Re: svn commit: r1839782 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ rsc/ rsc/prj/ rsc/source/parser/ solenv/gbuild/

[Damjan Jovanovic]

I don't get it, main/sfx2 builds for me on both FreeBSD and Windows.

main/salhelper fails to build on Windows, and it looks like a mission to
fix it :(.

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:16 AM Damjan Jovanovic  wrote:

> Thank you, I am having a look.
>
> Damjan
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 4:17 PM Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>> This one seems to break the Windows build:
>>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/main/sfx2/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>>
>> Am 31.08.2018 um 20:54 schrieb dam...@apache.org:
>> > Author: damjan
>> > Date: Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
>> > New Revision: 1839782
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1839782&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Implement gbuild functions for building Bison files.
>> >
>> > Port main/rsc to gbuild.
>> >
>> > Patch by: me
>> >
>> >
>> > Added:
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc2.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rscpp.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Makefile   (with props)
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Module_rsc.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Package_inc.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/prj/makefile.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/source/parser/yyrscyacc.y
>> >   - copied unchanged from r1839781,
>> openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/source/parser/rscyacc.y
>> > Removed:
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/source/parser/rscyacc.y
>> > Modified:
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/prj/build.lst
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/prj/d.lst
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/Executable.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/LinkTarget.mk
>> > openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/TargetLocations.mk
>> >
>> > Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk
>> > URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk?rev=1839782&r1=1839781&r2=1839782&view=diff
>> >
>> ==
>> > --- openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk (original)
>> > +++ openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
>> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Module_add_moduledirs,o
>> >   remotebridges \
>> >   reportdesign \
>> >   ridljar \
>> > + rsc \
>> >   sane \
>> >   sax \
>> >   sc \
>> >
>> > Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk
>> > URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk?rev=1839782&r1=1839781&r2=1839782&view=diff
>> >
>> ==
>> > --- openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk (original)
>> > +++ openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
>> > @@ -32,7 +32,10 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Helper_register_executa
>> >   mkunroll \
>> >   rdbedit \
>> >   rdbmaker \
>> > + rsc \
>> > + rsc2 \
>> >   rscdep \
>> > + rscpp \
>> >   so_checksum \
>> >   srvdepy \
>> >   svidl \
>> >
>> > Added: openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk
>> > URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk?rev=1839782&view=auto
>> >
>> ==
>> > --- openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk (added)
>> > +++ openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>> > +#**
>> > +#
>> > +#  Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
>> > +#  or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
>> > +#  distributed with this work for additional information
>> > +#  regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
>> > +#  to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
>> > +#  "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
>> > +#  with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
>> > +#
>> > +#http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>> > +#
>> > +#  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
>> > +#  software distributed under the License is distributed on an
>> > +#  "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
>> > +#  KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
>> > +#  specific language governing permissions and limitations
>> > +#  under the License.
>> > +#
>> > +#**
>> > +
>> > +
>> > +
>> > +$(eval $(call gb_Executable_Executable,rsc))
>> > +
>> > +$(eval $(call
>> gb_Executable_add_precompiled_header,rsc,$(SRCDIR)/rsc/inc/pch/precompiled_rsc))
>> > +
>> > +$(eval $(call gb_Executable_set_include,rsc,\
>> > +$$(INCLUDE) \
>> > +-I$(SRCDIR)/rsc/inc \
>> > +-I$(SRCDIR)/rsc/inc/pch \
>> > +))
>> > +
>> > +$(eval $(call gb_Executable_add_linked_libs,rs

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[toki]

On 2018-09-02 8:42 p.m., Rory O'Farrell wrote:

> It may be useful to know that the terminal command 
> inxi -S

Might need to emphasize that that is the majuscle S, not minuscle s.

> will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to do so of 
> which I am not aware.  

inxi -r gives repository type


jonathon




0x51B69DC37C9DC30D.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[toki]

On 2018-09-02 8:49 a.m., Matthias Seidel wrote:

> Apparently the problem is even bigger: I'm now running Ubuntu 16.04.5 x64 and 
> I'm still offered the RPMs (see table below)

Using Pale Moon 27.9.3 with English (Canada) as the UI language.

My User-Agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_3;
rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0"

https://www.openoffice.org/download/ offers me
OSX > 10.7 English US DMG.

Using Firefox ESR, on the same system.

My User-Agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0"

https://www.openoffice.org/download/ offers me the
Linux 64 Bit RPM English (US) 4.1.5

Using Midori 0.5.1 on the same system.

My User-Agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux) AppleWebKit/538.15 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.86 Safari/538.15 Midori/0.5"

https://www.openoffice.org/download/ offers me the
Linux 64 Bit RPM English (US) 4.1.5

FWIW, I use a 64 bit Linux distro that falsely claims to not use
SystemD. (Falsely becuase right now SystemD is using 50% CPU and 250 MB
RAM.)


jonathon





0x51B69DC37C9DC30D.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: html code generated from Open Office

[Damjan Jovanovic]

Hi

If it was me, I said:
The code for the "Save As" -> "HTML document" feature seems to be in:

main/sc/source/filter/html
for Calc, and
main/sw/source/filter/html
for Writer.
(Not sure if there are more?)

Thank you for your contribution, and please let us know if you need any
further help.
Damjan

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:55 AM Howard Cary Morris <
howard_cary_mor...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I seem too have deleted a more recent version of this request.
> Someone sent me name of module that gets invoked for a save as HTML
> request.
> I also like to compare that with the module that does the print request
> and the module that does the print preview. What are all those module names.
> Where can I download those modules from?
>
> Thanks Howard
>
> Sent from Mail for
> Windows 10
>
> 
> From: Howard Morris (aka Col Boogie) 
> Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 10:36:20 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: html code generated from Open Office
>
> The reason I joined Open Office was to enhance the html code generated
> from writer.
>
> For now, I have constructed html code to upload an html file generated by
> Open Office and PHP code to tweak that code and download a better version.
> Everything I have doe so far is in the attached zzz.zip file. Explanations
> are in Readme.txt
>
> I would have liked to have done this directly, but when I asked how to get
> there, I was directed to a site where I could download all the modules one
> by one, and there seemed to be hundreds of them and no indication what any
> of them contained with dubious directions how to put them together. This is
> not how I like to do things, so I went the other way for now.
>
> I seem to have run across documentation that Open Office puts its files
> internally into a XML format. If I could extract the XML directly from the
> .odt file I could do everything from there. Assuming that is true, is there
> an updated copy of https://www.openoffice.org/xml/xml_specification.pdf ?
> I would hope that whoever is doing the documentation keeps that up to date.
> It will take me at least 20 hours to read that document, but at least I
> will retain most of it the first time.
>
> Howard Morris
>

Re: svn commit: r1839782 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ rsc/ rsc/prj/ rsc/source/parser/ solenv/gbuild/

[Damjan Jovanovic]

Thank you, I am having a look.

Damjan


On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 4:17 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Damjan,
>
> This one seems to break the Windows build:
>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/main/sfx2/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
>
> Am 31.08.2018 um 20:54 schrieb dam...@apache.org:
> > Author: damjan
> > Date: Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
> > New Revision: 1839782
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1839782&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Implement gbuild functions for building Bison files.
> >
> > Port main/rsc to gbuild.
> >
> > Patch by: me
> >
> >
> > Added:
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc2.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rscpp.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Makefile   (with props)
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Module_rsc.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Package_inc.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/prj/makefile.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/source/parser/yyrscyacc.y
> >   - copied unchanged from r1839781,
> openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/source/parser/rscyacc.y
> > Removed:
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/source/parser/rscyacc.y
> > Modified:
> > openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/prj/build.lst
> > openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/prj/d.lst
> > openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/Executable.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/LinkTarget.mk
> > openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/TargetLocations.mk
> >
> > Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk?rev=1839782&r1=1839781&r2=1839782&view=diff
> >
> ==
> > --- openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk (original)
> > +++ openoffice/trunk/main/Module_ooo.mk Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Module_add_moduledirs,o
> >   remotebridges \
> >   reportdesign \
> >   ridljar \
> > + rsc \
> >   sane \
> >   sax \
> >   sc \
> >
> > Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk?rev=1839782&r1=1839781&r2=1839782&view=diff
> >
> ==
> > --- openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk (original)
> > +++ openoffice/trunk/main/Repository.mk Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
> > @@ -32,7 +32,10 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Helper_register_executa
> >   mkunroll \
> >   rdbedit \
> >   rdbmaker \
> > + rsc \
> > + rsc2 \
> >   rscdep \
> > + rscpp \
> >   so_checksum \
> >   srvdepy \
> >   svidl \
> >
> > Added: openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk?rev=1839782&view=auto
> >
> ==
> > --- openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk (added)
> > +++ openoffice/trunk/main/rsc/Executable_rsc.mk Fri Aug 31 18:54:31 2018
> > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> > +#**
> > +#
> > +#  Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
> > +#  or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
> > +#  distributed with this work for additional information
> > +#  regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
> > +#  to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
> > +#  "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
> > +#  with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > +#
> > +#http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > +#
> > +#  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> > +#  software distributed under the License is distributed on an
> > +#  "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
> > +#  KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
> > +#  specific language governing permissions and limitations
> > +#  under the License.
> > +#
> > +#**
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > +$(eval $(call gb_Executable_Executable,rsc))
> > +
> > +$(eval $(call
> gb_Executable_add_precompiled_header,rsc,$(SRCDIR)/rsc/inc/pch/precompiled_rsc))
> > +
> > +$(eval $(call gb_Executable_set_include,rsc,\
> > +$$(INCLUDE) \
> > +-I$(SRCDIR)/rsc/inc \
> > +-I$(SRCDIR)/rsc/inc/pch \
> > +))
> > +
> > +$(eval $(call gb_Executable_add_linked_libs,rsc,\
> > + i18nisolang1 \
> > + sal \
> > + tl \
> > + vos3 \
> > + stl \
> > +$(gb_STDLIBS) \
> > +))
> > +
> > +$(eval $(call gb_Executable_add_exception_objects,rsc,\
> > + rsc/source/prj/start \
> > + rsc/source/tools/rschash \
> > + rsc/source/tools/rsctree \
> > + rsc/source/tools/rsctools \
> > + r

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[toki]

On 2018-09-02 11:25 a.m., Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I used the Firefox from the Ubuntu distro, and assumed that was a "standard" 
> Firefox.

Ubuntu adds their own special sauce, that, as is usual for those that
compile distros, completely, utterly, and absolutely breaks the program.

jonathon




0x51B69DC37C9DC30D.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Conversion from Microsoft Word

[Howard Cary Morris]

Hi all,
   I have been testing my HTML simplification on all the documents I 
have (plenty). I have found it easier to let Word convert its documents tp Open 
Office format, mainly because it knows how to change Math equations insertion 
to Function Objects in writer (it also seems to use some elements not 
documented for writer). I sometimes have small problems with function objects. 
HTML now has a  tag. Could we borrow the code from Firefox? Do you think 
any of the Firefox coders might help us.
   There also seems to be some problem with the double lines in the 
conversion. Writer recognizes them as double lines (I checked format 
paragraph), but shows them as triple spaces.
   I do not think either is urgent, but something to put on a list for 
a future release to address.

Howard

RE: html code generated from Open Office

[Howard Cary Morris]

Sorry, I seem too have deleted a more recent version of this request.
Someone sent me name of module that gets invoked for a save as HTML request.
I also like to compare that with the module that does the print request and the 
module that does the print preview. What are all those module names.
Where can I download those modules from?

Thanks Howard

Sent from Mail for Windows 10


From: Howard Morris (aka Col Boogie) 
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 10:36:20 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: html code generated from Open Office

The reason I joined Open Office was to enhance the html code generated from 
writer.

For now, I have constructed html code to upload an html file generated by Open 
Office and PHP code to tweak that code and download a better version. 
Everything I have doe so far is in the attached zzz.zip file. Explanations are 
in Readme.txt

I would have liked to have done this directly, but when I asked how to get 
there, I was directed to a site where I could download all the modules one by 
one, and there seemed to be hundreds of them and no indication what any of them 
contained with dubious directions how to put them together. This is not how I 
like to do things, so I went the other way for now.

I seem to have run across documentation that Open Office puts its files 
internally into a XML format. If I could extract the XML directly from the .odt 
file I could do everything from there. Assuming that is true, is there an 
updated copy of https://www.openoffice.org/xml/xml_specification.pdf ? I would 
hope that whoever is doing the documentation keeps that up to date. It will 
take me at least 20 hours to read that document, but at least I will retain 
most of it the first time.

Howard Morris

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Jim Jagielski]

For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO that they can use, 
since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build for  older platforms (eg: 
CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to make 4.1.6 as good and as stable and 
as useful, with as many patches and fixes, as feasible for those users.

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> How about this one:
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
>>> It fixes a typo in the build process.
>> 
>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a
>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it wouldn't
>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk and
>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I understand
>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.
>> 
>> In general, release blockers should be:
>> - important bugfixes for users
>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler)
>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a newer
>> Windows release... just an example)
> 
> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-)
> 
> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would finally
> find its way into a release.
> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"...
> 
> Regards,
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>>   Andrea.
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Marcus]

Am 02.09.2018 um 10:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 02.09.2018 um 10:11 schrieb Marcus:

Am 01.09.2018 um 16:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Unfortunately not a single person did respond/test...

I would have loved to get these icons into 4.1.6!


first I need my laptop to work again. Seems a repair is necessary.

Do you have a build that doesn't need to be installed? Just unzipp to
get started? Then I could try it on my daily system.


There are builds in ARC format available from our buildbots:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux32/

Hope that helps?


thanks for the builds. At the moment I'm really busy but I hope to have 
some time on the weekend.


Marcus




Am 08.08.2018 um 23:49 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Hi all,

With r1837621 I could finally enable higher resolution icons (128x128)
for Linux.
I can confirm they are visible on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04.

Please test on any Distribution you can. ;-)



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Kay Schenk]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 12:39 Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Kay,
>
> Am 03.09.2018 um 00:16 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> > Hello Matthias--
> >
> > I should have replied to this ages ago. The last build I did was against
> Rev: 1838339 so this would have included your changes. I don't see any
> difference in the printer icons, but...I typicall install the Freedesktop
> desktop interface on rpm build, AND, I don't normally do this during test
> builds, just starting from the binary instead.The reason is I don't want my
> production version to get accidentally trampled.
> >
> > At this point, I seem to have the old icons available because I did't do
> a new desktop installation. Sorry...
>
> I am not sure if it would be visible on Freedesktop, but on Gnome
> (Ubuntu 18.04) and Unity (Ubuntu 16.04) it makes quite a difference...
>
> Regards,
>Matthias
>

It looks like the new icons are installed in the right area. If I had run
the desktop-integration, I'm sure I would have seen them.


> >
> > On 2018/08/08 21:49:23, Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> With r1837621 I could finally enable higher resolution icons (128x128)
> >> for Linux.
> >> I can confirm they are visible on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04.
> >>
> >> Please test on any Distribution you can. ;-)
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Andrea,

Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> How about this one:
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
>> It fixes a typo in the build process.
>
> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a
> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it wouldn't
> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk and
> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I understand
> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.
>
> In general, release blockers should be:
> - important bugfixes for users
> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler)
> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a newer
> Windows release... just an example)

This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-)

It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would finally
find its way into a release.
There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"...

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Andrea Pescetti]

Matthias Seidel wrote:

How about this one:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
It fixes a typo in the build process.


This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a maintenance 
release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it wouldn't make sense to 
include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk and (unfortunately) 
4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I understand if we try to 
backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.


In general, release blockers should be:
- important bugfixes for users
- important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler)
- important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a newer 
Windows release... just an example)


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Kay,

Am 03.09.2018 um 00:16 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> Hello Matthias--
>
> I should have replied to this ages ago. The last build I did was against Rev: 
> 1838339 so this would have included your changes. I don't see any difference 
> in the printer icons, but...I typicall install the Freedesktop desktop 
> interface on rpm build, AND, I don't normally do this during test builds, 
> just starting from the binary instead.The reason is I don't want my 
> production version to get accidentally trampled.
>
> At this point, I seem to have the old icons available because I did't do a 
> new desktop installation. Sorry...

I am not sure if it would be visible on Freedesktop, but on Gnome
(Ubuntu 18.04) and Unity (Ubuntu 16.04) it makes quite a difference...

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> On 2018/08/08 21:49:23, Matthias Seidel  wrote: 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With r1837621 I could finally enable higher resolution icons (128x128)
>> for Linux.
>> I can confirm they are visible on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04.
>>
>> Please test on any Distribution you can. ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature