Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
Infra is okay with us using 'org.openoffice' as the groupId so that is what I've requested. Carl On 11/29/2015 07:39 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi Pedro, comment below. On 11/29/2015 12:54 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: (Sorry if you get this twice, I forgot to send the original from my apache address) Hello; First of all huge thanks to Marcus for taking over this project. I would prefer we maintain the org.openoffice groupId. This has been documented [1] already so we avoid confusion to our developers. Cheers, Pedro. [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Java/MavenBundles [cmarcum] I have created an Ifra issue to use Apache Nexus for the release. You have a good point about the groupId. I have asked a question to see if we can use 'org.openoffice' instead of an 'org.apache.openoffice' one and still use Apache Nexus. [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10858 Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
> -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 11:31 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository > > Thanks Dennis, > > The only remaining issue I think is the preference to use groupId > 'org.openoffice' . > > I am waiting on an answer to if that is a problem with Nexus in the > Infra issue I opened and will report back then. > > As far as I can tell all other projects have an 'org.apache.xxx' > groupId. > > see comment below. > > > On 11/29/2015 12:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > The wiki compilation on UNO is a work in progress. It has not been > touched in any important way since 2009. The wiki link does provide > more linked information; it is valuable in that respect. I agree that > [1] is a better intended place. > > > > It is not clear whether there remains information that is only > available on the web site. The current page [2] links to the wiki and > the link for downloading the SDK is broken. On that basis alone, [1] is > preferable. > > > > > > - Dennis > > > > SIDE NOTES > > > > This is challenging, > <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Effort/Migrate_Documentation>. > The migration was started in 2006 and status was last updated in July > 2007 (at 15% complete). I don't notice how connectivity to the web > pages is preserved pending movement of material. That [2] apparently > provides no link to other material on the web site means you have to > look in the SVN to see what additional material is there. > > > > ([2] is exactly as imported into Apache OpenOffice from the original > OO.o site repository. One feature of the page is that it links to the > focus areas page with a handy listing legacy projects from OO.o and > whatever on-line material there is about them, > <http://www.openoffice.org/projects/accepted.html>. We should manage to > hold onto that somehow. Maybe add it to the wiki page?) > [cmarcum] > > I have updated them to use the wiki URL [1] > > As a general question, Was there larger attempt to move content to the > wiki before Ooo came to Apache? > > And if so, should there be an effort to continue this migration and > deprecate web pages after adding links to the newer wiki page? [orcmid] My impression is that the migration was started at Sun but not completed. According to the July 2007 status, the work was estimated to be only 15% completed. I did nose around the web site for the pages that are not linked to but still there. A significant amount of information is still only available on the web site, although even that has sketchy parts and it depends on cross-references to the API documentation that don't always seem to work as intended. It appears that continuing the migration of the documentation would be an extensive task requiring strong expert knowledge of how UNO works, especially at the binary level. > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > >> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 06:13 > >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > >> Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository > >> > >> Comment on URL below. > > [ ... ] > >> I just found this wiki page [1] that says it's the replacement to the > >> URL I have listed in the POM [2]. > >> > >> I think I should use [1] instead. > >> > >> [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno > >> [2] http://www.openoffice.org/udk > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Carl > >> > >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
Thanks Dennis, The only remaining issue I think is the preference to use groupId 'org.openoffice' . I am waiting on an answer to if that is a problem with Nexus in the Infra issue I opened and will report back then. As far as I can tell all other projects have an 'org.apache.xxx' groupId. see comment below. On 11/29/2015 12:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: The wiki compilation on UNO is a work in progress. It has not been touched in any important way since 2009. The wiki link does provide more linked information; it is valuable in that respect. I agree that [1] is a better intended place. It is not clear whether there remains information that is only available on the web site. The current page [2] links to the wiki and the link for downloading the SDK is broken. On that basis alone, [1] is preferable. - Dennis SIDE NOTES This is challenging, <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Effort/Migrate_Documentation>. The migration was started in 2006 and status was last updated in July 2007 (at 15% complete). I don't notice how connectivity to the web pages is preserved pending movement of material. That [2] apparently provides no link to other material on the web site means you have to look in the SVN to see what additional material is there. ([2] is exactly as imported into Apache OpenOffice from the original OO.o site repository. One feature of the page is that it links to the focus areas page with a handy listing legacy projects from OO.o and whatever on-line material there is about them, <http://www.openoffice.org/projects/accepted.html>. We should manage to hold onto that somehow. Maybe add it to the wiki page?) [cmarcum] I have updated them to use the wiki URL [1] As a general question, Was there larger attempt to move content to the wiki before Ooo came to Apache? And if so, should there be an effort to continue this migration and deprecate web pages after adding links to the newer wiki page? -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 06:13 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository Comment on URL below. [ ... ] I just found this wiki page [1] that says it's the replacement to the URL I have listed in the POM [2]. I think I should use [1] instead. [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno [2] http://www.openoffice.org/udk Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
The wiki compilation on UNO is a work in progress. It has not been touched in any important way since 2009. The wiki link does provide more linked information; it is valuable in that respect. I agree that [1] is a better intended place. It is not clear whether there remains information that is only available on the web site. The current page [2] links to the wiki and the link for downloading the SDK is broken. On that basis alone, [1] is preferable. - Dennis SIDE NOTES This is challenging, <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Effort/Migrate_Documentation>. The migration was started in 2006 and status was last updated in July 2007 (at 15% complete). I don't notice how connectivity to the web pages is preserved pending movement of material. That [2] apparently provides no link to other material on the web site means you have to look in the SVN to see what additional material is there. ([2] is exactly as imported into Apache OpenOffice from the original OO.o site repository. One feature of the page is that it links to the focus areas page with a handy listing legacy projects from OO.o and whatever on-line material there is about them, <http://www.openoffice.org/projects/accepted.html>. We should manage to hold onto that somehow. Maybe add it to the wiki page?) > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 06:13 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository > > Comment on URL below. [ ... ] > > I just found this wiki page [1] that says it's the replacement to the > URL I have listed in the POM [2]. > > I think I should use [1] instead. > > [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno > [2] http://www.openoffice.org/udk > > Thanks, > Carl > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
Comment on URL below. On 11/28/2015 04:45 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: Here is an updated POM based in previous comments. http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> 4.0.0 org.apache.openoffice.udk ridl 4.1.2 jar Java Runtime Interface Definition Library The type library and the precompiled Java interfaces of the UDK API. http://www.openoffice.org/udk The Apache License, Version 2.0 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt Apache OpenOffice Project dev@openoffice.apache.org Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ridljar https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ridljar http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ridljar I just found this wiki page [1] that says it's the replacement to the URL I have listed in the POM [2]. I think I should use [1] instead. [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno [2] http://www.openoffice.org/udk Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
Hi Pedro, comment below. On 11/29/2015 12:54 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: (Sorry if you get this twice, I forgot to send the original from my apache address) Hello; First of all huge thanks to Marcus for taking over this project. I would prefer we maintain the org.openoffice groupId. This has been documented [1] already so we avoid confusion to our developers. Cheers, Pedro. [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Java/MavenBundles [cmarcum] I have created an Ifra issue to use Apache Nexus for the release. You have a good point about the groupId. I have asked a question to see if we can use 'org.openoffice' instead of an 'org.apache.openoffice' one and still use Apache Nexus. [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10858 Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
Hi Dennis, My comment below. On 11/28/2015 06:47 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Interesting. Only one comment. -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 13:45 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository Here is an updated POM based in previous comments. http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> 4.0.0 org.apache.openoffice.udk [orcmid] I think you're right that this is more-appropriate now. (I guess no connection with Java package names. Seem to be under com.sun.star.uno :) [cmarcum] None of the pom examples I have seen have the package names included. Included in the complete bundle jar file that is submitted to Nexus is a xxx-sources.jar and a xxx-javadoc.jar so that information can be discovered in documentation and we also have online docs. I have created and Infra issue [3] to request use of Nexus for the release. [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10858 Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
(Sorry if you get this twice, I forgot to send the original from my apache address) Hello; First of all huge thanks to Marcus for taking over this project. I would prefer we maintain the org.openoffice groupId. This has been documented [1] already so we avoid confusion to our developers. Cheers, Pedro. [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Java/MavenBundles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
Interesting. Only one comment. > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 13:45 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository > > Here is an updated POM based in previous comments. > > > http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; >xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 > http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> >4.0.0 >org.apache.openoffice.udk [orcmid] I think you're right that this is more-appropriate now. (I guess no connection with Java package names. Seem to be under com.sun.star.uno :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository
Here is an updated POM based in previous comments. http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> 4.0.0 org.apache.openoffice.udk ridl 4.1.2 jar Java Runtime Interface Definition Library The type library and the precompiled Java interfaces of the UDK API. http://www.openoffice.org/udk The Apache License, Version 2.0 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt Apache OpenOffice Project dev@openoffice.apache.org Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ridljar https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ridljar http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ridljar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
