date:20140404

I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.  
addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a RuntimeException 
is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819.  Then on line 830,  the code then 
tries to recover the "original status"  then call activateExtension, which then 
leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process 
the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException 
is causing the problem, but something is not correct.  Here is high level stack 
trace (typed out).

[1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 
0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx 
[2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 
0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 
[3] 
dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this-
 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = 
false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net] 
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/04/2014 12:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
>
>> On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
>>
>>> I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created 
>>> another simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the 
>>> same crash.  I don't know where to go from here.
>>>
>>>   ...
>>
>> Raymond,
>>
>> What version of AOO and netbeans are you using.
>>
>> For AOO4+ and NB7+ you should try this one:
>> http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org-
>> openoffice-extensions-4.0.5.alpha.nbm
>>
>> I can't say how much testing it's had, therefore the alpha designation.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
>
>
> Carl --
>
> Is is OK to update the wiki page --
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice_NetBeans_Integration#Downl
> oad_and_Installation
>
> with this new version regardless of "alpha" status? This would give 
> more visibility and testing.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
Kay,

I will leave that to the group.
At the time I had only been able to test it using Netbeans 7.2, AOO
4.0.0 on Fedora 17 x86-64.
I know of no testing on Windows or Mac.

When I posted the update, I believe Juergen Schmidt was on vacation at the time 
but was going to look at it for some other changes being made so I waited until 
I heard back.

The thread is here:
http://markmail.org/message/5yv2nyob4rurmj2h

The change that broke backward compatibility was for Addons.xcu here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122055

3-Layer removal here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123266

I would have some time to make changes if we find issues.

Also NB 8 is out now so I don't know if that breaks anything also.

Thanks,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: ping

2014-04-04 Thread Marco A.G.Pinto


  
  
pong
  
  On 05/04/2014 00:45, Alexandro Colorado wrote:


  ping





--

ping

2014-04-04 Thread Alexandro Colorado

ping

-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Thanks for letting me know Carl. I am still looking for a solution to why this 
is crashing. Any help would be great.

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 4:11 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/04/2014 11:47 AM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> Thanks Carl. I will give it a try. Can you tell me what the changes are as 
> compared to the 3.0 version that I am using.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:49 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
>> I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created another 
>> simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash.  I 
>> don't know where to go from here.
>>
> ...
Raymond,

AOO4 required a change to Addons.xcu that broke backward compatibility I 
documented here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122055

The other change was for 3-Layer removal here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123266

Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

2014-04-04 Thread Carl Marcum

On 04/04/2014 11:47 AM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

Thanks Carl. I will give it a try. Can you tell me what the changes are as 
compared to the 3.0 version that I am using.

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:49 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created another simple 
extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash.  I don't know 
where to go from here.

...

Raymond,

AOO4 required a change to Addons.xcu that broke backward compatibility I 
documented here:

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122055

The other change was for 3-Layer removal here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123266

Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

2014-04-04 Thread Carl Marcum

On 04/04/2014 12:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:

On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

I am not convinced the issue is with the extension. I created another
simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash. I
don't know where to go from here.

...

Raymond,

What version of AOO and netbeans are you using.

For AOO4+ and NB7+ you should try this one:
http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org-
openoffice-extensions-4.0.5.alpha.nbm

I can't say how much testing it's had, therefore the alpha designation.

Best regards,
Carl

Carl --

Is is OK to update the wiki page --

https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice_NetBeans_Integration#Download_and_Installation

with this new version regardless of "alpha" status? This would give more
visibility and testing.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Kay,

I will leave that to the group.
At the time I had only been able to test it using Netbeans 7.2, AOO
4.0.0 on Fedora 17 x86-64.

I know of no testing on Windows or Mac.

When I posted the update, I believe Juergen Schmidt was on vacation at
the time but was going to look at it for some other changes being made
so I waited until I heard back.

The thread is here:
http://markmail.org/message/5yv2nyob4rurmj2h

The change that broke backward compatibility was for Addons.xcu here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122055

3-Layer removal here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123266

I would have some time to make changes if we find issues.

Also NB 8 is out now so I don't know if that breaks anything also.

Thanks,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread Kay Schenk



On 04/04/2014 09:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Andre Fischer wrote:

Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like
to cancel this vote, if nobody objects.


It is a clear release blocker. I agree that a second Release Candidate
should be prepared. We can then do the right steps for fixing the
process, but the thing we are voting on is clearly not ready for release
based on what you write.

Regards,
   Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Should we send out a [CANCEL][VOTE] notice just so things don't get 
confusing and maybe reference Andre's message.


--
-
MzK

"Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
 for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
   -- James Mason

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO Weekly News?

2014-04-04 Thread Tal Daniel

Rob Weir wrote:

> I noticed this blog post from another Apache project, CouchDB:
> https://blogs.apache.org/couchdb/entry/couchdb_weekly_news_april_3
>
> Isn't that a cool idea?
>
> Sounds like a good idea, to summarize key discussions, and news, for the
rest of us who can't track all the forum posts.
Weekly? Monthly?

AOO Weekly News?

2014-04-04 Thread Rob Weir

I noticed this blog post from another Apache project, CouchDB:

https://blogs.apache.org/couchdb/entry/couchdb_weekly_news_april_3

Isn't that a cool idea?

Regards,

-Rob

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread Rob Weir

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer  wrote:
> On 03.04.2014 09:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
>> (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>>
> Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like to
> cancel this vote, if nobody objects. Juergen, who started the vote, is on
> vacation today, so I need your help to do that.
>
> The problem is described by issue 124599 [1].  Here is a summary:
>
> When you install the RC on Windows then a previously installed version (3.*
> and 4.*) is not removed.  For versions 3.* this leads to a parallel
> installation (because there are different installation paths).  For versions
> 4.* the files of the older version are overwritten but registry entries and
> links on the desktop remain. If you install the RC on a system with no prior
> installation of AOO then there are no problems.
>
> This problem is caused by my patch related changes and is therefore
> restricted to Windows.  Linux and Mac are not affected.
>
> I am currently working on a fix which will probably consist of a small
> change in our Perl program for creating the downloadable installer.  That
> means that it requires an SVN commit and therefore a rebuild on all
> platforms.  So,  even if Mac and Linux are not directly affected, they still
> have to be rebuilt so that they report the correct SVN revision.
>
> If you don't object to a cancellation of the vote then the current plan is
> to provide a fix today, rebuild and upload tomorrow and re-start the vote on
> the second RC on sunday or monday depending on how smooth this process
> works.
>

That makes sense.  A temporary inconvenience for us now will make
things cleaner for the users.  It may also help us later when trying
to figure out the update logic for AOO 4.1 to 4.2.

-Rob


> Regards,
> Andre
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread Marcus (OOo)


Am 04/04/2014 06:03 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Andre Fischer wrote:

Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like
to cancel this vote, if nobody objects.


It is a clear release blocker. I agree that a second Release Candidate
should be prepared. We can then do the right steps for fixing the
process, but the thing we are voting on is clearly not ready for release
based on what you write.


+1 for doing a second round and a RC2.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Anything we can do about premature redistribution?

2014-04-04 Thread Marcus (OOo)


Am 04/03/2014 11:12 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

2014-04-03 21:44 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):


Am 04/03/2014 12:57 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:

  On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:



2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt:

  On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:



Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:


2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):

  Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:


2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):



Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:



 On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weir
wrote:



 On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Marcus
(OOo)

  wrote:


Am 03/29/2014 09:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:



 2014-03-28 21:24 GMT+01:00 Marcus (OOo)<
marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:



 Am 03/13/2014 10:01 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):



 Am 03/09/2014 06:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):



 Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:



 Rob Weir wrote:



 http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/




 Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml







   Or maybe a disclaimer in the voting thread email?






Andrew's comments show clearly that these editors do
not
care


to be
careful or factual, or even read those disclaimers,
unfortunately.

We can be successful only if we manage to block their
downloads.

They





 link to our binaries hosted on SourceForge (which is

fine). Just



  thinking loud, but if it was possible (on the Sourceforge side)



to



deny

all download requests that do not come from the
openoffice.orgor

the





 sourceforge.net domains, then the project would

effectively be


in





  control. The embargo could be lifted just after the release.






For me this sounds like a great idea.



Maybe we should start with denying all download requests
that some

from





 these bad websites.






  @Roberto:

Can you tell us if this possible? If yes, is it much effort


for



you?



Do you see a chance to get this implemented? I think it


could



help to

stop some bad websites to do bad things with our software.


@Roberto:


Maybe you haven't seen this up to now.


Thanks for heads up Marcus, sorry for not having noticed
this


thread
before.




It would be great if you can tell us if it's possible to


exclude



some

domains / IP addresses from downloading our software?


I need the domain list and I'll check out with our SiteOps
if


that's
doable. Feel free to send me a list with a direct message.




- chip.de
- computerbase.de
- softpedia.com

This would be the domains from this thread that could be blocked
from
downloading from Sourceforge. Obviously needs to be extended in


the





future.



Remember, the next will happen with the AOO 4.1.0 RC. ;-)



*Of course*, this is just for the time frame as long as the new
version

is



not officially announced. As soon as the release is public,
the
block



will



be removed.



@all:
I think this could help to limit the downloadability like we
want to
see
until the official release. What you think?


I don't know.  Won't this just cause confusion?  They point
to
the


files, go to test them, see the links don't work, and then get


weird



errors and spend an hour trying to debug it.  We don't want to

needlessly annoy them, since their only fault is enthusiasm.   Is
there a way we can give a useful error message in this case like,
"This version of Apache OpenOffice has not yet been officially
released.  Links to these files are disallowed until the release
is
officially approved"  or something like that?


 To be honest, I don't care about a few days were a special

set of


domains
were not able to access for a few days. For me they are a bit too
enthusiastic. And as you said in a previous post it's to protect us


as



best

as possible.


 +1 This seems sufficient to me.




  @Roberto:

Do you see a technical way to return a predefined error message
when the
release builds are already on Sourceforge but not yet officially
released
and published?


  Our SiteOps team looked into this, here our findings:




Great :-)


One provider (chip.de) serves via Akamai CDN, one provider (


computerbase.de)
serves via their own FTP server, and softpedia.com lists
SourceForge


as



an

external mirror and passes traffic through our download redirector


flow



(not direct to a mirror).


The first two cases are things we can't control.

In the third case, we can indeed redirect this traffic by referrer
to


a



different landing page if one is provided. Maybe we want to have a

openoffice.org page explaining that's a release-candidate and it's
served
only for testing purposes and its use on a daily basis it is not
recommended.

How does that sound?



I'm pretty sure that these kind of downloaders do not care about
disclaimers - less then ever when located somewhere else. ;-)

So, either we disable the entire downlo

Re: Help

2014-04-04 Thread Max Merbald




Hello Vladislav,

the document opens without any problem at all in 4.0.1, maybe you'll 
just use this for the moment.


Max

Am 04.04.2014 16:49, schrieb Vladislav Stevanovic:

Uf, thanks Rob. If you can find the reason for read error that will be
great.

Regards,
Wlada


2014-04-04 16:42 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir:


I got a read error in AOO 4.1 beta as well.  But it loaded correctly
in Symphony.  I resaved in Symphony and the new version loads now in
AOO 4.1.  I'm attaching that version.

We should investigate the original file more to see why it is giving that
error.

-Rob

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Vladislav Stevanovic
  wrote:

Hello,
Yesterday I create a new document, make some changes, copied some

pictures

from other .odt file, saved changes, and closed the document. Tomorow, I
want to open this doc but without success. Is there some help to restore
this doc?
The document is attached.
I am using beta AOO.
Thanks in advance.

Wlada



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

2014-04-04 Thread Kay Schenk

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum  wrote:

> On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
>
>> I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created another
>> simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash.  I
>> don't know where to go from here.
>>
>>  ...
>
> Raymond,
>
> What version of AOO and netbeans are you using.
>
> For AOO4+ and NB7+ you should try this one:
> http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org-
> openoffice-extensions-4.0.5.alpha.nbm
>
> I can't say how much testing it's had, therefore the alpha designation.
>
> Best regards,
> Carl


Carl --

Is is OK to update the wiki page --

https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice_NetBeans_Integration#Download_and_Installation

with this new version regardless of "alpha" status? This would give more
visibility and testing.



>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
-
MzK

"Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
 for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
   -- James Mason

Re: Re issue 124599

2014-04-04 Thread Herbert Duerr


On 04.04.2014 17:39, Andre Fischer wrote:

On 04.04.2014 17:34, Andre Fischer wrote:

On 04.04.2014 17:01, Andre Fischer wrote:

Issue 124599 is the release blocker that requires a second RC. We
have a bug fix, the patch is attached to the issue.  Question is, how
to proceed without Juergen to approve the release blocker flag?  Does
anybody else feel like a stand in for Juergen or should I just
proceed?  After all, if I stop his vote, I should probably fix the
bug so that we/he can start the next vote.

-Andre


Herbert just reminded me that the upload speeds on the weekend are so
much better then during the week.  So I think that it would be good to
check in the patch right now, start the builds and upload.  Then we
can decide on Monday how to proceed.

-Andre



New SVN revision is 1584753.


New builds for this revision are being prepared and will hopefully 
finish uploading over the weekend. On Monday or latest on Tuesday 
everything should be ready again and we can decide then how to proceed. 
If things go as expected we could start a new vote early next week.


Since the eventual RC2 will be very similar to the RC1 (with the 
exception of the installation experience on Windows) I recommend to use 
the extra time for further checking of the original binaries until the 
new builds become available.


Herbert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Re issue 124599

2014-04-04 Thread Kay Schenk

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Herbert Duerr  wrote:

> On 04.04.2014 17:39, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
>> On 04.04.2014 17:34, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>>> On 04.04.2014 17:01, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>
 Issue 124599 is the release blocker that requires a second RC. We
 have a bug fix, the patch is attached to the issue.  Question is, how
 to proceed without Juergen to approve the release blocker flag?  Does
 anybody else feel like a stand in for Juergen or should I just
 proceed?  After all, if I stop his vote, I should probably fix the
 bug so that we/he can start the next vote.

 -Andre

>>>
>>> Herbert just reminded me that the upload speeds on the weekend are so
>>> much better then during the week.  So I think that it would be good to
>>> check in the patch right now, start the builds and upload.  Then we
>>> can decide on Monday how to proceed.
>>>
>>> -Andre
>>>
>>>
>> New SVN revision is 1584753.
>>
>
> New builds for this revision are being prepared and will hopefully finish
> uploading over the weekend. On Monday or latest on Tuesday everything
> should be ready again and we can decide then how to proceed. If things go
> as expected we could start a new vote early next week.
>
> Since the eventual RC2 will be very similar to the RC1 (with the exception
> of the installation experience on Windows) I recommend to use the extra
> time for further checking of the original binaries until the new builds
> become available.
>
> Herbert


definitely a good idea!


>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
-
MzK

"Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
 for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
   -- James Mason

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread Andrea Pescetti


Andre Fischer wrote:

Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like
to cancel this vote, if nobody objects.


It is a clear release blocker. I agree that a second Release Candidate 
should be prepared. We can then do the right steps for fixing the 
process, but the thing we are voting on is clearly not ready for release 
based on what you write.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Carl. 

Thanks for the information. I installed the module suggested and create a bare 
bones  OpenOffice Add-on project in Netbeans. After I compiled and created the 
.oxt, I attempted to add it to OpenOffice extension manager, but received the 
same result. I am starting to become more confident that there is an issues in 
the compiled code. Possible in call.s and cpp2uno.cxx, but I cannot figure it 
out.

Raymond

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:49 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created another simple 
> extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash.  I don't 
> know where to go from here.
>
...

Raymond,

What version of AOO and netbeans are you using.

For AOO4+ and NB7+ you should try this one:
http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org-openoffice-extensions-4.0.5.alpha.nbm

I can't say how much testing it's had, therefore the alpha designation.

Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Fwd: Help

2014-04-04 Thread Armin Le Grand


Hi Vladislav,

I took a look and it was written with the AOO410 beta 
(OpenOffice_Beta/4.1.0$Win32 
OpenOffice.org_project/410m14$Build-9760), thus it 
might be an interesting task.
It has three office:annotation sections. When I remove these handish the 
file loads. Setting Olli on CC...


On 04.04.2014 16:21, Vladislav Stevanovic wrote:


Hello,
Yesterday I create a new document, make some changes, copied some 
pictures from other .odt file, saved changes, and closed the document. 
Tomorow, I want to open this doc but without success. Is there some 
help to restore this doc?

The document is attached.
I am using beta AOO.
Thanks in advance.

Wlada



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Thanks Carl. I will give it a try. Can you tell me what the changes are as 
compared to the 3.0 version that I am using. 

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:49 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created another simple 
> extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash.  I don't 
> know where to go from here.
>
...

Raymond,

What version of AOO and netbeans are you using.

For AOO4+ and NB7+ you should try this one:
http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org-openoffice-extensions-4.0.5.alpha.nbm

I can't say how much testing it's had, therefore the alpha designation.

Best regards,
Carl


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Re issue 124599


On 04.04.2014 17:34, Andre Fischer wrote:

On 04.04.2014 17:01, Andre Fischer wrote:
Issue 124599 is the release blocker that requires a second RC. We 
have a bug fix, the patch is attached to the issue.  Question is, how 
to proceed without Juergen to approve the release blocker flag?  Does 
anybody else feel like a stand in for Juergen or should I just 
proceed?  After all, if I stop his vote, I should probably fix the 
bug so that we/he can start the next vote.


-Andre


Herbert just reminded me that the upload speeds on the weekend are so 
much better then during the week.  So I think that it would be good to 
check in the patch right now, start the builds and upload.  Then we 
can decide on Monday how to proceed.


-Andre



New SVN revision is 1584753.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Re issue 124599


On 04.04.2014 17:01, Andre Fischer wrote:
Issue 124599 is the release blocker that requires a second RC. We have 
a bug fix, the patch is attached to the issue.  Question is, how to 
proceed without Juergen to approve the release blocker flag?  Does 
anybody else feel like a stand in for Juergen or should I just 
proceed?  After all, if I stop his vote, I should probably fix the bug 
so that we/he can start the next vote.


-Andre


Herbert just reminded me that the upload speeds on the weekend are so 
much better then during the week.  So I think that it would be good to 
check in the patch right now, start the builds and upload.  Then we can 
decide on Monday how to proceed.


-Andre


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

review requested: [Issue 124599] Wndows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly : [Attachment 83085] Use hard coded ProductCode as temporary workaround.

2014-04-04 Thread bugzilla

Andre  has asked  for review:
Issue 124599: Wndows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions
correctly
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599

Attachment 83085: Use hard coded ProductCode as temporary workaround.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83085&action=edit

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread V Stuart Foote

> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Fischer
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 8:57 AM

> 
> On 03.04.2014 09:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> > (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
> >
> Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like
> to cancel this vote, if nobody objects. Juergen, who started the vote,
> is on vacation today, so I need your help to do that.
> ... 
> If you don't object to a cancellation of the vote then the current plan
> is to provide a fix today, rebuild and upload tomorrow and re-start the
> vote on the second RC on sunday or monday depending on how smooth this
> process works.

Reasonable and prudent,  +1 to stop the vote and respin.

Stuart


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re issue 124599

Issue 124599 is the release blocker that requires a second RC. We have a 
bug fix, the patch is attached to the issue.  Question is, how to 
proceed without Juergen to approve the release blocker flag?  Does 
anybody else feel like a stand in for Juergen or should I just proceed?  
After all, if I stop his vote, I should probably fix the bug so that 
we/he can start the next vote.


-Andre

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Help

2014-04-04 Thread Vladislav Stevanovic

Uf, thanks Rob. If you can find the reason for read error that will be
great.

Regards,
Wlada


2014-04-04 16:42 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir :

> I got a read error in AOO 4.1 beta as well.  But it loaded correctly
> in Symphony.  I resaved in Symphony and the new version loads now in
> AOO 4.1.  I'm attaching that version.
>
> We should investigate the original file more to see why it is giving that
> error.
>
> -Rob
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Vladislav Stevanovic
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Yesterday I create a new document, make some changes, copied some
> pictures
> > from other .odt file, saved changes, and closed the document. Tomorow, I
> > want to open this doc but without success. Is there some help to restore
> > this doc?
> > The document is attached.
> > I am using beta AOO.
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Wlada
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread O.Felka


Am 04.04.2014 15:57, schrieb Andre Fischer:


Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like
to cancel this vote, if nobody objects. Juergen, who started the vote,
is on vacation today, so I need your help to do that.

The problem is described by issue 124599 [1].  Here is a summary:


If you don't object to a cancellation of the vote then the current plan
is to provide a fix today, rebuild and upload tomorrow and re-start the
vote on the second RC on sunday or monday depending on how smooth this
process works.


*1 for the cancellation: AOO should have a working update for older 
versions.


Groetjes,
Olaf



Regards,
Andre

[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann


Hi,

On 04.04.2014 15:57, Andre Fischer wrote:

On 03.04.2014 09:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Hi all,

this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
(RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.


Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like
to cancel this vote, if nobody objects. Juergen, who started the vote,
is on vacation today, so I need your help to do that.

The problem is described by issue 124599 [1].  Here is a summary:

When you install the RC on Windows then a previously installed version
(3.* and 4.*) is not removed.  For versions 3.* this leads to a parallel
installation (because there are different installation paths).  For
versions 4.* the files of the older version are overwritten but registry
entries and links on the desktop remain. If you install the RC on a
system with no prior installation of AOO then there are no problems.



+1 for cancelling the vote due to the found issue.
The issue would cause confusion to the system and the user.

Best regards, Oliver.



This problem is caused by my patch related changes and is therefore
restricted to Windows.  Linux and Mac are not affected.

I am currently working on a fix which will probably consist of a small
change in our Perl program for creating the downloadable installer. That
means that it requires an SVN commit and therefore a rebuild on all
platforms.  So,  even if Mac and Linux are not directly affected, they
still have to be rebuilt so that they report the correct SVN revision.

If you don't object to a cancellation of the vote then the current plan
is to provide a fix today, rebuild and upload tomorrow and re-start the
vote on the second RC on sunday or monday depending on how smooth this
process works.

Regards,
Andre

[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)


On 03.04.2014 09:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Hi all,

this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
(RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.

Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like 
to cancel this vote, if nobody objects. Juergen, who started the vote, 
is on vacation today, so I need your help to do that.


The problem is described by issue 124599 [1].  Here is a summary:

When you install the RC on Windows then a previously installed version 
(3.* and 4.*) is not removed.  For versions 3.* this leads to a parallel 
installation (because there are different installation paths).  For 
versions 4.* the files of the older version are overwritten but registry 
entries and links on the desktop remain. If you install the RC on a 
system with no prior installation of AOO then there are no problems.


This problem is caused by my patch related changes and is therefore 
restricted to Windows.  Linux and Mac are not affected.


I am currently working on a fix which will probably consist of a small 
change in our Perl program for creating the downloadable installer.  
That means that it requires an SVN commit and therefore a rebuild on all 
platforms.  So,  even if Mac and Linux are not directly affected, they 
still have to be rebuilt so that they report the correct SVN revision.


If you don't object to a cancellation of the vote then the current plan 
is to provide a fix today, rebuild and upload tomorrow and re-start the 
vote on the second RC on sunday or monday depending on how smooth this 
process works.


Regards,
Andre

[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124599] Wndows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly

2014-04-04 Thread bugzilla

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann  has asked  for 4.1.0_release_blocker:
Issue 124599: Wndows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions
correctly
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599


--- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 
The current available Windows 4.1.0 installation packages does not recognize
former installed versions correctly:
- AOO 4.0.1 exists on the system
--> Shortcut in Desktop, StartMenu group and registry entries are still
available after the install.
- AOO 3.4.1 exists on the system
--> Installer doe snot offer option to keep or to delete it
---> AOO 3.4.1 installation, Shortcut in Desktop, StartMenu group and registry
entries are still available after the install.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread Sylvain DENIS


+1


 Sylvain DENIS

Conseiller Pédagogique TICE
/Responsable de projets TICE dans le cadre d'École Numérique/
0499 219 802 - sylv...@pedago-tic.be  | 
cont...@denis-sylvain.be 
École numérique : http://www.ecolenumerique.be | Pedago-TIC : 
http://www.pedago-tic.be | mENTeOS : http://www.menteos.be

Le 04/04/14 15:23, Liu Ping a écrit :

+1


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:


[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Edwin Sharp  wrote:


+1

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014, at 10:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Hi all,

this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
(RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.

Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the
iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step
forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on
Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A

long

and overdue "must do" shift forward to support newer APIs (replace
deprecated APIs)  and platforms on MacOS.
And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now
support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to
4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai.

Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the
success of OpenOffice.

An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under:



http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html

The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary
releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and
review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page:



https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds

The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1583666! And a
fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under



http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0

The vote starts now and will be open until:

Sunday evening, 6 April: 2014-04-06 11:00pm UTC.

But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would

like

to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
members.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
[ ]  0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...



(1) the upload for the Linux 32 bit artifacts is still ongoing, but 64
bit is already available.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org




--
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

2014-04-04 Thread Liu Ping

+1


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:

> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Edwin Sharp  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014, at 10:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> > > (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
> > >
> > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
> > > 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the
> > > iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step
> > > forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on
> > > Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A
> long
> > > and overdue "must do" shift forward to support newer APIs (replace
> > > deprecated APIs)  and platforms on MacOS.
> > > And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now
> > > support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to
> > > 4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai.
> > >
> > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the
> > > success of OpenOffice.
> > >
> > > An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under:
> > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > >
> > > The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary
> > > releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and
> > > review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > >
> > > The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1583666! And a
> > > fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under
> > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
> > >
> > > The vote starts now and will be open until:
> > >
> > >Sunday evening, 6 April: 2014-04-06 11:00pm UTC.
> > >
> > > But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would
> like
> > > to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
> > > members.
> > >
> > >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
> > >[ ]  0 Don't care
> > >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (1) the upload for the Linux 32 bit artifacts is still ongoing, but 64
> > > bit is already available.
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

2014-04-04 Thread Carl Marcum


On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created another simple 
extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash.  I don't know 
where to go from here.


...

Raymond,

What version of AOO and netbeans are you using.

For AOO4+ and NB7+ you should try this one:
http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org-openoffice-extensions-4.0.5.alpha.nbm

I can't say how much testing it's had, therefore the alpha designation.

Best regards,
Carl


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

2014-04-04 Thread Pedro Lino

Hi Yuzhen

Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
Or do you mean with the full installer?


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischm...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >>  Hi,
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >>  We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >>  further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >>  based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >>  in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >>  Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >>  ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > >

Re: volunteer

Welcome, Tiago!

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Steve Yin  wrote:

> Hi Tiago,
>
> Welcome to AOO community!
> Could you also subscribe the Localization Mailing
> List<
> http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#localization-mailing-list-public
> >?
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Tiago Leichsenring  >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > my name is Tiago and I am Brazilian. I would like to work with you as a
> > translator, I can translate into Portuguese and help you to create a
> > grammar and spelling corrector.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > --
> > Paz do Senhor
> > Tiago Leichsenring
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve Yin
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Edwin Sharp  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014, at 10:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> > (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
> >
> > Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
> > 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the
> > iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step
> > forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on
> > Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A long
> > and overdue "must do" shift forward to support newer APIs (replace
> > deprecated APIs)  and platforms on MacOS.
> > And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now
> > support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to
> > 4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai.
> >
> > Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the
> > success of OpenOffice.
> >
> > An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> >
> > The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary
> > releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and
> > review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >
> > The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1583666! And a
> > fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
> >
> > The vote starts now and will be open until:
> >
> >Sunday evening, 6 April: 2014-04-06 11:00pm UTC.
> >
> > But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like
> > to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
> > members.
> >
> >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
> >[ ]  0 Don't care
> >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> >
> > (1) the upload for the Linux 32 bit artifacts is still ongoing, but 64
> > bit is already available.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140404

Hi All,

We have completed the AOO 4.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR), here is the
weekly update (4/01 - 4/04):

*Test execution:*
1. Complete the left test executions on new snapshot build
(AOO410m15(Build:9761)  -  Rev. 1583666) and spot check the previous tests
completed last week

*Defect summary:*
1. New bugs opened this week:
124584 - open the sample file in AOO, group shape containing ellipse shape
and table not imported correct (already confirmed, not showstopper)

2. About 60 bugs(include crashes) have been verified by Juergen, Oliver,
Edwin, Steve, Clarence, Shao Zhi, Liu Ping, Yu Zhen, etc

*Issues & quality highlight:*
1. AOO 4.1.0 RC1 (AOO410m15(Build:9761)  -  Rev. 1583666) is proposed and
in voting
2. There is a upgrade install issue, reported by Pedro Lino on RC build,
need a bug in Bugzilla for tracking
"the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two startup
groups with different names pointing at the same folder. In addition the
OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the 4.1.0."
3. We need volunteers to retest the installation for below two typical
scenarios on all language packages
- Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1

*Volunteer status: *
1. We have total 10 test execution volunteers joined to FPR execution work
since Mar 24
2. We have 8 defect verification volunteers on 4.1 resolved crash bugs
since Mar 31
3. We have 3 - 5 defect checking volunteers on 4.1 regression bugs since
Mar 19 - led by Rainer Bielefeld

*Plan for next week:*
1. Vote for AOO 4.1.0 before Sunday evening, 6 April: 2014-04-06 11:00pm UTC
2. Stand-to for RC testing if We have RC2 (hopefully not :-))

Thank you all for effort provided last week, we are towards to the release
of AOO 4.1.0, let's continue and make progress this week!

Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Pedro,

I mean the full installation package

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:

> Hi Yuzhen
>
> Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
> Or do you mean with the full installer?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
>
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> > >
> > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> > >
> > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with
> two
> > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> > >
> > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > > 4.1.0.
> > >
> > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> > users.
> > >
> > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pedro
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > > en_US.
> > > >
> > > > From testing perspective:
> > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and
> ongoing
> > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> > scenarios
> > > > on all language packages
> > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem found.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > > jogischm...@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > > will
> > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the
> install
> > > > > >> packages
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for
> future
> > > > > patches
> > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > > 4.3.
> > > > > The
> > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > > overseen a
> > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now
> and
> > > > have
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> > careful.
> > > > They
> > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > > potential
> > > > > 4.2
> > > > > >> or
> > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't
> be
> > > > > >> installed
> > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> > now
> > > > ;-)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > > confusion.
> > > > > Stay
> > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > > testing
> > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> > the
> > > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Juergen
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >>  Hi,
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>  FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>  Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> > 4.1
> > > > > >> release.
> > > > > >>  We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> > fix
> > > > some
> > > > > >>  further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> > propose a
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

2014-04-04 Thread Steve Yin

Same symptom. And the shortcut named "OpenOffice 4.0.1" is still on the
desktop. But these old version stuffs can be removed manually.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischm...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >>  Hi,
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >>  We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >>  further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >>  based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >>  in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >>  Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >>  ongoing. But keep in mind the

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC