailing list is one source of feedback. But that doesn't give us a good sense of coverage. If there were no beta testers of the Bulgarian translation (for example) then we'd probably want to take a closer look, at that specific package. I'm putting together a beta survey that we can have beta testers fill out, to record their testing experience. I'm thinking of questions like: 1) What platform they ran with 2) What language they used 3) How many hours they have used AOO beta 4) Which apps did they use 5) What file formats did they read/write 6) Link to a list of P1 bugs reported on beta: Did they encounter any of these bugs? 7) Did they encounter any other bugs? (Nudge them to enter a BZ report) 8) Did they try any of the new features in AOO 4.1 (list them) 9) Any other comments (free text response) Does anyone have any other suggested questions? The plan would be to send out the survey early next week, before the beta period is done, so we can react to any feedback. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website : wrong download link
On 14/03/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Thanks for the hint. I've enhanced the German webpage to offer the Beta Release additionally. Now http://www.openoffice.org/it/download/ is serving the Beta too. Could you fix it there too? http://www.openoffice.org/es/descargar/ apparently has the same problem. Note: it's not necessary that they offer 4.1.0-beta, the only thing to fix is that they claim you will download 4.0.1 but they lead you to a 4.1.0-beta download (to be simply changed back to a 4.0.1 download). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: openoffice.lst, can wJRE be deleted?
Hi Andre It's now Issue https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124432 I found some other code related to wJRE in the code. I will prepare a patch. Greetings Raphael Am 14.03.2014 um 08:55 schrieb Andre Fischer: > On 13.03.2014 23:15, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >> On 03/13/2014 06:49 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> In openoffice.lst there is still a configuration for the with JRE build. We >>> have anymor Builds with JRE, and I doubt that we will have in future. The >>> license of Java is not ALv2 compatible, right. So the question is, can we >>> delete this part? >>> >>> Greetings Raphael >> >> I would think so unless others have a different opinion. > > I agree that removing this entry from openoffice.lst is a good idea. > > Raphael, do you want to do it or shall I? I already have two modules on my > to-remove list for Monday already. > > -Andre > >> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DOCUMENTATION] better installation guide - issue 124400 and issue 124408
On 03/14/2014 12:20 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 13.03.2014 21:52, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/13/2014 09:36 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 12.03.2014 21:15, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/12/2014 12:30 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, Rainer recently noticed that our installation guides needs improvement - see issues 124343 and 124400. I am volunteering to take corresponding actions. But I need support and feedback - I am neither a web designer nor a technical writer I can support you with the webdesign. Maybe it's gets a bit hard (when I read Kay's mail ;-) ) but I would try. Issue 124343: This is about the visibility of the headings. My suggestion here is to make the font used for the headings (all levels) bold. Thus, I would like to propose to change our corresponding CSS [1]. Please provide feedback regarding my suggestion. This is a central CSS file. Changes here would affect nearly all webpages. This needs to be treated very carefully. Does it makes sense to make more or less all headings on our website bold? No, I'm pretty sure here and there it wouldn't be the intended style. Are there alternatives to improve the visibility of heading? Should we make all heading italic or larger? Again no. ;-) Such a feedback does not help as you only say no, no, no, ... without any alternative suggestion :-) I'm sorry when you expected some code or else. But without looking closer into the CSS styling I wouldn't do anything. No, I do not expect any code. Just feedback as you have given, but also alternative suggestions, when my proposed changes are not your favorites. I would start with improving the text content. Then we should think about the formatting. BTW: This was my suggestion. Maybe you have overlooked it. ;-) No, but I mad a mistake - see below. What do you think? Hm. We have issue 124343 for the formatting and issue 124400 for the content. Changing the words of a heading will not improve its visibility. Thus, I think that these issues can be treated separately. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124400 Website: Installation guides: Headings do not look like headings https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124343 Website: Bugzilla documentation: Headings do not look like headings For me it's the same - just 2 different websites. I've adjusted the issue summaries. Damn, now I know what went wrong. I referenced the wrong issues - I am sorry. It is 124400 for the formatting on the installation guide website and 124408 [1] for the content on the installation guide website. That is why I was puzzled by your suggestion to 'start improving content and then look on formatting'. Thus, content and formatting of our installation guide is what I want to work on [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124408 - Improve AOO Installation Guide Best regards, Oliver. Got it! :} I'm sure we can do both -- with some help from the community! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Proposal to delete unused modules
On 03/13/2014 07:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mar 13, 2014 5:39 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 03/13/2014 01:46 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: I would like to propose to delete two unused modules: main/splitbuild and main/writerperfect - splitbuild looks like a collection of files that drive (drove) some sort of build script to build selected parts of OpenOffice. It may or may not be related to what is described in [1]. splitbuild depends on postprocess but nothing depends on splitbuild, therefore it is not used in any of our builds. - writerperfect is a second module that is not used anymore. The only module that depends on writerperfect is splitbuild. = There are some references in sysui to the wpf file format (application/vnd.writerperfect). = There is a configure switch --with-system-libwpd. It would trigger the building of library libwpft, which is referenced in postprocess and scp2, but without a dependency on module writerperfect this library is never built and using --with-system-libwpd could only lead to an error. This has to do with the processing of Word Perfect files, right? If we remove this module would this capability no longer exist? The support for WordPerfect files was already removed in 3.4.0, for security reasons as well as license issues. What we're talking about here is some related code that is not currently being used. -Rob OK. An awareness issue on my part, although I don't see anything in the release notes for either 3.4.0 or 3.4.1 about this. There is info on the forums about the removal for licensing issues, however. The security issue related to WPD files was here: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2149.html -Rob Ok, thanks. Hopefully, we can make changes/removals like this more obvious in the future. So, it makes sense to remove this code. Does anybody know of any reason not to delete the two modules? Regards, Andre [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort/Split_Build - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Can i Embed your products
Dear Open office team, I am building my website that contain open software section so Kindly, I would like to embed your software in my website or put a link related to your products. thank you in advance. And do you have any affiliate program. Kindest regards Muhammed Alhammouri
Academic Proposal
Good evening, I’m a student from Minho University in Portugal, taking my Master's in Computer Teaching, and myself and a colleague of mine, require as a group to contribute to an open source project, as a requirement for the course, during this semester (we must conclude by July 2014). The expected outcomes are: Analyst – Requirement document; Programmer – Code; Tester – Bug report. Among a list of choices, we were given, we chose the http://www.openoffice.org/ community to collaborate with. Our teacher Luis Barbosa (l...@di.uminho.pt) is participating in the project “A Pilot Project on Non-Conventional Learning” with the collaboration of Sara Fernandes (sara.fernan...@iist.unu.edu) from de United Nations University – IIST. Myself and my colleague, already concluded a Master's degree in Computer Science from the Faculty of Science of Porto University - Portugal. We have experience with: C, C++, Java, Javascript, Prolog, Haskell, SQL, PHP, CSS, HTML. We are hoping we could collaborate and help the openoffice community with QA, translation, graphic design or programming tasks, maybe 3-4 hours a week. We would like to know if you are willing to cooperate with us and if you could recommend any appropriate tasks for us to work on? We await your reply. Best reguards, Pedro
saving work
I have open office 4.0.1, for some strange reason the program is not saving my work! Any way you can help me?
Re: saving work
What platform are you working on? Are you working in a document that has been loaded "read only"? If so your changes will not be saved. If you're on Linux or Mac are you sure you have write permissions on the directory where you are saving your work? On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Etta's Gourmet Cookies wrote: > > > I have open office 4.0.1, for some strange reason the program is not > saving my work! Any way you can help me? >
Re: [RELEASE]: Beta downloads and feedback and a proposed way to the final
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > we have already >92,000 Beta downloads via SF, I can't say exactly how > many full install sets and how many of them are language packs only. But > I think the number is quite good we should be able to find serious > problems if only 50% use the beta for some real testing under normal > work conditions. But I don't know ... > > For now I haven't seen really serious problems which of course is good > but maybe I have overseen something. Anyway if we don't get serious > issues until March 30th I plan to prepare and provide the first final RC > on the 31th. The vote will start immediately after the upload ... > > The idea is to have the AOO 4.1 is place for the ApacheCon (7.-.11. > April) or even better announce it during the ApacheCon. > > Any opinions on this plan? > > Juergen > > I don't know what the normal feedback expectation is for a beta release like this, but this would provide 3 weeks and 3 weekends for testing, so probably a reasonable plan. I know we've already had some feedback on the "users" list, but we'll keep monitoring things. > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- - MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
hi
I am rajeev , from India.I read the readme_en-GB.txt file after installing openoffice.So I want contribute my knowledge and effort for this community.My technical knowledge java,jdbc,servlet,jsp,hibernate,spring,jquery,ajax,json,gson.I am not an employee of any company,I am a student. Thank you
Re: openoffice.lst, can wJRE be deleted?
Hi at all I added the patch. Can someone review it? Greetings Raphael Am 14.03.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Raphael Bircher: > Hi Andre > > It's now Issue https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124432 > I found some other code related to wJRE in the code. I will prepare a patch. > > Greetings Raphael > > Am 14.03.2014 um 08:55 schrieb Andre Fischer: > >> On 13.03.2014 23:15, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/13/2014 06:49 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all In openoffice.lst there is still a configuration for the with JRE build. We have anymor Builds with JRE, and I doubt that we will have in future. The license of Java is not ALv2 compatible, right. So the question is, can we delete this part? Greetings Raphael >>> >>> I would think so unless others have a different opinion. >> >> I agree that removing this entry from openoffice.lst is a good idea. >> >> Raphael, do you want to do it or shall I? I already have two modules on my >> to-remove list for Monday already. >> >> -Andre >> >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: problem downloading last version
Am 03/14/2014 12:25 AM, schrieb Jorge Pavón Fernández: I tried Trying to download the latest Spanish OO version 4.0.1 but the installer keeps saying it's beta 4.1.0http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/milestones/4.1.0-beta/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_Beta_4.1.0_Win_x86_install_es.exe/download?use_mirror=optimate&r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openoffice.org%2Fes%2Fdescargar%2F%3Futm_source%3DOOo3_3_es%26utm_medium%3DClient%26utm_campaign%3DUpgrade&use_mirror=optimate nevertheless I finally found the right version at:http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html I hope this report helps! Jorge Thanks for the hint. This problem is fixed now. The Spanish download webpage should offer AOO 4.0.1 again. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website : wrong download link
Am 03/14/2014 02:23 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 14/03/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Thanks for the hint. I've enhanced the German webpage to offer the Beta Release additionally. Now http://www.openoffice.org/it/download/ is serving the Beta too. Could you fix it there too? http://www.openoffice.org/es/descargar/ apparently has the same problem. I've fixed it on the it, es and nl webpages. Any other languages that uses the One-Click-Download? Note: it's not necessary that they offer 4.1.0-beta, the only thing to fix is that they claim you will download 4.0.1 but they lead you to a 4.1.0-beta download (to be simply changed back to a 4.0.1 download). OK but it wouldn't be a big effort to offer it additionally. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DOCUMENTATION] better installation guide - issue 124400 and issue 124408
Am 03/14/2014 08:20 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 13.03.2014 21:52, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/13/2014 09:36 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 12.03.2014 21:15, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/12/2014 12:30 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, Rainer recently noticed that our installation guides needs improvement - see issues 124343 and 124400. I am volunteering to take corresponding actions. But I need support and feedback - I am neither a web designer nor a technical writer I can support you with the webdesign. Maybe it's gets a bit hard (when I read Kay's mail ;-) ) but I would try. Issue 124343: This is about the visibility of the headings. My suggestion here is to make the font used for the headings (all levels) bold. Thus, I would like to propose to change our corresponding CSS [1]. Please provide feedback regarding my suggestion. This is a central CSS file. Changes here would affect nearly all webpages. This needs to be treated very carefully. Does it makes sense to make more or less all headings on our website bold? No, I'm pretty sure here and there it wouldn't be the intended style. Are there alternatives to improve the visibility of heading? Should we make all heading italic or larger? Again no. ;-) Such a feedback does not help as you only say no, no, no, ... without any alternative suggestion :-) I'm sorry when you expected some code or else. But without looking closer into the CSS styling I wouldn't do anything. No, I do not expect any code. Just feedback as you have given, but also alternative suggestions, when my proposed changes are not your favorites. I would start with improving the text content. Then we should think about the formatting. BTW: This was my suggestion. Maybe you have overlooked it. ;-) No, but I mad a mistake - see below. What do you think? Hm. We have issue 124343 for the formatting and issue 124400 for the content. Changing the words of a heading will not improve its visibility. Thus, I think that these issues can be treated separately. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124400 Website: Installation guides: Headings do not look like headings https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124343 Website: Bugzilla documentation: Headings do not look like headings For me it's the same - just 2 different websites. I've adjusted the issue summaries. Damn, now I know what went wrong. I referenced the wrong issues - I am sorry. It is 124400 for the formatting on the installation guide website and 124408 [1] for the content on the installation guide website. That is why I was puzzled by your suggestion to 'start improving content and then look on formatting'. ah, got it. :-) Thus, content and formatting of our installation guide is what I want to work on [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124408 - Improve AOO Installation Guide With the content I think I cannot help. I've just Linux and my installation is just: cd sudo rpm -ivh * I don't care about icons, system integration as I don't use it anyway. But I can work on the styling if it's OK. My suggestion remains: 1. Improve the content. 2. Then we know the document structure. 3. Then we can improve the styling. If there a good reasons, we can start to improve the styling earlier of course. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DOCUMENTATION] better installation guide - issue 124400 and issue 124408
OK, back to topic. Therefore top posting. I was a bit curious. So, I did a little test. The "instructions.html" file does not contain any references about CSS. So, I included the "styles.css" and "exceptions.css" files and looked at the local file --> It changed the layout. Now I committed the file to the test area into staging and compared old [1] and new [2]. Now the headings can be identified as headings again. If this is looking nice is a different topic. ;-) [1] http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/common/instructions.html [2] http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/instructions.html Marcus Am 03/14/2014 09:46 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 03/14/2014 08:20 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 13.03.2014 21:52, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/13/2014 09:36 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 12.03.2014 21:15, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/12/2014 12:30 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, Rainer recently noticed that our installation guides needs improvement - see issues 124343 and 124400. I am volunteering to take corresponding actions. But I need support and feedback - I am neither a web designer nor a technical writer I can support you with the webdesign. Maybe it's gets a bit hard (when I read Kay's mail ;-) ) but I would try. Issue 124343: This is about the visibility of the headings. My suggestion here is to make the font used for the headings (all levels) bold. Thus, I would like to propose to change our corresponding CSS [1]. Please provide feedback regarding my suggestion. This is a central CSS file. Changes here would affect nearly all webpages. This needs to be treated very carefully. Does it makes sense to make more or less all headings on our website bold? No, I'm pretty sure here and there it wouldn't be the intended style. Are there alternatives to improve the visibility of heading? Should we make all heading italic or larger? Again no. ;-) Such a feedback does not help as you only say no, no, no, ... without any alternative suggestion :-) I'm sorry when you expected some code or else. But without looking closer into the CSS styling I wouldn't do anything. No, I do not expect any code. Just feedback as you have given, but also alternative suggestions, when my proposed changes are not your favorites. I would start with improving the text content. Then we should think about the formatting. BTW: This was my suggestion. Maybe you have overlooked it. ;-) No, but I mad a mistake - see below. What do you think? Hm. We have issue 124343 for the formatting and issue 124400 for the content. Changing the words of a heading will not improve its visibility. Thus, I think that these issues can be treated separately. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124400 Website: Installation guides: Headings do not look like headings https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124343 Website: Bugzilla documentation: Headings do not look like headings For me it's the same - just 2 different websites. I've adjusted the issue summaries. Damn, now I know what went wrong. I referenced the wrong issues - I am sorry. It is 124400 for the formatting on the installation guide website and 124408 [1] for the content on the installation guide website. That is why I was puzzled by your suggestion to 'start improving content and then look on formatting'. ah, got it. :-) Thus, content and formatting of our installation guide is what I want to work on [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124408 - Improve AOO Installation Guide With the content I think I cannot help. I've just Linux and my installation is just: cd sudo rpm -ivh * I don't care about icons, system integration as I don't use it anyway. But I can work on the styling if it's OK. My suggestion remains: 1. Improve the content. 2. Then we know the document structure. 3. Then we can improve the styling. If there a good reasons, we can start to improve the styling earlier of course. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website : wrong download link
Marcus (OOo) wrote: I've fixed it on the it, es and nl webpages. Thanks, I confirm it works now! Any other languages that uses the One-Click-Download? http://www.openoffice.org/pt/download/ but apparently it already offers 4.0.1 (correctly). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website : wrong download link
Am 03/14/2014 11:21 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus (OOo) wrote: I've fixed it on the it, es and nl webpages. Thanks, I confirm it works now! Any other languages that uses the One-Click-Download? I've changed the behaviour in the JS code only. So, I expected that it is then working on all webpages. But I'm asking just to be sure ... http://www.openoffice.org/pt/download/ but apparently it already offers 4.0.1 (correctly). Great Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
