Re: "convert' pdf images in Draw

[marcia wilbur]

Hi!

Thank You! I will test.

-marcia
- Original Message -
From: "Mechtilde" 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 10:16:19 PM
Subject: "convert' pdf images in Draw

Hello Marcia,

Am 06.01.21 um 00:20 schrieb marcia wilbur:
> Hi.
> 
> Do we have a feature to open PDFs in Draw?
> I tried. All I had was characters. Am I doing something wrong or do we not 
> have "open PDF as images in Draw".

Yes we have this feature as an extension. I tried to build it from 4.2.x
branch.

You can get it from http://home.apache.org/~mechtilde/Tools/ and test it.

> 
> I have gs and imagemagick - was able to convert the same PDF at the shell 
> with convert... So, is it a config or not a feature yet?
> 
> also, i couldn't login to requests so, I'm asking here.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Marcia

Kind regards

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows und OS/2
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum merged pull request #115: Flaky tests

[GitBox]

cbmarcum merged pull request #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[PROPOSAL] add an unsubscribe/help footer to recruitment ML

[Carl Marcum]

Hi All,

It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.

I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with 
dev@ and some others.


Sorry this is a proposal without a known solution (on my part) but I 
suspect a ticket to infra may be involved which I could create.


Lazy Consensus in in effect for this and if there are no objections I'll 
figure out how to implement it in 72 hours.


Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

OpenOffice for Mac OS Big Sur 11.1

[john.yohe]

Hello,

I'm interested in trying the newer version of OpenOffice which would allow me 
to (maybe) open Word docs with OpenOffice? Was told in the Forums to write to 
you.

Thank you,

John Yohe

Fwd: [openoffice] annotated tag AOO419-RC1 created (now a53baa6)

[Jim Jagielski]

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: j...@apache.org
> Subject: [openoffice] annotated tag AOO419-RC1 created (now a53baa6)
> Date: January 8, 2021 at 2:24:06 PM EST
> To: "comm...@openoffice.apache.org" 
> Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> 
> jim pushed a change to annotated tag AOO419-RC1
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git.
> 
> 
>  at a53baa6  (tag)
> tagging 561082130aec836ff9c7626c642cf3c44fbec11f (commit)
> replaces AOO418-GA
>  by Jim Jagielski
>  on Fri Jan 8 14:19:15 2021 -0500
> 
> - Log -
> Tag HEAD (561082130aec836ff9c7626c642cf3c44fbec11f) of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1
> ---
> 
> No new revisions were added by this update.
> 

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated (db583c7 -> 5610821)

[Arrigo Marchiori]

Dear All,

I apologize for the confusion. I was sure I was working on my own
branch!

I should have restored everything as it was.

Sorry for the noise.

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 06:10:52PM +, ard...@apache.org wrote:

> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> 
> ardovm pushed a change to branch AOO419
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git.
> 
> 
>  discard db583c7  change c++ include paths on gcc >= 7
>  discard 00868dd  Install Python libraries also from lib64
> 
> This update removed existing revisions from the reference, leaving the
> reference pointing at a previous point in the repository history.
> 
>  * -- * -- N   refs/heads/AOO419 (5610821)
> \
>  O -- O -- O   (db583c7)
> 
> Any revisions marked "omit" are not gone; other references still
> refer to them.  Any revisions marked "discard" are gone forever.
> 
> No new revisions were added by this update.
> 
> Summary of changes:
>  main/boost/boost_1_55_0.patch | 14 --
>  main/python/prj/d.lst |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Arrigo

http://rigo.altervista.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Intent to roll AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds

[Jim Jagielski]

Yes, that is the current hash.

> On Jan 8, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 08.01.21 um 13:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1
>> so we can start builds over the weekend from that tag.
> 
> That would be 561082130a ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 6, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Matthias and I will be starting our AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds over
>>> the weekend for testing by the start of next week, hopefully.
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 

Re: Intent to roll AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 08.01.21 um 13:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1
> so we can start builds over the weekend from that tag.

That would be 561082130a ?

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Jan 6, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> Matthias and I will be starting our AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds over
>> the weekend for testing by the start of next week, hopefully.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[GitHub] [openoffice] jimjag merged pull request #116: [writerfilter] Add checks for non-empty stacks

[GitBox]

jimjag merged pull request #116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/116


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Intent to roll AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds

[Jim Jagielski]

By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1
so we can start builds over the weekend from that tag.

> On Jan 6, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Matthias and I will be starting our AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds over
> the weekend for testing by the start of next week, hopefully.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

[Jim Jagielski]

This seems like a safe and non-controversial fix to me...

> On Jan 7, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:03:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> 
>> On  6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
 On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
 wrote:
 
 Hello All,
 
 
 - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file.
 
 Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing
 4.1.9?
 
>>> 
>>> AFAICT, it is not a regression (trunk and 4.1.x are very different)... So I 
>>> don't
>>> think it should hold off 4.1.9-RC1 IMO
>> 
>> Agreed.  Who knows how long this would take to understand, fix, and
>> test.   In the meantime, there are a lot of Big Sur users waiting on
>> 4.1.9.
> 
> In the hope it can be useful, please see here:
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/116 
> 
> 
> Apparently, Linux crashes because certain stacks are pop()-ed without
> ever being push()-ed before.
> 
> My personal theory is that Windows's standard library may add some
> implicit checks, and for this reason Windows builds do not seem to
> crash.
> 
> The PR addresses the ``symptoms'' of a wrong parsing. The parsing
> itself should be fixed, but maybe this ``quick'' fix is ok for a
> minor release, if it avoids a blatant crash?
> 
> I hope it can be useful. It applies to trunk and AOO419 so it should
> be easily integrated ``at the last minute'' if we found it's worth it.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Arrigo
> 
> http://rigo.altervista.org 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>