Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
[ ] Carl Marcum (cmarcum) [X] Peter Kovacs (petko) [ ] Abstain (I cannot/won't choose between them) Best regards, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice
Am 15.09.2016 um 17:35 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: [BCC to PMC] RESOLUTION: That Marcus Lange (marcus) be recommended to the Apache Software Foundation Board to serve as Vice President for Apache OpenOffice. The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice serves in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation. The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice is the Chair of the OpenOffice Project Management Committee. Please vote by reply to this dev@-list thread on approval of the resolution. [ X] +1 Approve [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation Groetjes, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice
Am 15.09.2016 um 17:35 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: [BCC to PMC] RESOLUTION: That Marcus Lange (marcus) be recommended to the Apache Software Foundation Board to serve as Vice President for Apache OpenOffice. The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice serves in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation. The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice is the Chair of the OpenOffice Project Management Committee. Please vote by reply to this dev@-list thread on approval of the resolution. [ X] +1 Approve [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Remembering Ian Lynch in 4.1.2 announcement
+1 my personal opinion is that we should keep the release announcement focused on the product. People behind and/or involved the project can be addressed in a separate blog where we can also remember project members who passed away. People leave the project or became less active (including me) and new people started to become more active and do more and more. I suggest to focus on the new fresh blood that can make the difference in the future. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2
So please VOTE on releasing RC3 (as defined above) as OpenOffice 4.1.2: [ X ] +1 Approve [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Dennis Hamilton as new AOO Chair.
[ ] +1, I want Dennis Hamilton as new Chair [X] +0, I do not care if Dennis Hamilton becomes new Chair [ ] -1, I am against Dennis Hamilton becomes new chair Regards, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
Am 30.01.2015 um 19:52 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: [X] Jan Iversen (jani) Groetjes, Olaf Vote opens now and it will last one week, until 6 February 2015 7:00 PM GMT, to give all community members the opportunity to participate. The resolution will be submitted to the Board in time for the February meeting (18 February 2015). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
Am 15.01.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Procedural note: I didn't add it to my initial mail in order to keep it short, but it is highly recommended that -1 votes be accompanied by a brief motivation (1-2 lines), especially if you haven't participated in the discussions so far. Knowing what is wrong can help a lot. This holds for the -1 votes that have already been expressed too. Regards, Andrea. If this should be a vote no one has to argue for his decision. Groetjes, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
[X] +1 Yes [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 No Regards, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 (RC3)
Am 15.08.2014 09:15, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC3) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1. [X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)
Am 04.04.2014 15:57, schrieb Andre Fischer: Another problem came up that looks serious enough so that I would like to cancel this vote, if nobody objects. Juergen, who started the vote, is on vacation today, so I need your help to do that. The problem is described by issue 124599 [1]. Here is a summary: If you don't object to a cancellation of the vote then the current plan is to provide a fix today, rebuild and upload tomorrow and re-start the vote on the second RC on sunday or monday depending on how smooth this process works. *1 for the cancellation: AOO should have a working update for older versions. Groetjes, Olaf Regards, Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Drop support for OSX 10.4 and 10.5 for AOO 4.1
Am 08.08.2013 10:08, schrieb Herbert Duerr: This is very true also in other areas. I suggest we drop support for OSX 10.4 and 10.5 for Apache OpenOffice 4.1. There are some good points for the proposal: - the latest update of OSX 10.4 was in 2007 and Apple dropped support for it in May 2011 - the latest update of OSX 10.5 was in 2009 and Apple dropped support for it in July 2012 - Mozilla stopped releasing for them after FireFox 16 - Google stopped releasing for them after Chrome 22 - Microsoft stopped releasing for them after MSO 2011 - Adobe stopped releasing for them in 2012 - Oracle only provides Java for OSX 10.6 and up - Adium stopped releasing for them after Adium 1.4.5 - etc. It sounds reasonable to drop these OSXs for AOO 4.1 and I would second the proposal. But it's not a good style to drop an OS within a minor update. What are the big changes in AOO 4.1 compared to 4.0 that we can't support these OSXs any longer? We should have done that for AOO 4.0. Regards, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Proposal -- AOO 4.0.1 Release
Am 05.08.2013 23:34, schrieb David Gerard: On 5 August 2013 22:32, janI j...@apache.org wrote: When I consider what I hear in the real world, I would prefer a fast release, solving the most important issues. We always have the possibility to make a 4.02 if really needed. x.0.x releases monthly are the way to go. I think LibreOffice really got this right. If you do this, the users will be happier because they anticipate happiness in the *near* future, not a year from now. If we get quality we don't need quantity. We don't have to bother the user with monthly installations. The majority of feedback I remember is: 'We don't want all these new features but we want it stable.' Monthly updates are a pain in business areas. Groetjes, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Do language packs have update notifications?
Am 30.07.2013 19:04, schrieb Rob Weir: In OOo 3.3.0 we support Tamil with a language pack, but not a full install. In AOO 4.0 we provide a full install for Tamil, as well as a language pack. Are we able to notify 3.3.0 users of the Tamil language pack about the update? Is that something the update notification system can handle? Or does it only handle updates to the base install? -Rob AFAIR they don't have an update functionality. Groetjes, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Groetjes, Olaf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: AOO 4.0 getting rid of the 3 layer office, part 1
Sorry for top posting but: +1 !!! Groetjes, Olaf Am 22.03.2013 17:15, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, the so called 3layer office is not really useful anymore (it was never) and makes more problems than it helps. I thought that AOO 4.0 would be the best time to start at least with the necessary rework. The main idea is to use a new simplified directory layout and tweak the necessary config file (*rc, *.ini), rpath or similar linker flags where necessary etc. Eliminate the URE completely because we don't really want support it as a standalone product. I did some initial work so far and I am now able to build an office for Windows, MacOS and Linux with a new simplified directory layout. Windows and MacOS have already one main directory whereas on Linux we have openoffice (basis layer + URE) and openoffice4 (brand layer). I removed all this base-link, ure-link, URE, urelib stuff and reorganized the directories. Example layout on Linux: openoffice4 openoffice4/help openoffice4/presets openoffice4/program - contains basis-link/program + URE/bin + URE/lib openoffice4/program/misc - former URE/share/misc - will be removed openoffice4/README openoffice4/README.html openoffice4/readmes openoffice4/share In general the layout becomes more equal on all platforms. The good news is that the office work on all 3 platforms, I am able to select Java, extensions seems to work as well. Python is not yet tested, language packs are not yet tested and built but in general I am thinking it will be no problem. Advantage of this move would be a simplified structure, long term a simplified configuration when the *rc/*.ini files are consolidated. Easier deployment on Linux, no conflicts with an URE from LO or the distro at all. My idea is to continue this basic work, do further cleanup in the office as well as the build system, do further testing including the SDK... Still some work to do but from my point of view a useful move forward to get rid of this complex and unnecessary 3layer stuff. What do you think? On demand I can provide test builds if there are people interested to help with testing. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
