Re: [dev] NetBeans setup for sdk

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

Hi Terrence,

Terrence Enger escribió:

Hi,

I see "OpenOffice.org API plugin for Netbeans 1.1.3 available"
, but

 at least (I loooked at other some other mirrors back on the 6th) is a mere 42 bytes.  Wow, 
that is right good compression technology .

I presume this is just a packaging issue.  Is there a better place for
me to raise it?


OOo-Dev_OOO300_m2_src_sdk.tar.bz2 is the source code for compiling the
SDK (for this you need the whole OOo build environment). And the NB
plug-in isn't anyway included.

You can use the NetBeans IDE to checkout the plug-in sources and compile
them yourself.

Open the wizard from the menu Versioning - CVS - Chechout...

* In CVS Root type:

:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvs

* in Pasword type

anoncvs

* press "Next"

* in Module type

api/oonetbeansintegration

* in Local folder select a dir. where to download
* when finished the IDE will ask you to create a project, accept
* build it, and create the NMB
* install it

That's all.

Regards
Ariel.



--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.ArielConstenlaHaile.com.ar/ooo/



"Aus der Kriegsschule des Lebens
- Was mich nicht umbringt,
macht mich härter."
Nietzsche Götzendämmerung, Sprüche und Pfeile, 8.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] build or packaging problem

[Michael Strobel]

Hi All,

For some reason I can not install the RPM packages built under a RHEL4 
on that system. The RPM package manager complains about some files 
missing in the packages, but they seem to be built properly, e.g. 
libvcl680li.so is missing according to the package manager, but at least 
it exists under ../vcl/unxlngi6.pro/lib/ in my build. Any ideas why it 
is not in the packages? The number and names of the packages in my build 
are the same as in the release archive that could be downloaded from 
openoffice.org and I did not notice any errors during the packaging (it 
ends with the message "Successfull packaging process!"). I also built 
OOo under a Debian Etch and no problems, the DEB packages install correctly.


Best regards and thanks for your help,
Micha

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] uri handlers in open office

[bryan rasmussen]

Hi,

At one time in the past open office did not support the use of hyperlinks in
the document that were not http, ftp, or telnet, and if you put in a uri
scheme in a link that was not one of these it was helpful enough to put the
'correct' (meaning the incorrect) uri scheme at the beginning of the link
you were trying to make. At some other time in the past this behavior
stopped, and it became possible to put all sorts of uris in as wished, now
it seems that one can put in different uris and they do not get changed to
one of the default uri types but neither do they get handed off to a system
protocol handler - I can of course understand why one would not want to do
this automatically as a security measure but most tools do give you the
option of allowing the particular uri scheme to work via either the user
accepting it at the time of accessing the uri or via some sort of
application level settings. Is there a particular way in open office that
one can do this, and if there is where can I get ahold of this setting and
change it to allow new uri schemes in my Open Office installation.

Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen

Re: [dev] scp2 PATCH flags for OOo 3.0.1

[Ingo Schmidt]

Hi,

But this is rather old news, the PATCH flags already had to be set for 
OOo 2 (and probably also OOo 1).  Ingo, do we have documentation of this 
somewhere?




I made some documentation about the PATCH flag available at:

http://installation.openoffice.org/pics/understanding_the_patch_flag.html

Greetings

 Ingo

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] scp2 PATCH flags for OOo 3.0.1

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 08/13/08 11:09, Caolan McNamara wrote:

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:02 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Please all remember to appropriately set PATCH flags in scp2 


What this means, how to know what to do, and why might be clear inside
Hamburg, but not for external developers. Probably best to give some
concrete examples.


But this is rather old news, the PATCH flags already had to be set for 
OOo 2 (and probably also OOo 1).  Ingo, do we have documentation of this 
somewhere?


-Stephan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Debugging OOo

[Michael Strobel]

Thanks! That simplyfies the debugging alot.

Hubert Figuiere schrieb:

First build without debug and install.

Then rebuild the selected modules with debug and just symlink the 
selected .so within the installed version above.


That way I save on the step of copying, or even the "deliver". Just 
"build debug=true" to check your changes.


Hub



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] scp2 PATCH flags for OOo 3.0.1

[Caolan McNamara]

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:02 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Please all remember to appropriately set PATCH flags in scp2 

What this means, how to know what to do, and why might be clear inside
Hamburg, but not for external developers. Probably best to give some
concrete examples.

C.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] scp2 PATCH flags for OOo 3.0.1

[Stephan Bergmann]

Please all remember to appropriately set PATCH flags in scp2 when you 
make changes for OOo 3.0.1 (and, in general, any non-zero micro). 
(Unlike with OOo 2, OOo 3.1.0 will start out with cleared PATCH flags 
again---it is not intended to offer patches across OOo 3 minors, only to 
offer patches across the micros of a specific OOo 3.x.)


-Stephan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]