native language
hi, i nwwd your browser in german language, how can i get it ?? thanks al
Re: Help
@Armin Thanks for your effort. If you can see any system problems there you are free to open new report on bugzilla. I am not a programmer as you are, so you can see things there better than I. If you need any further information about this case, let me know. Regards, Wlada 2014-04-04 19:40 GMT+02:00 Max Merbald : > > > Hello Vladislav, > > the document opens without any problem at all in 4.0.1, maybe you'll just > use this for the moment. > > Max > > Am 04.04.2014 16:49, schrieb Vladislav Stevanovic: > >> Uf, thanks Rob. If you can find the reason for read error that will be >> great. >> >> Regards, >> Wlada >> >> >> 2014-04-04 16:42 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir: >> >> I got a read error in AOO 4.1 beta as well. But it loaded correctly >>> in Symphony. I resaved in Symphony and the new version loads now in >>> AOO 4.1. I'm attaching that version. >>> >>> We should investigate the original file more to see why it is giving that >>> error. >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Vladislav Stevanovic >>> wrote: >>> Hello, Yesterday I create a new document, make some changes, copied some >>> pictures >>> from other .odt file, saved changes, and closed the document. Tomorow, I want to open this doc but without success. Is there some help to restore this doc? The document is attached. I am using beta AOO. Thanks in advance. Wlada - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > >
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)
On 2014/04/05 05:40, Kay Schenk said: > > On 04/04/2014 09:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Andre Fischer wrote: >>> Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like >>> to cancel this vote, if nobody objects. >> >> It is a clear release blocker. I agree that a second Release Candidate >> should be prepared. We can then do the right steps for fixing the >> process, but the thing we are voting on is clearly not ready for release >> based on what you write. +1 for the cancellation. >> >> Regards, >>Andrea. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > Should we send out a [CANCEL][VOTE] notice just so things don't get > confusing and maybe reference Andre's message. > -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc <> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)
On 04/04/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote: It is a clear release blocker. I agree that a second Release Candidate should be prepared. We can then do the right steps for fixing the process So, here's the process as I see it. We had several +1s, then some more or less explicit -1s once the problem was discovered, confirmed and fixed. We simply keep this vote open until its natural expiration. Even if the vote passes (i.e., +1s outnumber -1s) this does not mean that the release must be published. Namely, the release manager must see if the -1s are motivated enough to produce a new release candidate. I expect that this is what will happen. So no need for people to change their vote, send more e-mails, or cancel the vote: if Juergen agrees this is a release blocker we simply move on with a new RC. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: native language
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:51 AM, A.v.Hagen - g-mail < albrecht.von.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, i nwwd your browser in german language, how can i get it ?? > thanks > al Please go to: http://www.openoffice.org/de/ for some additional help -- - MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
Linking Bugzilla search results
Hello, How is it possible a Bugzilla search results list to link so that it is visible _without login_? Is that even possible? reason: I'm working on the german translation of the release-notes for AOO 4.1 and was experiencing links of the form: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=AOO_410_Resolved which do not work. Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124607] Particular.odt fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file"
Rainer Bielefeld has asked for 4.1.0_release_blocker: Issue 124607: Particular.odt fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file" https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607 --- Additional Comments from Rainer Bielefeld (g) but it's not simply the comment, a lorem ipsum document with comment for text range works fine. Here my skills are at an end. This looks a little like a blocker? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Help
I have the same problem with other .odt file! I opened some old file created in older version of Openoffice (not AOO), changed something, saved changes, and now I can not open this file. I think that I will remove beta version, and return on AOO 4.01. Can somebody create report on bugzilla? Regards, Wlada 2014-04-05 14:12 GMT+02:00 Vladislav Stevanovic < stevanovicvladis...@gmail.com>: > @Armin > Thanks for your effort. If you can see any system problems there > you are free to open new report on bugzilla. I am not a programmer > as you are, so you can see things there better than I. If you need > any further information about this case, let me know. > Regards, > Wlada > > > 2014-04-04 19:40 GMT+02:00 Max Merbald : > > >> >> Hello Vladislav, >> >> the document opens without any problem at all in 4.0.1, maybe you'll just >> use this for the moment. >> >> Max >> >> Am 04.04.2014 16:49, schrieb Vladislav Stevanovic: >> >>> Uf, thanks Rob. If you can find the reason for read error that will be >>> great. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Wlada >>> >>> >>> 2014-04-04 16:42 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir: >>> >>> I got a read error in AOO 4.1 beta as well. But it loaded correctly in Symphony. I resaved in Symphony and the new version loads now in AOO 4.1. I'm attaching that version. We should investigate the original file more to see why it is giving that error. -Rob On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Vladislav Stevanovic wrote: > Hello, > Yesterday I create a new document, make some changes, copied some > pictures > from other .odt file, saved changes, and closed the document. Tomorow, > I > want to open this doc but without success. Is there some help to > restore > this doc? > The document is attached. > I am using beta AOO. > Thanks in advance. > > Wlada > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> >> >> >
4.1.0_release_blocker canceled: [Issue 124607] Particular.odt fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file"
Rainer Bielefeld has canceled Rainer Bielefeld 's request for 4.1.0_release_blocker: Issue 124607: Particular.odt fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file" https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607 --- Additional Comments from Rainer Bielefeld Still only few documents affected, so my blocker-idea might have been too hasty - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124607] Particular.odt with comments fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file"
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann has asked for 4.1.0_release_blocker: Issue 124607: Particular.odt with comments fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file" https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607 --- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (In reply to Rainer Bielefeld from comment #7) > Still only few documents affected, so my blocker-idea might have been too > hasty I am sorry, I have to re-request the show-stopper status. The defect is easy to reproduce in AOO 4.1.0 Beta: - new text document - insert a field - e.g. page number field - type some text - insert an annotation (aka comment) on an arbitrary text selection - save - close - reopen --> Read Error message Defect is triggered, if a text document contains at least one field beside an annotation/comment on a text range. Fix in progress - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.0_release_blocker canceled: [Issue 124607] Particular.odt fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file"
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 19:16:41 + bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > Rainer Bielefeld has canceled > Rainer Bielefeld 's request for > 4.1.0_release_blocker: > Issue 124607: Particular.odt fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading > file" > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607 > > > --- Additional Comments from Rainer Bielefeld > > Still only few documents affected, so my blocker-idea might have been too > hasty > Sample bad file attached to https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=68890 File doesn't open on 4.1 RC1 but does Insert on 4.1 -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Open Office Website
All- Just a very minor bug: On the index.html page, under Announcements, 4.1.0 beta announced section, the link for the Release notes fails - it has an extra 'h': hhttps:/. rather then https:/... Steve --- Steven K. SilberPh: 979-776-0272 4101 chamberlain Circle Cell: 979-324-3529 Bryan, TX 77802 FAX: 979-776-3961 steve_sil...@verizon.net You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know. William Wilberforce - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC
Hi Yuzhen, all Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing. Here are my findings: There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1 The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated as expected. The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0 There are 3 items that fail: there are 2 startup groups, there are 2 desktop icons and there are two entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. Updating from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0 using the MS patch is a little better: there is only one entry in the Add/Remove Programs list after updating (the 4.1.0 as expected). However there are still 2 desktop icons and 2 startup groups (in this case the patch fails to set the OO icon as the group icon while the full installer succeeds) How do you want me to report all these in bugzilla? Or can you (or someone in QA) add it to bugzilla and add me to CC so that I confirm it (and add screenshots if needed)? Regards, Pedro On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks! > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! > > > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US. > > > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder. > > > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the > > 4.1.0. > > > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for > users. > > > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary. > > > > Regards, > > Pedro > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > > > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on > > en_US. > > > > > > From testing perspective: > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting. > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical > scenarios > > > on all language packages > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1) > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin > > wrote: > > > > > > > No problem found. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt < > > jogischm...@gmail.com > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote > > will > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install > > > > >> packages > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future > > > > patches > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an > > 4.3. > > > > The > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have > > > overseen a > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and > > > have > > > > to > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more > careful. > > > They > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a > > potential > > > > 4.2 > > > > >> or > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be > > > > >> installed > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for > now > > > ;-) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further > > confusion. > > > > Stay > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available. > > > > >> > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy > > > testing > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday. > > > > >> > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain > the > > > > >> same values as before. > > > > >> > > > > >> Juergen > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Juergen > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Juergen > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Juergen > > > >
System Requirements AOO 4.1
Hi, this is about the System Requirements on the website. I don't know if there is something similar in release packages too. http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo41.html The topic "For Accessibility" needs some attention. iAccessible2 is not mentioned. "Java runtime environment 1.4.0_02 / 1.4.1_01 or newer" is this really still valid? "Java" topic should say something about support of Oracle Java 8 and openJDK8 released March 18, 2014, because main stream support of Java 7 might end in just one Year according to Oracle. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html Regards Jochen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: System Requirements AOO 4.1
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Jochen Nitschke wrote: > Hi, > > this is about the System Requirements on the website. I don't know if > there is something similar in release packages too. > http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo41.html > > The topic "For Accessibility" needs some attention. iAccessible2 is not > mentioned. > "Java runtime environment 1.4.0_02 / 1.4.1_01 or newer" is this really > still valid? > > "Java" topic should say something about support of Oracle Java 8 and > openJDK8 released March 18, 2014, because main stream support of Java 7 > might end in just one Year according to Oracle. > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html > > Regards > Jochen > > Thanks for noticing this. I just made the java requirement for accessibility consistent with our general java requirement, and removed the java bridge requirement which is no longer used or needed according to the Release Notes for 4.1. Someone might need to check on the Linux requirement of gnome (and not anything else?) as well. -- - MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
