Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues
Hi, On 01.07.2014 23:26, Kay Schenk wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. My issue query for issues which had been submitted since our 4.1.0 release and which are not solved contain more than 200 issues. Most of them are in status unconfirmed and several of them have subjects which indicate that they are critical. In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: - check, if the issue can be reproduced -- status confirmed -- if not reproducible, ask for more information -- keyword needmoreinfo - check, if the issue is a duplicate -- resolve as duplicate - check, if the issue is a regression to a recent release - e.g. no defect in 4.0.0 or/and 4.0.1, but not in 4.1.0 -- adjust version field - give attention to issues which seem to be serious enough to be considered for the next release. Thanks in advance, Oliver. Do you have a public saved search for this or should we just reference the BZ messages to dev since the 4.1.0 release? I have no public saved query, but you can use the following URL. It is long as it contain all the search criteria which I am using and thus reflects my perferences for such a view on these issues: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=CONFIRMEDbug_status=ACCEPTEDbug_status=REOPENEDchfield=[Bug%20creation]chfieldfrom=2014-04-28chfieldto=Nowcolumnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cversion%2Ckeywords%2Cop_sys%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddatef1=cf_bug_typef2=productf3=productf4=versionknown_name=OpenSubmittedSince410list_id=153560o1=equalso2=notequalso3=notequalso4=notsubstringquery_based_on=OpenSubmittedSince410query_format=advancedv1=DEFECTv2=Infrastructurev3=Build%20Toolsv4=4.2.0 Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124856] doAccessibleAction(0) failed on combobox with dropdown
Hi, On 01.07.2014 17:19, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: j...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124856: doAccessibleAction(0) failed on combobox with dropdown https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124856 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org it's a regression and a patch is in place I am volunteering to review the patch. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124856] doAccessibleAction(0) failed on combobox with dropdown
On 02/07/14 09:12, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 01.07.2014 17:19, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: j...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124856: doAccessibleAction(0) failed on combobox with dropdown https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124856 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org it's a regression and a patch is in place I am volunteering to review the patch. I have already done it locally and currently testing, sorry for the confusion Juergen Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124856] doAccessibleAction(0) failed on combobox with dropdown
Hi, On 02.07.2014 09:21, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 02/07/14 09:12, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 01.07.2014 17:19, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: j...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124856: doAccessibleAction(0) failed on combobox with dropdown https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124856 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org it's a regression and a patch is in place I am volunteering to review the patch. I have already done it locally and currently testing, sorry for the confusion Ok - I was too slow ;-) Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues
In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: I hope, I find enough time to help. Now I have enough time but can't help. :-( Breakdown with bicycle, both elbows are broken. Regards, Mathias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Test Schedule - AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi this is the first time I am doing automated cases, can I get some resources on how to go about it. I looked on the wiki but so far I haven't found a guide about it. It seems all the steps would be run from a JAVA piece of code. Then it would be run and the steps described on the TC would be executed in an automatic manner. Some question arise here: Where do I get this script? How do I run it? (version of java, etc.) Do I run it from CLI or from internal AOO application. If there is a guide about creating and executing these testcase https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto/A_step_by_step_example However I have some questions about them, such as Firstly compile the project with the command under test module. Does that mean I need to re-compile AOO or just the script? Do I need to put JUnit and Ant on my system? On 7/2/14, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alexandro, I have assigned you 11 test cases on Linux Redhat 32bit in Testlink as the first batch. You can find them in Test Case Assigned to Me. Please report issues in Bugzilla and warn for severe ones in QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). Please let me know when you are done. Thanks again for your support to AOO testing! On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Count me for Linux 32 bits, RPM. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Greg for your testing and update! Do you have interest to run Linux test cases for 4.1.1? If yes, I can assign them to you in Testlink. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Debian stable, not an 'offical tester'. I do use AOO in my business have lots of templates and archived docs. I test my use pattern. Writer and Calc work fine here..no regressions anyway. Good work..thanks to all. Greg M. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Here comes the update for test schedule, we plan to do test for AOO 4.1.1(execute test cases and verify showstopper bugs) for about *6* weeks. That means it starts now and is expected to be completed before *Aug 8*. We have three Windows volunteers(Wan Yun, Noel and Yu Zhen) joined since we call for AOO 4.1.1 test yesterday. We still need more volunteers on other platforms, Linux and Mac. Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:13 PM Subject: AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers! To: qa q...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi All, As Juergen announced, the first milestone build (m1) for AOO 4.1.1 is currently uploading. Then here comes the call for volunteers on AOO 4.1.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Window 2012, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org ). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to refer Test Plan in [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Testing+Plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM Subject: [RELEASE][MILESTONE]: preparation of AOO 4.1.1 milestone 1 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and
Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues
Hi, On 02.07.2014 09:44, Mathias Röllig wrote: In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: I hope, I find enough time to help. Now I have enough time but can't help. :-( Breakdown with bicycle, both elbows are broken. Very sad to hear from your injury. I hope you will soon be fine again. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Test Schedule - AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Thanks for your asking, please execute steps described on AOOTest-49 and AOOTest-196 with manual, we usually do automation testing in Build Verification Test(BVT) but not in FPR(Full Path Regression). On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Hi this is the first time I am doing automated cases, can I get some resources on how to go about it. I looked on the wiki but so far I haven't found a guide about it. It seems all the steps would be run from a JAVA piece of code. Then it would be run and the steps described on the TC would be executed in an automatic manner. Some question arise here: Where do I get this script? How do I run it? (version of java, etc.) Do I run it from CLI or from internal AOO application. If there is a guide about creating and executing these testcase https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto/A_step_by_step_example However I have some questions about them, such as Firstly compile the project with the command under test module. Does that mean I need to re-compile AOO or just the script? Do I need to put JUnit and Ant on my system? On 7/2/14, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alexandro, I have assigned you 11 test cases on Linux Redhat 32bit in Testlink as the first batch. You can find them in Test Case Assigned to Me. Please report issues in Bugzilla and warn for severe ones in QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). Please let me know when you are done. Thanks again for your support to AOO testing! On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Count me for Linux 32 bits, RPM. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Greg for your testing and update! Do you have interest to run Linux test cases for 4.1.1? If yes, I can assign them to you in Testlink. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Debian stable, not an 'offical tester'. I do use AOO in my business have lots of templates and archived docs. I test my use pattern. Writer and Calc work fine here..no regressions anyway. Good work..thanks to all. Greg M. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Here comes the update for test schedule, we plan to do test for AOO 4.1.1(execute test cases and verify showstopper bugs) for about *6* weeks. That means it starts now and is expected to be completed before *Aug 8*. We have three Windows volunteers(Wan Yun, Noel and Yu Zhen) joined since we call for AOO 4.1.1 test yesterday. We still need more volunteers on other platforms, Linux and Mac. Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:13 PM Subject: AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers! To: qa q...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi All, As Juergen announced, the first milestone build (m1) for AOO 4.1.1 is currently uploading. Then here comes the call for volunteers on AOO 4.1.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Window 2012, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org ). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to refer Test Plan in [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Testing+Plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM Subject: [RELEASE][MILESTONE]: preparation of AOO 4.1.1 milestone 1 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue
removal from list
Please remove me from this email list. Thank you! Vedha. DISCLAIMER The information contained and transmitted by this e-mail is proprietary to SLK Software Services Pvt. Ltd. and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain privileged or confidential information or information exempt from disclosure as per applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, you may not copy, deliver, distribute or print this message. If it is a forwarded message, it may not have been sent with the authority of the company. Any views or opinions are individual to the sender and are not the opinion of or endorsed by the company. This message and attachments has been virus checked. SLK Software Services Pvt. Ltd. will not accept any claims for loss or damages arising out of viruses.
Query
Hi i am using open office base and was using Microsoft access before and i could publish my database after creating it,but in this one i have no options of how to publish my base to run on my server for everyone in the office to have access to it when ever and wherever, please assist as soon as possible thanks
Re: removal from list
Please remove me as well. thanks, Julie On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 7:53 AM, Vedhanarayanan J vedhanarayanan.jaya...@slk-soft.com wrote: Please remove me from this email list. Thank you! Vedha. DISCLAIMER The information contained and transmitted by this e-mail is proprietary to SLK Software Services Pvt. Ltd. and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain privileged or confidential information or information exempt from disclosure as per applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, you may not copy, deliver, distribute or print this message. If it is a forwarded message, it may not have been sent with the authority of the company. Any views or opinions are individual to the sender and are not the opinion of or endorsed by the company. This message and attachments has been virus checked. SLK Software Services Pvt. Ltd. will not accept any claims for loss or damages arising out of viruses.
Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues
On 07/02/2014 12:08 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 01.07.2014 23:26, Kay Schenk wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. My issue query for issues which had been submitted since our 4.1.0 release and which are not solved contain more than 200 issues. Most of them are in status unconfirmed and several of them have subjects which indicate that they are critical. In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: - check, if the issue can be reproduced -- status confirmed -- if not reproducible, ask for more information -- keyword needmoreinfo - check, if the issue is a duplicate -- resolve as duplicate - check, if the issue is a regression to a recent release - e.g. no defect in 4.0.0 or/and 4.0.1, but not in 4.1.0 -- adjust version field - give attention to issues which seem to be serious enough to be considered for the next release. Thanks in advance, Oliver. Do you have a public saved search for this or should we just reference the BZ messages to dev since the 4.1.0 release? I have no public saved query, but you can use the following URL. It is long as it contain all the search criteria which I am using and thus reflects my perferences for such a view on these issues: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=CONFIRMEDbug_status=ACCEPTEDbug_status=REOPENEDchfield=[Bug%20creation]chfieldfrom=2014-04-28chfieldto=Nowcolumnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cversion%2Ckeywords%2Cop_sys%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddatef1=cf_bug_typef2=productf3=productf4=versionknown_name=OpenSubmittedSince410list_id=153560o1=equalso2=notequalso3=notequalso4=notsubstringquery_based_on=OpenSubmittedSince410query_format=advancedv1=DEFECTv2=Infrastructurev3=Build%20Toolsv4=4.2.0 Best regards, Oliver. OK, thanks. I will try this url and work on these. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved. -- George MacDonald - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Minor dictionary error.
Hello! I have added: 2658) Cordova Regarding matchup, it is Chiefly American: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/matchup?q=matchup This means I can't add it to en_GB but maybe Kevin Atkinson can add it to en_US: https://sourceforge.net/projects/wordlist/files/Hunspell Please notice that the dictionaries are updated (uploaded) monthly which means that only in August it will work. Thanks! Kind regards, Marco A.G.Pinto --- On 02/07/2014 00:03, Howard Morris (aka Col_Boogie) wrote: When someone has time, please add the word 'matchup' (as in matchup between two teams) to the dictionary. I live in Cordova, TN and the dictionary doesn't like Cordova. I checked Google, and we are not the only one. However, since I can always add it to the local dictionary, that is too minor to worry about. Howard Morris --
Re: Minor dictionary error.
On 02/07/2014 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: Please notice that the dictionaries are updated (uploaded) monthly which means that only in August it will work. ...or September. We have a translation deadline on July 18th for updating translations and dictionaries. And 4.1.1 expected for August. We should avoid that when 4.1.1 is released the English dictionary is already outdated, as this would force users to immediately download an update. We already coordinated well for 4.1.0, and we can do the same for 4.1.1. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Minor dictionary error.
A... yes, Andrea, sorry :-P Lots of things going on at the moment and my mind is failing. Kind regards, Marco A.G.Pinto --- On 02/07/2014 17:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 02/07/2014 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: Please notice that the dictionaries are updated (uploaded) monthly which means that only in August it will work. ...or September. We have a translation deadline on July 18th for updating translations and dictionaries. And 4.1.1 expected for August. We should avoid that when 4.1.1 is released the English dictionary is already outdated, as this would force users to immediately download an update. We already coordinated well for 4.1.0, and we can do the same for 4.1.1. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --
Re: New design of download page
On 01/07/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/01/2014 07:27 PM, schrieb Emanuele: http://www.elkarte.it/testing/ooo/ It's shaping good... Welcome to the community, Emanuele, and thanks for jumping in! The part above the carousel (including the carousel) depends on bootstrap ( http://getbootstrap.com/ ).. actually I started including bootstrap for the carousel and then I went ahead and replaced the menu as well. :P I've seen the bootstrap addition and it looks good. But what I meant is that the upper and lower part (header and footer areas) are assembled from some template files into real HTML files. Yes, but this is not particularly problematic. Our head section may include jQuery and Bootstrap with minimal changes to what we are doing now. And, to please Infra, we can host jQuery and Bootstrap locally since they are under a permissive (MIT) license anyway. Whereas the middle part is coming directly from HTML files. Therefore we have to handle this different. Differently, but not much differently than what we do now. The main issue I see is with the main body part, the current div with icon+title+description style does not fit well to the proposed new layout. Maybe we can give Bootstrap buttons a chance? http://getbootstrap.com/css/#buttons I'm not really sure, maybe it will look very bad, but maybe there are some elements can we can work with. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues
Am 07/02/2014 09:44 AM, schrieb Mathias Röllig: In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: I hope, I find enough time to help. Now I have enough time but can't help. :-( Breakdown with bicycle, both elbows are broken. oh, thats really sad to read. I wish you all the best and a quick recovery. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New design of download page
Am 07/02/2014 07:50 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 01/07/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/01/2014 07:27 PM, schrieb Emanuele: http://www.elkarte.it/testing/ooo/ It's shaping good... Welcome to the community, Emanuele, and thanks for jumping in! The part above the carousel (including the carousel) depends on bootstrap ( http://getbootstrap.com/ ).. actually I started including bootstrap for the carousel and then I went ahead and replaced the menu as well. :P I've seen the bootstrap addition and it looks good. But what I meant is that the upper and lower part (header and footer areas) are assembled from some template files into real HTML files. Yes, but this is not particularly problematic. Our head section may include jQuery and Bootstrap with minimal changes to what we are doing now. And, to please Infra, we can host jQuery and Bootstrap locally since they are under a permissive (MIT) license anyway. Whereas the middle part is coming directly from HTML files. Therefore we have to handle this different. Differently, but not much differently than what we do now. The main issue I see is with the main body part, the current div with icon+title+description style does not fit well to the proposed new layout. layout is a question of taste. I don't think it's looking bad with the new 3-column-layout. I would still use it. When shortening the text a bit (e.g., delete all OpenOffice and Apache OpenOffice words), then we can come to a 2-line-text which would look better - IMHO. Maybe we can give Bootstrap buttons a chance? http://getbootstrap.com/css/#buttons I'm not really sure, maybe it will look very bad, but maybe there are some elements can we can work with. Maybe good or bad. But it's definitely a step back as the buttons are just colored but now we have a graphic. This would be gone which is, hm, not good looking... ;-) But when the layout around the graphic does no longer fit then we can change/improve it. I'm sure this will be possible. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New design of download page
Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/02/2014 07:50 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: http://getbootstrap.com/css/#buttons I'm not really sure, maybe it will look very bad, but maybe there are some elements can we can work with. Maybe good or bad. But it's definitely a step back as the buttons are just colored but now we have a graphic. This would be gone which is, hm, not good looking... ;-) In the buttons of course one could reuse all the graphics, but still use Bootstrap buttons for the shape and to highlight the active choice. The current divs do not look bad (actually, they look nice!) on the current homepage, while they don't fit well in the new proposal; the hovering, for example, looks much nicer on the old design. Well, lots of options to play with! Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New design of download page
Am 07/02/2014 09:41 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/02/2014 07:50 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: http://getbootstrap.com/css/#buttons I'm not really sure, maybe it will look very bad, but maybe there are some elements can we can work with. Maybe good or bad. But it's definitely a step back as the buttons are just colored but now we have a graphic. This would be gone which is, hm, not good looking... ;-) In the buttons of course one could reuse all the graphics, but still use Bootstrap buttons for the shape and to highlight the active choice. ah, yes, that would work. The current divs do not look bad (actually, they look nice!) on the current homepage, while they don't fit well in the new proposal; the hovering, for example, looks much nicer on the old design. Well, lots of options to play with! Absolutely. :-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues
On 07/02/2014 08:40 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 07/02/2014 12:08 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 01.07.2014 23:26, Kay Schenk wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. My issue query for issues which had been submitted since our 4.1.0 release and which are not solved contain more than 200 issues. Most of them are in status unconfirmed and several of them have subjects which indicate that they are critical. In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: - check, if the issue can be reproduced -- status confirmed -- if not reproducible, ask for more information -- keyword needmoreinfo - check, if the issue is a duplicate -- resolve as duplicate - check, if the issue is a regression to a recent release - e.g. no defect in 4.0.0 or/and 4.0.1, but not in 4.1.0 -- adjust version field - give attention to issues which seem to be serious enough to be considered for the next release. Thanks in advance, Oliver. Do you have a public saved search for this or should we just reference the BZ messages to dev since the 4.1.0 release? I have no public saved query, but you can use the following URL. It is long as it contain all the search criteria which I am using and thus reflects my perferences for such a view on these issues: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=CONFIRMEDbug_status=ACCEPTEDbug_status=REOPENEDchfield=[Bug%20creation]chfieldfrom=2014-04-28chfieldto=Nowcolumnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cversion%2Ckeywords%2Cop_sys%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddatef1=cf_bug_typef2=productf3=productf4=versionknown_name=OpenSubmittedSince410list_id=153560o1=equalso2=notequalso3=notequalso4=notsubstringquery_based_on=OpenSubmittedSince410query_format=advancedv1=DEFECTv2=Infrastructurev3=Build%20Toolsv4=4.2.0 Best regards, Oliver. OK, thanks. I will try this url and work on these. short FYI -- there should now be a search with the name OpenSubmittedSince410 accessible to registered users with your criteria for others to work on as well. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved. -- George MacDonald - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues
On 07/01/2014 01:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. My issue query for issues which had been submitted since our 4.1.0 release and which are not solved contain more than 200 issues. Most of them are in status unconfirmed and several of them have subjects which indicate that they are critical. In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: - check, if the issue can be reproduced -- status confirmed -- if not reproducible, ask for more information -- keyword needmoreinfo - check, if the issue is a duplicate -- resolve as duplicate - check, if the issue is a regression to a recent release - e.g. no defect in 4.0.0 or/and 4.0.1, but not in 4.1.0 -- adjust version field - give attention to issues which seem to be serious enough to be considered for the next release. Thanks in advance, Oliver. OK, another question... I am currently using the latest 4.1.1 snapshot version for testing -- AOO411m1(Build:9770) - Rev. 1604099 2014-06-30_07:13:14-Rev.1606633 What should I use for the latest confirmed version in the issues since we seem to have only these choices --4.1.0, 4.2.0-dev. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved. -- George MacDonald - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
New Dev Volunteer
Hello everyone. My name is Anibal. I am VB6 and VB.NET programmer for 15 years. Not much English, my native language is Spanish. I hope I can help a little. Greetings! Hola a todos. Mi nombre es Anibal. Soy programador de VB6 y VB.NET desde hace 15 años. No se mucho de ingles, mi lenguaje nativo es el español. Espero poder ayudar un poco. Saludos!
new volunteer - technical writing
Hello,My name is Katrina. I'm interested in technical writing. I'm considering going to college for it actually, but I would love to do some volunteer work with open office to get a better idea of what it's all about. I live in Canada and my English is excellent. I don't have any training but I learn quickly!
