Re: suggestion for another cwiki change..new

[Kay Schenk]

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:

> I am personally fine with whatever you do along the lines of surfacing
> current planning efforts and archiving old efforts.
>

Well thanks...


>
> For cwiki articles that should be moved to Mwiki then perhaps a "For
> MWiki" category would make sense.
>

ah...I hadn't even thought of this.


>
> If you need someone with full confluence admin rights let me know, I'm
> happy to help.
>

Mostly I got to thinking about  link breakages due to moving...I don't know
how well cwiki handles this kind of thing. I'll investigate this more
before proceeding.


>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On Mar 9, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > Right now, for top level categories on cwiki, we have the following:
> >
> >
> >   -  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Project Planning<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Planning>
> >   -  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >User Documentation
> > Plan<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Documentation+Plan
> >
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Marketing Planning<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Marketing+Planning>
> >-
> >Development Snapshot
> > Builds<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Project Reporting<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting>
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Localization
> > Planning<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Localization+Planning
> >
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >QA Planning<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/QA+Planning>
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >AOO4 Brainstorming<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO4+Brainstorming>
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Board Reports<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Board+Reports>
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Directory of
> > Volunteers<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Directory+of+Volunteers
> >
> >-  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Archive  >
> >   -  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
> >
> >Strategic Plans<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Strategic+Plans>
> >
> > Now for releases, release planning, we have the AOO 3.4 Release Plan is
> its
> > own subcategory under Project Planning.
> >
> > However, other Release Plans are under a sub-category called Releases.
> >
> > Are there any objections to promoting "Releases" to a top-level category
> > and put the various version release plans under that (including 3.4)?
> >
> > I  must  be in a spring cleaning mood! :}
> >
> > --
> >
> 
> > MzK
> >
> > "Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin."
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 

MzK

"Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin."

Re: suggestion for another cwiki change..new

[Dave Fisher]

I am personally fine with whatever you do along the lines of surfacing current 
planning efforts and archiving old efforts.

For cwiki articles that should be moved to Mwiki then perhaps a "For MWiki" 
category would make sense.

If you need someone with full confluence admin rights let me know, I'm happy to 
help.

Regards,
Dave

On Mar 9, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:

> Right now, for top level categories on cwiki, we have the following:
> 
> 
>   -  
> 
>Project 
> Planning
>   -  
> 
>User Documentation
> Plan
>-  
> 
>Marketing 
> Planning
>-
>Development Snapshot
> Builds
>-  
> 
>Project 
> Reporting
>-  
> 
>Localization
> Planning
>-  
> 
>QA 
> Planning
>-  
> 
>AOO4 
> Brainstorming
>-  
> 
>Board 
> Reports
>-  
> 
>Directory of
> Volunteers
>-  
> 
>Archive 
>   -  
> 
>Strategic 
> Plans
> 
> Now for releases, release planning, we have the AOO 3.4 Release Plan is its
> own subcategory under Project Planning.
> 
> However, other Release Plans are under a sub-category called Releases.
> 
> Are there any objections to promoting "Releases" to a top-level category
> and put the various version release plans under that (including 3.4)?
> 
> I  must  be in a spring cleaning mood! :}
> 
> -- 
> 
> MzK
> 
> "Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin."


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

suggestion for another cwiki change..new

[Kay Schenk]

Right now, for top level categories on cwiki, we have the following:


   -  

Project 
Planning
   -  

User Documentation
Plan
-  

Marketing 
Planning
-
Development Snapshot
Builds
-  

Project 
Reporting
-  

Localization
Planning
-  

QA 
Planning
-  

AOO4 
Brainstorming
-  

Board 
Reports
-  

Directory of
Volunteers
-  

Archive 
   -  

Strategic 
Plans

Now for releases, release planning, we have the AOO 3.4 Release Plan is its
own subcategory under Project Planning.

However, other Release Plans are under a sub-category called Releases.

Are there any objections to promoting "Releases" to a top-level category
and put the various version release plans under that (including 3.4)?

I  must  be in a spring cleaning mood! :}

-- 

MzK

"Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin."