Re: App icons for Windows

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 08.09.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Peter kovacs:
> Can we fix this in 4.1.6 too?
> Seems a like small fix.

I think so, only six icons to copy...

>
> Am 8. September 2018 14:20:39 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
> :
>> Hi Pedro,
>>
>> Am 08.09.2018 um 13:46 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> Hi Matthias, all
>>>
>>>
 I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw,
>> Base
 and Math.

 Opinions?

>>> According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3
>>>
>>> "On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". That was almost 10
>> years ago...
>>> So I would say that it makes sense to update the Windows builds to
>> the 3.x icons (since there are no 4.x icons) so that the icons are the
>> same on all platforms (Linux and Mac already use these icons possibly
>> since version 3.0)
>>
>> Especially since all other icons on Windows (MIME types, templates,
>> ...)
>> are from the Galaxy icon set.
>> Updating the remaining 6 icons would give a more consistent "look and
>> feel".
>>
>> If anyone wants to test how it looks on Windows, I made a special build
>> based on r1839722:
>> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Matthias
>>
>> P.S.: It would be easy to do this for 4.1.6 already...
>>
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents ;)
>>>
>>> Pedro
>>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Discussion] Program for Sandro

[Peter kovacs]

Hi Sandro. 

If you see something on our wiki-pages.
You can decide on yourself. There is no real command structure here.
If you need a user for editing the wiki, just write a request here.

Have Fun.

All the best
Peter

Am 7. September 2018 18:08:12 MESZ schrieb sandro :
>Dear,
>
>I am enjoying a lot the vivid climate of cooperation and team spirit. I
>would like to tell that more programmatic goals maybe helps me in
>organizing my activity so I could work on a project in a more open
>manner.
>
>Example: instead of a task on the Wiki's HelpContent to fix the
>navigation content, I could have a more broad task in the HelpContent
>update, then I could think on short term goals and mid term goals, like
>a "to do list" under a more broad task of HelpContent update.
>
>Glad,
>Sandro Suzart
>
>
>
>De: Peter kovacs 
>Enviado: quinta-feira, 6 de setembro de 2018 02:13
>Para: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Assunto: Re: [Discussion] Program for Sandro
>
>Hi Andrea,
>
>Can you specify at least one task? So Sandro can make a plan. I think
>sondro can not proceed if a goal can not be described.
>
>@Sandro
>The time you allocate to OpenOffice is up to you. I suggest we do a
>plan like before and we check with you the proceedings.
>Is that fine for you?
>
>All the best
>Peter
>
>Thanks!
>
>All the best.
>
>All the best
>Peter
>
>Am 30. August 2018 22:33:20 MESZ schrieb sandro
>:
>>Dear Andrea,
>>
>>It is a jubilant experience to approach the PHP projects in so warm
>and
>>great manner, that is motivating to expand the frontiers and make the
>>project available and impacting. I like most the Wiki project because
>I
>>think it is the easiest code and the most accessible tasks in the
>>moment.
>>
>>I am certainly happy with that option and I think that in some time I
>>might become greatly productive with Wiki because to me it is the most
>>simple system structure from the options demonstrated. I feel that
>>maybe I might take some time to produce many outputs but I am very
>>happy with the Wiki project because I have a high confidence that I
>can
>>handle it well.
>>
>>Glad,
>>Sandro Suzart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>De: Andrea Pescetti 
>>Enviado: quinta-feira, 30 de agosto de 2018 13:15
>>Para: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>Assunto: Re: [Discussion] Program for Sandro
>>
>>Peter kovacs wrote:
>>> Doh! *facepalm* Where did I take that from, ...
>>> Okay, Drupal is still PHP.
>>
>>The PHP applications we, as a project, have are:
>>
>>1. http://forum.openoffice.org/ phpBB
>Apache OpenOffice - OpenOffice.org - The Free and Open Productivity
>Suite
>forum.openoffice.org
>Apache OpenOffice Community Forums. The Free, Open Source Office Suite.
>
>
>
>>Apache OpenOffice - OpenOffice.org - The Free and Open Productivity
>>Suite
>>forum.openoffice.org
>>Apache OpenOffice Community Forums. The Free, Open Source Office
>Suite.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2. http://wiki.openoffice.org/ MediaWiki
>>
>>3. http://extensions.openoffice.org/ (and Templates) Drupal
>>
>>For #1 and #2 we take care of updates and development and
>>infrastructure, since they are hosted at Apache. These are the ones we
>>should work on.
>>
>>Instead, #3 is managed directly by SourceForge.
>>
>>If a newcomer is to focus on one of our PHP applications, #2 (MWiki)
>is
>>likely the best one. It is rather normal (while our installation of #1
>>is, for example, very confusing and hard to grasp for a newcomer), it
>>needs maintenance work and it is fully under our control.
>>
>>If Sandro wants to work on MWiki I can provide further details and
>code
>>pointers. We are in the process of testing the new installation, so
>>there is room for help.
>>
>>Regards,
>>   Andrea.
>>
>>-
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: App icons for Windows

[Peter kovacs]

Can we fix this in 4.1.6 too?
Seems a like small fix.

Am 8. September 2018 14:20:39 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
:
>Hi Pedro,
>
>Am 08.09.2018 um 13:46 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Hi Matthias, all
>>
>>
>>> I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw,
>Base
>>> and Math.
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>>
>>
>> According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3
>>
>> "On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". That was almost 10
>years ago...
>>
>> So I would say that it makes sense to update the Windows builds to
>the 3.x icons (since there are no 4.x icons) so that the icons are the
>same on all platforms (Linux and Mac already use these icons possibly
>since version 3.0)
>
>Especially since all other icons on Windows (MIME types, templates,
>...)
>are from the Galaxy icon set.
>Updating the remaining 6 icons would give a more consistent "look and
>feel".
>
>If anyone wants to test how it looks on Windows, I made a special build
>based on r1839722:
>https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>
>Regards,
>   Matthias
>
>P.S.: It would be easy to do this for 4.1.6 already...
>
>>
>>
>> Just my 2 cents ;)
>>
>> Pedro
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: App icons for Windows

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Pedro,

Am 08.09.2018 um 13:46 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias, all
>
>
>> I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Base
>> and Math.
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>
> According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3
>
> "On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". That was almost 10 years 
> ago...
>
> So I would say that it makes sense to update the Windows builds to the 3.x 
> icons (since there are no 4.x icons) so that the icons are the same on all 
> platforms (Linux and Mac already use these icons possibly since version 3.0)

Especially since all other icons on Windows (MIME types, templates, ...)
are from the Galaxy icon set.
Updating the remaining 6 icons would give a more consistent "look and feel".

If anyone wants to test how it looks on Windows, I made a special build
based on r1839722:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/

Regards,
   Matthias

P.S.: It would be easy to do this for 4.1.6 already...

>
>
> Just my 2 cents ;)
>
> Pedro
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: App icons for Windows

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Matthias, all


> I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Base
> and Math.
> 
> Opinions?
> 


According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3

"On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". That was almost 10 years ago...

So I would say that it makes sense to update the Windows builds to the 3.x 
icons (since there are no 4.x icons) so that the icons are the same on all 
platforms (Linux and Mac already use these icons possibly since version 3.0)


Just my 2 cents ;)

Pedro

Re: svn commit: r1839782 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ rsc/ rsc/prj/ rsc/source/parser/ solenv/gbuild/

[Damjan Jovanovic]

On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 10:47 AM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Am 08.09.2018 um 10:16 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> > It should be fixed in 1840343:
> >
> > "When building other languages (--with-lang="..."), the build was
> breaking
> > because rsc couldn't compile certain resources (usually in main/sfx2).
> >
> > Apparently the RSC preprocessor, rscpp, uses very small buffers by
> default.
> > When the SOLAR preprocessor definition is defined, it uses bigger buffers
> > instead. Previously dmake was explicitly passing "-DSOLAR" to the C
> compiler
> > but I missed it when porting main/rsc to gbuild. When added back,
> > main/sfx2 builds languages successfully."
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Great! Building as we speak...
>
> And thanks for the explanation. It helps me to (hopefully) understand
> more and more. ;-)
>
> Regards,
>Matthias
>
>
Hi

Pleasure :)

Mine built successfully.

Regards
Damjan

Re: svn commit: r1839782 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ rsc/ rsc/prj/ rsc/source/parser/ solenv/gbuild/

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 08.09.2018 um 10:16 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> It should be fixed in 1840343:
>
> "When building other languages (--with-lang="..."), the build was breaking
> because rsc couldn't compile certain resources (usually in main/sfx2).
>
> Apparently the RSC preprocessor, rscpp, uses very small buffers by default.
> When the SOLAR preprocessor definition is defined, it uses bigger buffers
> instead. Previously dmake was explicitly passing "-DSOLAR" to the C compiler
> but I missed it when porting main/rsc to gbuild. When added back,
> main/sfx2 builds languages successfully."

Hi Damjan,

Great! Building as we speak...

And thanks for the explanation. It helps me to (hopefully) understand
more and more. ;-)

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 10:23 PM Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
>
>> Am 07.09.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>>
>> My successful builds used:
>>
>> configure:22632: checking which languages to be built
>> configure:22636: result: en-US
>>
>> The Windows buildbot:
>>
>> checking which languages to be built... en-US de fr it pt ja
>>
>> It's probably only reproducible with a certain language selection?
>>
>>
>> It is more probably building in en-US only?
>>
>> That is why the buildbots always build different languages, to catch such
>> situations...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:55 PM Matthias Seidel  
>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Nothing changed at the buildbots configuration...
>>
>> It began to break with 
>> r1839782:https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux64-nightlyhttps://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly
>>
>> Confirmed with my personal Windows builds.
>>
>>
>> Am 07.09.2018 um 17:45 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>>
>> Windows, Linux and FreeBSD all build for me.
>>
>> Something must be different with the options to ./configure.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:13 PM Matthias Seidel <
>>
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>> Am 05.09.2018 um 04:48 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:27 PM Matthias Seidel <
>>
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 04.09.2018 um 18:56 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:16 AM Matthias Seidel <
>>
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>> Am 04.09.2018 um 07:43 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>>
>> I don't get it, main/sfx2 builds for me on both FreeBSD and
>>
>> Windows.
>>
>> main/salhelper fails to build on Windows, and it looks like a
>>
>> mission
>>
>> to
>>
>> fix it :(.
>>
>> It *is* now in salhelper:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/main/salhelper/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>>
>> I just committed a patch to salhelper that should fix building on
>>
>> Windows.
>>
>> And starting a clean rebuild to check for other errors.
>>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>> I also started a new Windows build...
>>
>> But the Linux builds still fail in sfx2:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/main/sfx2/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>>
>> Looks like a syntax error in a resource file?
>>
>>
>>
>> I had to make a few more changes in r1840081 to get Windows to build,
>>
>> but
>>
>> it does build now.
>>
>> It's possible that porting rsc (our resource compiler) to gbuild, and
>>
>> the
>>
>> Bison support I had to add to gbuild, broke parsing some resource
>>
>> files.
>>
>> But I don't understand how Windows and FreeBSD build, but Linux
>>
>> doesn't?
>>
>> At least Windows doesn't build either:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/main/sfx2/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>>
>> Regards,
>>Matthias
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

App icons for Windows

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi all,

Is there a specific reason why we use old icons (OOo2 ?) for our Windows
executables?
All other platforms use Galaxy icons (OOo3 ?).

Not only do these icons look "old" but they do not contain higher
resolutions (256x256), whereas the Galaxy icons do.

Everything is already available here (Thanks to Pedro Lino to find this
out!):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/OOo30_final_mimetype/icos/

I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Base
and Math.

Opinions?

Regards,

   Matthias




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: svn commit: r1839782 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ rsc/ rsc/prj/ rsc/source/parser/ solenv/gbuild/

[Damjan Jovanovic]

It should be fixed in 1840343:

"When building other languages (--with-lang="..."), the build was breaking
because rsc couldn't compile certain resources (usually in main/sfx2).

Apparently the RSC preprocessor, rscpp, uses very small buffers by default.
When the SOLAR preprocessor definition is defined, it uses bigger buffers
instead. Previously dmake was explicitly passing "-DSOLAR" to the C compiler
but I missed it when porting main/rsc to gbuild. When added back,
main/sfx2 builds languages successfully."

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 10:23 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Am 07.09.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>
> My successful builds used:
>
> configure:22632: checking which languages to be built
> configure:22636: result: en-US
>
> The Windows buildbot:
>
> checking which languages to be built... en-US de fr it pt ja
>
> It's probably only reproducible with a certain language selection?
>
>
> It is more probably building in en-US only?
>
> That is why the buildbots always build different languages, to catch such
> situations...
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:55 PM Matthias Seidel  
> 
> wrote:
>
>
> Nothing changed at the buildbots configuration...
>
> It began to break with 
> r1839782:https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux64-nightlyhttps://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly
>
> Confirmed with my personal Windows builds.
>
>
> Am 07.09.2018 um 17:45 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>
> Windows, Linux and FreeBSD all build for me.
>
> Something must be different with the options to ./configure.
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:13 PM Matthias Seidel <
>
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Am 05.09.2018 um 04:48 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:27 PM Matthias Seidel <
>
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.09.2018 um 18:56 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:16 AM Matthias Seidel <
>
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Am 04.09.2018 um 07:43 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>
> I don't get it, main/sfx2 builds for me on both FreeBSD and
>
> Windows.
>
> main/salhelper fails to build on Windows, and it looks like a
>
> mission
>
> to
>
> fix it :(.
>
> It *is* now in salhelper:
>
>
>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/main/salhelper/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>
> I just committed a patch to salhelper that should fix building on
>
> Windows.
>
> And starting a clean rebuild to check for other errors.
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> I also started a new Windows build...
>
> But the Linux builds still fail in sfx2:
>
>
>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/main/sfx2/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>
> Looks like a syntax error in a resource file?
>
>
>
> I had to make a few more changes in r1840081 to get Windows to build,
>
> but
>
> it does build now.
>
> It's possible that porting rsc (our resource compiler) to gbuild, and
>
> the
>
> Bison support I had to add to gbuild, broke parsing some resource
>
> files.
>
> But I don't understand how Windows and FreeBSD build, but Linux
>
> doesn't?
>
> At least Windows doesn't build either:
>
>
>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/main/sfx2/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>
> Regards,
>Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
>